In this page, I will explain and document how I created my song using synthesis, sampling, music theory and studio recordings.
Drum and bass tune
Emotional, preferbaly female, vocal hook - this will be found by putting a call out into the depatemet and finding someone talented.
Maybe use a some form of rapper, in the same style as the song below.
Some recorded live instrumentation - such as a violin/viola would make the song feel emotional.
I want to record a female voclaist.
A guitar struming the chors of my song may also be a nice addition as it would thickedn out the sound and give the song am prganic feel
I will utilise serum to synthesis my own bass lines, and may create some pads to fill out the sound and some synth bells/leads to carry the main melody of the track.
I am aiming my tune for two audiences. I want it to be able to be played in one of club sets with enough energy and excitement, but also be soft enough to be listened to when lounging around.
My main goal is to be able to make the song sound poignannt and emotional.
Below are some reference tracks that I will base the vibe of my tune on.
My song uses a chord progression that I made at in Judith's lesson, then pitched it up 1 semi tone. The key I am now working in is F#m, with the key signature of 4/4, the genre is liquid drum and bass, as such the BPM is 174, a core staple in the style of drum and bass. The chords progression is F#m7 (i), A/E sus4 add6 (III), Dmaj7add9 (VI), F#m7 (i), A6 (III) and E6 (VII). These chords are extended and altered, I have done this because it creates emotion and evokes feelings of sadness and vulnerability. I created a drum loop by manipulating drum samples and resampling loops I had in my library. I created a baseline in Serum that follows the root notes of the chords, with the occasional pitch-bending riff to the relative 5th or 7th interval. I added some textural elements and some ethereal strings. I created an intro of sorts, with tension building instruments and a reversed reverb piano that leads into the main progression. I have now sent it to a friend of mine who is a singer/songwriter too see if she can add some melodies and vocal lines. Below is some photos of the project and the first bounce of the tune.
This is a circle of 5ths and can be used co create intresting chord progression or to modulate to a different key all together.
I have now recorded some live violin to add to the emotion of my track, I have explained how I recorded it below. The melody of my song is mostly driven by the chord progression and I feel the violin sounds rather folk-like and is a nice addition to it. I have added some reverb too it, to make it sound like it was recorded in a live abbey, plus it also adds to the haunted nature of the tune. Once I had the part I liked in my session, I used flex to put it properly in time, and manipulate some of the notes to make it how I liked it. I experimented with two different types of flex inside of Logic, monophonic and polyphonic. This website, https://www.logicprohelp.com/forums/topic/134034-a-question-regarding-monophonic-and-polyphonic-in-flex-editing/, explains how monophonic should be used for instruments that make one note, such as a vocal or flute, whereas polyphonic should be used on instruments that play chords, like pianos and guitars. Regardless, I wanted to try them both to see which one I preferred, as in the recording some of the notes overlap one another and I feel this could alter the sound. Below I have included bounces of a part of the violin track, using the two different flex modes.
In the monophonic bounce, an artefact has been added which makes part of it sound like a trill, I do not like this. Luckily, in the polyphonic version, this is not heard. I have used the polyphonic version. As such, I am glad I experimented myself, conducting primary research, with the different modes and not just trusted an internet source, because with out it I would not have achieved the sound I wanted. Regarding the vocals, my friend has got a job and can no longer help, so I have put a call out into the department looking for talented female vocalists.
Regarding dynamics and texture, there is a lot of contrast within the song. The first 8 bars has a small build up, that crescendo into the first verse. As well as this, before the drop all the instruments build in volume and tension. When the drop hits, this tension is released. In verse two, the volume and number of instruments is stripped back to make space for the violin to come in. These changes in dynamics and texture throughout the track keep it interesting and makes sure the listener does not get bored. I have also used some synthesised drones and nature ambience to thicken out the track and risers to transitions from each section smoothly. Here is a screen shot of the structure of the track, where I have annotated dynamic and textural changes.
Other melodic devices included in the song include a tonic pedal in the higher octave that acts as a rhythmic ostinato and keeps a steady beat throughout the tune. A tonic pedal is a repeated note that plays the root note of the scale, in my case F#. In my piece, there is lots of different rhythms and syncopation. For example, the chord progression is very on beat, the chords change on a strong beat. However, my drums are much more syncopated. I have two different patterns, yet both are syncopated. Here are some diagram explaining the second drum pattern, in particular the kick. If the kick pattern was basic it would look like diagram A, my kick pattern is diagram B. I have done this because it keeps my piece interesting and fits in with the style of the genre, drum and bass, which focuses heavily on syncopated drums and fat, dirty basslines.
Diagram A
Diagram B
I have now finally recorded some live vocals from my song from a performance student Rosie. She added the final touches to the song, adding wonderful harmonies and making the song sound beautiful and professional. To the recordings I added some compression to control some of her harsh dynamics and sent them all to a reverb bus to make them sound ethereal and elegant. In the Studio blog below I detail how the session was conducted. Here is a final screenshot of the final project, with all the vocal edits.
After the production was done, I started to mix it. I had the core idea down then asked a fellow classmate Jack for some advice with it. He helped by using compression to sidechain some instruments to the kick, so their volume ducks out when the kick plays. This makes the bass louder, yet still clean and makes everything sound much tighter. He also added some multiprocessor (a compressor that compresses the signal in certain frequency bands) to the harmony tracks to glue them together and make them sound cohesive. Here are some screen shots of the plug ins.
Multipressor on the Vocals
The Compressor on the bass.
Once the final touches were done, we bounced it and I sent it too my friend Dan (Bare Up). He gave me some feedback and told me to turn the drums up by a dB or two. I did this and agreed it sounded much better. He then told me to once the final mix is done, automate the final bounce to be 2 dB quiter in the verse than the chorus. I tried this and it sounded amazing. It just gives the drop so much more energy, it is such a good tip!! I bounced it again, and finally it is finished.
The master automation
Here is a video explingain how to use a sampler inside of Logic Pro.
Here are two videos that show how I recorded Rosie and her vocals inside of the studio.
Here is the signal flow of the session in a diagram
We decided to use the Rode NT2A because it is Rosie's favourite mic to use, it is the one she has at home so she knows how it effects the tone of her voice. I trusted her with the decision , as she knew how she wanted too sound. We also used a pop filter to eliminate any plosives that could distort the signal. I positioned the mic so the diaphragm was facing her and made sure that the switch on the mic itself was correct to record just in front of it. Before we recorded the takes, I did some test recordings to make sure that the gain levels were set at the correct level so that the recordings did not clip and distort. We did two run throughs of the full song, we both agreed the second take sounded much better, the tone of her voice was much softer in the beginning and she hits a really nice high note before the second chorus. Here is some footage of Rosie actually performing the song. When we were in the studio, we had to communicate with what parts I liked and what I wanted to change from the original idea that she had sent me a week before. I am glad we did this as it allowed us to get straight into recording as the core idea had already been agreed on. While in the flow of things, I thought we maybe try and record a harmony over a part of the chorus. Rosie also liked the idea and so we kept building on those harmonies, which gave the final thing a really nice gospel choir feel too it. This shows that experimenting with random ideas is so crucial, became of it we created such a memorable part of the track. Once all the harmonies were recorded, we listened to the track as a whole and identified a few words that were either distorting as the gain was slightly too high, or the note she sung was a bit too flat. We over came this issue by re-recording some of the vocals. This can be seen in the screenshot below, some of the poor tracks have been cut and muted.
There are two different types of microphone, these are dynamic and condensor. Each type is used for different things. Dynamics are used on instruments that create high sound pressure levels, such as drum kits or guitar/bass amps. They are heavy duty, not very sensitive which is great for live performances as this avoids feedback. Condensors on the other hand are much more sensitive. They are very fragile and can be easily broken if dropped or the instrument that is being recorded is too loud. They are great for recording detailed intimate instruments, such as vocals, pianos, strings and woodwinds. With regards to set up, they are both the same, except condensers need powering with 48v (phantom power) in order to work. This can be done on a mixing desk, or at college inside of Logic or the Apogee software, which is synced with Logic. All microphones have a frequency response curve. According to this website, www.teachmeaudio.com/recording/microphones/responses-measurements, This is a graphical representation of how a micriphone will respond in the audio spectrum, so subsequently how it will affect the signal's timbre. This is important to look at when deciding which micriphone to use. For example:
This is the frequency response curve for the Shure SM57, which is a dynamic microphone. It shows that it will cut some of the lower frequencies, below 200Hz, yet will boost some of the higher frequencies, from 3000-6000Hz. This is a great one to choose if you wanted to record a snare drum, or some live saxophone, but not a kick drum or bass amp, because of that low cut. This proves how crucial it is too look at the graph before recording because if you just thought that it would work on a kick because it is a dynamic microphone and kicks are loud you would be wrong. It would not accueratly record the sound that is being produced.
This is the frequency response curve for the microphone I used to record Rosie, my vocalist, the Rode NT2A. It has a low cut filter (the blue dotted line) on the microphone itself, which I switched on, to remove any low rumble which could muddy a mix. It is a perfect mic for vocals or acoustic guitars. It is a condensor, so picks up sensitive singing or intimate guitar picking and has a relatively flat response curve, other than a slight boost at the 2000-8000Hz range, so is a great choice when trying to record any instrument. Although it should not be used for anything with high sound pressure levels, like a bass amp or snare, due to it being condesnor it could permeanlty damage the microphone.
Polar pattern is the term used to explain the direction of the microphone. It shows how much of the signal will be picked up from the differnt directions. There are three common ones: omnidirectional, cardioid and bidirectional. These are shown to the left. Omnidirectional picks up the signal from all around the microphone. It is great if you want to record live ambience, like in nature, or recording a group of back up singers with just one mic. Cardioid is the most common choice, as it is only sensitve at the front, the best choice for recording vocals. Bidirectional records from the front and the back of the mic, but ignores anything from the sides. This makes it perfect for recording podcasts or a duet of singers.
In this project, I did not use any DI boxes, but if I did, this is how they work. DI (Direct Injection) boxes are used to convert an unbalanced signal into a balanced one, ready to be plugged into a mixing console to be recorded or broadcasted in a live setting. For example when recording an electric guitar, the signal chain would be: GUTIAR --> AMP --> DI BOX --> AUDIO INTERFACE --> DAW.
An example of using DI boxes in the studio is when recording anything with a 1/4 jack output, like an electric piano or some synths. Most mixing desks prefer mic inputs. These are balanced XLR inputs. 1/4 inch jacks are often unbalanced, so can pick up interference from ground noise and distort the signal being recorded. A DI box eliminates this and turns it into a balanced one so that the singal can be the best quailty. DI boxes can also be used in a live sernario, to lengthen a cable without ruining the quality of the signal.
Here is how I made the bass synth patch inside of Serum for this song. For more definitions on key words and the differtn parts of Serum please see my Project 4 blog.