So, a student has asked you to a be a reference for them. CONGRATULATIONS! This means you have made a big impact on this student and they hope you can share your feelings about them with their future university or company. Below is a guide on writing a reference letter based on the pathway the student has chosen.
STEP 1: After students ask you for a recommendation letter, make sure they provide you with the Student Brag Sheet which will tell you everything you need to know to complete your letter.
STEP 2: Use any of the following links to help you write the letter:
If the university/company has specific questions/instructions, make sure to read it carefully and answer using specific details to help ensure the student's profile shines.
STEP 3: Send your letter to the high school University & Career Advisor for review and any suggested changes. Every writer has an editor, this is to ensure recipients of the letters receive a well-tailored letter that also reflects VIS and the community in the most professional way possible.
*if the recommendation is done via an online form with specific questions, please complete each question carefully and double-check your grammar and spelling before submitting.
STEP 4: When the letter is completed, send it to the UCA to be placed on official letterhead, signed by you, and submitted to university/company.
*if submitting to an UK university (UCAS), the letter will need to be attached to their application by the UCA themself
Write in bullet points only.
Provide evidence and anecdotes that connect directly to the subject the student intends to study.
Use specific examples, data, or measurable outcomes wherever possible.
Avoid vague praise; show how the student demonstrated their ability.
If relevant, provide a short bullet on challenges the student has faced along with how they have managed/overcame it in a way that links to their subject. This section is OPTIONAL.
Example (English applicant):
Anna has dyslexia and compensates by reading ahead. She read all six set novels for the year before September, enabling her to participate confidently in seminar discussions and provide original interpretations in essays.
Example (Maths applicant):
Samira missed 15 classes due to illness but still scored 87% in the Mechanics mock exam (highest in the group). This demonstrates resilience and mathematical aptitude despite limited classroom time.
Give specific evidence that shows the student’s skills and habits of work match the demands of their chosen course.
Example (Law applicant):
Mhairi averaged 72% on sociology essays (above class mean of 60%).
In her extended essay on gender roles, she analysed 12 academic articles, compared statistical data on childcare in three countries, and built a clear, structured argument.
Demonstrated the ability to synthesise complex information—crucial for Law.
Example (Engineering applicant):
Hamza designed an outdoor play structure for children with disabilities.
Interviewed staff and families at a local children’s hospice (5 site visits, 20+ survey responses).
Used CAD software to create a prototype meeting government accessibility guidelines.
Showed problem-solving, independence, and application of technical skills to a real-world issue.
Frame academic strengths in terms of their relevance to the student’s intended degree.
Example (Finance applicant):
Isabella consistently scores above 80% in applied maths assessments.
In a project on modelling projectile motion, she built equations that predicted experimental results within 2% accuracy.
Her work demonstrates precision, logical reasoning, and applied mathematical thinking—skills directly transferable to Finance.
Extenuating Circumstances
Anna has dyslexia and compensates by preparing ahead: she read all six set texts for the year over the summer.
This preparation allowed her to contribute consistently to seminar discussions, often leading group debates with detailed textual evidence.
Despite reading more slowly, she maintains essay scores between 68–75%, showing resilience and effective strategies that will support her in an English degree.
Evidence of Subject Fit (for English applicant)
Scored 73% in her comparative essay on Othello and A Streetcar Named Desire—demonstrated sophisticated literary analysis by integrating critics’ viewpoints with her own.
Consistently asks challenging interpretive questions in class, e.g., linking Blanche’s fragility in Streetcar to broader discussions of gender and power in Shakespeare.
In her independent research project on postcolonial literature, analysed four novels and presented findings to the class, highlighting themes of identity and migration.
Strong oral communication: chaired two class debates and was praised by peers for her ability to summarise complex points clearly.
Work shows transferable skills for English at degree level: close reading, critical analysis, synthesis of multiple sources, and clarity of argument.