Cheap BNC-m connector for LMR-400 coax

Created: Feb. 2022

-------------------

Introduction

The "Oserjep" branded connector is available from the China-based Shopee retailer, ylkrp.my. The main selling point is a price that is ~1/10 of an equivalent model from established German manufacturer, Telegaertner (RM6.20 vs RM61).

Fig. 1: advertisement on Shopee

Mechanical aspects

The plating quality is dubious as speckles can be seen against the red grommet (fig. 2). 

Fig. 2: Flaked off plating appear as speckles on the red grommet 

As the clamp is different from what I have encountered before, I asked the vendor for an assembly diagram but got no response. The clamp's uniqueness lies in the use of a washer-like ring to lock the braid (fig. 3). However, it is a poor design because the connector body can rotate slightly after assembly (fig. 4).

Fig. 3: Cable assembly with an uncommon clamp

Fig. 4: After assembly, the connector body can slightly rotate wrt. the coax 

Electrical performances


Ideally, connectors should be evaluated in conjunction with a very short coax in order to minimize the coax's contribution to the measured performances. However, my intent was to produce a 15m coax and so will need to live with this imperfect evaluation setup.

The coax with the Oserjep connectors was compared to a similar cable fitted with Telegaertner ones. The testing utilized a network analyzer that swept over 10-1000 MHz, although the connectors should ideally be tested up to the specified maximum; i.e. 4 GHz for BNC. 

Both cables have almost similar insertion loss over, but only the Oserjep's loss is shown (fig 5). The return loss trace has ripples that are ~45 MHz apart; these are due to the reflected waves combining either constructively (peak) or destructively (notch) at the test port. 

However the cables' return loss differ significantly (fig. 6); i.e. the Oserjep equipped cable has significantly poorer match at higher frequencies. The Oserjep's poorer match should be tolerable at 435 MHz, but can be worrying above 800 MHz.  

Fig. 6: Return loss (RL) and insertion loss of a 15m LMR-400 coax fitted with the Oserjep connectors

Fig. 7: Comparison of two identical coax cables fitted with either Oserjep or Telegaertner connectors reveals that the former has poorer RL at higher frequencies. Both top & bottom graphs represent the same set of data, without & with smoothing, respectively