CashFX To Justice is a free initiative. No recovery fees will ever be requested. Join the official Telegram channel for extra information and updates.

About the Case

A criminal complaint (Denuncia Penal Formal) has already been filed
in the Dominican Republic regarding this CashFX case.
This initiative is completely FREE of charge and does not request any money from victims.
CashFX To Justice provides information for investors who lost money in CashFX Group S.A.

==============================================================================

✅ ABOUT THE CASE

CashFX Group S.A. promoted itself internationally as a cryptocurrency trading and education platform, offering investors the possibility to obtain passive returns through automated trading activities.

Over several years, thousands of investors from many different countries deposited funds into the platform after being promised weekly returns generated by professional cryptocurrency trading.

The business model relied heavily on a multi-level marketing (MLM) structure in which participants were encouraged to recruit new investors in exchange for commissions and bonuses.

Over time, many investors began experiencing increasing difficulties withdrawing their funds. Eventually, for a large number of participants worldwide, withdrawals stopped completely.

As a result, numerous investors now consider that the structure operated as a fraudulent investment scheme, commonly referred to as a Hybrid Ponzi-type structure.

CashFX operated through corporate entities registered in multiple jurisdictions, including Panama, the United Kingdom and Norway.

However, several of the founders and main operators are Dominican nationals and are still living in and have operated from within the Dominican Republic.

For this reason, a formal criminal complaint (Denuncia Penal Formal) has been submitted to the competent authorities in the Dominican Republic.

The complaint concerns alleged fraud, misrepresentation and related financial crimes affecting investors worldwide.

This initiative was started by mr. Lino M. Emerenciana
together with CashFX defrauded investors from Aruba, Bonaire and Curaçao in order
to coordinate information and enable CashFX defrauded investors worldwide
to submit their own complaint and join the central reference complaint.

Participation in this initiative is entirely voluntary and free of charge.

_____________________________________

✅ KEY ELEMENTS OF THE COMPLAINT

This is the table of contents of the already submitted criminal complaint
(Denuncia Penal Formal) that has been filed in the Dominican Republic,

55 pages and accompanied by a digital dossier of 10 to 15 GB.

The criminal complaint submitted in the Dominican Republic contains:
• legal analysis of the CashFX structure
• identification of founders and key promoters
• analysis of the MLM recruitment system
• blockchain analysis of Bitcoin wallets
• documentation of international financial flows
• supporting documentary evidence

TABLE OF CONTENTS

⚖️ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.. 6

⚖️ 1A. FORMAL CLASSIFICATION AND RESERVATION OF RIGHTS.. 7

⚖️ 1B. DETAILS OF THE COMPLAINANT.. 7

⚖️ 2. BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE CASE.. 8

⚖️ 3A. MAIN RESPONSIBLE PERSONS.. 10

🔹 1. HUASCAR JOSÉ LÓPEZ CASTILLO.. 10

🔹 2. EDWIN ABAD RAMÍREZ.. 11

🔹 3. CHURCHILL JOSÉ GONZÁLEZ FONTANA.. 11

🔹 4. RONALD OTIS POPE.. 12

⚖️ 3B. PERSONS INVOLVED AT ADMINISTRATIVE LEVEL AND FACILITATING INSIDERS.. 13

🔹 5. LUIS OMAR CAÑIZALEZ PEREZ. 13

🔹 6. ARIANE CRITINE NUNES SANTANA.. 14

🔹 7. INGRID ZANAIDE MARTINEZ MACEO.. 14

🔹 8. MARIANNA CECILIA LOPEZ FONTANA.. 15

⚖️ 3C. OTHER PERSONS INVOLVED (PROMOTERS).. 16

🔹 9. JOHN KINNEAR (CANADA).. 16

🔹 10. JUSTIN HALLADAY (USA).. 16

🔹 11. LUIGI BRUNI (CANADA).. 17

⚖️ 4A. RELATED COMPANIES AND CORPORATE STRUCTURES.. 18

🔴 CRUCIAL LEGAL DETERMINATION.. 18

🔹 PANAMA..18

🔹 REPÚBLICA DOMINICANA..18

🔹 INGLATERRA (UK)..18

🔹 NORUEGA..19

⚖️ 4B. SUMMARY OF DATA REGARDING SHELL COMPANIES LINKED TO CASHFX.. 20

🔹 ACADEMIA DE TRADING Y FORMACION EN NEGOCIOS FX S.A. 20

🔹 CASHFX GROUP S.A. 21

🔹 GLOBAL SUPPLY SERVICES (GSS). 22

🔹 GRUPO MUHTARIF S.A. 22

🔹 INEJ-EYE CORPORATION S.A. 23

🔹 ALFA BARIKA LOGISTIC S.A. 24

🔹 SURI MILLON S.A. 25

🔹 CH203 DEVELOPERS – RELATED ENTITIES.. 26

🔸 A. CH203 DEVELOPERS S.A. (PANAMA). 26

🔸 B. CH203 DEVELOPERS (REPÚBLICA DOMINICANA). 27

🔴 CRUCIAL DETERMINATION.. 28

🔴 IMPORTANT POINTS (!).. 28

⚖️ 5. SUMMARY LEGAL ANALYSIS – CORPORATE ENTITIES.. 29

5.1 USE OF LEGAL ENTITIES AS LEGAL COVER.. 29

5.2 ADMINISTRATIVE INTERRELATION AND DE FACTO CONTROL.. 29

5.3 DISSOLUTION ≠ END OF LIABILITY.. 30

5.4 TECHNICAL FACILITATION AND ROLE OF CH203 DEVELOPERS.. 30

5.5 LEGAL QUALIFICATION.. 30

⚖️ 6. MODUS OPERANDI OF THE FRAUD.. 31

6.1 ABSENCE OF LICENSES AND REGULATORY SUPERVISION.. 31

6.2 USE OF LEGAL AND SUBSTANTIVE SMOKE SCREENS.. 31

6.3 PONZI CONSTRUCTION AND MISUSE OF BITCOIN.. 31

6.4 GLOBAL RECRUITMENT AND EXPANSION.. 32

6.5 CONTROLLED COLLAPSE AND SUSPENSION.. 32

6.6 MISLEADING PAYMENT AND PROFIT MODEL (HYBRID FIAT/CRYPTO STRUCTURE).. 33

⚖️ 7. MISUSE AND MISAPPROPRIATION OF CAPITAL CONTRIBUTED BY PARTICIPANTS.. 34

7.1 OBSERVED PATTERN.. 34

7.2 SUMMARY OF TRACKED PAYMENTS FINANCED WITH FUNDS FROM CASHFX PARTICIPANTS.. 35

7.3 LEGAL QUALIFICATION.. 36

7.4 MEANS OF EVIDENCE AND REPRODUCIBILITY.. 36

⚖️ 8. SCOPE OF THE FRAUD: BLOCKCHAIN ANALYSIS AND “DORMANT” BITCOIN WALLETS.. 37

8.1 CLUSTER ANALYSIS AND FLOW OF FUNDS.. 37

8.2A SYSTEMATIC STRUCTURE OF “DORMANT” WALLETS.. 37

8.2B SUMMARY OF TRACKED “DORMANT” WALLET ADDRESSES.. 38

8.3 INDICATIONS OF PREMEDITATED AND STRUCTURAL ASSET MISAPPROPRIATION.. 39

8.4 FINANCIAL CONTROL AND TRACEABILITY.. 39

⚖️ 9. REGISTRATION AND AVAILABILITY OF WALLET SUMMARIES AND BLOCKCHAIN EVIDENCE.. 40

9.1 SUMMARY OF REGISTERED WALLET DATA.. 40

9.2 DOCUMENTATION OF CLUSTERS AND FUND FLOWS.. 40

9.3 FILE FORMATS AND UPDATES.. 40

9.4 TRACEABILITY AND REPRODUCIBILITY.. 41

9.5 AVAILABILITY OF EVIDENTIARY MATERIAL.. 41

⚖️ 10. COLLECTIVE COHERENCE, REFERENCE BY OTHER VICTIMS AND POSSIBILITY OF PARTICIPATION.. 42

10.1 COLLECTIVE NATURE OF THE FRAUD.. 42

10.2 REFERENCE BY OTHER VICTIMS.. 42

10.3 POSSIBILITY OF PARTICIPATION IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC AND INTERNATIONALLY.. 42

10.4 MODEL COMPLAINT LETTER FOR EFFICIENCY PURPOSES.. 43

10.5 PROCEDURAL AND INVESTIGATIVE INTEREST.. 43

10.6 NO REPRESENTATION (!), BUT REFERENCE AS SOURCE.. 43

10.7 OBJECTIVE AND INTENDED EFFECT.. 43

⚖️ 11. INTERNATIONAL DIMENSION, JURISDICTION AND JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE.. 44

11.1 CROSS-BORDER NATURE OF THE FACTS.. 44

11.2 JURISDICTIONAL CONNECTING FACTORS.. 44

11.3 INTERNATIONAL INVOLVEMENT AND SUSPECTS OUTSIDE THE JURISDICTION.. 44

11.4 NEED FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE.. 45

11.5 CONSISTENCY WITH THE DIGITAL EVIDENCE.. 45

11.6 OBJECTIVE OF THIS CHAPTER.. 45

⚖️ 12. LEGAL CLASSIFICATION OF THE FACTS.. 46

12.1 FRAUD AND DECEPTION.. 46

12.2 MISAPPROPRIATION OF PARTICIPANTS’ CAPITAL.. 46

12.3 MONEY LAUNDERING AND CONCEALMENT OF FINANCIAL FLOWS.. 46

12.3A PAYMENTS OUTSIDE THE FINANCIAL SECTOR FINANCED WITH PARTICIPANTS’ FUNDS.. 47

12.3B LEGAL QUALIFICATION OF THE PAYMENT PATTERN.. 47

12.3C RELATION WITH THE UNDERLYING DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE.. 47

12.4 STRUCTURAL AND ORGANISED EXECUTION.. 48

12.5 CONCURRENCE AND ADDITIONAL LEGAL QUALIFICATION.. 48

12.6 OBJECTIVE OF THIS CHAPTER.. 48

⚖️ 13. PERSONS INVOLVED, HIERARCHY AND RESPONSIBILITIES.. 49

13.1 FOUNDERS AND DE FACTO OWNERS (MAIN RESPONSIBLE PERSONS).. 49

01. HUASCAR JOSÉ LÓPEZ CASTILLO.. 49

02. EDWIN ABAD RAMÍREZ. 49

03. CHURCHILL JOSÉ GONZALEZ FONTANA.. 49

04. RONALD OTIS POPE (RON POPE). 49

05. ARIANE CRITINE NUNES SANTANA (ARIANE LOPEZ). 49

06. INGRID ZANAIDE MARTINEZ MACEO (INGRID ABAD). 49

07. MARIANNA CECILIA LOPEZ CASTILLO (MARIANNA GONZALEZ). 49

08. LUIS OMAR CAÑIZALEZ PEREZ. 49

13.2 PARTICULAR POSITION OF LUIS OMAR CAÑIZALEZ PEREZ.. 50

13.3 BIG PROMOTERS – INTERNATIONAL DISSEMINATION AND LEGITIMISATION.. 50

09. JOHN KINNEAR (NATIONALITY : CANADA). 50

10. JUSTIN HALLADAY (NATIONALITY: USA). 50

11. LUIGI BRUNI (NATIONALITY: CANADA). 50

13.4 AMBASSADORS AND PRESIDENTS – NETWORK STABILISATION FUNCTIONS.. 51

13.5 STRUCTURAL PAYMENTS AND CRIMINAL RELEVANCE.. 51

13.6 HIERARCHICAL COHERENCE AND PRIORITISATION.. 51

13.7 OBJECTIVE OF THIS CHAPTER.. 51

⚖️ 14. URGENCY AND NEED FOR IMMEDIATE MEASURES.. 52

14.1 ONGOING RISK OF ASSET MISAPPROPRIATION.. 52

14.2 INTERNATIONAL DISPERSION OF PERSONS AND ASSETS.. 52

14.2B CRIMINAL RELEVANCE.. 53

14.3 NEED FOR IMMEDIATE MEASURES.. 53

14.4 OBJECTIVE OF THIS CHAPTER.. 53

⚖️ 15. CONCLUSION AND FORMAL REQUEST.. 54

15.1 CONCLUSION.. 54

15.2 FORMAL REQUEST.. 54

15.3 COMMUNICATION, FOLLOW-UP AND ELECTION OF DOMICILE.. 54

15.4 FINAL OBSERVATION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT.. 55

Page updated

Google Sites

Report abuse