The urban population is on the rise worldwide. It is projected that, by 2050, 53% of the Indian population will live in urban areas. India is estimated to spend an average of 1.2% of its GDP annually to meet the infrastructure needs of 2036. Thus, an increasing need for excellent infrastructure in urban spaces could drive the nation's vision of becoming a developed country. Out of many facets of urban development, a sizable investment is required to meet the infrastructure needs of seamless transportation in cities. This is followed by the need to provide water and sewerage systems. Furthermore, there is an increasing demand for space above the ground surface, making underground space vital. Tunnels play a significant role in efficiently using the underground space. Therefore, ensuring the stability of such underground tunnels is of utmost importance for engineers so that they can provide uninterrupted access to people.
The stability assessment of tunnels placed in soils is twofold: face and peripheral stability. The soil collapse along the tunnel periphery is avoided by support systems in the form of precast concrete or steel liners, such that the minimum support pressure provided by these liners should be greater than or equal to the maximum normal stress imposed by the soil at its imminent collapse state. One of the leading causes of tunnel damage is earthquakes. In this regard, underground tunnels are considered safer compared to surface structures. However, recent studies have shown that the effect of the surrounding soil's inertia on the tunnel stability to earthquakes cannot be ignored. Though many studies are available for evaluating the seismic response, like ground deformation and amplification of seismic waves in the presence of tunnels along with lining forces and displacements, minimal studies have computed the support pressure requirement of tunnel linings.
The majority of the problems in soil mechanics are of two types: stability problems and elasticity problems. The stability problems involve finding the load that the soil mass can withstand at its ultimate failure. For the design of a structure, a suitable factor of safety is applied against the ultimate failure of the soil mass to ensure the serviceability requirements at the working load condition. In this thesis, the resistance is to be offered by the support systems of tunnels, i.e., tunnel lining against the stresses acting on it at the ultimate failure of the surrounding soil. Out of the methods available, the stability problems undertaken in this thesis have been solved based on the lower bound theorem of limit analysis.
The limit analysis relies on some assumptions: (i) the material behaves perfectly plastic; (ii) the normality condition of the plastic strain and the convexity of the yield surface hold true (associated flow rule); (iii) the change in geometry of the material is insignificant at failure. In the lower bound theorem of limit analysis, the magnitude of the collapse load is determined from a statically admissible stress field satisfying the equilibrium and stress boundary conditions without the violation of the yield criterion. The computed collapse load is either smaller or, at most, equal to the true collapse load’s magnitude. For a continuum like soil, these conditions are to be satisfied at infinite locations in the domain. It makes the computation of analytical solutions difficult when the problem or the loading conditions or both are complicated. Therefore, the continuous lower bound formulation is made discrete by discretizing the soil domain using the finite element approach. The search for the greatest lower bound eventually leads to a constrained optimization problem.
My research addresses several specific inquiries:
What is the correlation between soil types (granular and cohesive-frictional) and the seismic wave type that most significantly influences seismic stability?
What constitutes an optimal separation distance for piggyback dual tunnels to minimize interference? At what depth should the lower tunnel in a piggyback configuration be positioned to maximize stability through soil arching?
How can we derive a closed-form solution for spatiotemporal seismic accelerations in soils with heterogeneous wave velocities? What is the significance of considering wave velocity inhomogeneity in tunnel stability assessments?
What is the relevance of incorporating vertical seismic accelerations in tunnel stability analysis?
What are the implications of utilizing the Mononobe-Okabe theory in calculating seismic support pressure?
Additionally, my research extended to examining dynamic earth pressure in granular soils resulting from rigid retaining wall translation, considering inhomogeneous wave propagation velocities. I also explored probability techniques, including random field generation using Cholesky decomposition and the Karhunen-Loeve expansion method, as well as response surface methodology employing polynomial surfaces with and without cross terms.
My doctoral research is inline with these UN Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs)