Hope is key to coping with life’s challenges - an essential contributor to client change in psychotherapy. Lynch (1965) defined hope as, “the fundamental knowledge and feeling that there is a way out of difficulty, that things can work out, that we as human persons can somehow handle and manage internal and external reality” (pg. 32). The importance of hope to psychotherapeutic processes is explicitly claimed across a broad spectrum of theories including cognitive-behavioural, solution-focused, narrative, systemic, and emotion-focused approaches. Common factors theories reflect this reality estimating that hope may account for as much as 15% of therapeutic outcome, exerting an influence of approximately the same magnitude as that of theoretical orientation.
Hope attracts diverse disciplinary interest from nursing, psychology, education, political science, even business. While there are many well-validated hope scales, the most utilized scales within psychology are those developed by Charles Snyder (1995) where hope is understood as a positive psychological state derived from clear, conscious goals accompanied by pathways thinking (i.e., plans of action for goals attainment) and agency thinking (i.e., belief in one’s capacity to achieve one’s goals). Critique of Snyder’s hope scales balance respect for Snyder’s pioneering cognitive behavioural approach alongside research evidence that the important aspects of hope emotional, relational, spiritual, and contextual aspects of hope go virtually unaddressed.
This article has been published in the SEPI newsletter The Integrative Therapist, Volume 7, Issue 3, September 2021. A link to the newsletter can be found here.
Since Snyder’s influential early framework, the study of hope across disciplines has developed compelling evidence that hope is a multidimensional construct, the experience of which is often impacted by context. Further, psychotherapeutic research suggests that an individuals’ hope is not only goal/action oriented but can also reflect aspects of self and qualities of being. As a result, processes for fostering client hope in therapy should be based on understandings of client hope as it is experienced within psychotherapy. Indeed, research with clients in therapy demonstrates that therapeutic tools focused on hope tend to reflect the multidimensionality of hope in therapy.
The recently published Multidimensional Hope in Counseling and Psychotherapy Scale was constructed to reflect current research on hope in psychotherapy and offer direction for therapeutic hope interventions based on client responses to the scale. Developed via a sequence of four phases, keeping the entire scale construction close to clients’ and therapists’ experience was a priority for valid scale construction.
During Phase 1 the definitions of hope and eight initial dimensions were identified based on an extensive review of cross-disciplinary research on individuals’ experiences of hope in therapy. These definitions were then reviewed via a survey of psychologists with specialized knowledge of hope in therapy. Based on survey feedback the definitions were refined and a ninth dimension, spirituality, was added. During Phase 2, 200 items were developed based on the research literature and addressed the nine dimensions. A larger survey of psychologists with specialized knowledge of hope in therapy was conducted to determine the relevance of each item to its dimension and to solicit any improvements to item wording. Based on this second survey, of 200 original items 117 remained. During Phase 3, the remaining items were administered to a diverse group of 245 (211 completed data packages) clients at 7 Canadian psychotherapy sites (i.e., student counselling, community mental health, rehabilitation, and sexual assault centers). Factor analysis yielded six dimensions: Future, Spirituality, Cognitive, Therapeutic Relationship, Other Relationships, and Emotional. Frequency distributions of each subscale revealed that clients’ responses tended to cluster around the mean scores. The internal consistencies of the subscales and total scale were high. During Phase 4, MHCPS was validated using the Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R), the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS21), and the Adult Hope Scale (AHS). Correlations were as anticipated and revealed: weak convergent evidence with optimism, strong convergent evidence with Snyder’s hope scale, and strong divergent evidence with depression, anxiety, and stress.
Filling the need for a well-validated context sensitive measure that reflects the multidimensionality of client hope in therapy, the MHCPS is 34 items in length. The scale is intended for use in research and in practice. The scale responds to calls for deeper reflection on the common factors of therapy, particularly the usual distinctions made by common factors models regarding the contributions of hope and of therapeutic relationship to therapeutic outcome. Research repeatedly indicates that the therapeutic relationship itself is a common source of client hope suggesting that the usually distinct common factors of therapeutic relationship and hope are deeply entwined in the clients’ experiences of therapy. Uniquely, the MHCPS reflects this critical and nuanced understanding of hope offering a subscale score, Therapeutic Relationship, specifically reflecting client hope as experienced within the therapeutic relationship. Other Relationship is an additional subscale on the MHCPS, reflecting client hope as experienced via client relationships held outside of psychotherapy. Finally, the subscale, Spirituality, was initially unanticipated on the MHCPS and was added after Phase 1 feedback from hope-focused psychotherapists. The spirituality subscale reflects client experiences of hope in therapy via an inclusive understanding of spirituality informed by Worthington’s (2012) taxonomy of spirituality.
Clients often define success in therapy as the achievement of a single hoped-for outcome, e.g., the hope to repair a difficult relationship or the hope to gain access to a particular academic program. Use of the MHCPS with clients can tangibly and explicitly demonstrate to client and therapist alike (a) the presence of hope in the midst of client struggle, (b) a diverse range of possible ‘locations’ of hope’ available to the client, (c) where hope is most readily present and accessible in the client’s therapy and life, and (d) where the client and therapist might become curious about further building client hope. As such, the MHCPS has the potential to be a therapeutic tool in and of itself helping clients see hope in aspects of life that may have been unattended. Client responses to the MHCPS may also bolster therapist hope, deeply needed at times as therapists sit with clients in the face of dark struggles. Interestingly, during Phase 4 of scale development, several data collection sites (psychotherapy clinics) reported that clients enjoyed completing the MHCPS, with its explicit focus on hope. Indeed, some clients asked for more scales like the MHCPS that they - or even their friends – could complete, suggesting that taking the MHCPS itself can have a clinically favorable and meaningful impact on clients.
For permission to use the MHCPS, please contact Dr. Denise Larsen: denise.larsen@ualberta.
Larsen, D., Whelton, W., Rogers, T., Herth, K., McElheran, J. Herth, K., Tremblay, J., Green, J., Dushinski, K., Schalk, K., Chamodraka, M. & Domene, J. (2020). Development and validation of the Multidimensional hope in counselling and psychotherapy scale. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 30(3), 407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000198
Lynch, W.F. (1965). Images of hope: Imagination as the healer of the hopeless. Baltimore, MD: Helicon Press.
Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 335–343.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U.
Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063.
Snyder, C. R. (1995). Conceptualizing, measuring, and nurturing hope. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 355–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1995.tb01764.x
Worthington, E.L. (2012). Progress in physics and psychology affects the psychology of religion and spirituality. In L.J. Miller (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psychology and spirituality (pp. 47-62). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.