The third-generation Ford Escape debuted in 2013, and it instantly became a very popular compact SUV, but I believe it was the biggest flop in Ford's history.
Up front, the Escape has a dominating and aggressive look. No LED headlights are available, but the 2020 model comes with them standard. The SEL has a brighter grille than the other trims, but I'm not really a fan of the bright work. It'd look better with the Sport Package grille on the SEL trims. The front end is a very nice look, with angular creases and muscle. I prefer it to the 2020 redesign.
When you look at the side of the Escape, there is a lot going on. There's a good amount of body lines and creases, and the rear fender is extremely pushed out and gives the Escape a muscular appearance. SEL trims run with 17-inch rims, which are not fitting for the car. As it is the second to the highest trim, it would've been better for Ford to put 18s or 19s on it. Add the SEL Sport Appearance Package and you'll get an attractive set of 19-inch machined rims.
The Escape outback is styled quite conservatively, but is still easily identifiable as an Escape. LED taillights are only on the top-end Titanium model, which should've been standard on all Escapes. The rear hatch is also very vertical so it doesn't compromise on cargo practicality. Dual exhaust tips appear on SE models and above, whereas the S tucks them underneath the bumper.
In my opinion, I didn't find the interior of the refreshed Ford Escape any better than the pre-refresh.
There is a high percentage of soft-touch materials in the interior, but when you find the hard-touch, man do they feel cheap. They feel like cardboard! Also, the dashboard is much over-styled, with too many creases and angles and breaks and the whole nine yards. On the flip side, the seats are comfortable and largely adjustable. I love the driving position. You sit high, and the floor boards are low, giving you quite a unique driving position. Everything in the interior is logically laid out, but the interior has too much going on that it makes it a distraction.
In the second row of the Escape, it feels more like a prison cell than anything in the segment. The rear seats only recline, but they only recline about an inch or two, they don't slide (like the 2020), and there isn't much features back there other than auto up/down windows as well as an armrest and two rather large rear air vents. That's it. All materials except for the armrest are entirely hard touch plastic, which I find inexcusable, as if you add on packages and such, you'll pay nearly $40,000 and won't have nearly the same material quality as in a fully-specced Hyundai Tucson for a few thousand dollars less. The rear seats do fold in a 60/40 design, and they nearly fold flat. The rear seats are adequately supported, but the foam in the cushioning could be a little firmer, as longer trips may become uncomfortable for your rear passengers. Also, leg room looks plentiful, but my 6-foot-plus figure struggled for leg room. My knees were touching the seat back.
Ford offers a very minimal amount of technology in the Escape. An 8-inch SYNC 3 infotainment system comes as on option on SE trims and standard on SEL and Titanium, but that's practically it. But safety is where the Escape fails, and it shows how much Ford is behind the competition.
Available on the SE, SEL, and Titanium trims, the Ford Safe and Smart package gives you JUST driver-activated front rain-sensing windshield wipers, adaptive cruise control and forward collision warning and brake support (it cannot bring itself to a stop!!!), auto high-beams, blind spot with cross-traffic alert, a lane-keeping system, and a windshield wiper de-icer. It's $995, but Ford could've put more safety features into that package for that price.
The Ford Safe and Smart Titanium Plus package gives you only adaptive cruise control and Forward Collision Warning with Brake Support (again, it cannot stop itself!!!), auto high-beams, blind spot with cross-traffic alert, a lane-keeping system with lane-keeping alert and assist with driver alertness, a Panoramic Vista Roof, and Rain-Sensing Wipers. All for $1,895. It's a lot of money for that package when the car can't even stop itself in an impending collision.
The Escape earned the worst ratings in IIHS's crashworthiness testing as well as their other tests compared to its competition. Although Ford beefed up the driver-side structure to earn an Acceptable rating, up from a Poor, Ford didn't bother to fix the passenger side, and it earned a Poor rating. Even the side curtain airbag didn't deploy. Read more on the 2019 Ford Escape's safety ratings by clicking here.
The Escape was last redesigned in 2012 for the 2013 model year. The Escape was groundbreaking in that it was one of the first automakers to introduce turbocharged engines for the mainstream market.
The Escape has a very firm ride, and can get unsettled over small or large bumps. It's ride is adequate, but many bumps make their way into the cabin. For 2017, Ford must've made adjustments to the steering, because it was noticeably smoother and easier to drive compared to the 2014 Escape that my mother owns. In 2017, Ford dropped the 1.6L EcoBoost in favor for the 1.5L EcoBoost from the Fusion. It gained a couple horsepower, but lost a few torques. All Escapes are hooked up to a 6-speed SelectShift automatic.
Now, this is going to get really crazy. Reliability is one of the worst out of the entire automotive industry. My mother's 2014 Escape SE with the 1.6L EcoBoost and 4WD has been nothing but problems since she has bought it.
Her Escape has a MULTITUDE of problems. Some of the more common problems my mother has is that the transmission shifts very rough through the gears, particularly from first to second gear. In addition, there's many times where the clutch slips for a couple seconds before jerking into gear and thrusting forward. Even while driving it'll slip the clutch too much and will be a bit jerky when transitioning into higher gears while moving. Some less common problems that she has is the engine revving at extreme RPMs (redline) while accelerating from a stop. She's had this happen many times. She steps on the gas and the car will act normal for a second, but then it will shoot the RPMs to above redline, and accelerate extremely slow (or barely), then it will slip into gear and accelerate. She's also had the SYNC 2 infotainment gremlins, where many times she has got into her car and the infotainment system said "911 Assist Fault" and disabled the 911 Assist. So practically with that error message, you're telling me if my mother runs off the road because she couldn't stop in time to avoid an accident, and she is severely injured, you won't call the authorities? Well, I wish you luck Ford because you'll have a lawsuit on your hands if she is ever involved in an accident that she can't get to her phone and this feature is disabled. She's also had problems with the car refusing to start in cool temperatures (around 40-50 degrees). She's only had this happen twice in the five years she's owned it. In addition, she says that the car gives her extremely poor average fuel economy, averaging between 16 to 20 MPG (if she's lucky), in which her car should be getting 22 city and 29 highway. Not once in the many times she has filled the car up has she gotten anywhere close to the EPA estimate. Even road trips that she was on the highway for the majority of the time. I have even struggled to get that number driving it.
I would not trust the Escape at all, even if it was handed to me for free because the reliability is one of the worst in the entire automotive industry. Did I mention that the number of recalls is the most of any vehicle with four wheels (including school buses)? The 2014 model year Escape has a total of THIRTEEN recalls. My mother has gotten at least 10 of them on her SE. If I had to score the Escape based on reliability, it would be easily the main reason why I would not recommend this vehicle to ANYBODY.
The V6 was dropped for the 2013 redesign. A 2.5L naturally-aspirated I4, a 1.6L EcoBoost I4, and a 2.0L EcoBoost I4 were offered. The EcoBoosts were the only engines available with Intelligent 4WD. For 2017, Ford replaced the 1.6L EcoBoost with a 1.5L EcoBoost I4, and the 2.0L EcoBoost I4 got some updates and upped the power figures slightly. All engines are backed by a 6-speed SelectShift automatic.
The SEL trim (as tested) had the 1.5L EcoBoost I4 paired with the great Intelligent 4WD system. The Intelligent 4WD system does a good job in the snow, but it reacts very late as it will often spin the wheels for a couple of seconds, even if you are light on the throttle on snow-covered roads. In addition, the traction and stability control kicks in dangerously late, often slamming on the brakes to straighten the car out. The 1.5L EcoBoost I4 is really slow when you put your foot down. It's hampered by that 6-speed automatic that shifts lethargically, making the car really slow. In fact, pair the 1.5L EcoBoost I4 against the 1.6L turbo in the Hyundai Tucson in a drag race, and the Tucson will walk the Escape in 0-60, doing it 1.5 seconds faster (I timed my Tucson and it ran 0-60 in a best 7.27 seconds), despite having nearly the same horsepower (the Tucson has four less horsepower), but 195 lb/ft of torque compared to the Escape's 177, as well as a 7-speed dual clutch compared to the lethargic 6-speed automatic in the Escape.
My engine of choice on the Escape is the 2.0L EcoBoost, because compared to the 1.5L, it has 66 more horsepower and 98 more lb/ft of torque, dropping two seconds off the 0-60 time (and barely beating the 1.6L Tucson) just with a 1 MPG penalty in fuel economy. It also pairs much better and smoothly with the 6-speed SelectShift more than the 1.6L EcoBoost and 1.5L EcoBoost do. With the 2.0L EcoBoost, the Escape has the fastest 0-60 times in the class without being a performance SUV.
1.5L turbocharged EcoBoost I4
Coming soon.