Environmentalism is the idea/movement advocating for:
The environment, and protecting it
Sustainability
Improving natural conditions
Preserving the planet
Limit human impact
Climate Change - The change in the world's Global Average Temperature (GAT), usually due to manmade reasons/causes
Impacts include (but aren't limited to):
Warmer climate
Rising sea levels
change in water salinity, loss of drinking/freshwater
More natural disasters at more common rates
Habitat loss
Animal/species extinction
Lower air, land, life quality
All the above impacts are negative. People know climate change is bad. So why do environmentalism debates exist?
Usually comes down to:
Feasibility/possibility of change
Principles - spending energy fixing a problem that wasn't caused by us, but rather, generations beforehand
Biosphere
Contains all life forms
Hydrosphere
Contains all water
Lithosphere
Contains all land
Atmosphere
Contains the air and its layers
Advocacy
Supporting/disagreeing with the environmentalist movement becoming very mainstream, and raising awareness
Consider:
Overall impact (long term+ short term)
What happens at the very end of the day? What does the world look like, say, 100 years from now?
Perception (from the general public)
How do they view the movement? How likely are they to support it?
Ways to "spread the word"
Social media, flyers, other types of promo, etc
Government Intervention
(Pushing for) action(s) started by the government, leading to change in populations
ex. Carbon taxes on companies, monetary incentives for buying EVs, punishments for littering
Consider:
Pros/Cons of new policy
Feasibility of new policy - how easy is it to implement, and to what extent?
Helps determine tangible change that may come out of it (ex. if a policy is really situational and hard to enforce it probably won't be the magical solution to climate change)
Resulting input from public
Will people be upset/angry? Will that result in things like riots, protests, or general backlash?
On a Global Scale
How willing are certain countries to adapt a new "green policy"?
Will be harder for some nations than others - Developing countries will have a much harder time creating infrastructure but developed countries may face problems with monitoring action from citizens
International/Foreign aid towards developing nations
To implement green infrastructure/develop solutions to climate crisis
Generally expensive, not very effective, raises dependence for developing nation (refer to IR pages)
Common debate idea: Punishing/rewarding countries more depending on their impact towards saving the environment
For example: China being one of the biggest polluters means needing to implement harsher policies/do more work
Sustainability
Consider: Investing in green energy
Usually involves developing technology like:
Wind turbines
Solar panels
Gardens
Or just making them more widespread. Other options include:
Planting trees
Purifying water
No pollution of any kind!!!!
Air, water, land, light, sound/noise
Carbon footprint - total amount of carbon/greenhouse gases consumed or created by an individual
Common sources: Transportation, heating, electricity, manufacturing
Ways to limit it individually (setting widespread goals, etc)
biking/walking, carpooling, travelling less
Prevention/Adaption
Often grouped together, just consists of ways to either slow down, or adapt to, global warming and its other side effects
Building dams, creating natural disaster survival plans/courses, investing in space exploration
Consider:
How effective is prevention (Trying to stop global warming/climate change from getting worse)
Depending on what temperature the GAT (Global Average Temperature) is currently at. The more severe, the harder to do
involves changing ways of life that probably have been practiced for generations (fuel used for cooking/heating, etc)
Requires big government involvement/involvement from a higher power (not religious)
How effective is adaptation (usually follows prevention, involves changing society to fit/survive in new climate conditions)
Better alternative to "undoing climate change" - more likely to actually happen in the future
May include:
Creating new tech to cool down homes sustainably
Genetically modifying crops to grow better in harsher climates
THO the glorification of international travel
THS the expansion of nuclear energy generation
THW force countries that are major polluters to accept environmental refugees
THW remove all patents on green technology