The information profession relies on research data to minimize bias and subjectivity. PLO3 focuses on evidence-based practices, learning to identify problems, gather and evaluate evidence, and then design and implement solutions assessing their success.
In LIS 600, I identified censorship, specifically in relation to minors, as an issue for the library profession. I created a LibGuide to take an in-depth look at the root causes and explore the ethical and legal actions available to librarians in censorship cases.
In the same class, I examined the issues of copyright and piracy as discussed in a news article about the National Emergency Library. Accessibility became a hot topic during the summer of 2020 with so many libraries closing their doors due to Covid19. As librarians, we must be cognizant of the rights of all content producers as we work to improve accessibility in an equitable way.
Gathering and evaluating evidence before making decisions and implementing plans ensures that the efforts being made are needed and productive. Throughout this program I have had opportunities to gather evidence through literature studies and surveys. In LISSA CritLib sessions I was able to gather immediate feedback from participants using Poll Everywhere to help guide the conversations. For program follow-up evaluations I have used Google Forms to determine how to improve the course for future offerings. And in the following example I used Survey Monkey to evaluate the need for a potential new service offering.
This action research project on public communications gathered information from published research as well as collecting new information specific to this community through a survey. Using this data, a plan was created and implemented to enhance the communication from the library to the public it serves. Feedback is gathered from each monthly communication. Here is the archive of newsletters published since this research was conducted.
In LIS 634 I wrote a makerspace expansion proposal. One key element of the proposal was information about what type of making tools to add. I conducted a survey of library patrons to determine interest levels in a variety of making categories. Because of the survey results, the idea to purchase videography equipment was dismissed and jewelry making tools were prioritized instead. The survey also allowed individuals the option to share their contact information in order for us to continue the conversation with them about additions to the space and how they would like to be involved.