1. What is the main reason for COPE rejection? (Summary)
COPE did not say that the journal is bad, but they said that:
The journal's website does not have ethics & policies that are clear, detailed, and transparent enough.
2. The first and most important improvement:
Mandatory Policies on the Journal Website (in DETAIL)
COPE requires the following policies to be on separate dedicated pages (one-paragraph is not enough).
(A) Authorship Policy (Authorship Criteria & Responsibilities)
It should be clearly stated on the website:
Who can become an author?
Responsibilities of the corresponding author
Gift / Ghost authorship is not allowed
How will author order be changed?
(B) Plagiarism Policy (Plagiarism & Similarity Policy)
Definition of plagiarism
Similarity % limit (e.g. <15%)
Software used (Turnitin / iThenticate)
What action to take if plagiarism is found?
(C) Data Fabrication / Falsification Policy (Research Misconduct: Data Fabrication & Falsification)
Fake data and manipulated figures are not allowed.
If editors have suspicions, an investigation process is followed.
There is a retraction/correction policy.
(D) Conflict of Interest (Conflict of Interest Policy - COI)
Authors, reviewers, editors – everyone must disclose
Examples of financial/personal conflicts
Disclosure statement is mandatory
(E) Complaints & Appeals Policy (VERY IMPORTANT) (Complaints and Appeals Handling Policy)
COPE specifically looks at this matter:
Where to submit an author complaint?
How to appeal against an editorial decision?
Timeline (e.g., 30 days)
Mention of independent review
(F) Long-term Digital Preservation (Digital Archiving & Preservation Policy)
COPE has specifically mentioned a point.
It should be written on the website:
How will journal papers remain safe in the long term?
Example:
LOCKSS / CLOCKSS
Institutional repository
National library backup
3. Clear website confusion (VERY IMPORTANT)
COPE has clearly stated: Journal appears to have two websites
What you need to do:
Keep ONLY ONE official journal website
If there are two domains:
Keep one main domain
Redirect the other domain with a 301 redirect
4. Add COPE & Transparency statement
Add a page on the website: “Publication Ethics & Transparency Statement”
Write on this page:
The journal follows:
COPE Core Practices
Principles of Transparency & Best Practice
Editors are independent
Peer review type (double blind / single blind)
Roles of the editorial board
5. Update editorial board details
COPE also subtly assesses this.
Ensure:
Full name
Affiliation
Country
ORCID (optional but recommended)
Clear role (Editor-in-Chief, Associate Editor)
6. FINAL CHECKLIST before Re-application
Make sure before applying:
✔ All policies are on separate pages
✔ Policies are detailed (not copied, not 2-3 lines)
✔ Only one single website
✔ Clear navigation menu
✔ Ethics pages easily accessible
✔ No contradictions anywhere
7. When and how to re-apply?
Only after 12 months. Use the same journal name + mention the reference