As you plan your program, you should consider an effective & equitable leadership structure for the program and the youth members. As your program develops, facilitate a conversation with youth through the following three simple steps:
Decide on needed responsibilities.
Decide on roles.
Decide on terms and selection process.
Keep in mind that the best leadership structure may change not only depending on the make-up of the group but also on how long a group has been around. Below are some examples of potential leadership structures. Sometimes the right model might be a combination of one, two, or more of these models. For more information on equitable structures, visit https://z.umn.edu/equitable-youth-leadership-structures.
Officers
This traditional leadership model positions youth in formal officer roles, including a president, vice-president, secretary, and treasurer.
Strengths of this model:
It's used in many other settings, including 4-H clubs, so it is familiar to most youth.
Each of the roles has a defined set of guidelines and expectations.
It creates aspirational roles for youth.
Shared Leadership
In a shared leadership model, leadership of meetings and activities rotates to each interested member.
Strengths of this model:
It gives each interested member an opportunity to lead without requiring an extended commitment to serve in a single leadership role.
It allows for flexibility in groups with inconsistent attendance.
It eliminates competitive aspect of position-seeking.
Core Leadership Team
In this model, the more senior members of the group take on collective leadership roles as part of their membership and serve as mentors to newer members.
Strengths of this model:
It is a team approach to leadership that positions more experienced youth to exercise their leadership.
Shared responsibilities among the leadership group make it a reasonable time commitment
It provides many youth the opportunity to serve in a key leadership position
It allows for a junior leadership team (or ambassador-in-training-like) program to surface
Committees
Activities are categorized into themes and are assigned to various committees, and youth leaders are assigned as chairs of committees.
Strengths of this model:
It provides an opportunity for youth to lead a smaller group toward a shared goal
It creates an executive board of committee chairs to connect program elements
Committees can be event-specific (County Fair, Project workshop, etc) or be theme-based (service, outreach, social/belonging, etc)