Based.one is building something broader than another Hyperliquid trading interface. It combines crypto perpetuals, 24/7 stock and commodity-linked markets, prediction markets, self-custodial wallets, advanced orders, AI research and autonomous trading tools, plus a Visa spending product. The result is closer to a crypto-native financial super-app than a conventional DEX front end.
Decentralised News Rating: 8.8/10
Referral link: Trade on Based with Decentralised News
Referral code: DECENTRALISE
Read the complete technical review on Decentralised News
The easiest way to misunderstand Based is to think it is simply another exchange.
It is not.
Based uses Hyperliquid as core trading infrastructure and builds a broader interface around it. Users can access crypto perpetuals, stock and index-linked perpetuals, commodities and other markets through a self-custodial wallet, while Based layers on mobile access, social-login onboarding, advanced execution, prediction markets, spending and AI.
Based currently says more than $44 billion in trading volume has passed through the platform. Its website also describes the product as an all-in-one trading app for US stocks, Asian stocks, crypto and commodities, available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Based
That breadth is impressive.
But a single interface does not mean every product has the same economics or the same risks.
That distinction is central to this review.
Based is a self-custodial trading application designed to make onchain markets feel more like a mainstream financial app.
Rather than building a competing perpetual exchange from scratch, Based connects users to Hyperliquid's underlying market infrastructure.
This gives it an interesting advantage.
Hyperliquid can concentrate on being an execution venue.
Based can concentrate on:
trading UX,
market discovery,
mobile access,
wallet onboarding,
AI,
prediction markets,
rewards,
and real-world spending.
Based's 2026 litepaper says the project raised $11.5 million in a Series A led by Pantera to build what it describes as a unified onchain financial layer. Based Litepaper
The long-term vision is therefore much bigger than:
“A nicer Hyperliquid interface.”
Based wants the wallet itself to become the financial account.
This is probably the most important point for anyone discovering Based through its stock markets.
Based lets users trade markets referencing companies and indices such as:
Nvidia,
Alphabet,
Microsoft,
Samsung,
SK Hynix,
the S&P 500,
and other global assets.
But these are perpetual futures, not conventional shares.
Based explicitly states that its S&P 500 market runs on Hyperliquid as a perpetual future tracking the index. Users do not own the underlying stocks and therefore do not receive voting rights or ordinary dividends. Funding and liquidation risk apply while the position remains open. Based
The same distinction applies to individual equity-linked markets such as Nvidia. Based
That means:
Trading NVDA on Based ≠ buying Nvidia stock through a broker.
What you receive is price exposure.
That can still be extremely useful.
But the economics are different.
Traditional stock exchanges have opening hours.
Based's stock-linked perpetuals do not.
The platform markets its equity and index markets as available:
during normal trading hours,
overnight,
on weekends,
and during traditional market holidays.
The S&P 500 perpetual, for example, remains tradable on Based when conventional equity-index futures are closed. Based
This creates a fascinating new market structure.
Imagine Nvidia releases unexpected news on a Saturday.
A traditional shareholder may need to wait until the next available market session.
A perpetual market can start repricing immediately.
The same idea is particularly interesting for Asian stocks.
Based currently markets 24/7 access to names such as Samsung and SK Hynix, which would otherwise require access to Asian exchanges and their local trading hours. Based
There is, however, a trade-off.
When the underlying cash market is closed, there is no continuously updating primary share price.
The perpetual market may therefore develop a basis, meaning the perp's price can diverge from where traders expect the underlying share to reopen.
That can create opportunities.
It can also create risk.
Before trading a stock perp on Based, we would consider six numbers:
Margin
How much collateral are you putting behind the position?
Leverage
How much actual market exposure does that margin control?
Entry and exit fees
Small percentages become significant when multiplied by leveraged notional.
Funding
A perpetual position may continuously transfer funding between longs and shorts.
Slippage
The screen price is not necessarily the final executable price.
Dividend opportunity cost
A perpetual trader does not own the underlying share and generally does not receive the company's normal dividend.
Consider a simplified example.
You deposit $1,000 and use 5x leverage.
Your market exposure becomes:
$5,000
Buying $5,000 of the underlying shares directly would normally require roughly $5,000 of capital if no borrowing is used.
The perpetual therefore delivers much greater capital efficiency.
But if the position incurs:
trading fees,
funding,
slippage,
and liquidation risk,
that capital efficiency is not free.
This is why comparing a stock perp with a normal share using only the headline trading fee can be misleading.
Based sits on top of Hyperliquid, so users need to think about more than one fee layer.
Based's documentation explains that Hyperliquid's underlying exchange fees can apply alongside a Based builder fee.
Based currently documents a standard builder fee of 0.025% on Hyperliquid perpetuals, while spot sells carry a 0.1% Based builder fee and spot buys do not carry that builder fee under the published structure.
$BASED staking can reduce the builder-fee component. Based's current staking documentation lists discounts of 30% after staking 60,000 BASED, 60% after 300,000, and 100% after 600,000. The discount affects the Based builder fee, not Hyperliquid's underlying fee. Based App
That distinction matters.
A 100% Based builder-fee discount does not mean every trading cost disappears.
Based's current individual TradFi market pages advertise stock and index perpetuals starting at approximately:
0.011% taker
and
0.005% maker
before applicable staking discounts. Based
Those are unusually low headline rates for accessing leveraged equity-linked markets.
However, we would still use the live trading interface as the final source of truth.
HIP-3 markets can differ by deployer, fee mode and market.
Funding and slippage also remain separate from the quoted execution fee.
The true cost of a position is therefore:
Trading Fees + Funding + Slippage + Price Impact
rather than simply:
0.011%.
This is one of the most important comparisons.
If Based ultimately executes your perpetual on Hyperliquid, why not just use Hyperliquid directly?
For some traders, that is exactly what makes sense.
Direct Hyperliquid access avoids the extra Based builder-fee layer.
Based has to justify that additional layer through everything else it provides.
That includes:
advanced execution,
mobile UX,
stock discovery,
prediction markets,
AI research,
rewards,
the Based Cash ecosystem,
and a more consumer-oriented interface.
So the relevant question is not:
“Is Based cheaper than Hyperliquid?”
It is:
“Are Based's additional features worth the difference for how I trade?”
For a trader using several Based services, they may be.
For someone who opens one BTC perpetual and wants the most direct path to Hyperliquid, going directly to the underlying venue remains a rational alternative.
Based's trading experience is designed around self-custody.
Its current stock-market pages say users can log in using email or Google through Privy while retaining control of their wallet. Based also provides a path for exporting private keys associated with social-login wallets. Based
This is a useful design choice.
Traditional self-custody often creates a difficult onboarding experience for mainstream users.
Based attempts to provide:
normal app-style login
without turning the trading wallet into a conventional custodial exchange account.
That is one of its strongest product decisions.
But self-custody also transfers responsibility to the user.
If credentials, keys or recovery mechanisms are compromised, blockchain transactions are generally not reversible.
The phrase self-custodial super-app can become misleading if it is applied to every Based product in exactly the same way.
Based Cash deserves separate treatment.
Based Cash is a Visa debit-card product that allows supported crypto assets to be deposited into a card account and spent through merchants accepting Visa.
The current card terms state that users must complete KYC and that the Card Account is a segregated digital wallet managed via Fireblocks. The terms also give the card provider the ability to reject, freeze or delay transactions for fraud, sanctions, AML or legal-compliance reasons. Based
So there are two different concepts inside the same ecosystem.
Your Based trading wallet can be self-custodial.
Your Based Cash card account participates in regulated payment infrastructure.
That is not inherently bad.
It is simply important to understand.
Based's current Cash page advertises crypto deposits, Visa spending and card-based rewards.
Its Premium tier currently shows 2% cashback on eligible spending, a 1.5% FX markup on non-USD transactions, and a monthly rebate for eligible OpenAI and Anthropic subscription purchases. It currently requires a 10,000 BASED lock-up for 21 days. Benefits and requirements vary by card tier. Based
The card terms also note that other charges can exist depending on the card arrangement, including issuance, replacement, conversion, network processing or onchain costs. Based
Users should therefore evaluate Based Cash separately from Based's trading fees.
Based has also integrated prediction-market access into the broader app.
This strengthens the super-app thesis because prediction markets can provide something ordinary perpetuals cannot:
explicit market probabilities around future events.
A trader can potentially monitor an event probability and use that information alongside a crypto, commodity or stock-perp position.
For example:
A prediction market may price the probability of a rate cut.
A trader can then monitor that alongside:
Bitcoin,
gold,
the S&P 500,
or another macro-sensitive market.
That creates a more interesting research environment than simply adding another casino-style YES/NO market.
Based also goes beyond a basic Hyperliquid wrapper with execution features aimed at active traders.
Its current product pages promote functionality such as:
automated take profit and stop loss,
TWAP,
scale orders,
scalp orders,
and trailing stops.
One particularly interesting feature is its privacy-oriented TWAP approach.
Instead of sending the full execution schedule to a centralized server, Based documentation describes a setup where parts of the execution logic can run locally.
For a large trader, hiding the complete execution schedule can reduce the risk that other participants infer the full intended order.
This is a relatively sophisticated feature for a product that also markets itself as easy enough for mainstream users.
AI is becoming a much more important part of the Based strategy.
In August 2026, Based introduced Infinity, a trading-focused AI system designed around access to live market information rather than simply placing a general-purpose chatbot beside a chart.
Based says Infinity combines a specialized reasoning model with 16 live data sources, including derivatives, onchain activity, fundamentals, news, filings and sentiment.
High-frequency information such as funding, open interest, liquidations and exchange flows can be fetched at query time, while slower-moving research material is continuously indexed. Based
This is a stronger approach than simply asking a generic language model:
“Should I buy Bitcoin?”
The model's usefulness depends heavily on what it can actually see.
Based now goes further.
Its current AI product page describes Autonomous Trading Agents that can take a strategy expressed in natural language, translate it into executable logic, monitor the relevant markets and trade automatically. Based
Conceptually, that is powerful.
A user might eventually describe something like:
“Trade BTC momentum when price makes a 20-day breakout and open interest is rising. Reduce risk when volatility spikes.”
The AI can convert the concept into structured rules.
But autonomous trading introduces a new category of risk.
The question is no longer just:
“Is the market going against me?”
It becomes:
“What authority did I give the software?”
For agentic finance, permission architecture may matter as much as the model itself.
Based could have a genuine structural advantage in AI trading.
Its AI research system and execution environment exist in the same ecosystem.
That means an agent can theoretically move from:
Research
to
Decision
to
Execution
without requiring the user to manually transfer information between unrelated platforms.
This can become extremely powerful.
But it also means Based should make safety controls highly visible.
We would like to see autonomous trading built around:
hard capital limits,
maximum position sizes,
restricted markets,
leverage ceilings,
strategy simulation,
full execution logs,
human approval options,
and one-click kill switches.
The future of AI finance will not only be about giving agents more power.
It will be about giving agents precisely limited power.
The BASED token is increasingly tied into platform economics.
Staking can currently reduce Based builder fees.
The published discount thresholds are:
60,000 BASED for a 30% builder-fee discount,
300,000 BASED for 60%,
and
600,000 BASED for a 100% builder-fee discount. Based App
Other ecosystem benefits include staking rewards and card-related benefits, with Based also describing future uses around agentic AI credits and other services. Based App
But a fee discount should not be viewed in isolation.
If a user buys a volatile token solely to save on trading fees, they are taking token-price risk to reduce another cost.
The correct calculation is:
expected fee savings versus the capital and market risk of holding BASED.
Based also has one of the more aggressive affiliate structures we have seen among trading apps.
Current program documentation describes a three-tier model.
Direct referrals currently generate 60% of qualifying trading fees for the affiliate, with additional 12% and 4% shares from second and third-degree referral activity, bringing the advertised network maximum to 76%. Based App
This is commercially attractive.
It is also why affiliate disclosure matters.
Our link is:
https://app.based.one/r/DECENTRALISE
Referral code:
DECENTRALISE
Decentralised News may receive compensation from qualifying activity.
We do not allow that relationship to determine the rating in this review.
We would not describe Based as risk-free.
No leveraged onchain trading platform deserves that description.
The important difference with Based is that its risk surface is distributed across several components.
Hyperliquid powers much of the trading infrastructure.
HIP-3 deployers can influence individual real-world-asset markets.
Privy supports social-login wallet onboarding.
Polymarket can underpin prediction-market functionality.
Based Cash depends on card issuers, Fireblocks and payment infrastructure.
AI agents add another execution and permission layer.
This architecture has advantages because Based does not need to reinvent every component.
But it also creates dependencies.
During our current review, we did not locate one comprehensive independent Based-specific audit covering the complete application, wallet integration and autonomous-agent stack.
We would like to see Based build a canonical public security center as the product becomes more complex.
Based makes the most sense for an active trader who already likes Hyperliquid but wants a broader financial interface around it.
It is especially compelling for someone who wants to move between crypto perps, equity-linked markets, commodities, prediction markets and potentially real-world spending without switching between several unrelated applications.
It also has unusually strong potential for traders interested in AI-assisted research and future autonomous execution.
Based makes less sense for investors whose primary goal is owning actual shares and collecting dividends.
It also may not be necessary for a trader who simply wants the most direct possible access to Hyperliquid and does not need the additional Based ecosystem.
The most interesting thing about Based is not any single feature.
It is the combination.
Crypto trading alone already exists.
Stock perpetuals already exist.
Crypto cards already exist.
Prediction markets already exist.
AI research tools already exist.
Based is trying to put all of them behind one financial identity and one wallet.
That creates the possibility of a new kind of financial account.
Instead of:
bank account + brokerage + crypto exchange + prediction platform + AI assistant
the user has:
wallet + modular financial infrastructure.
That is a much bigger thesis than building another trading app.
Based.one is one of the stronger examples of how the next generation of crypto trading products may evolve beyond the exchange itself.
Its biggest strength is that it does not try to recreate Hyperliquid.
Instead, it builds on top of it.
That gives Based the freedom to focus on everything around execution:
better UX,
24/7 global markets,
prediction markets,
advanced orders,
mobile access,
AI,
and spending.
The most exciting feature may be Based's 24/7 TradFi layer.
Trading Nvidia, the S&P 500, Korean stocks or gold outside traditional market hours is genuinely different from using a normal brokerage.
But users need to understand exactly what they are trading.
These are perpetual derivatives, not shares.
The same principle applies across the product.
The interface is simple.
The infrastructure underneath it is not.
Based Cash has different custody and compliance rules from the trading wallet.
AI agents introduce different risks from manual execution.
HIP-3 markets can have different economics from ordinary crypto perps.
A strong user needs to understand these distinctions rather than allowing the super-app interface to hide them.
Best feature: 24/7 access to crypto and global TradFi-linked markets from one self-custodial interface.
Most underrated feature: combining mainstream social-login UX with private-key export.
Biggest misconception: stock perpetuals are not stocks.
Biggest hidden distinction: Based Cash does not use the same custody model as the self-custodial trading wallet.
Biggest risk: the unified interface makes very different underlying market and infrastructure risks look similar.
Biggest opportunity: combining AI research, autonomous execution, global markets and real-world spending into a crypto-native financial operating system.
Explore Based with Decentralised News
Referral code: DECENTRALISE
The link above is a referral link. Decentralised News may receive compensation when qualifying users register or trade through it. Based currently operates a revenue-sharing affiliate program. Affiliate relationships do not determine our ratings or editorial conclusions.
Based and the markets accessible through it involve substantial financial risk. Leveraged perpetual futures can result in rapid or total loss of posted collateral. Stock-linked perpetuals do not provide ownership of the underlying shares. Funding, liquidation, liquidity, oracle and basis risk can apply. Prediction markets involve resolution risk. Based Cash is subject to KYC, issuer, payment-network and compliance rules. Autonomous AI agents may make incorrect decisions or execute undesirable trades within the permissions granted to them.
This review is for educational purposes only and is not investment, financial, legal or tax advice.