• Who is the intended audience for the game?
• What are some specific examples of published games you see as being in the same intended category as the game being evaluated?
  
• What are your general biases as a player for or against games in this category?
• How much fun did you have playing the game?
  
• What aspects did you like most / least about the design?
• How likely would you be to play this game again?

Clarity

• How clear were the rules of the game?
• How clear was the game presentation (components, board, icons, etc.)?
• What could be done to make the game experience more clear for the players?

Theme (if applicable)

• How well did the game mechanics reinforce the theme?
• What could be done to improve the integration of theme and mechanics?
• What opportunities and/or challenges are presented by the current theme or lack thereof?

Choices

• How engaging were the choices presented by the game?
• How appropriate was the depth of the choices offered compared to the overall length and pace of the game?
• What could be done to make the choices more engaging?

Pacing

• How well did the game maintain an engaging pace throughout the experience?
• What aspects of the game's design interfered with a satisfying pace (ex. "fiddly" or tiresome "book keeping" procedures)?
  
• What could be done to improve the pacing?

Fairness

• How appropriate was the fairness of the game experience for each participant?
  
• What could be done to improve this aspect of the game?
  

Product Viability

• What price would you expect to pay for a game in this category?
• What price point would have to be charged to support the game's production given the current quantity and types of components?
• How well does the strategic depth of the game match the anticipated price point?
• What components could/should be changed or removed to support a viable price point?