This course provides an overview for aligning instructional design, delivery, and assessment to achieve standardized objectives by meeting the diverse needs of learners. Instructional design explores four levels of curricular considerations: national and state standards and tests, district expectations, teacher expectations, and diverse student needs. Instructional delivery examines research-based practices for increasing student achievement. Instructional assessment includes presentation of formal and informal tools for assessing student learning and performance throughout the instructional process.
1. Identify applications of curricular terms in lesson design, delivery, and assessment.
2. Create lessons plans that align instructional design, delivery, and assessment to achieve national/state/district expectations.
3. Design delivery strategies and techniques that adapt instruction for diverse learners.
4. Use appropriate formal and informal assessments that clearly match state and district objectives.
5. Create instructional unit plans that effectively align critical elements of lesson design.
6. Analyze classroom teaching process and methodology through digital media and reflection.
7. Show evidence of improvement in instructional design, delivery, and assessment skills gained through a timely professional learning process applied during the course.
The teacher organizes and plans systematic instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter, students, the community, and curriculum goals.
The teacher understands and uses formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate and ensure the continuous intellectual, social, and physical development of the learner.
To demonstrate my ability to reach Wisconsin Teaching Standards 7 & 8, I focused on the differentiation of instruction in teaching the specific skillset of grid drawing. Differentiated lessons were created to address the needs of students who displayed deficiencies in skills comprehension, while honoring the majority of middle-level learners, and challenging advanced learners to develop skills independently. As a result of my research, I elected to implement homogeneous working groups informed by formative skills checkpoints. Each of three homogeneous working groups provided focused tasks that would address generalized skill levels, provide appropriate challenges for advanced learners, and offer more direct instruction time for struggling learners.
This video demonstrates the homogeneous working groups designated through formative exercises and checkpoints. Students worked in three differentiated groups to focus on tasks required in project learning objectives. These differentiated groups provide more support for students struggling with learning goals and independent work time for advanced learners to practice enrichment activities relevant to the project unit.
Please see WTS Entry 7 & 8 for details regarding these project artifacts.
Portfolio Entry for WTS 7 and 8