Background
Generative AI is rapidly changing how information is created, accessed, and used, and mathematics education is no exception. Students now routinely encounter AI tools that can solve problems, generate code, visualize data, and produce step-by-step explanations on demand. This shift challenges traditional assumptions about what it means to “do mathematics” and what skills are most valuable in an AI-rich world. At the same time, it opens opportunities to focus more deeply on conceptual understanding, modeling, interpretation, and communication, while offloading some symbolic manipulation and coding tasks to machines. A thoughtful integration of generative AI into math education must therefore balance opportunity and risk: harnessing AI’s capacity to support exploration and personalization, while guarding against overreliance, superficial learning, and the uncritical acceptance of AI-generated output.
Note: Picture AI generated (Can you spot any error?).
Goals
A general program for using generative AI in math and AI education has three main goals.
1) AI as Interactive Tutor and Collaborator. It aims to enhance learning by using AI as an interactive tutor and collaborator, supporting multiple solution paths, immediate feedback, and tailored explanations that adapt to different backgrounds and levels of preparedness.
2) AI-Integrated Curriculum and Workflows. It seeks to modernize curricula by embedding AI-supported workflows into core topics: having students use AI to generate code, test conjectures, design simulations, or explore data, and then requiring them to verify, refine, and explain the results mathematically.
3) Critical and Ethical AI Literacy. It intends to cultivate critical AI literacy: teaching students to question the correctness, limitations, and biases of AI outputs; to document AI use transparently; and to understand the ethical dimensions of relying on AI in academic and professional settings.
Note: Picture AI generated (Can you spot any error?).
Together, these goals position generative AI not as a shortcut around learning, but as a structured catalyst for deeper reasoning and more reflective practice.
Broader Impacts
If implemented carefully, this program can have a broad and positive impact on both math and AI education.
Generative AI can lower entry barriers for students who struggle with notation, coding, or language, allowing them to engage more quickly with higher-level concepts such as modeling complex systems, interpreting data, and evaluating algorithms.
It can promote more active and inquiry-based learning, where students experiment with ideas, test counterexamples, and iterate on models with AI as an accessible partner. It also helps align education with contemporary practice, where professionals routinely use AI tools in data analysis, optimization, and decision-making.
Most importantly, by making critical engagement with AI a central learning outcome, rather than an afterthought, math and AI programs can prepare students not only to use advanced tools effectively, but also to shape and question the AI systems that increasingly influence science, industry, and society.
Note: Picture AI generated (Can you spot any error?).
Selvitella, A.M. and Anderson, J.R. (2026). A professional development course on data-driven dynamical systems at a primarily undergraduate institution. CODEE Journal, 20(2), Article 3. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/codee/vol20/iss2/3
Madasu, V.R. and Selvitella, A.M. (2026). The data science landscape of the Indiana financial industry: a machine learning study. To appear in the Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science, 131(2), 1-10.
Blackford, D. and Selvitella, A.M. (2025). Data science academic programs in the pre-ChatGPT era: a curated dataset. Scientific Data, 13, 236. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-06553-4
Selvitella, A.M and Foster, K.L. (2025). AI tools could decrease the appeal of predatory journals. Nature, 646, 38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-03182-6.
Kapre, V., Anderson, J.R., and Selvitella, A.M. (2024). On solving differential equations describing the ecology of shallow lakes: a comparison of classical and modern computational methods through Python. Spora: A Journal of Biomathematics, 11, 1-19.