Federico Fabiano (CNR-ISAC): “Quantifying the Tuning Uncertainty on the Climate Sensitivity of the EC-Earth Climate Model”
Senne Van Loon (Colorado State University): “Observation-based Estimate of Earth's Effective Radiative Forcing”
00:27:33 Pappu Paul: Nice work, the parameters you changed 30% from default value?
00:28:04 Gavin Schmidt: we had a paper just come out on the GISS PPE emulator. Maybe some relevant things there: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024MS004713
00:28:23 Karsten Haustein (he/him): Reacted to "we had a paper just ..." with 👍
00:28:29 Yihan Du: Reacted to "we had a paper just ..." with 👍
00:29:03 Gavin Schmidt: Fig 9 for instance shows the importance of ‘minor’ parameter variation once you’ve calibrated the simulation to be in balance.
00:29:26 Clare Singer: Reacted to "we had a paper just ..." with 👍
00:29:46 Pappu Paul: Reacted to "we had a paper just ..." with 👍
00:29:47 Karsten Haustein (he/him): Reacted to "Fig 9 for instance s..." with 👍
00:36:00 Gavin Schmidt: this is the anomaly in EEI (w.r.t. ~2005?), not the absolute value, right?
00:37:52 Federico Fabiano: Replying to "Nice work, the param..."
yes, in the two selected sets the two main parameters are changed by 30% and 20% in both directions (everything's linear so the cold and warm sets are just in the opposite direction)
00:38:26 Federico Fabiano: Reacted to "Fig 9 for instance s..." with 👍
00:38:52 Pappu Paul: Replying to "Nice work, the param..."
thank you
00:47:52 Isaac Held: Can you say that the nonlinear R(T) from the CNN is superior to the linear regression result?
00:52:46 Clare Singer: How do you go from ocean-only SST as input to a global mean forcing? What is the CNN learning about forcing and feedbacks over land?
00:53:22 Johannes Muelmenstaedt: Very confused question… both your result and Forster et al. (2024) have a negative forcing until the mid-2000s?