Pretty Little Problematic: A Closer Look at Grooming Behavior on TV
Pretty Little Problematic: A Closer Look at Grooming Behavior on TV
Written By: Heather Almand
July 23, 2024
In June of 2010, Pretty Little Liars aired on ABC Family. The show revolves around four teenage girls dealing with the mysterious disappearance of their friend, Alison DiLaurentis. When they start receiving threatening messages from an anonymous figure named “A,” they are forced to confront their deepest secrets while unraveling the truth behind Alison’s disappearance. The show received massive success, becoming the network’s highest-rated series debut on record across the network's target pre-teen/teenage demographic. With its drama, mystery, and romance, the series gained a devoted fanbase and established itself in pop culture throughout its seven-season run.
Recently, there has been an evolving discourse online regarding the show’s problematic portrayal of romantic relationships. Wanting to investigate grooming behaviors in television media, I, along with four other researchers, did a content analysis. Our analysis involved both manifest (overt) and latent (underlying) representations of perpetrator and victim behaviors from the first two seasons of the show and its spin-off on HBO Max. Serving as the project coordinator, I invested countless hours scrutinizing various elements within each episode. This included coding for demographic information of perpetrators and victims, their behaviors, instances of secret keeping, the nature of relationships, the stages of grooming, and the portrayal of such relationships within each episode.
In this blog post, I wanted to specifically point out some of the tactics the showrunners used to shape how the audience felt about these relationships. These tactics, aimed at romanticizing and idealizing grooming behaviors, were often subtle and overlooked by many viewers at the time.
Romantic clichés are used to evoke emotions and appeal to the viewers. For instance, the idea of forbidden love, opposites attract, or love triangles. Student-teacher and age-gap relationships are romantic tropes most notably seen in the relationship between Aria Montgomery (Lucy Hale) and her teacher, Ezra Fitz (Ian Harding).
And what is more ‘romantic’ than kissing your English teacher in the rain.
Ezra and Aria: “we need to keep this a secret.”
Also them: Goes to the next town over and kisses in the middle of ongoing traffic.
Showrunners are very intentional on how they present a scene visually and using this filter was an active choice. Glow filters are a common technique used on television to enhance the romantic elements of a story. A notable instance of this is in a scene where Ian (25 years old) assists Spencer (15 years old) in hitting a golf ball. This scene is significant not only because of the glow filter but also because it portrays one of the most common perpetrator behaviors: Helping the victim with a task.
Like the visual aspects, the show uses romantic melodies when these relationships are shown on screen. In many scenes where Aria and her teacher are alone, romantic music plays in the background. Not only that, but the show’s soundtrack album had original music created for Aria and Ezra’s relationship. Interestingly, no other couples on that show had this.
Wren massaging a teenage girl in a bathing suit. (Fun fact: this scene was initially supposed to be shot in a hot tub).
Ezra Fitz (“Mr. Fitz”) (Mind you, this character is supposed to be a grown man, even though he looks like a teenage boy).
This show breaks away from the stereotypical image of a creepy, older predator by presenting its groomers as conventionally attractive, both appearance and personality wise. Perpetrators are charismatic, possessing the ability to deceive their victims effortlessly. One such character is Wren, a 24-year-old medical student with a British accent. His good looks and charm were an attempt to override his problematic grooming behaviors, like when he inappropriately touches and kisses minors. Despite being an actual predator, in the context of the storyline Wren is presented as the boy next door—someone in love. Which is exactly what this show was trying to do: Not make the audience think that this was grooming, but rather “teenage love.”
Highschool teacher Ezra Fitz, aka Mr. Fitz, is the main predator in the show. Conventionally attractive, he appeals to the targeted teenage demographic. If Mr. Fitz was an 80-year-old, there would be a completely different reaction from the audience.
The show makes several references to "Lolita" through the character of Alison, who uses the alias "Vivian Darkbloom," an anagram of Vladimir Nabokov. As many are aware, this is a novel well-known for its themes of obsession, manipulation, and the sexualization of a young girl by an older man. In my opinion, the portrayal of Alison in the flashbacks seemed deliberately crafted to evoke a "Lolita" vibe. She consistently attracted the attention of older men, who saw her as both youthful and alluring.
When a show wants the audience to root for a couple, they’ll add another unlikeable character who impedes upon the relationship. This creates an “us vs. them” mentality. This is used by real-life perpetrators to gain their victim’s trust.
In this scene, Wren (perpetrator) and Spencer (victim) are sitting side by side at a restaurant, while Melissa (Spencer’s older sister and Wren’s significant other) and their father sit across from them. Melissa begins a competitive family game where they all share their biggest accomplishments of the day. When Spencer pauses at her turn, Wren jumps in and jokingly says he got an excellent parking spot at work. Then, he slides his alcohol to her while the others are distracted. Wren's actions exemplify classic grooming tactics aimed at building a bond with their victim through offering advice, displaying empathy, or giving gifts.
(I want to emphasize that Wren’s behaviors here are not perceived as creepy through the eyes of a teenager. His actions are a way to charm Spencer and gain her trust).
Now, here me out. As I mentioned before, EVERYTHING that a show does visually has intention behind it. In that scene, they could have easily had Spencer and Wren sitting across from one another, but instead wanted to create a barrier between the two sides. This further perpetuates the us vs. them tactic used by the showrunners.
Let’s look at another scene where Aria and Mr. Fitz tell her parents about their secret teacher-student relationship. Again, both are on opposite sides of the room. While watching it’s clear that her parents, not the groomer, are the main villain in this scenario as well. This is not only seen with Aria’s parents, but every other character who opposed their relationship.
(Another thing that really bothered me is that Aria’s parents did absolutely nothing to protect her. All they did was “ban” them from seeing each other ever again, which of course didn’t work. Also, her parents never mentioned that her age was the problem. They were only upset because he was her teacher. I don’t know why they didn’t call the police on this man).
Aria getting married to her high school sweetheart: her English teacher.
Having the perpetrator and victim get married at the end of the series sets an unrealistic standard for the audience. Groomers are not romantically interested in their victims; their motivation stems from a need of power and control over someone else. These relationships are abusive (emotionally and/or physically).
Alison is the embodiment of complex characterization, leading viewers, especially younger ones, to overlook the problematic stuff she was a victim of. Alison's relationships with older men were portrayed as a reflection of her ability to charm and manipulate those around her. Alison thought she knew what she was doing, but in reality, she was just preyed on by grown men. By depicting Alison as the instigator, the show distracts from the real issue of power imbalances and potential predatory behavior.
Another layer to this issue was that the actress who played Alison (Sasha Pieterse) was only 13 years old when she filmed Season 1, and the rest of the cast were in their early 20s. Having a child actor play a character who is promiscuous irks me.
Although the characters were the same age in this scene, in real life it was a 22-year-old woman (Shay Mitchell) kissing a 13 year-old Sasha. Mitchell openly admitted that it was awkward for the first couple of seasons when the pair had to do kissing scenes, primarily due to Sasha's age at the time. (Again, with the glow filter). They could’ve had them kiss on the cheek or something. That was so unnecessary.
Aria is another example of this. When Mr. Fitz realizes that he is Aria’s teacher, he pushes back. Aria is persistent and believes what they had was “real.” She is portrayed as the pursuer. This, in turn, makes the audience think that they have an equal playing field. The show basically makes it seem like since Aria is so adamant about making their relationship work, Mr. Fitz cannot be a groomer. When in actuality, the adult always have power over the child and is responsible for setting boundaries.
Wren in Spencer’s bedroom. There is no reason that this grown man should alone with a teenage girl in her bedroom.
In the show, the perpetrators conveniently always found ways to be around or alone with the victim. Similarly, in our analysis, the most common perpetrator behavior by far was isolating the victim or finding ways to be alone with them.
Majority of the scenes of Aria and Mr. Fitz take place in his apartment, which makes sense because he is with a literal predator.
Detective Wilden in a towel in Hannah’s kitchen.
Mr. Fitz spending Christmas (shirtless) with his high school students.
Did they just expected the us to forget that Ezra was their teacher. Like how did we go from hanging out with Aria one on one to spending time with the whole friend group of teenagers and none of it being weird?
I have so many questions too. Like, did they order the matching sets off of amazon? Was there like a group chat with Mr. Fitz and they all planned this together? Where are these kids parents? All in all, this picture makes me physically cringe. I cant look at for too long.
The cast wearing the merch.
(Notice how the shirts specifically say “Mr. Fitz,” not “Ezra Fitz”)
It's mind-boggling how the show got away with this. If it aired now, it would have been scrutinized and probably canceled. It's also concerning that nobody involved in the making of this show, whether on-screen or behind the scenes, seemed to question the glorification of relationships between 25+ year old men and 15-year-old girls. There are many teenage tv shows that handle grooming storylines responsibly, aiming to educate viewers about the associated dangers. However, when a show actively makes “ship-names” and then puts it on t-shirts for their young, impressionable viewers to buy, it is problematic. The existence of this merchandise speaks volumes about the intentional romanticization of these relationships. Disregarding everything else that just I mentioned, this is enough proof that the showrunners were intentionally romanticizing these grooming behaviors and inappropriate relationships.
Lastly, I wanted to point out how people have started to reevaluate the depiction of these relationships. This shift is seen on reddit threads and tweets, with posts from adults who watched the show when they were younger and are now appalled by the show’s portrayal of grooming.
There are so many things I left out for the sake of brevity. As someone who went deep into the show’s lore for this study, it is much worse than it seems. There are many other inappropriate relationships in this show, so much so that it feels like majority of the characters are either a groomer or a victim of one. The way this show sensationalizes these inappropriate relationships is honestly gross. Many of these tactics easily slip under the radar, especially for young, impressionable viewers who might not fully understand the concept of grooming. Conducting this study has been an eye-opening experience, to say the least. I've gained invaluable insights into grooming behaviors and how to identify them. Although it has gained more attention in recent years, grooming is still very misunderstood. My hope is that our study will contribute to that ongoing discussion and bring more awareness to this issue.
A video by Sloan Stowe does a deep dive into the show’s grooming: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3b4XGahIfk
Hi everyone! My name is Heather Almand and I’m a recent graduate from UTC. I graduate with my B.S. in psychology with a social science concentration (mainly in the fields of criminal justice, social work, and anthropology). I was the Project Coordinator for the Grooming Media Analysis Project. After graduation, I will be pursuing a master’s in Clinical Mental Health Counseling at The University of Memphis. My dream is to become a therapist, however, conducting psychological research is another passion of mine. My current research interests include studying prosocial behaviors and social inequalities. I’m also interested in studying psychopathology. When I am not in the lab, you can find me at the gym. I also enjoy writing, reading, shopping, and walking my dog.