Theme: Seeds of Change: Urban Gardening Program for Food Security
Duration: 1 day
Location: Batong Malake Barangay Hall
The intended audience for this urban gardening education program is “less-privileged”, low-income individuals and households who want to start their own urban gardens for the purpose of subsistence amid growing food insecurity but do not have the financial means or materials to do so. The target learners stated that they have some degrees of familiarity with various topics and skills related to urban gardening, including crop selection, compositing, and organic gardening practices, but have significant levels of interests in such topics. Most of the participants in the pre-survey stated that they have gardening experience and said that they wanted to start their own urban garden, most of which want to do so on small plots of land. Most of the participants learn less than PHP10,000 every month and have an average age of 50.39 years.
The target learners of this urban gardening course are expected to have basic knowledge in gardening. They shall also have a grasp in certain branches of earth sciences, including geology and meteorology, as topography and climate may have effects on the appropriateness of certain species of plants in the environment. In addition, they are also expected to have knowledge in basic plant biology, including the taxonomy of plants, plant metamorphosis (life cycle), photosynthesis, and plant reproduction. The students shall have some interest in urban farming and topics and skills related to it, and are also expected to have at least a “small” space (a land area of 10 square meters or less) for urban gardening, as well as willing to dedicate a portion of their time and their resources into urban gardening.
The ADDIE Model is one of the most popular instructional design models, consisting of five stages: analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation (University of Washington - Bothell, 2023). In the first stage of this model, Analysis, the instructional problem is clarified; the instructional goals and objectives are devised, and the learners’ needs, as well as their learning environment, are identified. The Design phase, a systematic approach, informs how the learning content and activities are organized and presented. The Development phase entails the creation of instructional materials and activities, including lesson plans and assessments, as well as the selection of appropriate instructional media for the learning context. The fourth stage, Implementation, involves the training of the facilitators on delivery methods, organization of learning content, and the creation of assessments. Finally, the Evaluation stage is a reflection of the instructional design process as a whole, determining the success of the program in following set objectives and the acquisition of students’ expected learning outcomes.
Informed by various pedagogical theories developed by educational psychologists including Dewey, Piaget, and Vygotsky, the constructivist theory assumes that learners participate actively in the learning process and that they build new knowledge from their experiences on top of their prior knowledge, mending these new ideas into their experiences (Kurt, 2021). It also assumes that learning is a social process as collaboration and interaction with others is vital in constructing knowledge. Additionally, learning is an active process that requires students to actively participate in discussions and activities in order to construct knowledge (Kurt, 2021). Constructivist learning theories also underscore the importance of motivation in improving how learners learn as they reflect on their prior experiences and knowledge.
Four key ideas determine the success of a constructivist approach in a learning environment, wrote Kurt (2021). Firstly, the instructor acts as a “facilitator” rather than merely a “director”, and that both the instructor and the learners share authority and responsibility. Learning takes place in small groups, and lastly, the instructor and the learners exchange ideas. In this case, the enrolled students in the upcoming urban gardening education program may share “best practices” in gardening in a similar way the facilitators teach these students novel techniques in farming, such as hydroponics and vertical gardening.
Devised by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe, Understanding by Design (UbD) is a learner-centered pedagogical approach that seeks to enhance the students’ learning experience through “backwards design” (Bowen, 2017). Whereas “forward design”, which is a feature in most instructional design models, considers the development of learning content and activities and then attempts to connect them to the set learning objectives, “backwards design” considers the learning goals, objectives, and the desired learning outcomes first.
According to Wiggins and McTighe (2005), the three stages of “backwards design” are as follows: (1) identify the desired learning outcomes by considering the learning goals, examine existing curricular standards, and review what is expected in the curriculum; (2) determine whether or not the target learners have achieved the expected learning outcomes through “performance tasks” and other assessments; and (3) plan learning experiences and instruction through transfer of learning, meaning-making, and association. “Backwards design”, Wiggins and McTighe (2005) wrote, helps prevent the “twin sins” of instructional design – “activity-focused” and “coverage-focused” teaching, both of which do not provide sufficient answers to key questions of effective learning,
However, it must be recognized that the specifics of instructional planning, including teaching methods and the structure of learning content, may only be accomplished once the required learning goals are established. (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005).
In search of a context expert, I communicated with officials from the barangay for referral to the Municipal Agriculturist in Los Baños, Laguna. Additionally, I also partnered with local organizations related to agriculture, particularly the Institute of Crop Sciences (iCrops) which was under the University of the Philippines Los Baños College of Agriculture and Food Sciences (UPLB-CAFS), as suggested by my external adviser.
On June 24, 2024, I went to the Municipal Agricultural Office, hoping to collaborate with an official from the Department of Agriculture (DA) for my project. I sent a cover letter to the Municipal Agriculturist stating my intention to meet with them because I wish to collaborate with the office if they have any projects with a similar premise to mine in the community; another intent for the meeting was the search for a content expert. They provided input to my project, enriching what I have already developed with the office's - and the aforementioned agencies' - expertise in agriculture.
The Municipal Agriculturist was not present that day, so I was advised to send the letter directly to the Mayor's office. While the approval of collaborating with the MAO was pending, and I was also advised to check any messages or calls from MAO within the weeks that follow. I was expected to implement this program on late July or in the first two weeks of August.