For our purposes, however, the definition that is of relevance is the one where the concept is part of the ideological arsenal of the racist, the sexist, and so on. Considered from this perspective, this concept refers to the fallacy that there is a basket of characteristics—often taking the form of malignant stereotypes—that constitutes the “essence” of whatever group (marked by, either, race, or gender, or religion, or ethnicity, etc.) that is being targeted by this view because these stereotypes are, supposedly, biologically-rooted and therefore unchangeable. The common stereotypical beliefs, in this society, that for biological (genetic) reasons all women are illogical and emotional creatures; that all Jews are cunning and untrustworthy when it comes to money; that all Asians are asexual and robotically hardworking; that all blacks are intellectually subpar or lazy or generally incompetent; that all Latina/Latinos are drug dealers and gang bangers; that all Native Americans are alcoholics; that all Muslims are terrorists; that all whites are overly individualistic and lack communality, or are racists obsessed with the supremacy of whiteness, are all examples of essentialist beliefs. Needless to say, essentialism is among the cornerstones of the toxic variety of
identity politics, no matter who engages in it. Note: essentialism as part of the
ideological mechanism that facilitates marginality operates thusly: essentialism -->
stereotypes -->
otherness -->
marginality. (Yes, you must know these concepts as well.)