Apart from the well-known Euler function, q-functions and q-analogues such as f(z) = (1 - a z)(1 - a z^2)(1 - a z^3)(1 - a z^4)... ,
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/q-PochhammerSymbol.html
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/q-Series.html
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/DedekindEtaFunction.html
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/q-Product.html
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/EulerFunction.html
Or the lesser known
f(x) = f(0) (1 + x/t_1) (1 + x/t_2) (1 + x/t_3) ...
What even works when f(x) = exp(x)
exp(x) = (1+z)(1 + (1/2) x^2)...
see
https://www.go.helms-net.de/math/musings/dreamofasequence.pdf
***
btw an interesting somewhat sum analogue of q-series and taylor expansion is this
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/LambertSeries.html
***
there are other interesting infinite products.
Such as this
For real x > 0
ln(x) = (x - 1) [2 / (x^(1/2) + 1)] [2 / (x^(1/4) + 1)][2 / (x^(1/8) + 1)][2 / (x^(1/16) + 1)][2 / (x^(1/32) + 1)]...)
Notice this is problematic if x would be on the unit circle, therefore we take x real > 0.
Replacing x with z such that Re(z) > 1 however also works.
Notice how this is a telescoping identity that follows from (x+1)(x-1) = x^2 -1.
Also notice that by telescoping it is clear that f(x^2) = 2 f(x) is satisfied here.
Notice the equation f(x^2) = 2 f(x) makes alot of sense if x is not on the unit circle.
Lets generalize
For real x > 0
T(x) = (x - 1) [2 / (x^(1/a_1) + 1)] [2 / (x^(1/a_2) + 1)][2 / (x^(1/a_3) + 1)][2 / (x^(1/a_4) + 1)][2 / (x^(1/a_5) + 1)]...)
And
1/a_1 + 1/a_2 + 1/a_3 + ... = 1.
Now clearly this function does not grow like any power.
T(x) =/= O( x^a)
precisely because 1/a_1 + 1/a_2 + 1/a_3 + ... = 1.
The log is an example of it since 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ... = 1 and indeed log(x) grows slower than any x^a.
so how fast does T(x) grow for a given sequence a_n ?
a_n = n(n+1) ?
( that is a telescoping sum to 1 btw)
or
a_n being sylvester's sequence ?
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/SylvestersSequence.html
Worth investigating.
Update :
See these posts by my friend.
The integral proof comes from me, I am his mentor.
Basically the same question on mathstack.
Also slightly related
Update 2 :
Additional links by my friend :
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4982893/is-fx-d-x-1-prod-n0-frac1dx1-2nd-close-to-lnxgd