Representation in Media
by Christine Joy Atun
Blog Post 1
Media representation acknowledges our existence in the world (Tomas, 2020), hence underrepresented groups or people won’t be able to see themselves in the world. For instance, there are no non-binary characters among the mainstream movies released in 2014 and if there are there any, out of a hundred storylines only 12% of representation are accurate while 54% of those characters are portrayed negatively like a sex worker or a villain (Nolan, 2015).
Such figures inform us of the existing disparity in gender representation in media influencing viewers, particularly the youth’s view of themselves and their approach to socialization as they participate in society. As Shoemaker and Reese (2014) posited, media representation entertained and taught people to think in specific ways about their lives, other people, and society. Drawing from this, it is important that everyone would have as much opportunity as others to be represented in the media positively and/or accurately. It matters because, for those trans youth that commits and/or attempt suicide every year having more and accurate representation on media will make more people talk and be aware of gender, gender identity, and related issues which by doing so would transform media and society as a commonplace for people of any gender.
https://bit.ly/3w3kC0T
https://sa.kapamilya.com/absnews/abscbnnews/media/2018/news/11/16/20181116-ang-probinsyano.jpg
https://contents.pep.ph/images2/images2/2020/06/15/ivana-eddie-1592217581.jpg
Another concerning issue in media representation is women being underrepresented with historically male characters being twice as many as females in TV programs; and women being undervalued (Shoemaker & Reese, 2014). Women are also undervalued in national television. In the Philippines for instance, in one of the longest-airing prime-time show, Ang Probinsyano the previous female lead is often clothed in a long skirt and off-shoulder top despite it being inconvenient for the character who is often running away to escape from the hoodlums chasing her until Cardo comes to her rescue. The way she was clothed adheres to the stereotype that women should dress modestly in long skirts, and be a damsel in distress while her off-shoulder top caters to the implicitly demanded sexiness which male viewers enjoyed watching. Another character is of the sexy star Ivana Alawi, who’s clothed in skimpy and provocative material with the role of a woman who’s secretly planning how to get rid of the man whom she has no choice but to sexually satisfy and please.
These aforementioned kinds of female representations show how limited the role of women into a loving, modest, and non-careered housewife who tends to the household chores and waits for her husband to return from work and cook for him. Or a role of a sexy, uneducated girl who has to leech her way on rich and powerful men to be well-off while these men have free-pass to abuse her in return.
These negative transgender people and women portrayal aren’t realistic reflections of the world but are distorted and selective representation that are highly prejudicial stereotypes and offensive (Croteau & Hoynes, 2019 p. 288). However, if internalized by the audience could lead to negative perceptions and expectations; body dissatisfaction, and negative self-concept. Furthermore, these promote gender-stereotyped roles, demoralize and restrain women's and non-binary people’s development and empowerment.
With this, I believe that we should talk about this. We should protest and demand positive, accurate, and equal representation in the media that is not only limited to particular gender or race. I also think that talking about this would inform and make it clear that we are willing to spend a couple of bucks for women, and other non-binary people–starred, featured, and even produced and directed media contents as much as we are currently spending on men’s.
References
Croteau, D. R., & Hoynes, I. WD. (2019). Media/Society: Industries, Images, and Audiences. SAGE
Shoemaker, P. & Reese, S.D. (2014). Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. Routledge
TEDx Talks. (2015, August 31). Transgender Representation in the Media | Declan Nolan | TEDxYouth@Wayland [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/B8GYjnBSZoA
TEDx Talks. (2020, February 7). Why Representation Really Matters | Aisha Thomas | TEDxBristol [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/-X-taPvKWbY
Comments/Feedback:
Hello, CJ! I find your blog post right up my alley. :) I also want to share my insights about media representations. Aside from the LGBTQIA+ community being underrepresented in media content, I can say that they are also misrepresented. Take Boys' Love romance in Thai films, for example. I was hooked (emphasis on the past tense) on this kind of Thai drama series because watching it was a no-brainer. The scenes were light; the actors and actresses were good-looking; and, the whole plot was just predictable. It was a nice escape from a stressful day. However, when I got to pay more attention to the story and how the characters (LGBTQIA+ members) were portrayed, I felt disappointed and somehow, maddened. The main and supporting characters, which were in a same-sex relationship, were portrayed as if between the same-sex couple, there had to be a feminine/submissive figure and a masculine/dominant one. The male with the feminine figure in the relationship was usually characterized by female gender stereotypes. He would perform domestic roles, and be gentle and soft. This portrayal implies that although Thai Boys' Love series show inclusivity by involving same-sex narratives, these narratives are still framed within the context of heteronormative relationships; hence perpetuating gender stereotypes.
CJ: Hi K. I agree with you. Also, one factor for trans people or LGBTQ+ misrepresentation in media is because these representations of them are usually portrayed by non-trans or by cisgender individuals/actor which Declan Nolan also mentioned in his TEDxtalk.
Who Has a Say: Media Organizations and Their Influence on Media Content
Blog Post 2
Media organization creates, modifies, and distributes content to many receivers thus, we can look at influences on content from factors such as the ownership of the organization, policies, goals, actions, rules, membership, bureaucratic structure, economic viability among others (Shoemaker and Reese, 2014). In particular, the composition of a media organization's ownership can influence the content it produces in several ways. First and foremost, a media organization's owner or owners have the power to make decisions about how the money will be spent. For example, if a media company is owned by one person who has substantial wealth and that owner also has a political agenda they would like to see promoted in the media then they can channel money toward that agenda. They can hire new staff members if need be to produce content that aligns with their agenda. They can also utilize their financial resources to expand or contract their reach or the number of people who see their content. This can include buying more advertising space or increasing distribution outlets. Ownership or having huge shares in the media organization also gives a person or group of people the ability to set policy within an organization in ways that may influence content. For example, they could set a policy that either allows or does not allow news stories to include offensive narratives that are intentionally meant to harm someone's reputation to benefit or disadvantage a particular group or individual. For instance, the media and politics are often considered separate entities, but the news media are in many ways an integral part of the political process. News reporting can shape public opinion and influence voters' decisions at the ballot box. Media coverage of a candidate or policy can directly affect how people see a candidate or issue. In most modern democracies, the news media play a vital role in shaping public opinion and influencing voters' choices at election time.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRwzDNeoXvRlaC3gCmKOuEbFArPIu8oRm4WdQ&usqp=CAU
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ3Ch6_mD5XvnZm1xyu1YtUkY_CJ0ZFHCGCiA&usqp=CAU
In the Philippines, take Sonshine Media Network International (SMNI) as an example. It is the broadcasting arm of a Philippine television evangelist, Pastor Apollo Quiboloy that is based in Davao (Sonshine Media Network International, n.d.) that hosts debates for politicians that were attended by presidential aspirant Bongbong Marcos that was publicly endorsed by Quiboloy, the network’s chairman.
Having such huge power to influence media content, media organizations/owners/administrators can gatekeep the information that the audience consumes in favor of their certain vision of things or someone they wanted to portray. In theory, gatekeeping can be described as the process by which editors or journalists decide what stories will pass through the gates into their publication (Shoemaker & Reese, 2014). In other words, it’s concerned with how media organizations process information before they present it to the public. It is also important to note that gatekeepers are not necessarily journalists but may be editors or producers who decide what will be included in the final product. They may also be the audience for information that others have gathered. As media serve as the vehicles for conveying political messages and mobilizing voters (Croteau & Hoynes, 2019) one main problem is that when we consume media, we rarely think about all of the steps it took to get from the original idea to the final product we see. Thus, we may not be aware of all the different influences that can affect the end product.
References
Croteau, D. R., & Hoynes, I. WD. (2019). Media/Society: Industries, Images, and Audiences. SAGE
Shoemaker, P. & Reese, S.D. (2014). Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. Routledge
Sonshine Media Network International. (n.d.). Sonshine Media Network International. Retrieved April 19, 2022, from https://smni.com/about
Comments/Feedback:
When Government Regulates Media: What Can Happen?
Blog Post 3
The Philippines' exposure to numerous forms of media has provided people with a vast amount of information on national and worldwide concerns. With this, national crisis and government incompetence become more exposed that governance and political issues are the most common headlines in the majority of media coverage today. Consequently, people’s political knowledge and involvement also grow. However as social media facilitates activism and social group mobilization in pursuit of their goals, so does political propaganda against them.
Propaganda as posited by Smith (2019) is a “dissemination of information—facts, arguments, rumors, half-truths, or lies—to influence public opinion.” This type of advertising is known in the political arena as political propaganda, and it is used by politicians, their parties, and/or followers to promote their line-ups and political goals, as well as to discredit critics, antis, and opposition groups. One form is the baseless red-tagging of the activists. Red-tagging is the malicious "act of labeling, branding, naming, and accusing individuals and/or organizations of being left-leaning, subversives, communists, or terrorists (used as) a strategy...by State agents, particularly law enforcement agencies and the military, against those perceived to be 'threats' or' enemies of the State" (Supreme court, 2010 as cited by Gavilan, 2020).
One of the many problematic injustices of this propaganda is the Philippine National Police's "Bloody Sunday" operation on March 7, 2021, in which nine activists were killed and six were captured, whom the PNP claimed in the news to be members of the New People's Army posing as protestors (Cahiles, 2021). Simply put, such statements to the media could make the incident appear as something that was done against the enemies of the state and for the sake of the country. Thus manipulating the media and the public’s perception of the injustice to be something acceptable. In essence, this inhumane propaganda accusing activists of being communists aims to distort the public’s judgment or contaminate the perception of these individuals and their causes and justify what was done to them. Especially because political experiences are not always gained through direct interactions with government officials but through encounters with political content and imagery mediated and constructed by the media (Cushion, 2019).
This scenario is likely to happen when the government continues to determine what could be published by the media which is usually filtered of negative reports against the government and inflicts negative repercussions on offenders. Croteau and Hoynes (2019) presented the role of government in regulating media including censorship and surveillance. Moreover, at some point, media organizations, especially those owned or acquainted with government leaders served as propaganda arms of the state.
In the country, television broadcasts are regulated by the Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB) which was placed under the office of the president. The board has the authority to approve or disapprove the contents of television programs and publicity materials (Code of Ethics for Media, n.d). Nevertheless, the process of promoting a political agenda through the media is more complicated than merely feeding individuals ideas and visuals to passively accept (Croteau & Hoynes, 2019). This may include propagating a specific point of view on issues, legitimizing institutions, promoting a cause or behaviors, prohibiting specific ideas, or swaying public opinion in one direction.
References
Cahiles, G. 2021. PNP claims “Bloody Sunday” victims were NPA members; activist groups reject tag. Cnn. https://www.cnnphilippines.com/news/2021/3/11/PNP-claims-Bloody-Sunday-victims-NPA-members-.html
Code of Ethics For Media. (n.d.). https://pcoo.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/buk1_code_of_ethics_for_media.pdf
Croteau, D. R., & Hoynes, I. WD. (2019). Media/Society: Industries, Images, and Audiences. SAGE
Cushion, S. (2019). The Political Impact of Media. In Curran, J and Hesmondhalgh, D. (eds). Media and Society. 6 th edition. Bloomsbury Academic.
Gavilan, J. 2020. Lives in danger as red-tagging campaign intensifies. Rappler. https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/in-depth/lives-in-danger-duterte-government-red-tagging-campaign
Smith, B. L. (2019). propaganda | Definition, History, Techniques, Examples, & Facts. In Encyclopædia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/propaganda
Comments/Feedback:
Hi, CJ! Indeed, propaganda is a powerful tool in forwarding one's initiatives. It can alter social realities and narratives which can propagate social injustices and threaten the country's democracy. Of course, the government has the authority in regulating media content which most often, is biased to their interests. Therefore, i think it is imperative that while we educate our fellow Filipinos to be critical and responsible media users, it is equally important that we reform institutions to practice accountability and transparency.
Hi, Ceej! This is Khent. I think discussions on political propaganda could not be more timely and relevant than today. Be that media organizations do not have the entire agency to produce media content, politicians and other powerful entities may exert much influence and control over our media landscape. This consequently gives them the power to deliberately manipulate those who are more susceptible to their political tactics. Manipulation happens, for instance, when individuals are being exposed to one-sided narratives --- narratives that are more often than not designed to favor one party over the other. I have discussed this in one of my case studies. It was the case of People's Television Network. It's quite interesting to not that we share the same insights about government, media, and political propaganda. Great work!