Although the first determination of the Hubble constant was (Hubble 1929) today it is well known that this proportionality constant takes values less than . In fact, Sandage (Sandage 1958) gave the first reasonable estimated of the Hubble constant by studying Cepheids, he obtained that is about . Four decades later, Freedman et al. (Freedman et al. 2001) studied objects over the range of about 60-400Mpc, using Cepheids, and determined that . Bonamente et al. (Bonamente et al 2006) studied galaxies with redshift between 0,14 and 0,89, obtaining that the Hubble constant is 77.2 km/s Mpc^-1 . After nine years of recording and analysis of the CMB data from WMAP, Bennett et al. (Bennett et al 2012) calculated that . The latest value of the Hubble constant was determined by Ade et al. (Ade et al .2013), who studied the CMB through Planck satellite, where the data fitted . The measurements of the anisotropies in de Cosmic Microwaves Background (CMB) constraints indirectly the set of cosmological parameters (k, H0, m, ), by multiple statistics correlations over the acoustic peaks in the distribution of the radiation in the angular power spectrum. The results of the Planck Collaboration (2019) throw lower values for H_0. In the Planck Collaboration, the estimates of the cosmological parameters, show degeneration in the simultaneous estimates of H_0 and m; Figure 3 in Planck Collaborations (2016), because the CMB measurements are not a direct measure of the Hubble constant. Most recent direct measurements of the constant of Hubble which Space Telescope (HST), are H_0 = 75.8 (+5.2 −4.9) km/s Mpc−1 and 78.5 (+6.3 −5.8) km/s Mpc−1 depending of the target calibration (de Jaege et al. 2020), furthermore Riess (2019) had found that H_0 = 74.22 (± 1.82) km/s Mpc−1 in Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). Earlier, Falcon & Genova-Santos (2008) found H_0 values as high as 73 km/s Mpc-1 using the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect and X-ray emission data in galaxy clusters, with the advantage that this method is independent of redshift. In order to verify the Hubble law and our value for the Hubble constant, Falcon et al (Falcon & Aguirre 2014) used the primitive technique used by Hubble, which consists in plotting the observational measurements of the velocity (via redshift) and the distance of a set of objects such as galaxies, quasars, radio sources, X-ray sources, infrared sources, etc. For this end, we considered the Master List of Redshift-Independent Extragalactic Distances of 15339 galaxies provided by NED (Version 9.2.0). The observational measurements were filtered by: (1) recent measurements (year of publication from 2009), (2) distant objects ( ), (3) redshift from 0,0167 to 0.33, and (4) accurate measurements (with maximum error of 0,5%). As result, the list was reduced to 392 objects (the complete list of the 392 objects can found on https://db.tt/vwlVdhVM) (Falcon & Aguirre 2014) . Here, we must clarify that in order to filter errors by peculiar motions we used redshifts above 0,0167, so errors are under 6% (Freedman et al. 2001)., and due the theoretical assumption of we set redshifts below 0,33, so that Lorentz factor is equally under 6% and the relativistic effects are neglected.