Motivational Activity: (Give it a witty name) 

The teacher will present memes that illustrate logical fallacies (e.g., "Appeal to Authority"

meme of a famous person saying something untrue with the text: “It must be true because they said so!”) and ask students to guess the fallacy type or describe why the reasoning is flawed. The teacher will let the students discuss why these examples do not make sense or lack credibility. Then, the teacher will discuss each example briefly, introducing the concept of logical fallacies in a fun, relatable way. 



Lesson Presentation Strategy


The teacher will present examples of logical fallacies and interact with the students for their observation on the texts. Then, the teacher will expound on each type of logical fallacies.



Lesson Development 


The teacher will divide the class into five people per group for fallacy type identification activity. Students will be given pictures or texts of relevant or known arguments. Instructions would include students re-enacting the situation wherein their peers have to correctly identify the type of logical fallacy. Students with the most points will be given incentives for their assignment.



Application 


The teacher will give each student a short paragraph from a sample position paper that contains logical fallacies and ask them to read the paragraph, identify any fallacies, and rewrite it to improve its credibility by removing or correcting the fallacies.



The Short Paragraph from a Sample Position Paper


The feminist argument that pornography is harmful has no merit and should not be discussed in college courses. I read “Playboy” magazine, and I don’t see how it could be harmful. Feminists might criticize me for looking at porn, but they shouldn’t talk; they obviously look at it, too, or they couldn’t criticize it. Many important people, including the Presidents, writers, and entertainers who have been interviewed by the magazine and the women who pose in it, apparently agree. Scientific studies so far have not proved that pornography is harmful, so it must not be harmful. Besides, to be harmful, pornography would either have to harm the men who read it or the women who pose in it, and since they both choose these activities, they must not be harmful. Feminists should take a lesson from my parents—they don’t like loud music and won’t have it in their house, but they don’t go around saying it’s harmful to everyone or trying to prevent others from listening to it. Ever since feminists began attacking our popular culture, the moral foundation of our society has been weakened; the divorce rate, for example, continues to rise. If feminists would just cease their hysterical opposition to sex, perhaps relationships in our society would improve. If feminists insist, instead, on banning porn, men will have no freedom and no pleasure left, and large numbers of women will be jobless and will have to work as prostitutes to support themselves. In light of these consequences, feminists shouldn’t be surprised if their protests are met with violence. Truly, the feminist argument is baseless.



Generalization


The teacher will ask a question to the class to generalize their topic: “How can identifying and avoiding logical fallacies improve the strength and credibility of an argument in a position paper?”



Assessment


The students will write a one-paragraph argument on a current issue and avoid logical fallacies

and focus on clear, logical reasoning.



Assignment


The students will find a short article or position paper online, highlight any logical fallacies they

find, and explain why these weaken the argumen