::References

【参照文献】

• Abusch, D,（1994）. The scope of indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 2, 83-136.
• Austin, J. L. （1962）, How to do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • （J. L. オースティン『言語と行為』坂本百大訳，大修館書店，1978）
• Bach, E.（ 1986）. Natural language metaphysics. In R. Barcan Marcus, G. J. W. Dora, and P.
• Weingartner, eds.. Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science VII. Amsterdam:
• North Holland, 573-95.
• Bach, E.（ 1989）. Informal Lectures on Formal Semantics. Albany, NY; SUNY Press.
• Barwise, J.（ 1981）. Scenes and other situations. Journal of Philosophy 77, 369-97.
• Barwise, J. and J. Perry（ 1983）. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • （ジョン・バーワイズ& ジョン・ペリー『状況と態度』土屋俊・白井英俊・向井国昭・鈴木浩之・片桐恭弘訳，産業図書，1992）
• Block, N.（1986）, Advertisement for a semantics for psychology. In P. French, T. Uehling, and H. Wettsetin, eds.. Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Vol. 10: Studies in the
• Philosophy of Mind. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 615-78.
• Block, N, （1998）. Holism, mental and semantic. In E. Craig, ed.. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge.
• Brandom, R,（1983）. Asserting. Noûs 17, 637-50.
• Brandom, R,（1994）. Making It Explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Brandom, R. （2000）. Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Buirge, T. （1979）. Individualism and the mental- In P. French and H. Wettstein, eds..
• Midwest Studies in Philosophy: Studies in Metaphysics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 73-122.
• Burge, T, （1982）. Other bodies. In A. Woodfield, ed., Thought and Object. New York: Oxford University Press, 97-120.
• Carlson, G.（ 1977）. Reference to kinds in English. University of Massachusetts at Amherst Ph.D. dissertation. Can be downloaded from semanticsarchive.net
• Chierchia, G. and S. McConnell-Ginet （2000）. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics, 2nd edn, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Chomsky, N.（ 1970）. Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In R. Jakobson and S. Kawamoto, eds.. Studies in General and Oriental Linguistics. Tokyo: TEC Corporation, 1S3-216.
• Cooper, R., K, Mukai, and J. Perry, eds.（1990）, Situation Theory and Its Applications, Vol.7. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, and Stanford, CA: CSL.
• Cresswell, M. and A- von Stechow （1982）. De re belief generalized. Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 503-35.
• Davidson, D.（ 1967a）. Truth and meaning. Synthese 17, 304-23.
  • （ドナルド・デイヴィドソン「真理と意味」野本和幸訳，『真理と解釈』勁草書房，1911）
• Davidson, D.（ 1967b）. The logical form of action sentences. In N. Rescher, ed.. The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 81-120.
  • （ドナルド・デイヴィドソン「行為文の論理形式」『行為と出来事』服部裕幸・柴田正良訳，勁草書房，1990）
• Davis, S. ed.（ 1991）. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Dietrich, W, （1955）. Erweiterte Form, Prateritum und Perfektum im Englischen: Eine Aspet- und Tempusstudie. Munich: Max Hueber.
• Donnellan, K.（ 1966）. Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 75, 281-304.
  • （キース・ドネラン「指示と確定記述」荒磯敏文訳，松阪陽一編『言語哲学重要論文集』，春秋社，2013）
• Dowty, D. （1977）. Towards a semantic analysis of verb aspect and the English “imperfective progressive.” Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 45-78.
• Dowty, D.（ 1979）. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
• Dowty, D.（ 1990）. Thematic proto-roles, argument selection, and lexical semantic defaults. Language 67（3）, 547-619.
• Dresner, E. （2002）. Holism, language acquisition, and algebraic logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 25, 419-52.
• Eno M.（ 1991）. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 1-25.
• Evans, G,（ 1973）. The causal theory of names. Aristotelian Society: Supplementary Volume 47, 187-208.
  • （ガレス・エヴァンズ「名前の因果説」池田さつき・佐藤康之・松阪陽一，松阪陽一編『言語哲学重要論文集』春秋社，2013）
• Evans, G.（ 1980）. Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 337-62.
• Evans, G.（ 1982）, The Varieties of Reference. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press.
• Evans, G. and J. McDowell, eds,（ 1976）. Truth and Meaning; Essays in Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Fauconnier, G. （1975）. Implication reversal in a natural language. In F, Guenthner and S.Schmidt, eds., Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 289-300.
• Fauconnier, G. （1985）. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • （ジル・フォコニエ『メンタルスペース』坂原茂・田窪行則・水光雅則・三藤博訳，白水社，1996）
• Field, H.（1977）. Logic, meaning, and conceptual role, Journal of Philosophy 69, 379-408.
• Fodor, J.（1975）. The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell.
• Fodor, J. and E. Lepore（1992）. Holism: A Shoppersʼ Guide. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • （ジェリー・フォーダー& アーネスト・ルポア『意味の全体論─ホーリズム，そのお買い物ガイド』柴田正良訳，産業図書，1997）
• Fodor, J. D. and L Sag （1982）. Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 355-98.
• Gazdar, G.（1979）, Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.
• Gazdar, G.（ 1981）. Speech act assignment. In A. EC Joshi, I. A. Sag, and B. L. Webber, eds,. Elements of Discourse Understanding, New York: Cambridge University Press, 64-83.
• Ginzburg, J, （1995a）. Resolving questions, part I. Linguistics and Philosophy 18（5）, 459-527.
• Ginzburg, J. （1995b）. Resolving questions, part II. Linguistics and Philosophy 18（6）, 567-609.
• Green, G.（ 1996）. Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • （ジョージア・グリーン『プラグマティックスとは何か─語用論概説』深田淳訳，産業図書，1990）
• Grice, H. P.（ 1957）. Meaning. Philosophical Review 66, 377-58.
  • （ポール・グライス「意味」『論理と会話』清塚邦彦訳，勁草書房，1998）
• Grice, H, P. （1975）. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. L Morgan, eds.. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3; Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41-58. Repr. in H. P. Grice （1989）. Studies in the Ways of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 22-40.
• Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof （1982）. Semantic analysis of wh-complements. linguistics and Philosophy 5,175-233.
• Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof （1984）. Studies in the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Amsterdam.
• Hamblin, C. L（ 1973）, Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10, 41-53.
• Hamblin, C. L. （1971）. Mathematical models of dialogue. Theoria 37, 130-55, Han, C. H. （1998）. The structure and interpretation of imperatives: mood and force in Universal Grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
• Harman, G. （1987）. （Non-solipsistic） conceptual role semantics. In E. Lepore, ed., New Directions in Semantics. London: Academic Press, 55-81.
• Hausser, R.（ 1980）. Surface compositionality and the semantics of mood. In R Kiefer and J. Searle, eds.. Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Dordrecht: Reidel, 71-95.
• Heim, I. （1982）. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts.
• Heim, I.（ 1985）. E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 137-78.
• Heim, I,（1990）. On the projection problem for presuppositions. In S. Davis, ed., Pragmatics. Oxford; Oxford University Press, 397-405.
• Heim, I. （1992）. Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs, Journal of Semantics 9, 183-221.
• Heim, I. and A. Kratzer（1997）. Semantics in Generative Grammar, Oxford and New York: Blackwell.
• Inoue, K.（1979）. An analysis of the English present perfect. Linguistics 17, 561-89.
• Jackendoff, R.（1990）. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Jackendoff, R.（1992）. Languages of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Jacobs, J. （1983）. Fokus und Skalen: Zur Syntax und Semantik der Gradpartikel im Deutschen. Tubingen: Niemeyer.
• Kadmon, N.（2001）, Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition and Focus. Maiden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell
• Kadmon, N. and E Ladman（ 1993）, Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 353-422.
• Kamp, H. （1981）. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M, Stokhof, eds.. Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum, 277-322.
• Karttunen, L.（1969）. Pronouns and variables. In Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago: CLS, 108-15.
• Karttunen, L（ 1977）. Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3-44.
• Karttunen, L （2003）. Discourse referents. In J. Gutierrez-Rexach, eds. Semantics: Critical Concepts in Linguistics. Vol. HI. New York and London: Routledge, 20-39. Also in J. DMcCawley, ed. （1976）. Syntax and Semantics 7: Notes from the Linguistic Underground. New York: Academic Press, 363-85.
• Karttunen, L. and S. Peters （1979）. Conventional implicature. In C-Y, Oh and D. Dinneen, eds., Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 21: Presupposition. New York: Academic Press, 1-56.
• Kennedy, C. （1999）. Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison. New York: Garland Press. （1997 University of California at SantaCruz Ph.D. dissertation.）
• Kleiny E. and I. Sag（ 1985）. Type-driven translation. Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 63-201.
• Klein , W.（ 1994）. Time in language. London: Routledge.
• Kratzer, A.（ 1977）. What “must” and “can” must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 337-55.
• Kratzer, A. （1981）. The notional category of modality. In H, J. Eikmeyer and H, Reiser, eds., Worlds, Words, and Contexts: New Approaches in Word Semantics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 38-74.
• Kratzer, A,（ 1989）. An investigation of the lumps of thought, linguistics and Philosophy 12, 607-53.
• Kratzery A. （1991）. Modality. In A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich, eds,, Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 639-50.
• Kripke, S. （1972）. Naming and necessity. In D. Davidson and G. Harman, eds., Semantics for Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 253-355. Also pub. 1982 as Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • （ ソール・クリプキ『名指しと必然性』八木沢敬訳，産業図書，1985）
• Kripke, S. （1977）. Speakerʼs reference and semantic reference. In P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, Jr, and H. K. Wettstein, eds.. Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 6-27.
  • （ ソール・クリプキ「話し手の指示と意味論的指示」黒川英徳訳，『現代思想』（Vol. 23: no.4）青土社，1995）
• Ladusaw, W,（ 2002）. On the notion affective in the analysis of negative-polarity items. In P.Portner and B. Partee, eds., Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings. Oxford: Blackwell, 457-70.
• Lakoff, G. （1987）. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago; University of Chicago Press.
  • （ジョージ・レイコフ『認知意味論』池上嘉彦・河上誓作訳，紀伊國屋書店，1993）
• Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson （1980）. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • （ジョージ・レイコフ& マーク・ジョンソン『レトリックと人生』渡部昇一・楠瀬淳三・下谷和幸訳，大修館書店，1986）
• Landman, F.（ 1992）, The progressive. Natural Language Semantics 1, 1-32.
• Larson, R. K. and G- Segal （1995）. Knowledge of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Larson, R. K. and P. Ludlow（ 1993）. Interpreted logical forms. Synthese 95, 305-55.
• Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav （1995）. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 26. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Levinson, S. （1983）. Pragmatics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • （スティーヴン・C・レヴィンソン『英語語用論』安井稔・奥田夏子訳，研究者出版，1990）
• Lewis, D, （1970）. General semantics. Synthese 22, 18-67. Repr. in D. Davidson and G.Harman, eds.（ 1972）, Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 169-218.
• Lewis, D.（ 1979）. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 339-59.
• Lewis, D.（ 1986）. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford and New York: Blackwell.
• Linebarger, M.（ 1987）. Negative polarity and grammatical representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 325-87.
• Link, G.（ 1983）. The logical analysis of plural and mass terms; a lattice-theoretic approach. In R, Bauerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow, eds., Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 302-32.
• Ludlow, P.（ 2000）. Interpreted logical forms, belief attribution, and the dynamic lexicon. In K. M. Jaszczolt, ed.. Pragmatics of Propositional Attitude Reports. Oxford: Elsevier, 31-42,
• Lycan, W, G,（ 1984）, Logical Form in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books: MIT Press.
• Martin, R.（ 1987）. The Meaning of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• McCoard, R. （1978）. The English Perfect: Tense-Choice and Pragmatic Inferences. Amsterdam: North Holland.
• Montague, R. （1970a）. English as a formal language. In B. Visentini et al., eds., Linguagginelia Sodeta e nella Tecnica: Edizioni di ComunitH. Milan: Edizioni di Comunita, 189-224. Repr. in R. Montague （1974）. Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, ed. and intro, R. H. Thomason, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 188-221.
• Montague, R. （1970b）. Universal Grammar. Theoria 36, 373-98. Repr. in R. Montague （1974）. Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, ed, and intro. R. H. Thomasoa New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 222-46.
• Montague, R,（ 1973）. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English, In K. J. J, Hintikka, J. M. E, Moravcsik, and P, Suppes, eds.. Approaches to Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 221-42, Repr, in R. Montague （1974）. Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, ed. and intro. R. H. Thomason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 247-70.
• Montague, R. （1974）. Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, ed. and intro. R. H. Thomason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
• Parsons, T.（ 1990）. Events in the Semantics of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Partee, B, （1973）, Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. Journal of Philosophy 70（18）, 601-9.
• Partee, B. （1986）. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, and M. Stokhof, eds. Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers. Dordrecht: Foris, 115-43.
• Perry, J. （1993）. The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays. New York; Oxford University Press.
• Pinker, S. （1994）. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York: William Morrow.
  • （スティーブン・ピンカー『言語を生みだす本能 上・下』椋田直子訳，日本放送出版協会，1995）
• Portner, P.（ 1998）. The progressive in modal semantics. Language 7（4 4）, 760-87.
• Portner, P. （2003）. The （temporal） semantics and （modal） pragmatics of the perfect. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 459-510.
• Portner, P.（ forthcoming）. The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Linguistics Department.
• Portner, P. and K. Yabushita. （1998）. The semantics and pragmatics of topic phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 117-57.
• Putnam, H.（ 1975）. The meaning of “meaning.” In K. Gunderson, ed., Language, Mind, and Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 131-93. Repr. in H. Putnam （1979）, Mind, Language, and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 215-71.
• Quine, W. V. O. （1953）. Two dogmas of empiricism. In W. V. O. Quine, From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 20-46.
  • （ W. V. O. クワイン「経験主義のふたつのドグマ」『論理的観点から』飯田隆訳，勁草書房，1992）
• Quine, W. V. O.（ 1960）. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • （ W. V. O. クワイン 『ことばと対象』大出晃・宮館恵訳，勁草書房，1984）
• Reichenbach, H.（ 1947）, Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan.
  • （ ハンス・ライヘンバッハ『記号論理学の原理』石本新訳，大修館書店，1995）
• Reinhart, T.（ 1982）. Pragmatics and linguistics: an analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 278, 53-94.
• Reinhart, T. （1997）. Quantifier scope: how labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 335-97.
• Reis, M. （1999）. On sentence types in German: an enquiry into the relationship between grammar and pragmatics. IJGLSA 4（2）, 195-236.
• Richard, M.（1990）. Propositional Attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Rooth, M. （1985）. Association with focus, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Arnherst.
• Rooth, M.（ 1992）. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1, 75-116.
• Russell, B. （1919）. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin, Relevant section repr. in A. P. Martinich, ed. （1985）. The Philosophy of Language. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 213-19.
  • （バートランド・ラッセル『数理哲学序説』平野智治訳，岩波書店，1954）
• Sadock, J. （1978）. On testing for conversational implicature. In P. Cole, ed., Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 281-98.
• Saeed, J.（ 2003）. Semantics, 2nd edn. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
• Salmon, N.（ 1986）. Fregeʼs Puzzle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Searle, J. R. （1965）. What is a speech act? In M. Black, ed., Philosophy in America. New York; Allen and Unwin, 221-39.
• Searle, J. R.（ 1969）. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • （ジョン・R・サール『言語行為』坂本百大・土屋俊訳，勁草書房）
• Searle, J. R. （1975a）. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In K. Gunderson, ed., Language, Mind, and Knowledge: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 3,
• Minneapolis; University of Minnesota Press, 1-29.
  • （ ジョン・R・サール「発語内行為の分類法」野村㤗史訳，『表現と意味』山田友幸監訳，誠信書房，2006）
• Searle, J. R. （1975b）. Indirect speech acts. In F, Cole and J, L. Morgan, eds. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 59-82.
  • （ジョン・R・サール「間接言語行為」『表現と意味』山田友幸監訳，誠信書房，2006）
• Smith, C.（ 1999）. Activities: states or events? Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 479-508.
• Soames, S. （1989）. Presupposition. In D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, eds., Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Vol. 4; Topics in the Philosophy of Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 553-616.
• Soames, S.（1990）, Lost innocence. Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 59-71.
• Soames, S.（ 992）. Truth, meaning, and understanding. Philosophical Studies 65, 17-35.
• Soames, S. （2002）. Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Stalnaker, R.（1974）. Pragmatic presupposition. In M. Munitz and P. Unger, eds.. Semantics and Philosophy. New York: New York University Press, 197-213.
• Stalnaker, R,（1978）. Assertion. Syntax and Semantics 9, 315-32.
• Stalnaker, R.（1984）. Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Stanley, J. （1997）, Names and rigid designation. In B. Hale and C. Wright, eds., A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford and Maiden, MA: Blackwell, 555-85.
• Tarski, A. （1944）. The semantic conception of truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, 341-75.
• van der Sandt, R. A.（1992）. Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution, Journal of Semantics 9, 333-77.
• von Stechow, A.（1991）. Current issues in the theory of focus. In A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich, eds., Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin; Walter de Gruyter, 804-35.
• Wittgenstein, L.（1953）, Philosophical Investigations, trans. G, E. M, Anscombe. New York: Macmillan.
  • （ウィトゲンシュタイン『哲学探究』藤本隆志訳，大修館書店，1976）
• Zwarts, F. （1998）. Three types of polarity. In F. Hamm and E. Hinrichs, eds., Plurality and Quantification. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer, 177-238.