RECORDS

2019

Infographic: What Have We Done?

Foam Core Board

Using a foam core board, our team visualized and documented our thought processes. Below is a Google Sheets file documenting the details of our foam core board. Make sure to look through all four sub-sheets in this file; it includes 51 Themes, 101 "How Might We" Questions, and over 100 Ideas.

Harvey Mudd Foam Core Board

Bibliography

Abelson, Philip H. “Editorial: Global Technology Competition.” Science 277, no. 5332 (1997): 1587–1587. Andersson, P, and B Onarheim. “Facilitating Creativity as a Core Competence in Engineering Education,” 2015, 9.

ARMSTRONG, JOHN A. “Rethinking the Ph.D.” Issues in Science and Technology 10, no. 4 (1994): 19–22. Bam, Louzanne, and Pj Vlok. “TOWARDS A FRAMEWORK FOR SYSTEMIC CREATIVITY IN ENGINEERING ORGANISATIONS.” South African Journal of Industrial Engineering 27, no. 2 (August 2016). https://doi.org/10.7166/27-2-1288.

“Barriers_to_Creativity_in_Engineering_Education_A_.Pdf,” n.d.

Carpenter, Wesley. “Engineering Creativity - Toward an Understanding of the Relationship between Perceptions of Creativity in Engineering Design and Creative Performance.Pdf.” International Journal of Engineering Education 32 (August 15, 2016): 10.

Cheng, Ying-Hsueh, and Chin-Chung Tsai. “Online Research Behaviors of Engineering Graduate Students in Taiwan.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 20, no. 1 (2017): 169–79.

Committee on Revitalizing Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century, Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Policy and Global Affairs, and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century. Edited by Alan Leshner and Layne Scherer. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.17226/25038.

“Educating Scientists and Engineers: Grade School to Grad School.” Journal of College Science Teaching 18, no. 3 (1988): 156–58.

“Enhancing Creativity in Engineering Students.Pdf,” n.d.

“Factors That Influence the Creativity of Engineering Students.Pdf.” Accessed July 2, 2019. https://www.me.utexas.edu/~ppmdlab/files/ASEE%2020110308.pdf.

Ferguson, Daniel, Wayne Li, Jonathan Weaver, John Ochs, Kathryn Jablokow, Cristi Bell-Huff, and Wendy Newstetter. “Do Engineering Creativity/Innovation Courses Impact Engineering Innovativeness?” In 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–5. Indianapolis, IN: IEEE, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109 /FIE.2017.8190628.

Furukawa, Takao, Nobuyuki Shirakawa, and Kumi Okuwada. “An Empirical Study of Graduate Student Mobility Underpinning Research Universities.” Higher Education 66, no. 1 (2013): 17–37.

“Global Grand Challenges Summit Summary.Pdf.” Accessed July 2, 2019. https://www.nae.edu /File.aspx?id=186594.

Gray, Colin M., Seda Yilmaz, Shanna Daly, Colleen M. Seifert, and Richard Gonzalez. “Creativity ‘Misrules’: First Year Engineering Students’ Production and Perception of Creativity in Design Ideas.” In Volume 3: 17th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies; 12th International Conference on Design Education; 8th Frontiers in Biomedical Devices. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2015-46492.

Guadeloupe, Patrica. “SO YOU WANT TO BE AN ENGINEER.” Hispanic Engineer and Information Technology 22, no. 1 (2007): 22–25.

Ibrahim, Badaruddin, Michael A. DeMiranda, and Thomas J. Siller. “The Correlation between Creativity and Engineering Knowledge among Engineering Undergraduate Students.” In 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), 38–43. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: IEEE, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2016.7856090.

Kaldewey, David, and Désirée Schauz. “Transforming Pure Science into Basic Research:: The Language of Science Policy in the United States.” In Basic and Applied Research, edited by David Kaldewey and Désirée Schauz, 4:104–40. The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century. Berghahn Books, 2018. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv8bt0z7.9.

Lamothe, Karl A., Vanessa Bourne, Andrew T. M. Chin, Kristin Daoust, Catherine M. Dieleman, Camille Ouellet Dallaire, and Stephanie A. Tomscha. “Are Research Networks Worth the Time for Graduate Students?” Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 99, no. 3 (2018): 343–50.

Levecque, Katia, Frederik Anseel, Alain De Beuckelaer, Johan Van der Heyden, and Lydia Gisle. “Work Organization and Mental Health Problems in PhD Students.” Research Policy 46, no. 4 (May 2017): 868–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008.

Messaging for Engineering: From Research to Action. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.17226/13463.

Morin, Sophie, Jean-Marc Robert, and Liane Gabora. “A New Course on Creativity in an Engineering Program: Foundations and Issues.” In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Innovative Design and Manufacturing (ICIDM), 270–75. Montreal, QC, Canada: IEEE, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109 /IDAM.2014.6912706.

Morse, Wayde Cameron, Max Nielsen-Pincus, Jo Ellen Force, and J. D. Wulfhorst. “Bridges and Barriers to Developing and Conducting Interdisciplinary Graduate-Student Team Research.” Ecology and Society 12, no. 2 (2007). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26267883.

Panthalookaran, Varghese. “Hour of Creativity: An Agenda to Foster Creativity and Innovation in the Students of Engineering.” In 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 612–17. Amman, Jordan: IEEE, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773201.

Pawley, Alice L. “Universalized Narratives: Patterns in How Faculty Members Define ‘Engineering.’” Journal of Engineering Education 98, no. 4 (October 2009): 309–19. https://doi.org/10.1002 /j.2168-9830.2009.tb01029.x.

Ragusa, Gisele. “Engineering Creativity and Propensity for Innovative Thinking In Undergraduate and Graduate Students,” n.d., 7.

Repko AF. 2008a. Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory. Sage.

Repko AF. 2008b. Assessing interdisciplinary learning outcomes. Academic Exchange Quarterly

(Fall): 171–178.

Roach, Michael, and Henry Sauermann. “The Declining Interest in an Academic Career,” August 18, 2017, 23.

Slaughter, Sheila, Teresa Campbell, Margaret Holleman, and Edward Morgan. “The ‘Traffic’ in Graduate Students: Graduate Students as Tokens of Exchange between Academe and Industry.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 27, no. 2 (2002): 282–312.

STAMP, NANCY, ANNA TAN-WILSON, and ALEXSA SILVA. “Preparing Graduate Students and Undergraduates for Interdisciplinary Research.” BioScience 65, no. 4 (2015): 431–39.

Stouffer, W B, Jeffrey S Russell, and Michael G Oliva. “Making The Strange Familiar: Creativity and the Future of Engineering Education,” 2004, 13.

Tekic, Zeljko, Anja Tekic, and Vladimir Todorovic. “Modelling a Laboratory for Ideas as a New Tool for Fostering Engineering Creativity.” Procedia Engineering 100 (2015): 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.proeng.2015.01.384.

Toh, Christine A., and Scarlett R. Miller. “Choosing Creativity: The Role of Individual Risk and Ambiguity Aversion on Creative Concept Selection in Engineering Design.” Research in Engineering Design 27, no. 3 (July 2016): 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-015-0212-1.

Törnkvist, Sören. “Creativity: Can It Be Taught? The Case of Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 23, no. 1 (March 1998): 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0304379980230102.

Walker, Dionne. “Grad School? Not Right Now.” ASEE Prism 10, no. 1 (2000): 10–10.

Report abuse