Post date: May 10, 2014 3:11:23 PM
Last night I was reading news online, and I found a news item that exposes the mindset of today’s culture and the intellectual vapidity, and the attitude, of the cultural elites toward logic and law. A county circuit judge, who is obviously little more than a pencil-pushing twaddle-head, has essentially declared that state’s constitution to be in violation of itself. If this represents the intellectual capacity of the judiciary of these United States, then this culture is farther gone than even I thought.
When an amendment is applied to a constitution, which in this case was done by a vast majority of those who sit superior to that constitution, it is not a mere tack-on, like a post-it note on a refrigerator door. It is part and parcel to that constitution. You cannot declare it to be a violation of the constitution without therefore declaring the entire constitution to be a violation of the constitution—and that, my friend, is Alice-in-Wonderland run amok.
Has no judge in this land today even heard of the term “non-sequitur”?
What is worse is the well anticipated do-nothing wringing of hands and cries of woe from the supposedly faithful of this land—and that is if there is any outcry at all.
The immediate reaction of that state’s legislature should be to forthwith and without delay or mercy declare that judge to be unfit and immediately remove them from office and vacate that non-sequitur opinion.
Every judge in the land is sworn to uphold the constitutions under which they serve.
Read that again:
Every judge in the land is sworn to uphold the constitutions (yes, plural) under which they serve.
They are inferior to those constitutions, not those constitutions to them. Therefore, declaring one of those constitutions to be a violation is itself a violation of their oath to defend and uphold that which they are attacking as a violation. It is open rebellion against the authorities under which they have sworn to faithfully serve. They have violated their oath and should be dispassionately and immediately removed and negated from office.
Even holding such an opinion demonstrates the lack of a digit of IQ. Trying to actually enact it, though, lacks both the second and third.
This poor excuse for a person should not be ruling over anything at all, much less any collection of their legal superiors. They should, rather, be held in an institution for the criminally insane.
This is like the stubborn, pigheadedly stubborn, child threatening to take their ball and go home. This, though, is not their ball. It is yours.
Take it back!