Vortex Shedding Test Cases with/without Coriolis force, and 120/60 resolution
Test case results at: /glade/work/kyho/vortex_shedding_results/
vortex_mpasa120_no_coriolis.cam.h0i.0001-01-01-00000.regrid.1x1.nc
vortex_mpasa120_coriolis.cam.h0i.0001-01-01-00000.regrid.1x1.nc
mpasa60.no_coriolis
vortex_mpasa60_coriolis.cam.h0i.0001-01-01-00000.regrid.0.5x0.5.nc
Very similar to default 3rd order time stepping
Very small differences in the eyeball norm
Look at the L^2 norm of the difference between surface pressure between dt={45, 22.5, 15, 9, 5, 3} and dt=1. No observed time convergence when varying the time step. Worth looking at this result for the native output grid, but remeshing shouldn't make it 0th order, should be at least 1st order.
Remarkably stable with a large range of diffusion coefficients. High parameter values lead to strong damping of shear, and damping of shear prevents the formation of vorticity.
Set mpas_horiz_mixing='2d_fixed', then set mpas_h_mom_eddy_visc2, mpas_v_mom_eddy_visc2, mpas_h_theta_eddy_visc2, and mpas_v_theta_eddy_visc2 all to the same value. 1e3 was on the upper range for stability which is reasonable, taking into account the Earth scaling factor 1e3 becomes 4e5. However, the fact that the model remains stable for a coeff of 1e-2 suggests that other diffusion settings are maintaining stability. Not super large differences between the various settings.