As learned, these determinants are grouped into 5 domains; economic stability, education access and quality, health care access and quality, neighbourhood and built environment, social and community context (OASH, 2020). These domains can be further broken down into the 12 main determinants.
Although the determinants of health help us understand that individuals can be affected from the moment they are brought into the world, when recognizing these determinants, it is also important to apply guidelines, frameworks, and models to the populations within these domains that are not as advantageous. The Spheres of influence are also what help shape the outlook of health for all demographics and populations. To define, spheres of influence are institutions or individuals that have more influence and responsibility than others (Karches, 2021). To put into perspective, physicians in Flint Michigan were realizing an increase in patients due to water contamination; the core sphere of influence to bring this issue to notice was the direct interaction the physician had with the patient. The healthcare provider was then able to influence at the community level by engaging with other healthcare providers within and around the organization (Karches, 2021). The population of Flint Michigan was seen as disadvantageous and thus marginalized as they did not have access to clean water, and this is another health issue that these individuals will have to deal with unless a higher level of influence intervenes. Diving into the spheres of influence gave more pathway to using models that are applied to health issues to keep the risk at a minimum. The Socioecological Model of Health (SEM) is a model that was highly discussed in this course. It gave comprehension to why certain public health measures are in place and why they should be enforced to begin with. For example, looking at high school sports related death through the lens of SEM, allowed for more knowledge about how certain measures are put into place for health issues across all demographics. Although formal and informal guidelines have been developed to shape cultural norms within highschool sports, there is an expectation to know the consequences in engaging in specific behaviours (McLeroy, Bibeau, Steckler & Glanz, 1988, Bronfenbrenner 1977). Policies such as fire drills, lockdowns, and threats, are directly correlated to policy mandates for safety in educational environments – the policy to keep students safe should extend to the athletic department within the institution (Scarneo, 2019). Interventions that involve the SEM are deemed to be more lasting, and effective than interventions that only address 1 level of influence.In addition, not all demographics have the advantage of healthy policies being implemented, as the resources won’t allow for it. Communities in Canada within the lowest socioeconomic status have a higher prevalence of death due to chronic disease than those who are not a part of that demographic. After doing some research on chronic diseases in Ontario, it seems as though the CCO has conceptualized a multi-year plan to help combat the risk of chronic diseases for all Ontarians – by monitoring the initiatives developed in the strategy, the CCO will be able to use the evidence and to create more preventative measures. Also, the inclusion of the First Nations, Inuit, Métis, and urban Indigenous people is a priority to ensure all chronic health prevention needs are met, which now brings the discussion to marginalized communities within Canada and Ontario.
The term marginalization can be defined as a process where certain individuals and groups of people are unable to completely participate in society. Individuals within a marginalized community have limited or no accessibility to education, employment, adequate housing, clean water, health services, and other social determinants of health. Not only is individual health affected in marginalized communities, but overall community health as well (On-Marg, 2016). This point in the course allowed for me to understand that marginalized communities are much closer than we think – along with indigenous communities that may not have access to clean water, effective healthcare, proper housing, communities within the city of Toronto, such as Regent Park, are very much marginalized. Unfortunately, what has been learned through literature is that these communities are often torn down to build expensive condos, displacing the current citizens within that population. Targeting marginalized communities is easier as their access to resources are minimal to begin with. Public health and policy’s main goal is to promote and advocate for healthier lifestyles and behaviours, creating a universality concept of ‘one size fits all’. When conceptualizing public health policies, we tend to unconsciously build these initiatives around the demographic and populations that have access to resources that benefit their health. I quickly learned that something as simple as washing your hands before a meal is not in sight for everyone; clean water and food for a family of 5 every night is a privilege. In relation, the indigenous community makes up the youngest population in Canada but in contrast, have the least amount of medical resources, plus the suicide rate and mood disorders are extremely prevalent in this demographic and preventative measures need to be implemented.