You should know that there are 5 d-orbitals each usually at the same energy – we say that they are degenerate.
Crystal field theory models ligands as “point-charges” - occupying no space.
Many complex ions are octahedral – ligands form covalent bonds along the x,y and z axes.
Some d-orbitals lie on the axes (dz2 and d x2-y2) - their energy is raised.
The other three orbitals lie between the axes and their energy is lowered.
The difference in energy is the Crystal Field Splitting Energy, ∆o.
It is affected by the oxidation number of the metal ion, the ligand, the geometry of the complex and the metal at its centre.
Different metals cause different amounts of splitting – ie, different ∆o.
Larger metals tend towards larger ∆o – providing that their oxidation states aren’t different.
Look at the relative sizes of metals in the d-block.
Why would you expect 2+ ions of Period 3 transition elements to have similar ∆o?
Why would you expect 2+ ions of V and Ta to have quite different ∆o?
Different oxidation states also cause different amounts of splitting – ie, different ∆o.
Larger oxidation states produce larger ∆o for the same metal.
We’re not expected to know exactly why a tetrahedral complex ion will have a different splitting than a square planar complex.
Nor are we expected to know which would be larger.
Crystal Field Theory divides ligands into weak-field ligands and strong field ligands.
Strong-field ligands cause bigger splitting because their charge density is higher.
Below, different complexes of the same ion have different Splitting energies.
The tetrahedral split is smaller – the energy gap is less.
Energy is proportional to frequency, and inversely proportional to wavelength
E ∝ f E ∝ 1/λ
So the frequency of light needed to promote electrons is low – and the wavelength long.
Long wavelengths are at the red end
A solution will appear blue-green – the opposite side of a colour wheel.
The lowest energy orbitals should be filled first.
– so there is no “choice” for the first 3 electrons in an octahedral complex.
After this there are two alternatives:
i) The next electron could singly occupy a higher orbital
ii) The next electron could spin pair in a lower energy orbital
Both are higher energy options than for the first 3 electrons but pairing is the highest energy option.
The extra energy needed to spin pair is the Pairing Energy, P.
We really aren’t expected to know anymore.