Evaluation

Individual (30 points possible) :

0 - 5 points Team member worked independently on a selected a role (e.g., Sightseer, Shopper, Historian etc.) (inquiry)

0 - 20 points Team member has submitted a proposed list of places they would like to visit in to the provided collaboration tool.

0- 5 points Team member worked well with the teammates (showed good listening skills, respect and, and positive attitude).

Group (100 points possible) :

The group has submitted a schedule for their six days in Poznan. The schedule should be evaluated based upon the following standards:

0 - 20 points The schedule is full but doable. It includes times for rest and relaxation, taking in to the account the stores, museums and other attractions' operating hours. (math, planning, logical thinking skills)

0 - 10 points The resources and information are accurate and relevant

0-10 points The itinerary is written in a proper English, without spelling and grammatical errors.

0 - 10 points The completed collaborative tool is submitted along with the itinerary

0 -20 points The QR codes lead to the resources that are accurate and relevant (history and information literacy)

1 - 15 points The itinerary design is aesthetic, functional, and easy to follow

0-10 points The team showed team effort, and worked well together (collaboration skills)

0 - 5 points The offer is well presented to the judges. The team clearly practiced their pitch, every member has assigned part of the presentation. (collaboration, presentation skills)

Total Possible Points: 130