Lewis & Clark students
We spoke to six different groups of people to get their input on what the issues are with the current transportation systems at Lewis & Clark College. Listed below are the biggest issues each group identified.
Public transit is very time consuming
Low frequency of public transit
Many people don't live along the Otterbus route
Heavy use of personal vehicles
Biking is a good method of transportation, but is underutilized
Heavy reliance on carpooling
Morning traffic to campus is too slow
Limited parking
Use public transit less than once a week
Find carpooling easier than using public transit
Inconsistent scheduling of public transit
Least established in the area, may not understand how to get around
Rely on rideshare apps
Aren't allowed to have cars on campus
TriMet is difficult to understand
Otterbus doesn't offer many destinations
Public transit is very time consuming
Heavy focus on carbon emissions and not enough focus on other environmental issues (habitat loss, runoff, etc.)
Any vehicle (even electric or energy saving) is unsustainable if not enough people are using it
People are not incentivized to use public vehicles
There is no e-bike charging on campus
Past attempts at carpool apps have failed
Bike rental program stopped during the pandemic
2/3rds ($430,000 per year) of the transportation budget is being used on the Otterbus
TriMet is currently in debt
Not much incentive to use the Otterbus
Otterbus is owned 3rd party by ecoShuttle, and this is unlikely to change
A second shuttle would raise the shuttle budget to around $800,000 a year (including the bus purchase, and its operations) exceeding the transportation budget.
Expanding or changing anything would cost a lot
The current carpool system is sometimes exploited
Transportation team can give input/suggestions, but can't make final decisions
Want to prioritize timing and accessibility for students, but this is difficult to do because shorter routes would mean fewer destinations
Traffic in Portland
Using the information gathered from interviewing the six groups, we narrowed in on what the biggest issues were. Here is what we found:
Heavy reliance on cars
Not an option for first-year students
Expensive
Parking is very limited
Bad for the environment
Public transportation is not very utilized because it is time-consuming, offers limited destinations, and raises safety concerns for some people
In order to determine what the problem is, we thought about what a future would look like if these issues were solved. We decided that a widely successful public transportation system would:
Be used by a diverse population
Offer access to a variety of locations
Be safe and accessible for all
Be multi-modal
Be widely known
We realized that some of the issues could only be solved with unrealistic solutions. In order to develop a problem we would actually be capable of solving, we had to rule out these unrealistic possibilities. We ruled out:
Making large changes to the Otterbus
Out of our hands due to the outside company
Expensive
Making changes to TriMet
TriMet is in debt
Adding another Otterbus
Not within our budget
Adding more parking
Lewis & Clark College already has the maximum amount of parking spaces it is allowed to have due to city environmental standards
Lewis & Clark Pioneer Express
Using all of the information gathered in the previous steps, we developed the problem statement, in the form of a research question, below.
PROBLEM STATEMENT
How do we improve and incentivize current systems (the Otterbus, TriMet, carpooling) to make them more appealing than single occupancy vehicles?