The teaching procedures followed a clear and structured lesson plan designed around the Present Perfect Tense. The lesson began with an opening activity to set the tone and prepare students for learning. This included greeting the students, checking attendance, reviewing classroom rules, and activating prior knowledge through questions about the Past Simple and Present Perfect tenses.
In the main activities, the teacher used the Presentation-Practice-Production (PPP) approach. First, the teacher explained the differences between the Past Simple and Present Perfect tenses, including the usage of “since” and “for.” This was followed by guided grammar exercises through worksheets, and finally, students were asked to apply what they had learned by creating and transforming their own sentences into affirmative, negative, and interrogative forms.
The lesson concluded with a feedback session and a class prayer, reinforcing both academic and character education.
The total time allocation for the lesson was 80 minutes (2 x 40-minute periods), which was managed efficiently. Each phase of the lesson was appropriately timed:
Opening (10–15 minutes): Brief, focused activities to build rapport and review previous knowledge.
Main Activities (55–60 minutes): Divided into three key parts—presentation (15 minutes), guided practice (20–25 minutes), and production activities (20 minutes).
Closing (5–10 minutes): Feedback and reflection.
The teacher smoothly transitioned between activities, giving enough time for explanation, group work, and individual practice, which helped maintain students' attention and participation.
Classroom management was handled positively and effectively. The teacher established clear rules at the beginning of the lesson and used a calm, respectful tone throughout the session. Students were engaged through interactive questions and random selection for answers, which encouraged attentiveness.
The physical classroom setting was orderly, and the teacher utilized a variety of tools—such as the whiteboard, textbook, PowerPoint slides, and printed worksheets—to keep students on task. Additionally, the use of technology (e.g., Google Classroom, WhatsApp) supported communication and access to materials both during and after the lesson.
Peer work was encouraged during the practice phase, promoting collaboration and reducing disciplinary issues. The teacher monitored student work actively, providing on-the-spot assistance and managing any distractions quickly and constructively.
Like any real classroom experience, challenges did arise during teaching practice. One issue was varying student proficiency levels—some students grasped the grammar rules quickly, while others needed more time and examples. To address this, the teacher used differentiation by providing additional explanations and allowing stronger students to support their peers during pair work.
Another challenge involved technical issues, such as unstable internet during online activities or limitations with devices. The teacher mitigated this by preparing offline worksheets and printed materials in advance.
Regarding adjustment to school environment, initial unfamiliarity with school routines and students was resolved through regular communication with mentor teachers and school staff. The mentor teacher played a crucial role in providing practical advice, including classroom management tips, assessment techniques, and cultural expectations within the school.
By the end of the teaching practice, the teacher had adapted well to the school setting, demonstrated professional growth, and successfully implemented a well-structured and engaging lesson.