We gathered for the first meeting to discuss the competition and establish a direction for our website. Janet introduced the competition guidelines, emphasizing the importance of creating a well-structured, informative, and engaging website about disabilities. Ophelia proposed including sections that not only define disabilities but also highlight personal stories to foster empathy. Mars and Matt suggested researching existing websites to identify effective elements and avoid redundant content. Barnett emphasized the importance of making the website interactive, proposing quizzes or videos to engage users. The team also discussed potential collaborations with organizations specializing in disability advocacy to ensure the accuracy of our content. By the end of the meeting, responsibilities were divided: Janet and Ophelia would focus on research, Mars and Matt would explore website design concepts, and Barnett would draft an initial website structure. A follow-up meeting was scheduled to refine our ideas and begin outlining content.

We had a brainstorming session to discuss the website project and competition requirements. Janet emphasized the importance of structuring the website with clear sections covering different aspects of disabilities. Ophelia suggested including real-life stories to make the content more engaging. Mars and Matt researched existing websites for inspiration, noting key design elements that enhance user experience. Barnett proposed an interactive approach, such as quizzes or infographics, to make learning more dynamic. The team also discussed potential collaborations with foundations to ensure our content was well-informed and credible. We divided research responsibilities, with Janet and Ophelia focusing on disability types and misconceptions, while Mars and Matt explored accessibility issues. Barnett took charge of drafting an initial outline for the website layout. A deadline was set for preliminary research, and we planned to reconvene in the next meeting to share findings and refine our approach.

We focused on collaboration with foundations and disability organizations to enrich our website with expert insights. Janet and Ophelia researched and shortlisted organizations that advocate for disability awareness. Mars and Matt worked on drafting professional emails to request interviews and resources. Barnett suggested preparing a structured list of questions to guide our discussions with representatives. The team emphasized the need for diverse perspectives, ensuring that both physical and cognitive disabilities were covered. Janet took the lead in reaching out to organizations, while Ophelia compiled general research on disability statistics. Mars and Matt brainstormed ways to present the collected information in an engaging format, such as video clips or interactive elements. Barnett coordinated the timeline, ensuring follow-ups were scheduled for responses. By the end of the meeting, we had sent out several emails and planned to integrate insights from these collaborations into our next development phase.

Janet provided an update on the responses from disability foundations, summarizing key takeaways from her discussions with representatives. She highlighted the importance of addressing not only physical disabilities but also cognitive and developmental disorders. Ophelia suggested creating a section on the website dedicated to debunking common misconceptions, as many people lack accurate knowledge on the subject. Mars and Matt refined the website structure, ensuring information was easily accessible and user-friendly. Barnett proposed adding an interactive quiz to test users’ knowledge about disabilities. The team also discussed accessibility features, such as high-contrast designs, text-to-speech functions, and closed captions for videos. Janet and Ophelia began drafting content based on the insights gathered, while Mars and Matt worked on initial design concepts. Barnett outlined a content integration plan to keep the project organized. A deadline was set for the first version of the website content, and each member committed to specific tasks.

We executed a promotional campaign at school, targeting junior high students to raise awareness about disabilities. Janet and Ophelia designed an engaging presentation, explaining the different types of disabilities and how society can foster inclusivity. Mars and Matt managed the distribution of flyers and posters around campus. Barnett coordinated the logistics, ensuring smooth execution of the event. The session included an interactive Q&A where students asked questions, revealing common misconceptions. Some students believed disabilities were only physical, overlooking cognitive and mental health conditions. This feedback highlighted the need for clearer information on our website. The team collected responses and agreed to refine our messaging based on student engagement. Ophelia suggested adding a frequently asked questions (FAQ) section to address common concerns. We recorded parts of the event and planned to include highlights in our website’s outreach section. The success of the event motivated us to explore further engagement strategies.

We conducted a survey to assess the community’s awareness of disabilities. Matt led the design of the questionnaire, ensuring it covered key topics such as accessibility, inclusion, and disability rights. Janet and Ophelia distributed the survey both digitally and in person, targeting students, teachers, and community members. Mars analyzed the data, identifying gaps in public understanding. Results showed that while some respondents had basic knowledge, many lacked awareness of invisible disabilities. Barnett suggested comparing our findings with national statistics to highlight disparities. The team discussed ways to incorporate survey results into the website, possibly through an interactive data visualization. Janet proposed an awareness campaign based on our findings, addressing the most common misconceptions. Mars and Matt worked on formatting the data into an easy-to-understand report. We concluded that the website should emphasize educational content tailored to address these knowledge gaps.

The team focused on expanding and refining the website’s content. Janet led efforts in compiling statistics and case studies, ensuring accuracy and credibility. Ophelia worked on making the information accessible by simplifying medical terms and using relatable language. Mars and Matt focused on the website’s user experience, refining navigation and layout for better accessibility. Barnett suggested adding a section featuring personal stories from individuals with disabilities, believing it would make the content more relatable. We reviewed all sourced materials to verify their credibility and ensure a respectful, inclusive tone. The team discussed color schemes and font choices to enhance readability, ensuring compliance with accessibility standards. Mars and Matt tested the site on different devices to identify potential usability issues. We planned to have all written content finalized before moving into the final design stage.

After the advocacy, here's a review of areas for improvement that emerged:

• Time Management: We noticed some speakers may have procrastinated a bit during their speeches. We suggest being more mindful of time management in future advocacy events to avoid affecting the overall program schedule.

• Language and Content: Some content may have been a bit difficult for the students to understand. We suggest using clearer, more understandable language in preparing advocacy materials and adjusting the content to themes closer to students' lives.

• Presentation Style: It's suggested that presenters face the students to increase interaction and interest.

• Stage Design and Presentation: We could make the stage design simpler and add more lively animations in the slides to capture students' attention.

• Post-event Interaction: After the advocacy event, we can arrange interaction time with students, such as taking photos with winners or engaging in conversations, to increase participation and interaction.

• Use of Metaphors: We suggest using more metaphors in explanations and presentations to make the content more vivid and understandable.

• Organization and Layout: Participants could stand on both sides of the stage to increase dynamism and participation.

The team gathered to finalize the interviewee selection and prepare the interview questions. After discussing various options, we decided to interview our school’s psychological counselor, recognizing their valuable insights into supporting students with disabilities. We drafted thoughtful questions, focusing on school support systems, common stereotypes, and inclusive strategies. Mars and Matt discussed the technical aspects, planning for recording the interview with clear audio and photos. We also coordinated the logistical details, confirming the date and time for the interview, which was scheduled for March 12, 2025, at the school. We finally discussed how the counselor’s insights would be incorporated into the website and potentially shared on social media to broaden outreach.

This meeting focused on ensuring the website was ready. Janet and Ophelia performed a last round of content edits, ensuring accuracy and readability. Mars and Matt conducted fixed minor bugs and optimizing site speed. Barnett coordinated the team’s final outreach efforts, ensuring we reached as many people as possible before the deadline. The team rehearsed the competition presentation, refining our talking points. We reflected on the project, discussing lessons learned and future plans beyond the competition. Janet emphasized our commitment to ongoing advocacy, and the team agreed to continue raising awareness even after the event concludes. We also finish writing the Project Narrative effectively.