I teach courses on 20th and 21st Century literatures in America and Canada, on topics such as poetry and poetics, migration and mobility, voice and testimony in documentary literature, theories of gender and sexuality, race and class in southern modernism, cultures of resource and labor extraction, and writings of repair, revenge, and redress. My courses have been cross-listed in the Department of English, the Creative Writing Department, the Department of Race, Diaspora and Indigeneity, and the Center for the Study of Gender and Sexuality.
I work to keep abreast of contemporary pedagogical research and continue to develop supplementary pedagogical resources for my students and colleagues such as research dossiers and workshops. I also continue to adapt my own teaching approaches and syllabi in light of developments in learning technologies and questions of equity, accessiblity, and universal design in educational infrastructures. I am attentive to the importance of engaging themes of gender and sexuality, race and racialization, documentation status, disability, and class inequity, even in courses where they are not primary topics. I do this understanding that these perspectives are valuable, especially as they can charge a discussion and bring the lived stakes of reading a text into focus. I also do this from the belief that the literature I teach is inextricable from the wider social and political contexts of the 20th and 21st centuries in which it is produced, and from the audiences to which it speaks.
The following are samples of courses that I have offered at the University of Chicago, and additional course syllabi that I have prepared for teaching in a variety of contexts. Course materials are available by request.
“I am not wrong: Wrong is not my name”
- June Jordan, “Poem about My Rights”
What does it feel like to mess up, to get something wrong, to be the wrong way in the wrong place or time? How do you know? What does the “normative” in heteronormative mean? In this class, we will use the question of normativity—senses of wrongness and rightness and how those judgments are articulated, navigated, and enforced—to explore foundational concepts in and across theories of gender and sexuality. This course will cover philosophical, sociological, psychoanalytic, and literary theoretical approaches to accounting for the emotions, social norms, and interactions that constitute the experience of “being wrong.” We will examine ways in which gender and bodily regimes of normativity occur in and around scenes of discomfort, uncertainty, and insecurity as well as through infrastructures of legality and policing. We will also examine the performances of apology, guilt, regret, and remorse that occur when individuals learn that they have erred or transgressed, and how those forms of interaction relate to projects of repair and reconciliation.
Each week pairs central theoretical texts from feminist, queer, critical race and disability studies with literary texts, works of poetry, and contemporary cultural objects in order to examine how these questions are enacted and answered in a variety of lived and literary perspectives. We will begin by examining the current state of the "field" the course proposes: asking how “being wrong” and the affects of guilt and shame have been taken up or disavowed by gender theory. We will then examine accounts of how various historical and institutions have attempted to establish and enforce codes of behavior and “cure” deviance, and we will end the course by examining what José Munoz calls "disidentifications", refusals, escapes, and alternatives to compliance, as well as other ways in which we might navigate—through apologies and other performances—conflicts between norms, failures, harms and behaviors.
Students will be able to:
Articulate a variety of theoretical stances and employ a variety of methodologies to analyze gender and normative affects in society and in their own life experiences.
Use close reading tools to analyze gender dynamics across a wide variety of genres of text and objects, and craft arguments about how those discourses function.
Take risks, experiment, and pose creative and critical questions about course texts in collaborative and collegial dialogue—written and spoken—with peers.
Come and listen you fellers so young and so fine,
And seek not your fortune in the dark dreary mines.
It will form as a habit and seep in your soul,
'Til the stream of your blood is as black as the coal
— Merle Travis, 1946
This course examines the political, economic, ecological, and affective legacies of fossil fuel extraction industries as articulated in modern and contemporary American and Indigenous literatures, especially poetry. We will examine how forms such as the novel, the work song, the blues, the documentary, the elegy, and a variety of other poetic forms structure and interrogate narratives of humanness, the natural world, and national identity: narratives that are inextricably linked to the extraction and processing of coal, oil, silica, and uranium.
Beginning after World War I with the rise of petroleum as the predominant modern fossil fuel, we will examine the material processes of coal mining, oil drilling, and the transportation of these resources via trains, trucks, and pipelines, and their impact on bodies, natural landscapes, built neighborhoods, and cultural imaginaries. We will also trace how the traffic in and desire for these substances undergirds regimes of racialization and white supremacy, indigenous relocations and resistance and issues related to immigration, in addition to structuring the most banal of our daily activities. This course will progress thematically as we begin to investigate the “petroliteratures” and other forms of writing produced by the devastatingly global and simultaneously intimate scale of these industries.
We begin with how coal mining, oil drilling, and work cultures around resource extraction were fundamental to conceptions of rural masculinity and American identity—reading works by Upton Sinclair, Breece D’J Pancake, Mark Nowak, and Muriel Rukeyser. We will contextualize this in the large archive of Native American and Canadian Indigenous literatures, performance art, and direct action around Unistʼotʼen and Standing Rock, reading works by Nick Estes, Audra Simpson, and Rebecca Belmore. We will build towards a globalized understanding of the fossil fuel economy and how it intersects with regimes of racialization and class stratification in the United States, as explored through poetic and literary material.
Students will be able to:
Discuss how literature produced of, about, and through fossil-fuel extractive industries engages questions of modernity, environmental politics, indigeneity, relationships to land, and notions of belonging and internationalism.
Engage, critique, and formulate their own opinion on a variety of literary, cultural, and historical approaches to understanding extractive economies, and to making sense of questions of scale and agency in relation to those things.
Identify how the history of particular literary forms in the United States such as the novel, the work song, the blues, the documentary, the elegy, and a variety of other poetic forms, is linked to and articulates the history of fossil fuel extraction and consumption. Students will have the opportunity to experiment creatively with producing texts in such forms.
"In a discussion on this subject Miss Searle pointed out that the child’s impulse to restore things is also hindered by its early experience of the fact that it is easy to break things but exceedingly difficult to put them together again. Factual evidence of this kind must, I think, contribute to increase its doubts about its creative powers."
— Melanie Klein, “Obsessional Neurosis and Super Ego” The Psycho-Analysis of Children, 1932. Footnote, 240.
What does it mean to address oneself to, or attempt to repair, legacies of violence and harm? What theories, resources, and models of personal, psychoanalytic, legal, political repair are available, and what kinds of possibilities do they enable? Is repair even a possibility, or a useful framework, for change? This course tracks the question of repair through contemporary conversations and historical case studies. Reading works by Ta-Nehisi Coates, Saidiya Hartman, Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang, we will track how the concept of repair and reparation has motivated political action, activism, economic decision-making, artistic creativity and interpersonal ritual. We will read poems, engage performances, and consider other rituals of repair, breaking, and re-making. In addition, we will read literary and activist material pertinent to historical movements for reparations, including works from the Redress Movement for Japanese Internment in Canada and the United States, ongoing projects of the repatriation of Indigenous remains and cultural materials in museums, and transformative justice models of conflict resolution.
Students will be able to:
Articulate a variety of theoretical stances and employ a variety of methodologies to consider reparative projects and modes of redress and conflict resolution in society and in their own life experiences.
Use close reading tools to analyze how power, identity, race, indigeneity, and difference operate and articulate themselves in discourses of repair across a variety of genres of text and objects, and craft arguments about how those discourses function.
Take risks, experiment, and pose creative and critical questions about course texts in collaborative and collegial dialogue—written and spoken—with peers.
“What we call ‘descriptions’ are instruments for particular uses. Think of a machine-drawing, a cross-section, an elevation with measurements, which an engineer has before him. Thinking of a description as a word-picture of the facts has something misleading about it: one tends to think only such pictures as hang on our walls.”
— Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations
“Light is sharply directed on one spot, leaving not only the greater part in darkness but also denying by implication that the great unlighted field exists.”
— Zora Neale Hurston, “Seeing the World As It Is,” Dust Tracks on a Road.
The work of description—the way that writers convey the characteristic features and significant details of people and places in language—can contain and confirm biases and anchor stale tropes of identity, but can also refuse, exceed, play with, and subverting readerly
expectations. Descriptions made for the purposes of political consciousness-raising, journalistic documenting, or narrative storytelling bring into sharp relief senses of ourselves in relation to perceptions of “otherness” along lines of place, race, class, and gender. In this class, we will read literary and photographic works by authors such as Zora Neale Hurston, Richard Wright, William Faulkner, James Agee and Walker Evans and focus on how they experiment with methodologies of description and representation of people borrowed from
anthropology, photography, and documentary journalism, as well as literary techniques like stream-of-consciousness narration and first-personal disclosure—to productively account for the limitations of their individual perspectives and authorial voices as a narrative and poetic tool. Particular attention will be paid to how gender and sexuality, race and racialization, and embodiment impact these accounts of social worlds, relations, and cultures, and person.
Students will be able to:
Use tools of close literary analysis to attend to the formal features of novels, documentary accounts, and works of poetry in order to parse how they employ description as a tactic for portraying a world.
Identify how particular literary forms and projects such as the stream of consciousness novel, the documentary, the work song, the blues, traditions of representing dialect, and structures of analogy, are linked with the ethnographic.
Articulate and marshal textual evidence to support original arguments about the course texts. Take risks, experiment, and pose creative and critical questions about course texts in collaborative and collegial dialogue—written and spoken—with peers.
This course examines the genre of the apology and, asks—but does not necessarily answer—the question of what a good apology is. We will read a broad historical arc of classical Greek apologia and defense speeches, works and practices of Christan confessionals and Maimonides’ rules for making restitution, Sir Philip Sidney’s Elizabethan “Apology for Poetry”, as well as criticism and theory about regret and forgiveness in what is called the “Age of Apology” after WWI. We will end by reading a number of contemporary political apologies (as well as the archive of apologies offered by celebrities and YouTube confessionals) as well as a collection of alter-apologetic literature that re-works or responds to the terms of the apologies and offers antagonistic forms of relation to the ongoing present of settler-colonialism, structural racism, and patriarchal violence. In particular, we will read works by Eve Ensler, Layli Long Soldier, Jordan Abel, and Tanya Lukin Linklater, and the queer performance collaboration between Adrian Stimson and settler artist AA Bronson, works which explore how apologetic genres open unique ways to address a national politics whose power comes about through instruments that are bureaucratic, archival, and issued on paper.
In this course we will read works of literature from the 20th and 21st centuries that present, subvert, challenge and question the stories of “what happened” through a variety of literary, filmic, and documentary techniques. We will read works of nonfiction journalism as well as novels, examine how the development of photographic technologies and the circulation of “the news” change the perception of time and history, read experimental and poetic utopian re-tellings of historical violences towards activist ends of social change, consider the function of monuments and performances that attempt to preserve or change our memories of the past, and watch performance works and embodied movements that all engage the documentary. We will examine the play between the subjective perspective and presentational form of historical events and the people that documentary literature portrays through the work of artists and authors such as Dorothea Lange, Charles Reznikoff, Muriel Rukeyser, Joshua Oppenheimer, Mark Nowak, and Divya Victor.
Reading and engaging course material and assignments, listening to lectures and discussions, and taking notes on the information covered in class constitute some of the primary tasks that students will undertake in educational settings, but they are often activities for which students are given the least guidance. Presuming that students know how to take effective notes and attend to reading and lectures can activate issues of equity and access, as first-generation or low-income students might not have had access to instruction or support in these activities, or might for reasons of diversity, ability, positionality, experience, or preference just think they “aren’t very good” at the basic activities of note-taking: writing, drawing, listening.
Taking effective and useful notes from readings, lectures, tutorials, and discussions, is a skill (like all other skills students acquire in the classroom) that can be developed through practice, and which can be made more accessible and effective using a variety of techniques and technologies. Providing instructions for notetaking or review along with readings and other classroom assignments is also an important pedagogical tool that teachers can make use of to help students achieve course goals.