American Academy of Actuaries Invited Sessions

Session IBias in Assessing Financial Risk

Moderator: Grace Lattyak, Chair of the Academy Research Committee


Anti-discrimination Insurance Pricing: Regulations, Fairness Criteria, and Models


Speaker: Xi Xin, Ph.D. candidate, University of New South Wales


This presentation is based on an article co-authored with Fei Huang.  On the issue of insurance discrimination, a grey area in regulation has resulted from the growing use of big data analytics by insurance companies: direct discrimination is prohibited, but indirect discrimination using proxies or more complex and opaque algorithms is not clearly specified or assessed. This phenomenon has recently attracted the attention of insurance regulators all over the world.  In this article, we introduce some fairness criteria that are potentially applicable to insurance pricing as a regression problem to the actuarial field, match them with different levels of potential and existing antidiscrimination regulations, and implement them into a series of existing and newly proposed antidiscrimination insurance pricing models, using both generalized linear models (GLMs) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost).


A fair price to pay: Exploiting causal graphs for fairness in insurance


Speaker: Olivier Côté, Université Laval


This presentation is based on an article co-authored with MariePier Côté and Arthur Charpentier.  In many jurisdictions, insurance companies are prohibited from discriminating based on certain policyholder characteristics. Exclusion of prohibited variables from models prevents direct discrimination, but fails to address proxy discrimination, a phenomenon especially prevalent when powerful predictive algorithms are fed with an abundance of acceptable covariates. The lack of formal definition for key fairness concepts, in particular indirect discrimination, hinders effective fairness assessment. We review causal inference notions and introduce a causal graph tailored

for fairness in insurance. Exploiting these, we discuss potential sources of bias, formally define direct and indirect discrimination, and study the theoretical properties of fairness methodologies. A novel categorization of fair methodologies into five families (best estimate, unaware, aware, hyperaware, and corrective) is constructed based on their expected fairness properties.


Discrimination-Free Insurance Pricing with Privatized Sensitive Attributes


Speaker: Tianhe Zhang, University of Wisconsin - Madison


This presentation is based on an article co-authored with Suhan Liu and Peng Shi.  Fairness has emerged as a critical consideration in the landscape of machine learning algorithms. One specific sector that merits attention in this regard is insurance. Achieving fairness according to established notions does not automatically ensure fair pricing in insurance. In particular, regulators are increasingly emphasizing transparency in pricing algorithms and imposing constraints on insurance companies on the collection and utilization of sensitive consumer attributes. These factors present additional challenges in the implementation of fairness in pricing algorithms. To address these complexities and comply with regulatory demands, we propose an efficient method for constructing fair models that are tailored to the insurance domain, using only privatized sensitive attributes. Notably, our approach ensures statistical guarantees, does not require direct access to sensitive attributes, and adapts to varying transparency requirements, addressing regulatory demands while ensuring fairness in insurance pricing.


Session IIProfessionalism

From Code to Culture: Living Professionalism Every Day


Speaker:  Annette James, Vice President for Health, American Academy of Actuaries


U.S. credentialed actuaries benefit from the system of self-regulation that governs many aspects of practice. qualification, and conduct — a system that firmly buttresses the meaning and value of being an actuarial professional to the public, employers, clients, and policymakers alike. But self-regulation also puts the onus on actuaries themselves to ensure appropriate standards are in place, and that they're actively applied and supported within the profession. This session will introduce and explore what self-regulation means anchored by the U.S. Code of Professional Conduct, and how it comes alive through a culture across U.S. professional and professionalism organizations and actuaries applying and promoting professionalism every day.