Grading and Course Evaluation (SRT)

University Grading & Your Grade Roster

Submitting University Grades

The University of Minnesota requires that all grades be submitted online. Online grade rosters are available for final grade entry approximately one week prior to your scheduled class end date. 

Before You Enter Grades

All registration changes (late registrations or withdrawals) must be made before final grades may be submitted online. 

Review step-by-step instructions in “How to enter final grades in faculty center” guide.

To Access Your Grade Roster

If you have questions or problems using the online grading system, call the web Grading Support Line at 612-625-2803. 

Uploading Grades Directly From Canvas

If you use Canvas to manage your class grades, you may upload those grades to your Grade Roster. 

Resources:

Entering Late Grades, Changing "NR" to a Final Grade, Correcting a Mistake, or Making a Grade Change After Final Grades Have Been Submitted

See step-by-step instructions in the “How to Change a Grade" guide.

Grades & Transcripts: Policies

Excerpted from Administrative Policy: Grading and Transcripts: Twin Cities, Crookston, Morris, Rochester; edited for application to CIS.

University of Minnesota Grades  

University grade definitions establish the qualities of expected performance. CIS instructors define grade standards for their courses in conformity with their U of M departmental policies. Grade definitions assume that instructors, knowing their course’s basic requirements, can determine when students meet or exceed them. 

CIS instructors may choose to assign different grades for the high school course and the U of M course. For the high school grade, instructors should be guided by their school’s grading policies. For the U of M grade, consult your faculty coordinator for departmental guidelines as well as U of M criteria as stated in Academic and as discussed below. 

University Grades

Grades describe levels of achievement. 

These are the general University standards. In connection with all symbols of achievement instructors will define for a class, at one of its earliest meetings and as explicitly as possible, the performance that will be necessary to earn each. 

University policy prescribes the following grades and symbols that will be reported on the student’s transcript: 

Permanent Grades

Failures (F)

The grade of F is a permanent grade given for a course for which no credit is to be awarded. It will be entered on a student's official transcript.

Incompletes (I)

Withdrawals (W)

Do not enter a grade of F, I, or X for a student who has withdrawn from your class. Please contact cisenroll@umn.edu immediately to discuss next steps.

No Grade Reported (NR)

There will be a symbol NR, administratively assigned to indicate that a grade was not reported for the course. The NR does not carry any GPA points. 

If you enter your grades more than three business days after your last class session, the U considers these grades to be LATE, and your students see NR on their transcript until you change that NR grade to the grade earned by the student. See section below on entering late grades. 

Applying University Graded Coursework

Academic Progress Notifications

Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP)

Federal financial aid eligibility requires that aid recipients make Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP). These regulations do not apply to students in high school. However, students should be aware that credits earned through College in the Schools (CIS) will be included in the cumulative completed credits percentage, GPA, and the maximum attempted credits calculation when determining Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) after high school.

Teach Students How to Request a U of M Transcript

CIS students who have taken a course for U of M Twin Cities credit may request their unofficial or official transcript through OneStop.

See "Transcripts and Credit Recognition" in the Students section of the CIS website for more information.

Scholastic Dishonesty - Impact on Grades

Excerpted from Board of Regents Policy: Student Conduct Code.

Scholastic dishonesty in any portion of the academic work for a course will be grounds for awarding a grade of F for the entire course, at the discretion of the instructor. This provision allows instructors to award an F to a student when scholastic dishonesty is discovered; it does not require an instructor to do so. 

If the instructor determines that a grade of F for the course should be awarded to a student because of scholastic dishonesty, the student cannot withdraw to avoid the F. If the student withdrew from the course before the scholastic dishonesty was discovered or before the instructor concluded that there was scholastic dishonesty, and the instructor (or the appropriate hearing body if the student requests a hearing) determines that the student should receive the F, the student will be re-registered for the course and the F grade will be entered on the transcripts. 

Grade Accountability & Addressing Student Academic Complaints

Excerpted from Administrative Policy: Grade Accountability: Twin Cities, Crookston, Morris, Rochester.

The instructor who is in overall charge of a course offering is accountable for all grades given to students. 

FAQ: Addressing Student Academic Complaints

Excerpted from Administrative Policy: Addressing Student Academic Complaints; edited for application to CIS.

Q: I don't agree with the grade I received from my instructor. Is there anything I can do?

A: While grades are not subject to complaint, [the student is] entitled to an explanation for the grade assigned. If [the student is] not able to get an explanation for the grade from [the] instructor, [the student should] consult the [CIS faculty coordinator for the course as the appropriate departmental representative.] Students also may wish to seek assistance from [Jan M. Erickson, CIS Associate Director]. An instructor’s judgment in assigning a grade is not a subject for a formal hearing, and can only be reviewed through these informal processes. 

A student who questions or disagrees with their instructor about a grade begins the process by talking with their instructor to arrive at an understanding of the facts and to learn where expectations were not met. The Student Conflict Resolution Center’s website has a helpful video demonstrating more and less successful ways to approach this sometimes difficult conversation. 

If a better understanding of the assigned grade is not reached, the student may choose to speak to the CIS faculty coordinator for that course as the appropriate departmental representative at the University. Jan Erickson, CIS Associate Director, and the Student Conflict Resolution Center are additional resources for students and instructors. CIS faculty coordinators appreciate hearing from an instructor if he or she anticipates that one of their students will bring their case to University personnel. 

Feel free to contact Jan M. Erickson (j-eric@umn.edu; 612-624-9898) with questions. 

Archival Notes:  Academic Grading during the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020-2021 only)

Details about the 2020-2021 grading update, and the temporary S/N grading option for students who were in session during Spring 2020 can be found in this section.

2020-2021 Grading

All undergraduate students enrolled in Twin Cities courses, including CIS courses, may choose to change their grading basis from A-F to S/N (satisfactory/not satisfactory) after a final grade is posted for all Fall 2020 and Spring 2021 courses. CIS students may change their grading basis to S/N after their final grade is posted by emailing cisenroll@umn.edu by June 15th, 2021. This applies to all CIS courses offered during the 2020-2021 academic year.

Students must include the following information: 

All F grades will be automatically converted to an N (Not Satisfactory) grade on the U of M transcript. Neither F or N grades award credit for the course, however, an N does not impact U of M GPA. This change will be applied to all U of M courses offered through CIS during the 2020-2021 academic year due to the unpredictability of the impact of COVID-19. In accordance with CIS standard grading policy, CIS will not offer the option to change grade basis to S/N that may be available to some students on-campus.

Things to note and consider:

S/N Grading Basis for U of M CIS sections that were in session during Spring 2020

During the COVID-19 outbreak of 2020, the U of M made a temporary exemption to the policy for the limits on use of S/N grades for undergraduate students. The S/N option, which is not usually permitted for students enrolled in CIS sections, was also made available to students enrolled in CIS sections during Fall 2019 Year Long, Spring 2020 Semester/Trimester 2-3, and Spring 2020 Trimester 3. Information about this policy and a form where students could request to change to the S/N grading basis, was posted to the College in the Schools Students webpage. Instructions were also emailed to all instructors, with instructions to share this information with their students.

What are S/N grades?

S/N grading basis refers to a grade of satisfactory or not satisfactory, also known as pass/fail. Administrative Policy Grading and Transcripts: Twin Cities, Crookston, Morris, Rochester provides a definition of the S/N grading basis.

SRT Course Evaluation

College in the Schools uses a variety of tools, including student and staff surveys, to gather feedback about the program’s impact and to identify successes and areas in which the program may need improvement. 

Managing Student Evaluation of the U of M Course (SRT)

The Student Rating of Teaching (SRT) is a University-required course and instructor evaluation form. SRTs may not be replaced by another evaluation, although midterm assessments are encouraged, and supplemental questions may be added to the standard rating form. CIS emails SRTs collection windows and information to instructors a few weeks before the end date you’ve given us for your class. Instructors are responsible for ensuring that University protocols are followed when administering the SRT. 

Students will need to activate their U of M accounts to access course SRTs, if they have not already. 

Tips for Improving Online Response Rates

Student Evaluation of Teaching (Policy)

Excerpted from Administrative Policy: Evaluation of Teaching: Twin Cities, Crookston, Morris, Rochester

Evaluation of teaching provides information to help improve teaching. One method used is the student ratings of teaching.

General Provisions for Evaluation of Teaching

Student Rating of Teaching Form and Requirements

FAQ: Can instructors administer additional evaluation items?

Instructors are encouraged to conduct early- and mid-semester course assessments for the purpose of receiving feedback about student learning during the term. Instructors may ask students to answer supplemental questions in the open-ended section of the standard rating form, on a separate sheet, or online. See Early Term Feedback on Teaching for more information about early- and mid-semester course assessments.