Prosecutions

_Acuña, Carlos H., and Catalina Smulovitz. 1997. Guarding the Guardians in Argentina: Some Lessons about the Risks and Benefits of Empowering the Courts. In Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies, edited by A. J. McAdams. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

_Adams, Kif Augustine. 1993. What is Just? The Rule of Law and Natural Law in the Trials of Former East German Border Guards. Stanford Journal of International Law 29 (2):271-314.

_Affolder, Natasha A. 1998. Tadic, The Anonymous Witness and the Sources of International Procedural Law. Michigan Journal of International Law 19 (2):445-496.

_Akhavan, Payam. 2005. Justice, Power, and the Realities of Interdependence: Lessons from the Milosevic and Hussein Trials. Cornell International Law Journal 38 (3):973-982.

_Akhaven, Payam. 1993. Punishing War Crimes in the Former Yugoslavia: A Critical Juncture for the New World Order. Human Rights Quarterly 15 (2):262-289.

_Akhaven, Payam. 1996. The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda: The Politics and Pragmatics of Punishment. American Journal of International Law 90 (3):501-510.

_Akhaven, Payam. 1996. The Yugoslav Tribunal at a Crossroads: The Dayton Peace Agreement and Beyond. Human Rights Quarterly 18 (2):259-285.

_Akhaven, Payam. 1997. Justice and Reconciliation in the Great Lakes Region of Africa: The Contribution of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 7 (2):325-348.

_Akhaven, Payam. 1998. Justice in The Hague, Peace in the Former Yugoslavia? A Commentary on the United Nations War Crimes Tribunal. Human Rights Quarterly 20 (4):737-816.

_Akhaven, Payam. 2001. Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Atrocities? American Journal of International Law 95 (1):7-31.

_Akhaven, Payam, Teodor Meron, William H. Parks, and Patricia Viseur-Sellers. 1998. The Contribution of the Ad Hoc Tribunals to International Humanitarian Law. American University International Law Review 13 (6):1509-1539.

_Aldana, Raquel. 2006. A Victim-Centered Reflection on Truth Commissions and Prosecutions as a Response to Mass Atrocities. Journal of Human Rights 5 (1):107-126.

_Alexander, Larry. 1983. Retributivism and the Inadvertent Punishment of the Innocent. Law and Philosophy 2 (2):233-246.

_Alivizatos, Nicos C., and P. Nikiforos Diamandouros. 1997. Politics and the Judiciary in the Greek Transition to Democracy. In Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies, edited by A. J. McAdams. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

_Allen, Tim. 2006. Trial Justice: The International Criminal Court and the Lord's Resistance Army. London, UK: Zed Books.

_Alvarez, José E. 1996. Nuremberg Revisited: The Tadic Case. European Journal of International Law 7 (2):245-264.

_Alvarez, José E. 1998. Rush to Closure: Lessons of the Tadic Judgment. Michigan Law Review 96 (7):2031-2112.

_Alvarez, José E. 2004. Trying Hussein: Between Hubris and Hegemony. Journal of International Criminal Justice 2 (2):319-329.

_Amnesty International. 1987. Argentina: Report of the Trial of the Former Junta Members. London, UK: Amnesty International Press.

_Appleman, John A. 1954. Military Tribunals and International Crimes. Indianapolis, IN: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.

_Arbour, Louise. 2000. The International Tribunals for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law in the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. McGill Law Journal 46 (1):195-201.

_Arbour, Louise, and Aryeh Neier. 1998. History and Future of the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. American University International Law Review 13 (6):1495-1508.

_Arendt, Hannah. 1990. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York, NY: Viking Press.

_Arnson, Cynthia J. 1999. Comparative Peace Processes in Latin America. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

_Askin, Kelly D. 2000. Judgments Rendered in 1999 by the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda. ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 6 (2):485-505.

_Aspen Institute. 1989. State Crimes: Punishment or Pardon. New York, NY: Aspen Institute.

_Aydelott, Danise. 1993. Mass Rape During War: Prosecuting Bosnian Rapists Under International Law. Emory International Law Review 7 (2):585-631.

_Baird, Jay A. 1972. From Nuremberg to My Lai. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

_Bald, Stephanie H. 2002. Searching for a Lost Childhood: Will the Special Court of Sierra Leone Find Justice for its Children? American University International Law Review 18 (2):537-583.

_Bang-Jensen, Nina, Tom Gjelten, Roy Gutman, Ivana Nizich, and Thomas Warrick. 1998. Tribunal Justice: The Challenges, the Record and the Prospects. American University International Law Review 13 (6):1541-1577.

_Bass, Gary J. 2000. Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

_Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 1986. Nuremberg Forty Years After: An Introduction. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 18 (2):261-266.

_Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 1987. A Draft International Criminal Code and Draft Statute for an International Criminal Tribunal. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

_Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 1996. Searching for Peace and Achieving Justice: The Need for Accountability. Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (4):9-28.

_Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 1997. From Versailles to Rwanda in Seventy-Five Years: The Need to Establish a Permanent International Criminal Court. Harvard Human Rights Journal 10:11-62.

_Bassiouni, M. Cherif, ed. 2002. Post-Conflict Justice. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.

_Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 2002. The United Nations Commission of Experts Established Pursuant to Security Council Resolution 780 (1992) to Investigate Violations of International Humanitarian Law in the Former Yugoslavia. In Post-Conflict Justice, edited by M. C. Bassiouni. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.

_Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 2005. Post-Conflict Justice in Iraq: An Appraisal of the Iraq Special Tribunal. Cornell International Law Journal 38 (2):327-390.

_Bassiouni, M. Cherif, Charles N. Brower, Claudio Grossman, Diane F. Orentlicher, Tina Rosenberg, David J. Scheffer, and Paul R. Williams. 1998. War Crimes Tribunals: The Record and the Prospects. American University International Law Review 13 (6):1383-1411.

_Bassiouni, M. Cherif, Mark S. Ellis, Stephan Landsman, Madeline Morris, Diane F. Orentlicher, Michael P. Scharf, and Paul R. Williams. 2002. Proposed Guiding Principles for Combating Impunity for International Crimes. In Post-Conflict Justice, edited by M. C. Bassiouni. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.

_Bassiouni, M. Cherif, and Michael Wahid Hanna. 2007. Ceding the High Ground: The Iraqi High Criminal Court Statute and the Trial of Saddam Hussein. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 39 (1-2):21-98.

_Bassiouni, M. Cherif, and Peter Manikas. 1996. The Law of the International Criminal Tribunal For the Former Yugoslavia. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Transnational Publishers.

_Beigbeder, Yves, and Theo Van Boven. 1999. Judging War Criminals: The Politics of International Justice. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.

_Bell, Rose. 1996. Truth Commissions and War Tribunals. Index on Censorship 25 (5):148-151.

_Benomar, Jamal. 1993. Justice after Transitions. Journal of Democracy 4 (1):3-14.

_Berat, Lynn. 1993. Prosecuting Human Rights Violators From a Predecessor Regime. Guidelines for a Transformed South Africa. Boston College Third World Law Journal 13 (2):199-231.

_Beres, Louis René. 1998. Why and How Saddam Must Be Punished: A Jurisprudential/Philosophical Explanation. University of Detroit Mercy Law Review 75 (4):667-680.

_Beresford, Stuart. 2002. Redressing the Wrongs of the International Justice System: Compensation for Persons Erroneously Detained, Prosecuted, or Convicted by the Ad Hoc Tribunals. American Journal of International Law 96 (3):628-646.

_Best, Geoffrey. 1984. Nuremburg and After: The Continuing History of War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity. Reading, PA: University of Reading Press.

_Binder, Guyora. 1989. Representing Nazism: Advocacy and Identity at the Trial of Klaus Barbie. Yale Law Journal 98 (7):1321-1383.

_Bizos, George. 2003. Why Prosecutions are Necessary. In The Provocations of Amnesty: Memory, Justice and Impunity, edited by C. Villa-Vicencio and E. Doxtader. Cape Town, South Africa: David Philip Publishers.

_Blakesley, Christopher L. 1997. Atrocity and Its Prosecution: The Ad Hoc Tribunals for Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. In The Law of War Crimes: National and International Approaches, edited by T. L. H. McCormack and G. J. Simpson. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.

_Blaser, Arthur. 1992. How To Advance Justice without Really Trying: An Analysis of Non-governmental Tribunals. Human Rights Quarterly 14 (3):339-370.

_Bodley, Anne. 1999. Weakening the Principle of Sovereignty in International Law: The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 31 (2-3):417-472.

_Boed, Roman. 2000. The Effect of a Domestic Amnesty on the Ability of Foreign States to Prosecute Alleged Perpetrators of Serious Human Rights Violations. Cornell International Law Journal 33 (2):297-330.

_Boed, Roman. 2002. The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. In Post-Conflict Justice, edited by M. C. Bassiouni. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.

_Boelaert-Suominen, Sonja. 2001. Prosecuting Superiors for Crimes Committed by Subordinates: A Discussion of the First Significant Case Law since the Second World War. Virginia Journal of International Law 41 (4):747-785.

_Borneman, John. 1997. Settling Accounts: Violence, Justice, and Accountability in Postsocialist Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

_Brackman, Arnold. 1987. The Other Nuremberg: The Untold Story of the Tokyo War Crimes Trials. New York, NY: William Morrow and Co., Inc.

_Braithwaite, John. 1989. Crime, Shame, and Reintegration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

_Brody, Reed. 2001. Justice: The First Casualty of Truth? The Global Movement to End Impunity for Human Rights Abuses Faces a Daunting Question. Nation April 30th.

_Brown, Bartram S. 1998. Primacy or Complementarity: Reconciling the Jurisdiction of National Courts and International Criminal Tribunals. Yale Journal of International Law 23 (2):383-436.

_Buscher, Frank. 1989. The US War Crimes Trial Program in Germany, 1946-1955. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.

_Carroll, Christina M. 2000. An Assessment of the Role and Effectiveness of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the Rwandan National Justice System in Dealing with the Mass Atrocities of 1994. Boston University International Law Journal 18 (2):163-200.

_Cervoni, Rocco P. 1997. Beating Plowshares into Swords - Reconciling the Sovereign Right to Self-determination with Individual Human Rights through an International Criminal Court: The Lessons of the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda as a Frontispiece. St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary 12 (2):477-534.

_Chaney, Kevin R. 1995. Pitfalls and Imperatives: Applying the Lessons of Nuremberg to the Yugoslavia War Crimes Tribunal. Dickinson Journal of International Law 14 (1):57-94.

_Charney, Jonathan I. 1999. The Impact on the International Legal System of the Growth of International Courts and Tribunals. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 31 (4):697-708.

_Chhang, Youk. 2007. The Thief of History - Cambodia and the Special Court. International Journal of Transitional Justice 1 (1):157-172.

_Cissé, Catherine. 1997. The International Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda: Some Elements of Comparison. Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 7 (1):103-118.

_Clapham, Andrew. 2003. Issues of Complexity, Complicity and Complementarity: From the Nuremberg Trials to the Dawn of the New International Criminal Court. In From Nuremberg to the Hague: The Future of International Criminal Justice, edited by P. Sands. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

_Cobban, Helena. 2006. Think Again: International Courts. Foreign Policy 153:22-28.

_Cockayne, James. 2005. Hybrids or Mongrels? Internationalized War Crimes Trials as Unsuccessful Degradation Ceremonies. Journal of Human Rights 4 (4):455-473.

_Cohen, David. 1999. Beyond Nuremberg: Individual Responsibility for War Crimes. In Human Rights in Political Transitions: Gettysburg to Bosnia, edited by C. Hesse and R. Post. New York, NY: Zone Books.

_Cohen, David. 2007. 'Hybrid' Justice in East Timor, Sierra Leone, and Cambodia: 'Lessons Learned' and Prospects for the Future. Stanford Journal of International Law 43 (1):1-38.

_Cohen, Stanley. 1995. State Crimes of Previous Regimes: Knowledge, Accountability, and the Policing of the Past. Law and Social Inquiry 20 (1):7-50.

_Cooper, Belinda. 1999. War Crimes: The Legacy of Nuremberg. New York, NY: TV Books.

_Correa Sutil, Jorge. 1997. 'No Victorious Army Has Ever Been Prosecuted.' The Unsettled Story of Transitional Justice in Chile. In Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies, edited by A. J. McAdams. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

_Cragg, Wesley. 1992. The Practice of Punishment: Toward a Theory of Restorative Justice. London, UK: Routledge.

_Creel, George. 1944. War Criminals and Punishment. New York, NY: R.M. McBride & Company.

_Creta, Vincent M. 1998. The Search for Justice in the Former Yugoslavia and Beyond: Analyzing the Rights of the Accused Under the Statute and the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Houston Journal of International Law 20 (2):381-418.

_Crocker, Lawrence. 1992. The Upper Limit of Just Punishment. Emory Law Journal 41 (4):1059-1110.

_Deák, István, Jan T. Gross, and Tony Judt, eds. 2000. The Politics of Retribution in Europe: World War II and Its Aftermath. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

_Dermody, John. 2006. Beyond Good Intentions: Can Hybrid Tribunals Work after Unilateral Intervention? Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 30 (1):77-102.

_Des Forges, Alison, and Timothy Longman. 2005. Legal Responses to Genocide in Rwanda. In My Neighbor, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity, edited by E. Stover and H. M. Weinstein. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

_Dickinson, Laura A. 2002. Transitional Justice in Afghanistan: The Promise of Mixed Tribunals. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 31 (1):23-42.

_Dickinson, Laura A. 2003. The Promise of Hybrid Courts. American Journal of International Law 97 (2):295-309.

_Dixon, Rod. 1997. Developing International Rules of Evidence for the Yugoslav and Rwanda Tribunals. Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 7 (1):81-102.

_Dougherty, Beth K. 2004. Right-sizing International Criminal Justice: The Hybrid Experiment at the Special Court for Sierra Leone. International Affairs 80 (2):311-328.

_Drakulic, Slavenka. 2004. They Would Never Hurt a Fly: War Criminals on Trial in the Hague. New York, NY: Viking.

_Drumbl, Mark A. 2001. The (Al)lure of the Genocide Trial: Justice, Reconciliation, and Reconstruction in Rwanda in Effective Strategies for Protecting Human Rights. In Effective Strategies for Protecting Human Rights, edited by D. Barnhizer. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.

_Drumbl, Mark A. 2001. Appeals in the Ad Hoc International Criminal Tribunals: Structure, Procedure, and Recent Cases. Journal of Appellate Practice and Process 3 (2):589-659.

_Dupuy, Pierre-Marie. 1999. The Danger of Fragmentation or Unification of the International Legal System and the International Court of Justice. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 31 (4):823-832.

_Dworkin, Anthony. 1996. The World in Judgment: Do International War Crimes Tribunals Help or Hinder National Reconciliation? Index on Censorship 25 (5):137-144.

_Edelenbos, Carla. 1994. Human Rights Violations: A Duty to Prosecute? Leiden Journal of International Law 7 (2):5-22.

_Ellis, Mark S. 2005. Defense Counsel Appearing before International Tribunals: Past Experiences and Future Challenges. Journal of Human Rights 4 (4):491-512.

_Eser, Albin. 1996. 'Defenses' in War Crimes Trials. In War Crimes in International Law, edited by Y. Dinstein and M. Tabory. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff.

_Fabian, Kellye L. 2000. Proof and Consequences: An Analysis of the Tadic [Prosecutor v. Tadic, [1997] 36 I.L.M. 908] & Akayesu [Prosecutor v. Akayesu, Case No. ICTR-96-4-T (Sept. 2, 1998)] Trials. DePaul Law Review 49 (4):981-1039.

_Falk, Richard A. 1971. Nuremberg: Past, Present, and Future. Yale Law Journal 80 (7):1501-1528.

_Farrell, Brian. 2003. The Right to a Speedy Trial Before International Criminal Tribunals. South African Journal on Human Rights 19 (1):98-117.

_Ferencz, Benjamin B. 1990. The Nuremberg Precedent and the Prosecution of State-Sponsored Mass Murder. New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law 11 (3):325-332.

_Findlay, Mark, and Ralph Henham. 2005. Transforming International Criminal Justice: Retributive and Restorative Justice in the Trial Process. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.

_Foucault, Michel. 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by A. Sheridan. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

_Furuya, Shuichi. 2000. Legal Effect of Rules of the International Criminal Tribunals and Court Upon Individuals: Emerging International Law of Direct Effect. Netherlands International Law Review 47 (2):111-145.

_Glueck, Sheldon. 1966. War Criminals: Their Prosecution and Punishment. New York, NY: Kraus Reprint Corporation.

_Goldstone, Richard J. 1996. Justice As a Tool for Peace-Making: Truth Commissions and International Criminal Tribunals. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 28 (3):485-503.

_Goldstone, Richard J. 1997. Assessing the Work of the United Nations War Crimes Tribunal. Stanford Journal of International Law 33 (1):1-8.

_Goldstone, Richard J. 1997. The United Nations' War Crimes Tribunals: An Assessment. Connecticut Journal of International Law 12 (2):227-240.

_Goldstone, Richard J. 1998. Bringing War Criminals to Justice During an Ongoing War. In Hard Choices: Moral Dilemmas in Humanitarian Intervention, edited by J. J. J. Moore. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

_Goldstone, Richard J. 2000. For Humanity: Reflections of a War Crimes Investigator. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

_Greenwood, Christopher. 1993. The International Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia. International Affairs 69 (4):641-655.

_Grossman, Claudio, Gabrielle Kirk McDonald, Arlen Specter, and Steven Weinstein. 1998. International Support for International Criminal Tribunals and an International Criminal Court. American University International Law Review 13 (6):1413-1440.

_Grossman, Claudio, and Aryeh Neier. 1998. War Crimes Tribunals: The Record and the Prospects. American University International Law Review 13 (6):1579-1584.

_Harhoff, Frederik. 1997. Consonance or Rivalry? Calibrating the Efforts to Prosecute War Criminals in National and International Tribunals. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 7 (2):571-596.

_Harris, Marshall Freeman, R. Bruce Hitchner, Michael P. Scharf, Paul R. Williams, and Diane F. Orentlicher. 1998. Making Justice Work: The Report of the Century Foundation/Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on Apprehending Indicted War Criminals. New York, NY: The Century Foundation Press.

_Higonnet, Etelle R. 2006. Restructuring Hybrid Courts: Local Empowerment and National Criminal Justice Reform. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 23 (2):347-435.

_Horovitz, Sigall. 2006. Transitional Criminal Justice in Sierra Leone. In Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth versus Justice, edited by N. Roht-Arriaza and J. Mariezcurrena. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

_Hosoya, Chihiro, Nisuke Ando, Yaskuaki Onuma, and Richard H. Minear, eds. 1986. The Tokyo War Crimes Trial: An International Symposium. Tokyo, Japan: Kodansha.

_Human Rights Watch. 1989. Policy Statement on Accountability for Past Abuses. Special Issue: Accountability for Past Human Rights Abuses 4:1-2.

_Human Rights Watch. 2004. Justice at Risk: War Crimes Trials in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia and Montenegro. New York, NY: Human Rights Watch.

_Humphrey, Michael. 2003. International Intervention, Justice and National Reconciliation: The Role of the ICTY and ICTR in Bosnia and Rwanda. Journal of Human Rights 2 (4):495-505.

_Jacoby, Susan. 1983. Wild Justice: The Evolution of Revenge. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

_Jacovides, Andrew A. 2001. International Tribunals: Do They Really Work for Small States? New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 34 (1):253-262.

_Jaspers, Karl. 1947. The Significance of the Nuremberg Trials for Germany and the World. Notre Dame Law Review 22 (2):150-160.

_Joyner, Christopher C. 1998. Redressing Impunity for Human Rights Violations: The Universal Declaration and the Search for Accountability. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 26 (4):591-624.

_Judah, Tim. 2004. The Fog of Justice. New York Review of Books, 23-25.

_King, Henry T. Jr. Nuremberg and Sovereignty. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 28 (1):135-140.

_Kingsbury, Benedict. 1999. Is the Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals a Systematic Problem? New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 31 (4):679-696.

_Klip, Andre, and Goran Sluiter. 1999. Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: Volume 1: The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 1993-1998. Antwerp, NY: Intersentia.

_Klip, Andre, and Goran Sluiter. 2000. Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: Volume 2: The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda 1994-1999. Antwerp, NY: Intersentia.

_Kremnitzer, Mordechai. 1996. The Demjanjuk Case. In War Crimes in International Law, edited by Y. Dinstein and M. Tabory. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff.

_Lael, Richard L. 1982. The Yamashita Precedent: War Crimes and Command Responsibility. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.

_Landsman, Stephan. 1996. Alternative Responses to Serious Human Rights Abuses: Of Prosecution and Truth Commissions. Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (4):81-92.

_Lawyers Committee for Human Rights. 1991. Impunity: Prosecutions of Human Rights Violations in the Philippines. New York, NY: Lawyers Committee for Human Rights.

_Malamud-Goti, Jaime. 1990. Transitional Governments in the Breach: Why Punish State Criminals? Human Rights Quarterly 12 (1):1-16.

_Mann, Kenneth. 1996. Hearsay Evidence in War Crime Trials. In War Crimes in International Law, edited by Y. Dinstein and M. Tabory. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff.

_McAdams, A. James. 1997. Communism on Trial: The East German Past and German Future. In Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies, edited by A. J. McAdams. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

_McDonald, Gabrielle Kirk. 2001. The International Criminal Tribunals: Crime and Punishment in the International Arena. ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 7 (3):667-686.

_McDonald, Gabrielle Kirk. 2001. The International Criminal Tribunals: Crime and Punishment in the International Arena. Nova Law Review 25 (2):463-484.

_Méndez, Juan E. 1997. Accountability for Past Abuses. Human Rights Quarterly 19 (2):255-282.

_Mertus, Julie. 1999. Only a War Crimes Tribunal: Triumph of the International Community, Pain of Survivors. In War Crime: The Legacy of Nuremberg, edited by B. Cooper. New York, NY: TV Books.

_Mills, Marsha V. 1999. War Crimes in the 21st Century. Hofstra Law and Policy Symposium 3:47-74.

_Morris, Madeline H. 1996. International Guidelines against Impunity: Facilitating Accountability. Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (4):29-40.

_Morris, Madeline H. 1997. Justice in Cataclysm: Criminal Trials in the Wake of Mass Violence. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 7 (2):319-324.

_Muller-Rappard, Ekkehart. 2002. International Cooperation in Prosecution and Punishment. In Post-Conflict Justice, edited by M. C. Bassiouni. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.

_Mundis, Daryl A. 2000. Improving the Operation and Functioning of the International Criminal Tribunals. American Journal of International Law 94 (4):759-773.

_Murphy, Jeffrie G. 1991. Retributive Hatred: An Essay on Criminal Liability and the Emotions. In Liability and Responsibility, edited by R. G. Frey and C. W. Morris. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

_Mutua, Makau wa. 1997. Never Again: Questioning the Yugoslav and Rwanda Tribunals. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 11:167-187.

_Nalepa, Monica. 2010. Why do they Return? Evaluating International Tribunals' Contribution to Reconciliation. In NOMOS 50: Transitional Justice (Proceedings of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy), edited by J. Elster and M. S. Williams. New York, NY: New York University Press.

_Neier, Aryeh. 1990. What Should be Done About the Guilty? New York Review of Books, 32-35.

_Nersessian, David L. 2002. The Contours of Genocidal Intent: Troubling Jurisprudence from the International Criminal Tribunals. Texas International Law Journal 37 (2):231-276.

_Nersessian, David L. 2007. Comparative Approaches to Punishing Hate: The Intersection of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity. Stanford Journal of International Law 43 (2):221-264.

_Nino, Carlos S. 1991. The Duty to Punish Past Abuses of Human Rights Put into Context: The Case of Argentina. Yale Law Journal 100 (8):2619-2640.

_Nino, Carlos S. 1996. Radical Evil on Trial. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

_O'Shea, Sheila. 1995/96. Interaction Between International Criminal Tribunals and National Legal Systems. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 28 (1-2):367-434.

_Oppenheim, John, and W. Van der Wolf, eds. 1997. Global War Crimes Tribunal Collection. Holmes Beach, FL: Gaunt and Global Law Association.

_Orentlicher, Diane F. 1991. A Reply to Professor Nino. Yale Law Journal 100 (8):2641-2643.

_Orentlicher, Diane F. 1991. Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime. Yale Law Journal 100 (8):2537-2615.

_Orentlicher, Diane F. 1994. Addressing Gross Human Rights Abuses: Punishment and Victim Compensation. In Human Rights: An Agenda for the Next Century, edited by L. Henkin and J. Hargrove. Washington, D.C.: The American Society of International Law.

_Orentlicher, Diane F. 1997. Swapping Amnesty for Peace and the Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Crimes. ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 3 (2):713-718.

_Orentlicher, Diane F. 2007. 'Settling Accounts' Revisited: Reconciling Global Norms with Local Agency. International Journal of Transitional Justice 1 (1):10-22.

_Osiel, Mark J. 2000. Why Prosecute? Critics of Punishment for Mass Atrocity. Human Rights Quarterly 22 (1):118-147.

_Overy, Richard. 2003. The Nuremberg Trials: International Law in the Making. In From Nuremberg to the Hague: The Future of International Criminal Justice, edited by P. Sands. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

_Paskins, Barrie, and James Gow. 2000. The Creation of the International Tribunals from the Perspectives of Pragmatism, Realism, and Liberalism. International Relations 15 (3):11-15.

_Peskin, Victor. 2005. Trials and Tribulations: International Criminal Tribunals and the Politics of State Cooperation. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

_Popoff, Evo. 2001. Inconsistency and Impunity in International Human Rights Law: Can the International Criminal Court Solve the Problems Raised by the Rwanda and Augusto Pinochet Cases? George Washington International Law Review 33 (2):363-395.

_Post, Jerrold M., and Lara K. Panis. 2005. Tyranny on Trial: Personality and Courtroom Conduct of Defendants Slobodan Milosevic and Saddam Hussein. Cornell International Law Journal 38 (3):823-836.

_Prinz, Barrett. 1998. The Treaty of Versailles to Rwanda: How the International Community Deals with War Crimes. Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 6:553-582.

_Rana, G. 1997. And Justice for All: Normative Descriptive Frameworks for the Implementation of Tribunals to Try Human Rights Violators. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 30 (2):349-378.

_Robertson, Geoffrey. 2005. Ending Impunity: How International Criminal Law Can Put Tyrants on Trial. Cornell International Law Journal 38 (3):649-672.

_Rogers, John M. 1987. Prosecuting Terrorists: When Does Apprehension in Violation of International Law Preclude Trial? University of Miami Law Review 42 (2):447-465.

_Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. 1990. State Responsibility to Investigate and Prosecute Grave Human Rights Violations in International Law. California Law Review 78 (2):449-514.

_Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. 1995. Special Problems of a Duty to Prosecute: Derogation, Amnesties, Statutes of Limitation, and Superior Orders. In Impunity and Human Rights in International Law and Practice, edited by N. Roht-Arriaza. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

_Romano, Cesare. 1999. The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Pieces of the Puzzle. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 31 (4):709-752.

_Romano, Cesare, Andre Nollkaemper, and Jann K. Kleffner. 2004. Internationalized Criminal Courts: Sierra Leone, East Timor, Kosovo and Cambodia. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

_Roper, Steven D., and Lilian A. Barria. 2006. Designing Criminal Tribunals: Sovereignty and International Concerns in the Protection of Human Rights. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.

_Roper, Steven D., and Lilian A. Barria. 2007. Donor Motivations and Contributions to War Crimes Tribunals. Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (2):285-304.

_Rudolph, Christopher. 2001. Constructing an Atrocities Regime: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals. International Organization 55 (3):655-691.

_Sandholtz, Wayne. 2006. Creating Authority: The International Criminal Tribunals. In International Studies Association Annual Convention. San Diego, CA.

_Sands, Philippe. 2003. After Pinochet: The Role of National Courts. In From Nuremberg to the Hague: The Future of International Criminal Justice, edited by P. Sands. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

_Schabas, William A. 1997. Sentencing by International Tribunals: A Human Rights Approach. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 7 (2):461-517.

_Schabas, William A. 1997. War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity and the Death Penalty. Albany Law Review 60 (3):733-770.

_Schabas, William A. 2006. The UN International Criminal Tribunals: The Former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

_Scharf, Michael P. 1996. The Letter of the Law: The Scope of the International Legal Obligation to Prosecute Human Rights Crimes. Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (4):41-62.

_Scharf, Michael P. 1997. Balkan Justice: The Story Behind the First International War Crimes' Trial Since Nuremberg. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.

_Scharf, Michael P. 1997. The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic: An Appraisal of the First International War Crimes Trial Since Nuremberg. Albany Law Review 60 (3):861-882.

_Scharf, Michael P. 1997/98. Trial and Error: An Assessment of the First Judgment of the Yugoslavia War Crimes Tribunal. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 30 (1-2):167-200.

_Scharf, Michael P. 2005. Errors and Missteps: Key Lessons the Iraqi Special Tribunal Can Learn from the ICTY, ICTR, and SCSL. Cornell International Law Journal 38 (3):911-948.

_Scharf, Michael P. 2005. The Perils of Permitting Self-Representation in International War Crimes Trials. Journal of Human Rights 4 (4):513-520.

_Scharf, Michael P. 2007. Chaos in the Courtroom: Controlling Disruptive Defendants and Contumacious Counsel in War Crimes Trials. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 39.

_Scharf, Michael P., and Nigel Rodley. 2002. International Law Principles on Accountability. In Post-Conflict Justice, edited by M. C. Bassiouni. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.

_Shriver, Donald W. Jr. 2001. Truth Commissions and Judicial Trials: Complementary or Antagonistic Servants of Public Justice. Journal of Law and Religion 16 (1):1-34.

_Shriver, Donald W. Jr. 2003. Truth Commissions and Judicial Trials: Complementary or Antagonistic Servants of Public Justice? In The Provocations of Amnesty: Memory, Justice and Impunity, edited by C. Villa-Vicencio and E. Doxtader. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.

_Simpson, Gerry J. 1997. Didactic and Dissident Histories in War Crimes Trials. Albany Law Review 60 (3):801-840.

_Simpson, Gerry J. 1997. War Crimes: A Critical Introduction. In The Law of War Crimes: National and International Approaches, edited by T. L. H. McCormack and G. J. Simpson. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.

_Snyder, Jack, and Leslie Vinjamuri. 2003/04. Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice. International Security 28 (3):5-44.

_Spelliscy, Shane. 2001. The Proliferation of International Tribunals: A Chink in the Armor. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 40 (1):143-177.

_Stojanovic, Lazar, ed. 2000. Spotlight on War Crimes Trials. Belgrade, Serbia: Humanitarian Law Center.

_Summers, Mark A. 2003. The International Court of Justice's Decision in Congo v. Belgium: How Has It Affected the Development of a Principle of Universal Jurisdiction that Would Obligate All States to Prosecute War Criminals. Boston University International Law Journal 21 (1):63-100.

_Thornberry, Cedric. 1996. Saving the War Crimes Tribunal. Foreign Policy 104:72-85.

_Tomuschat, Christian. 1993. A System of International Criminal Prosecution is Taking Shape. Review of the International Commission of Jurists 50:56-70.

_Tracol, Xavier. 2001. The Appeals Chambers of the International Criminal Tribunals. Criminal Law Forum 12 (2):137-165.

_Tucker, Aviezer. 1999. Paranoids May be Persecuted: Post-Totalitarian Retroactive Justice. Archives Europeennes De Sociologie 40 (1):56-100.

_Tutorow, Norman. 1986. War Crimes, War Criminals, and War Crimes Trials: An Annotated Bibliography and Source Book. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.

_Van der Merwe, Hendrik W. 1995. Restitution: Neither Witch-Hunt nor Cover-up. Track Two.

_Verdeja, Ernesto. 2004. Institutional Responses to Genocide and Mass Atrocity. In Genocide, War Crimes and the West, edited by A. Jones.  London, UK: Zed Books.

_Verdeja, Ernesto. 2009. Repair and Justice in Latin America.  In State Violence and Genocide in Latin American: The Cold War Years, edited by M. Esparza, H. Huttenbach, and D. Feirstein.  New York, NY: Routledge.

_Verdirame, Guglielmo. 2000. The Genocide Definition in the Jurisprudence of the Ad Hoc Tribunals. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 49 (3):578-598.

_Villa-Vicencio, Charles. 2000. Why Perpetrators Should not Always be Prosecuted: Where the International Criminal Court and Truth Commissions Meet. Emory Law Journal 49 (1):205-222.

_Vinjamuri, Leslie, and Jack Snyder. 2004. Advocacy and Scholarship in the Study of International War Crime Tribunals and Transitional Justice. Annual Review of Political Science 7 (1):345-362.

_Walther, Suzanne. 1995. Problems in Blaming and Punishing Individuals for Human Rights Violations: The Example of the Berlin Wall Shootings. In Impunity and Human Rights in International Law and Practice, edited by N. Roht-Arriaza. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

_Warbrick, C. 1995. The United Nations System: A Place for Criminal Courts. Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 5 (2):237-261.

_Wladimroff, Michail. 2005. Former Heads of State on Trial. Cornell International Law Journal 38 (3):949-972.

_Wolfrum, Rudiger. 1996. The Decentralized Prosecution of International Offenses through National Courts. In War Crimes in International Law, edited by Y. Dinstein and M. Tabory. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff.

Comments