photo above derived from copyright-free material on pexels.com
photo above derived from copyright-free material on pexels.com
Note: It is presumed that you have read through the HOME page prior to reading content on this page. Thank you.
List of Contents on this Page:
1. Conversation with SME/External Adviser- internship onset
2. Observations of Zoom-recorded and synchronous, real-time MuEd 105 classes
3. Overall commentary on class observations
4. Creation of an e-learning vocal jazz workshop prototype using iSpring Suite technology
5. Validation of analyses
6. Conversation with SME on e-workshop evaluation
7. Proposal for an actual 3-day vocal jazz workshop based on prior e-learning workshop
INITIAL CONVERSATION WITH THE SME DURING INTERNSHIP APPLICATION INTERVIEW
PRIOR TO JOINING MUED 105 SYNCHRONOUS CLASS SESSIONS
October 21, 2022 (Interview for internship application)
Meeting with Asst. Prof. Maria Sherla Najera- my would-be gatekeeper/subject matter expert. Prior to this meeting, I had already communicated with the Dean of the College of Music, Dr. Laverne de la Peña . I had presented to him my intent to work as an instructional design intern at the UP College of Music, showing him links to my portfolio of instructional design-oriented coursework at UP Open, as well as my profile as a jazz singer/artist. The Dean referred me to the Music Education Chair, Asst Prof Maria Sherla Najera. Hence, the October 21, 2022 interview which was conducted on Zoom.
In the interview, Ma'am Sherla (as I would eventually casually call her) was interested in my profile as a jazz artist/singer. She also noted how rich and varied my instructional design portfolio was. She then helped me take a quick survey of as many possible courses under her music education department as applicable to my internship. She agreed to me joining MuED 105 (Pedagogy of Voice) which she herself taught. Also, Ma'am Sherla opined that she could be open to any jazz-oriented project applicable to my internship in her MuEd 105 class.
As a jazz vocalist with basic vocal training in Classical music/Opera, I would be able to relate to the course content/subject matter. It was however noted that MuEd 105 students are highly busy senior students, dealing with other important major courses while preparing for an upcoming music education practicum (MuEd 110) in the following term. The gatekeeper at the onset set expectations towards difficulty getting MuEd 105 students to participate in internship-related activities I might organize for them. The gatekeeper/SME herself Prof. Najera was also highly preoccupied handling MuEd 105, while chairing the Music Education Department, and overseeing the UP-CWTS Open School of Music. As early as this October 2021 meeting with the gatekeeper, I had to think of ways on how I could positively motivate the MuEd 105 students as well as my gatekeeper to participate in internship-oriented activities I might have to organize.
One very important thing pointed out to me by Ma'am Sherla earlier on was that most of her teaching style veered towards experiential learning.
October 25, 2022 Zoom-recorded class observation
Observation of a recorded synchronous class from October 25th.
The class did a vocal relaxation activity as modeled by the teacher for the first 10-15 mins of class. Cameras were not turned on on the students' end. After a relaxation activity, the students had another getting-to-know-each-other session (two truths and a lie game) especially among the newcomers catching up on class activities. The teacher went through the course guide. The teacher highlighted important concepts to be learned in the MuEd 105 course especially in relation to vocal phonation, resonance, power of words (articulation and expressivity) as well as the historical development and philosophies of voice pedagogy. In this session, the teacher also emphasized an important Classical (European) pedagogical principle in voice production- which is doing away with the "breathy" sound of the singer. This breathiness issue may run counter to vocal jazz pedagogical principles which encourages the voice to be free and be as natural as possible in terms of quality and texture.
An important concept discussed in class by the teacher was about a voice teacher's duty to adjust to the student's profile and singing abilities:
-copy the tone of the student; do not insist on the pitch that you want the student to hit;
-relate to the student, then help the student reach the the pitch that you want; and
-as teachers we adjust to where the students are.
In this observation, I took down personal notes of the session as an instructional design intern: the importance of the zone of proximal development principle, schematic, scaffolded voice teaching (Juachon-Panlilio, 2020), Robert Gagne's 9 levels of instruction (Ullah et al., 2015), as well as consideration of a student's unique learning style.
First Synchronous Class Observation- Focus on Interaction (See Appendix 3.3)
Evidence/full report at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eESHmeGTKfVQogGgKplcYXYXEeK3ZHXwoEcdNzwO64Y/edit?usp=sharing
The teacher acted as a sage on a stage and was indeed without question an excellent, knowledgeable, highly credible lecturer. The topic was about the vocal mechanism (vocal cords vis-a-vis phonation and resonance). The class did well at learner-learner, learner-content interactions. An area for improvement was towards teacher-learner interaction. The teacher was able to model desired singing behavior to the class, and also provided helpful multimedia to reinforce important concepts. The teacher may have had to bank on Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development principle (Juachon-Panlilio, 2020), by perhaps grouping students according to knowledge of the subject matter in a way that some students can provide tips, suggestions or relevant ideas to others. The teacher could have asked the students to pose problematic experiences in vocal production and resonation on which students can contribute insights regarding best practices as validated by the teacher. This would have made for a more contribution-based type of class interaction. Therefore, based on a social-constructivist learning paradigm (Juachon-Panlilio, 2020), I gave the teacher a satisfactory rating of 3.32/5 (based on MacGregor rubrics). Feedback was emailed to the teacher (my SME/gatekeeper), who was thankful for the helpful and graphic observations. (Observation graph shown below.)
Second Synchronous class observation using Salmon's e-tivities (See Appendix 3.4)
Evidence/full report at:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15urxWRPmsFLpMhpORzZfWwPpvR76BVC_USO9FfuMxRY/edit?usp=sharing
This time I observed the class in reference to Salmon's e-tivities (Anderson, 2008) mainly in terms of information exchange and knowledge construction. As well, I had to include the previous observation's area for improvement: teacher-learner interaction.
The topic for today mainly rested on the the sequencing of essential voice pedagogy aspects: Resonation, Relaxation Phonation, Posture, Breathing, Articulation, Expressive tools, and Range Extension. I was very, very impressed with the class today. As far as Salmon's e-tivities are concerned, I could say that knowledge construction with the learners was perfect and highly commendable. Everyone was participating.
An area for improvement on my end could have been a post-class 15-minute talk or a 5-question written survey with the students to interview on learning styles.
In this synchronous class, I saw how transactional presence was manifested through a more dynamic teacher-learner interaction on a Zoom-based class. Therefore, based on a social-constructivist learning paradigm, I gave the teacher a very satisfactory rating of 5/5 (based on MacGregor rubrics). Feedback was emailed to the teacher (my SME/gatekeeper), who was thankful for the helpful and graphic analyses. (Observation graph shown below.)
Third Synchronous MuED 105 Teaching Demo Role-Plays (See Appendix 3.5)
Evidence/ Full Report:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bri6K9Bh8Qm67Q6qGlA1XCHhZ1uhcCLY06sZAL1sO_I/edit?usp=sharing
I noted on one of the teaching practice demonstrations where Student is adolescent: by adjusting to the student's initial range/tonal register, the teacher exhibited use of scaffolding techniques (Vygotsky) (Juachon-Panlilio, 2020). Considering the student's developing voice as an adolescent, the teacher seemed aware of Piaget's adaptation/assimilation/ accommodation principles. Nevertheless, the teacher also needs to be aware of the socio-cultural aspects of voice and gender. The teacher must be a more knowledgeable other in the student's zone of proximal development (Vygotksy). The teacher taught in a friendly way. The teacher successfully acted as an expert/ more knowledgeable other (Vygtosky), as well as a good role model. The teacher attempted to socialize with the students by incorporating the student's favorite game into the lesson as relates to the subject matter at hand.
In this session, I focused my observation on the teaching role-plays of the would-be singing pedagogues. The teaching role-players lacked active experimentation in their demonstrations. At this point, I opined that it may be beneficial for MuEd 105 students to experience active experimentation in class activities so that they themselves could embody and carry on this particular teaching principle not only as singers but also as music teachers.
Overall commentary on the synchronous class observations/immersions
Synchronous class observations resulted in recollection of prior learnings in Introduction to Online Education and Foundations of Education- COI (Community of Inquiry), interactionist learning, dialogic learning, contribution-based pedagogy, transactional distance management, the Laurillard Conversational Framework, connectivism and the like (Anderson, 2008). Learning psychology-wise, I realized how important classical conditioning (behaviorism), as well as social-cognitivism (Erikson), and experiential learning principles are as a whole to creating a dynamic, interactive learning environment (Juachon-Panlilio, 2020). For the most part, the approach to the teaching of MuEd 105 was didactic in nature (teacher-led) in which the instructor discussed concepts, modeled the desired behavior, and acted as a credible resource person. Multimedia resources for Classically-informed vocal production were made available through YouTube links. Quizzes which mostly incited recall of important concepts were taken by students at certain intervals throughout the term. As far as I could observe, students were neither made to craft such creative projects as collaborative vlogs or blogs, nor interact with online communities of vocal pedagogues and students from other universities.
When it comes to content, my synchronous class immersions/observations confirmed my initial observation that vocal jazz was not covered in the lessons or discussions especially in regard to phonation, articulation, resonation and vocal expression which are the bedrock of voice pedagogy as a subject matter. Techniques covered, such as proper formation, enunciation of vowels, articulation of consonants, breathing, phonation, overall articulation, resonation, expressive tools and overall dome-shaped tonality were all European in form.
"According to James Stark, 'Bel canto [or European/Italian Classical singing] is a concept that takes into account two separate but related matters. First, it is a highly refined method of using the singing voice in which the glottal source, the vocal tract, and the respiratory system interact in such a way as to create the qualities of chiaroscuro, appoggio, register equalization, malleability of pitch and intensity, and a pleasing vibrato. The idiomatic use of this voice includes various forms of vocal onset, legato, portamento, glottal articulation, crescendo, decrescendo, messa di voce, mezza voce, floridity and trills, and tempo rubato [in an] expressive way'"(Canedo, 2019).
Vocalization exercises were also crafted in the standard European, bel canto fashion. There was no mention of any blues-inflected vowel or consonant vocalization technique, which is basic to vocal jazz, although there was discussion of mainstream singing being mostly grounded in a belted, chesty approach.
While my class immersions convinced me that the MuEd 105 teacher was an excellent lecturer of bel canto singing technique, I figured that an area for opportunity in the class would be the lack of content related to such non European styles as jazz, which is a socio-culturally and economically important and unique musical genre studied by music majors in universities abroad, and performed by artists working in luxurious, high-end venues (Fisher, 1981; Whiteoak, 2022; Burland, 2012; Tonelli, 2015; Kleinschmidt, 2011).
Moreover, another challenge to an online MuEd 105 class which used to be taught in-person was transactional distance management even during synchronous online sessions. While the teacher often utilized the use of expressive emojis on Zoom to check up on the students' moods as well as the chat box to have students type in answers to questions, comments, or feedback to the ongoing discussion, I noticed that most students' cameras were turned off probably to save up on bandwidth.
I emphasize an observation that there was not any vocal jazz-oriented, or -related content in the MuEd 105 discussions. The teaching style of the instructor also appeared to be significantly didactic in nature (focused on transfer of knowledge/sage-on-a-stage approach).
In a search on the UP College of Music library resources, there is not any record of a vocal jazz workshop or any vocal jazz-related academic activity conducted by MuEd 105 students so far; although there are performances of certain jazz standards included in voice majors' recital work, presumably delivered in Classical, bel canto fashion (Tuklas.up.edu.ph, 2023). Overall, there is neither a vocal jazz syllabus, course, nor an elective available to voice majors at the College of Music, referencing the curriculum checklist available at https://music.upd.edu.ph/Undergraduate_Programs.html
Content-wise, I was beginning to get convinced on a jazz-oriented pursuit at this point. At the same time, I had to take into account the challenge of helping MuEd 105 become a more interactive class.
It is important to note that a lecturer can be creative in engaging a class especially a virtual, online class. A game, debate or any other type of collaborative activity can be organized.
In order for me to validate my interaction- and content-oriented observations, I decided to create a prototype of a vocal jazz workshop that would introduce Classically trained voice students to the art of Jazz singing in a way that is not too far off from the MuEd 105 syllabus. This workshop prototype would materialize through my free trial of an iSpring Suite account which would allow me to create a self-paced yet highly interactive digital e-workshop with "unskippable" slides.
Accessible on tablets, laptops and mobile phones, this digital e-workshop would be designed with transactional presence in mind. Students are provided material that will talk about vocal jazz as much schematically related to their bel canto orientation as possible. Slides cannot be skipped unless an interaction on some prior slides is completed by the student. Formative and summative assessments are also built into the e-workshop. Following the e-workshop, a survey is going to be conducted to validate the students' readiness for vocal jazz-oriented learning content, as well as reaction to dynamic, interactive instructional strategies. The survey will be partly based on System Usability Scale principles (Azzano, 2023), Moore's interactionist theory (learner-learner, learner-content, learner-teacher) interactions (Park, 2011), as well as Anderson's teacher, cognitive, social presences (Arinto & Garcia, 2009; Anderson, 2011).
CREATION OF AN E-LEARNING TYPE OF WORKSHOP PROTOTYPE (using iSpring Suite)
General Inspiration
The idea of a self-paced vocal jazz e-workshop using iSpring Suite stemmed from my observations of MuEd 105 especially as regards the lack of jazz-oriented or -related material in the syllabi, as well as my intent to address transactional distance issues in class. iSpring Suite (especially iSpring version 8) provides a highly interactive digital learning environment being a "presentation flash-based [type of] software. iSpring is a flash-based program which is integrated with the presentation program of [Microsoft] PowerPoint. It presents the learning materials in the form of a flash slide that contains pictures, animation, video, or audio. Basically, it can be used as the alternative learning media for the teacher to deliver the learning materials in an interesting way. It is also more practical and optimal since it also can engage the students more in the lesson" (Nurwijayanti et al, 2018). One important feature to iSpring Suite is its "unskippable" slides on which a learner has to finish the interaction required and cannot just simply move thoughtlessly through the presentation.
In a nutshell, I also wanted to test how MuEd 105 students would react to a self-paced, interactive type of workshop where teacher-learner, content-learner and learner-learner interactions are potentially underpinning the learning environment. This e-workshop would also be followed by a survey to determine students' learning styles as well as interest in jazz music.
Pedagogical Basis
Content to this e-workshop was made to be schematically related to Classical vocal technique. The most important video resource employed was in fact a YouTube video differentiating, comparing between Classical voice and Jazz voice. Performers in the workshop were also renowned Classical/Opera singers performing Jazz pieces--- this was to strike perceived similarity between Classically trained students and the Jazz-singing Opera singers. Transactional presence fostered through interactive slides and intermittent quizzes in which the student could not move past a slide without completing the required interaction on it. Positive reinforcement was provided by congratulatory remarks and points earned once a quiz is correctly answered. The e-workshop was meant to be to an extent didactic but also interactive and learner-centered.
This e-workshop was also gamified--- points were earned from interactions throughout the digital workshop; and participants had to submit a recording of their jazz singing. The jazziest recording would merit a prize--- which is a chance to sing on TV with the post-workshop survey answered--- meaning, no jazz recording, no survey response: no prize.
Creation of an e-workshop learner manual (see Appendix 3.6): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Sl2uUfg9Vu8G3nE3eoDW4mn1QMNDxHOE/view?usp=drive_link
The above manual was created as some sort of a pedagogical wrapper to the e-workshop.
Instructional Material Design Vis-a-vis Pedagogical Considerations
Something-for-everyone workshop design (All possible types of learners): Diverger (creative, generates alternatives), Assimilator (defines problems, creates theoretical models), Converger (practical applications, makes decisions), and Accommodator (takes risks, gets things done) (Brooks-Harris & Stock-Ward, 999).
Use of multimedia (audio visual, performance samples, voice-overs mimicking a teacher's voice) (Mayer, 2014)
Dual-coding theory (Barber et al., 2007). More simply, multimedia in education can primarily be grounded in dual coding theory, which posits that information can be presented either verbally or visually. On a more elaborate basis, Robert Dale gives us a Cone of Experience theory which claims that “people generally remember: 10% of what they read, 20% of what they hear, 30% of what they see, 50% of what they see and hear, 70% of what they see and write, and 90% of what they do” (Barber et al., 2007). Educational multimedia to me appears to be rooted in dual coding theory and multimodal learning. There are as much different ways to teach as there are different ways to learn. Learning theory over the last few decades has favored a more constructivist, more immersive, more experiential, and more learner-centered approach to pedagogy. Multimedia can aid in making teaching less didactic, less boring, and less teacher-centered.
Objectives, Instructional Activities and Assessment (Bloom's Taxonomy, Didactic Class Discussion/s- schematic revisit of previous related MuEd 105 concepts, Video Watching- Expert vocal jazz demonstration of an expert; comparison of parallels/differences between vocal jazz and classical styles, and Authentic Assessment)
Two major objectives to the e-workshop were for the student participant to:
1) Highlight applications of bel canto technique into jazz singing in terms of
vowel formation, mouth opening, resonation, shifting of registers,
rhythmic flexibibility, as well as expressive and dynamic tools
(ANALYSIS)
2) Demonstrate the differences of bel canto and jazz vocal technique and
dynamics by singing a portion of the Classical-Jazz crossover song
Summertime (Gershwin) in both bel canto and jazz styles
(APPLICATION)
Objectives were crafted in reference to Bloom's taxonomy (Morphew, 2005).
For the assessment, the student was made to sing the jazz standard In a Sentimental Mood (which was a song modelled in the workshop by renowned Opera singers). Two participating students namely Lis and Ben emailed their jazz takes on In a Sentimental Mood, demonstrating Classical technique while freely bending notes at some point and throwing in some melodic deviation.
Evidence of learning: Emails of song recordings submitted by students organized via vocaroo.com (See Appendix 3.7).
Below is a snippet of an actual slide in the e-workshop:
Below is a link to the full navigation of the e-workshop as recorded on Zoom
E-learning workshop evidence ( A recording of an actual taking of the above e-learning workshop created via i-Spring Suite):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VA5b19bQInmpoOi9ERPgLMDiZQnNnyfj/view?usp=sharing
Note: I had to record the navigation because I was subscribed to a trial version of iSpring Suite, meaning I only had approximately 15 days to get the content accessible to anyone.
VALIDATION OF ANALYSIS PART (See Appendix 3.9)
The post e-workshop survey utilized a Likert Scale model of attitudinal measurement (Strongly Disagree- Strong Agree, numerically represented as 1-5 once translated as Excel-organized data) (Leonor, 2022).
Survey data available at https://docs.google.com/forms/d/16I14RkbRUsjW3IUiU1AQgJFODLn1-Ba1Jv4Hri6hzK8/edit#responses.
Not requiring respondent email or responder personal information input, the said survey was expected to provide insights into MuEd 105 students' profile as to learning styles and strategies, as well as to reaction to and interest in the vocal jazz subject matter as relates to MuEd 105 voice pedagogy/voice production content. Likewise, given that the students actually engaged in actual e-learning material, some survey questions were to an extent patterned after SUS (System Usability Scale) questions to gauge how usable, navigable the workshop would be to participants.
The survey questions were crafted using the BRUSO model (Paul et al., n.d.). An acronym, BRUSO stands for “brief,” “relevant,” “unambiguous,” “specific,” and “objective” (Paul et al., n.d.). At this point, I had to craft a survey of not more than ten questions given the busy schedule of the MuEd 105 students.
A. Learning Styles (Kovačić, 2006; Hydrie et al., 2021; Tsai, 2011; Brooks-Harris & Stock-Ward)
Learning styles considered in the survey covered the following:
Learning Strategy--- Diverger (creative, generates alternatives); Assimilator (defines problems, creates theoretical models), Converger (practical applications, makes decisions); and Accommodator (takes risks, gets things done)
Visual learners- prefers videos or graphic printed material
Auditory learners- prefers audiotaped material or a teacher orally discussing concepts
Kinesthetic learners- prefers to actively and physically immerse in the subject
Important Findings from the Survey
100% of the respondents agreed that a gamified and output-based/ practical type of learning is likeable. 50% strongly agreed seeing things (notes) in color, as well as to sketches, photographs, flowcharts, say when it comes to being able to phonate better as a singer. 100% agreed to watching videos and dynamic examples in workshops. 100% agreed to an activity-oriented type of workshop.
An average of 4.1 (representing "Agreement") to visual, graphic learning was established from the survey.
B. SUS (System Usability Scale)
100% of the respondents agreed (a score of 4) to the workshop's use of videos and other graphic, dynamic examples/interactions mainly composed of YouTube videos and animated characters and voice-overs and scored quizzes crafted through i-Spring Suite technology. The same score of 4 from respondents applied to the workshop's activities (quizzes and interactions) engaging the participant.
C. Reaction to/interest in vocal jazz content
100% of respondents gave a strongly agree (5) score for "I am interested in music from different cultural traditions", as well as to "I believe that there is no such thing as high culture or low culture. Every art form is art. Every type of music is music. As a voice pedagogue, I have to know a lot about anthropology and ethnomusicology". Respondents also agree that vocal jazz has to be part of standard collegiate music education in the Philippines like it is in the US, Europe, Canada, and Australia. Awareness of UNESCO's proclamation and establishment of International Jazz Day also merited a score of 4 (agree).
Conversation with SME/Gatekeeper/MuEd 105 teacher after survey results came out:
Ma'am Sherla had to emphasize the busy schedules of MuEd 105 students. I was already lucky to have two students providing both vocal jazz recordings and survey response. Furthermore, the workshop is meant to be some kind of a competitive game--- in this case, only two would potentially get the prize to sing on TV.
After this, I officially emailed the two students who sent in their jazz recordings and survey responses that they were invited to sing on TV--- RJTV (courtesy of my personal connections in the network). They could not take on the chance due to busy schedules as per the SME.
Further discussions with Ma'am Sherla of the survey covered answers to e-learning workshop and also centered on general information on MuEd 105 students' profiles.
DEMOGRAPHIC
age ranges- generally senior students (Bachelor of Music major in Voice), generally 20-25 years of age
co-educational
COGNITIVE AND PRIOR KNOWLEDGE CHARACTERISTICS
musical skills- trained in Opera/ bel canto repertoire, can read music, can sight-read, can sight read
learning styles (while part of MuEd 105)--- as per SME, she taught class in an experiential way
tech savvy/ familiar with online computer systems, apps etc.- class has been on Zoom
AFFECTIVE SOCIAL
interest in jazz content- shown from the survey
attitudes towards jazz- shown from the survey
I underscore the fact that only two (2) students out of nine (9) took the self-paced e-workshop and emailed in their assignments/outputs expected from the e-learning workshop participants. The same two students answered the post-workshop survey.
The SME and instructional designer concluded that given the very busy schedules of MuEd 105 students (some are taking online courses, while others are on-campus and also preparing for an upcoming music education practicum) if they are involved in any further assignment related to a jazz workshop, most likely only two could provide concrete assessment outputs. Hence, the possibility of only two concrete outputs and potentially 2 survey responses if another workshop were to be iterated following the iSpring Suite based e-workshop. The two out of nine students who took the self-paced e-workshop and answered the survey concretized my previous reading of a study that delved into attention provided by music majors into their curriculum in which a
"hypothetical student class would have spent similar percentages of their time engaged in art music of the Twentieth Century (25.14%), Romantic (22.71%) and Classical (21.56%) periods (2 .29, d.f. 2, p .05). Subjects spent 14.54 percent of their time on Baroque music, followed by 6.12 percent on Jazz/Broadway music. The category ‘Other’ – which anecdotally consisted mainly of études, exercises, arrangements, and recomposed pieces in traditional western art music styles – ranked sixth (4.98%). Renaissance and Medieval styles came next (1.95% each), followed by American Popular (.54%), Latin/Caribbean (.28%), African (.17%), Asian (.05%) and Native American (.00%) styles" (Wang & Humphreys, 2009).
In other words, generally speaking especially in the American setting, most music majors would be interested in or would have to attend to Western, European music- only a very small percentage of music major populations would tackle jazz. This scenario would also be the case given that there is not even a vocal jazz course in the Bachelor of Music curriculum at UP.
While still forming a minority in the music education sphere, I have to quote that "Over recent years, jazz as an academic discipline has grown in volume and stature—indeed, jazz studies now play a significant role in a number of higher education music programmes within the university and conservatoire sector. The proliferation of jazz education programmes has, inevitably, brought about the publication and development of specific pedagogical methodologies; from the development of the Associated Board of the Royal Schools of Music (ABRSM) jazz examinations to the widespread dissemination of Jamey Aebersold jazz ‘playalongs’ (a business that has now transformed itself into Jamey Aebersold summer schools and a university programme), jazz pedagogy is big business" (Whyton, 2007).
On top of the fact that students who may be interested in jazz can be considered a minority specifically in the Philippines and more specifically among MuEd 105 students at the UP College of Music, another seeming obstacle I had to grapple with at this point regarding my jazz-informed internship was the fact that MuEd 105 students are highly preoccupied senior students.
I consulted this matter regarding the busy schedules of MuEd 105 students with my Capstone adviser Sir Ley. His comment was that, should I decide to design a workshop comprised of a 3-day schedule, a it would be advisable for me to pilot the first day of the workshop with actual MuEd 105 students, given that the students are quite preoccupied. Every day of the workshop must not be longer than an hour if possible. What happens to the Day 1 iteration influences design of Days 2 and 3 (Ley Gripal, personal communication, November 2022).
With the two student responses to the post e-worskhop survey and two vocal jazz recordings out of a population of nine MuEd students as of February 2023, I would moving forward have to design with a something-for-everyone blueprint (considering all types of learners) for any following workshop with MuEd 105, of course banking on the the survey inputs thus far. Furthermore, based on the two survey responses (given a sample size of 2 and a population size of 2), I could confidently say with a 95% level of confidence that two students of the MuEd 105 class of 2023 showed openness to and immense interest in learning vocal jazz music further, as well as equal treatment and regard towards all types of art and musical forms. Based on the responses, multimedia (audio-visual) material coupled with active experimentation and gamification techniques were favorable elements to the workshop curriculum.
Proposal for Vocal Jazz Workshop Based on Prior E-Learning Workshop (See Appendix 3.10)
(Proposal presented March 09th, 2023 to SME/Gatekeeper Ma'am Sherla)
Evidence: Proposed Day 1 content in PowerPoint:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/18NidDGlGxVMK8WNupQ2xXCqUcHjdm6mI/view?usp=sharing / https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1X290jba4gD2MMt8OgGdxRrfVTMTaaGLu/edit?usp=share_link&ouid=117893716258164377805&rtpof=true&sd=true
General Inspiration
Based on a MuEd 105 immersion, the designer of this workshop believes that Classically trained/ bel
canto singers and voice teachers can broaden their artistic acumen and enhance future employability as singers and teachers by exploring jazz music which primarily combines Classical/European and African musical traditions. From a digital introduction to vocal jazz workshop prototype recently field-tested among MuED 105 students by this proposal’s author, it can be noted that MuED 105 students trained in the bel canto technique are open to learning a non-Classical genre of music, showing interest in multiculturalism, ethnomusicology and anthropology. The said students also displayed considerable competence in applying Classical technique into a jazz standard as part of the digital workshop’sassessment.
UNESCO itself has a very high regard for jazz music as a music of peace, intercultural dialogue, freedom and creativity, declaring April 30th of each year as International Jazz Day. Jazz originated in a
multicultural America as a reaction to racial discrimination and social inequalities. Since the 1920s jazz
music has evolved into more global, more multicultural formats melding with Brazilian, Latin American,
European, Asian, Indian, and even Filipino musical traditions (Unesco.Org, n.d.).
Classical singers can further enhance their creativity through jazz. A recent German study showed that
Jazz musicians showed higher ideational creativity than Folk musicians (p = .01, and p = .01) and Classical musicians (p = .09, and p = .02), thereby revealing that Jazz musicians show higher divergent thinking ability, and a higher number of creative activities and achievements in the musical domain as compared to musicians from other genres such as Classical music or Folk music. These findings support the view that the music genre of Jazz is highly associated with creativity, both in terms of musical activities and psychometric aspects of musicians (Benedek et al., 2013).
Over the last four decades especially in the US and Canada, jazz education has been considerably
established in high schools and colleges (Fisher, 1981; Kuzmich, 1989) (Carter, 1986; McDaniel, 1993;
Murphy, 1994) (Thomas, 2022; English, 2004; Brenan, 2005).
In America, "By 1979 it was estimated that there were more than 500,000 students in jazz-related
ensembles across the country, and over 70 percent of the 30,000 middle and high schools had at least
one jazz ensemble (Berry, 1979). The steady increase of jazz bands has continued at the
middle level, in high schools, and at the college level all across the country. The growth of vocal jazz
ensembles has not been as steady or as widespread" (Monkelien, 2001).
As do Europe and Australia, Canada does have plenty of post-secondary institutions offering
undergraduate as well as graduate jazz programs (Kearns, 2011).
In the Philippines, only the University of Santo Tomas offers a jazz studies program. This 3-day vocal jazz workshop is envisioned not only to expand students’ training in voice pedagogy, but also to help inspire the UP College of Music to consider offering a vocal or instrumental jazz program.
Pedagogical Basis
Based on the field-testing of the e-workshop prototype, pedagogy would rest on mostly gamified, teacher-led learning which utilizes multimedia (audio-visual material), as well interactive discussions. Evaluation of learning would center on applicatory and creative skills, requiring workshop participants to produce vocal music artefacts as relates to the subject matter. The workshop would be generally designed considering visual, auditory and kinesthetic learners, striking a balanced learning environment for divergers, assimilators, convergers and accommodators.
Instructional Material Design vis-a-vis pedagogical considerations
At this point, the very first version of the proposed workshop envisioned a gamified 3-day curriculum where Day 1 is teacher-led and would award a badge to participants who could complete Day 1's required tasks. This badge would entitle them to Days 2 and 3 of the workshop.
Due to the highly busy schedules of the gatekeeper/SME and the MuEd 105 students, Day 1 would be online (Zoom-based) and at most run for around 1.30 hours to also coincide with the usual class schedule of MuEd 105. Day 1 would focus on comparisons between Classical and Jazz vocals.
Day 2 would also be online and approximately be the same length as Day 1 but would center on straight-ahead vocal jazz content with Professor Katherine Molina of the College of Music who teaches both Jazz and Classical techniques.
Day 3, on the other hand, would be a masterclass with an actual vocal jazz practitioner and may be conducted online. Duration at the time of the original proposal was yet to be determined.
Objectives and Assessment
General Objectives of the 3-Day Vocal Jazz Intro Proposal
Workshop Objectives (Crafted based on Bloom's Taxonomy)
Throughout and at the end of the workshop, the student should be able to:
Highlight applications of bel canto technique into jazz singing in terms of vowel
formation, mouth opening, resonation, shifting of registers, rhythmic flexibibilty,
as well as expressive and dynamic tools (ANALYSIS)
Demonstrate the differences of bel canto and jazz vocal technique and dynamics
by singing a portion of the Classical-Jazz crossover song Summertime (Gershwin)
in both bel canto and jazz styles (APPLICATION)
Revise renditions of one single jazz standard song from a ballad to swing and
bossa nova formats through a performance in an online masterclass with an
esteemed jazz singer (SYNTHESIS)
To justify the flexibility of a jazz song in terms of feel, rhythm and dynamics by
posting a 100-word online blog centered on the creative philosophy of jazz
(EVALUATION)