Question: "Can I create a google blog?"
Answer: Yes. Go to www.blogger.com and here is a link to a blog I started for you to use to share your ideas with me about legal research on the web:
https://paralegal235.blogspot.com/2025/01/using-google-blogs.html
Question: "What is this I hear about Google perspectives filter?"
Answer from Google:
"You’ll now see more pages that are based on first-hand experience, or are created by someone with deep knowledge in a given subject. And as we underscore the importance of “experience” as an element of helpful content, we continue our focus on information quality and critical attributes like authoritativeness, expertise and trustworthiness, so you can rely on the information you find."
We will take a look at this new filter a bit more deeply in one of our sessions.
Question: " I am searching for reports about an incident that took place a few years ago and wondered if there are sites where you can search through old newspapers and magazines?"
Answer:
Nearly all major city and large county libraries have digital archives of old newspapers and some magazines. This would be my first place to look. Check with your local public library about digital copies of the old newspapers. In one of our sessions I will demonstrate searching one of these newspaper collections.
Question: "I am using fine screen recorder but have three monitors connected to the computer and it records all three screens, so how do I just capture one of the screens not all three?"
Answers:
See screen shot above - choose duplicate rather than extend when you want to screen capture. See answer #3 below
I am assuming you are using the free version of fine screen capture and so are not able to use the option to just capture a region of the screen and that MAY be the problem but...see #2
Try to use PowerPoint's insert screen option because it does allow you to select a portion of the screen and should allow you to just pick the monitor screen you are interested in capturing.
Third possibility is that you’ve extended your display, and the system understands all monitors as a single screen so change our display settings and return to the PC Screen Only option to take screenshots or to use fine screen recorder to just capture the PC screen. See the video below about how to change your settings regarding dual or multiple screens.
Question June 2023
Can you put a page on the website with all the links to those legal research resource pages you told us about?
Answer:
Yes - I put it on our site as a separate page and we will review each site as to the benefit of use. Click here to open that page:
Question June 2023
How do you get to the Advanced Search option in Google Chrome?
Answer:
https://www.google.com/advanced_search
On this page I will answer any questions you ask at the end of any session or via email:
Question July 29
Are there other ways to download a whole website?
Answer:
Yes but the best way to capture a website is to use Fine Screen Recorder or PowerPoint's Insert Screen option demonstrated in the last session because all of the following methods will have problems with audio and video and any animations on the sites. Once you have captured all the site into an mp4 file you can then pause the video and make screen clips of the frames of the video into jpg files if you need to have individual pages for evidence. But the following do a pretty good job if you do not need audio and video off of a website. I WARN, ONCE AGAIN, NOT TO INSTALL ANY SOFTWARE ON YOUR COMPUTER WITHOUT HAVING YOUR I.T. TECHNICIANS TEST IT ON A TEST COMPUTER.
THE RIGHT BUTTON CLICK ON A PAGE AND SAVE OPTION REQUIRES NO ADDITIONAL SOFTWARE ALTHOUGH THE LINKS IN THE SAVED PAGES WILL NOT WORK WITHOUT YOU MODIFYING THE LINKS, YOU STILL DO HAVE EACH INDIVIDUAL PAGE - MINUS, OF COURSE, THE AUDIO AND VIDEO.
1. WebCopy
How to Download an Entire Website With WebCopy
https://www.cyotek.com/cyotek-webcopy
Install and launch the app.
Navigate to File > New to create a new project.
Type the URL into the Website field.
Change the Save folder field to where you want the site saved.
Play around with Project > Rules… ...
Navigate to File > Save As… to save the project.
2. HTTrack
HTTrack is a free (GPL, libre/free software) and easy-to-use offline browser utility.
It allows you to download a World Wide Web site from the Internet to a local directory, building recursively all directories, getting HTML, images, and other files from the server to your computer. HTTrack arranges the original site's relative link-structure. Simply open a page of the "mirrored" website in your browser, and you can browse the site from link to link, as if you were viewing it online. HTTrack can also update an existing mirrored site, and resume interrupted downloads. HTTrack is fully configurable, and has an integrated help system.
WinHTTrack is the Windows (from Windows 2000 to Windows 10 and above) release of HTTrack, and WebHTTrack the Linux/Unix/BSD release. See the download page.
3. THIS WEBSITE SUGGESTS SEVERAL OTHER METHODS - ONE IS TO READ THE WEBSITE FROM CACHE SEE BELOW LINK
https://www.hongkiat.com/blog/read-download-website-offline/
Question July 29
What are some of the free websites that can be used for various purposes not necessarily web research?
Answer:
This is a youtube video that describes 10 of what he considers the best free websites on the internet. It includes a free photoshop like image editing program, image identifier and much more.
Question July 29
If you save a web page using right button click on it and save to your local computer will the hyperlinks still work if the web page is taken down?
Answer:
No, the links will try to find the page on the web. However, if you save each of the pages to your local computer, then modify the hyperlinks to point them to the pages where they are stored on your computer, then the links will of course work off your computer hard drive or your network drive depending on where you saved the pages.
Question July 26
How do you find out who owns a website?
Answer:
To find out who owns a domain, you can use a WHOIS lookup service.
...
We will be using ICANN to find out the domain owner.
To begin, open your browser and go to ICANN. https://lookup.icann.org/lookup
Now, in the search box, enter the domain name that you want to search for.
Click on 'Lookup' and the search will begin.
It will provide you with a method for contacting the owner of the url- most of the time the name of the owner is hidden for privacy but through the provider of the url you can try to get in touch with the owner - usually a form is supplied you fill out with your information.
Another website that discusses this well is at: https://www.wpbeginner.com/wp-tutorials/how-to-find-out-who-actually-owns-a-domain-name/
Question July 22
Does Google Scholar offer a shepardizing tool to show if the case has been overturned, etc.? If not, what do you suggest as a free service for that?
Answer:
First a bit of history regarding "shepardizing" and then a consideration of whether Google Scholar could be used as a free shephardizing method.
Shepard's Citations is a citator used in United States legal research that provides a list of all the authorities citing a particular case, statute, or other legal authority.[1] The verb Shepardizing (sometimes written lower-case) refers to the process of consulting Shepard's to see if a case has been overturned, reaffirmed, questioned, or cited by later cases.[1] Although the name is trademarked, it is also used informally by legal professionals to describe citators in general[citation needed]—for example, Westlaw's similar electronic citator called KeyCite. Prior to the development of electronic citators like KeyCite during the 1990s, Shepard's was the only legal citation service that attempted to provide comprehensive coverage of U.S. law.[1]
The name derives from a legal service begun by Frank Shepard (1848–1902) in 1873, when Shepard began publishing these lists in a series of books indexed to different jurisdictions.[1] Initially, the product was called Shepard's Adhesive Annotations. The citations were printed on gummed, perforated sheets, which could be divided and pasted onto pages of case law. Known as "stickers", these were literally torn to bits and stuck to pertinent margins of case reporters.
By the early 20th century, the Frank Shepard Company was binding the citations into maroon volumes with Shepard's Citations stamped in gold on their spines, much like the ones still found on library shelves.[2]
Under the leadership of William Guthrie Packard, the company endured the Great Depression and continued to grow. It moved to Colorado Springs in 1948; in 1951, it adopted the name Shepard's Citations, Inc.[3] In 1966, Shepard's Citations was acquired by McGraw Hill.[4]
In 1996, Shepard's was purchased by Times Mirror and Reed Elsevier (owner of LexisNexis since 1994).[5] In 1998, LexisNexis bought full ownership of Shepard's.[6] After this acquisition, LexisNexis engaged in a "multi-million-dollar Citations Redesign (CR) project" that "redesigned the way we process case law and citations".[2]
Here is one suggestion:
How do I Shepardize on Google Scholar?
Select a jurisdiction by clicking “select courts” and then place a check mark next to the courts you would like to search. If you look to the the top of any opinion's page, you will see a link to the "How Cited" feature.Mar 3, 2021
You could compare the results with a free trial version of Keycite
Here is someone evaluating this method:
https://researchfreedom.wordpress.com/2012/04/23/can-you-use-google-scholar-to-shepardize/
The author seems to think it can be used and suggests it is as good a method as paid services.
Here is what he states: https://sportsclinictampico.com/self-organization/how-to-shepardize-a-case/
Google stated: "Today [March 8], we are changing how we present citations to legal opinions. Now, instead of sorting the citing documents by their prominence, we sort them by the extent of discussion of the cited case. Opinions that discuss the cited case in detail are presented before ones that mention the case briefly. We indicate the extent of discussion visually and indicate opinions that discuss the cited case at length, that discuss it moderately and those that discuss it briefly. Opinions that don’t discuss the cited case are left unmarked.
Here is his opinion:
Given this change, I decided to conduct a simple test of two cases. I selected two state cases, each with a moderate number of citator results (around 40 results). For each case, I compared the KeyCite and Shepard’s results with the Google Scholar “How Cited” Results.
With respect to both cases, every citator result that affected the validity of the cases (negative citing references) appeared in all citators, including Google Scholar, towards the top of the results. All results that discussed the cited cases appeared in all citators, as well. In connection with these two particular cases, the ordering of results were substantially similar in all citators. Importantly, however, Google Scholar does not index most unreported or unpublished cases. So, if you want an accurate depiction of how many times a case is cited, there is no substitute for West or Lexis. But with respect to precedent that might actually affect a case’s viability, I found no substantive differences between the citators.
Of course, there are differences in the way Google Scholar and Lexis/Westlaw present the results. Google doesn’t provide any treatment signals (e.g., red flags, stars, etc.). Nonetheless, one might argue that this might cause attorneys to study the precedent more carefully, rather than rely on the West/Lexis characterization of precedent. I also found the case excerpts in Google Scholar’s How Cited results much more helpful than the excerpts provided by West and Lexis."
Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that this is is merely anecdotal evidence, not empirical research, and this post should not be considered legal advice.
Here is another opinion from: https://libguides.law.uconn.edu/free
Shepardizing cases is difficult without using Lexis or Westlaw. Free case law searches, such as Google Scholar, often have ways to at least look at other cases that have cited to the case you are trying to Shepardize, but this will not identify cases that may be overruled by implication or find cases on the same issue that are conflicting but do not cite each other.
There is also this link:
https://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/Using-Shepards-Online.pdf
https://sandiegolawlibrary.org/services/electronic-resources/
Lexis allows free use of its shepardizing databases from time to time remotely through libraries like the one with the link above
It is available at this San Diego Law Library until July 31, 2021 but depending on the pandemic situation might continue to be available.
Here is a citator page from the Free Law Project
Or, just make a link with a format like:
https://www.courtlistener.com/c/REPORTER/VOLUME/PAGE/
And you’ll get to the page for that citation. For example, using parallel citations, any of these links will take you to Citizen’s United v. Federal Elections Commission:
This new tool relies on our existing citation extractor, which extracts thousands of citations from opinions every day. As a result, these links are also able to handle alternate names for any reporter that we have encoded in our Reporters Database. For example, the United States Reports has historically also been abbreviated as “U.S.S.C.Rep.” or “USSCR”. Use either of these, and you’ll find that they also work without a hitch.
The Library of Congress has good resources regarding free shephardizing and other research tools:
https://guides.loc.gov/free-case-law
It references this link:
https://case.law/search/#/cases
Questions July 20, 2021
Are these search engines free or do they end up charging for the reports they generate?
Answer:
Some of these are free but others charge nominal fees and let you know up front what those charges will be. Before I use any of them I try google searches such as:
"karl kindt" and Missouri
or
"karl kindt" and "St. Louis"
etc.
Question:
I have had luck with Accurint (a Lexis subscription) in locating individuals. www.accurint.com
Answer:
Thanks for sharing and here is a link to their website: www.accurint.com
https://www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/products/accurint-for-legal-professionals.page
If you pay for this service, they offer free training in the use of their software:
https://www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/training/telephonic-consulting.page
Our course in web searching is designed to help you use the free web search and options that require payment per search options but if your law firm pays for these other services from Lexis and Westlaw, these companies th en provide you with training without cost.
Other sites to find people are listed at:
Most of these do have a fee associated with them as well.
Question:Are you familiar with other archive sites besides archive.org/web?
Answer:
Other archive websites:
https://www.nla.gov.au/collections/what-we-collect/archived-websites#
https://www.library.drexel.edu/news-and-events/news/libraries-news/2021/March/DUA_WebsiteCollection/
Question:
I don't see the general web search techniques pptx in the file cabinet of the Google drive site
Answer:
These are linked to and stored on my google share site at:
Google Scholar Search Suggestions
Question July 15, 2021
Are we going to cover any online search tools for looking up laws such as RCW/WAC or more focused on cases? Also are we going to cover any tools to help research individuals such as for conflict checking or finding contact information for personal service?
Answer:
Here are some websites that will be helpful in this type of searching the web:
New State Laws:
Commonly requested laws and regulatins:
https://www.usa.gov/laws-and-regulations
Washington Administrative Code WAC
State Laws and Regulations:
https://www.llsdc.org/state-legislation
http://www.lawsource.com/also/
Where State Laws Differ:
https://www.lawhelp.org/find-help
https://www.findlaw.com/dui/laws-resources/comparing-state-dui-laws.html
https://www.gunstocarry.com/gun-laws-state/
https://statelaws.findlaw.com/
Conflict Checking Research Software Options:
https://www.capterra.com/conflict-checking-software/
PDF file that deals with Conflict Checking:
https://krieger.jhu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Handbook-Conflict-of-Interest_12.01.16.pdf
Another Software option for conflict checking using this web tool
https://www.perfectlaw.com/applications/back/conflict_checker.asp
People Search Websites with Contact Information
Tracking someone down using Google: enclose the person’s official names in quotes, such as “Andrew Lee Washington”
https://inspirationfeed.com/people-search/
http://www.truepeoplesearch.com
https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/how-can-i-serve-someone-if-i-don-t-know-where-they-live-34099
https://www.lifewire.com/search-engines-that-top-the-web-3482269
Question May 6, 2020
Can you use a single character wild card in your Google searches? (I had shown this in one of my searches)?
Answer from Google support:
It's recommended to use a function such as IFERROR to check for cases when there aren't matches to the search. You can use the wildcard characters: question mark (?) and asterisk (*), in search_for . A question mark matches any single character; an asterisk matches any sequence of characters.
SEARCHB - Docs Editors Help - Google Support
Question 2
What is the best search sites for medical legal research?
Answer:
Here are a few:
Question 1
Can you use the PRNTSR button to capture website information?
Answer:
You can use the PRNTSCR button on your keyboard to capture into memory of the computer the whole screen or use the ALT-PRNTSCR buttons at the same time to just capture the 'window' of the website into memory then use CONTROL+V to paste what is in memory into Word or PowerPoint. But these methods only capture the visible portion of the website.