1. The Two Main Divisions of E1a1 [M44]

THE ORIGINAL PDF OF THIS REPORT IS DOWNLOADABLE HERE

The Two Main Divisions of E1a1, With An Emphasis on North Africa By Robert Hall

IMAGES AND SOME DATA REFERENCED HERE ARE VIEWABLE AND DOWNLOADABLE

AT THE SOURCE DOCUMENT AT https://exploringe1a1.wordpress.com/2018/07/12/173/

Eleven years ago, after discovering that I had what is considered an African male line,

other men of my haplogroup tested and it soon was apparent that we had two distinct

lines of what was known at first as E1. There were those with a Middle Eastern

background and the rest of us with no known links to the Levant. Since then, we have

learned a lot, but our initial impression that there were basically two groups of us has

not changed. In fact, it has been confirmed.

Today, with all the confusion of labels in y-dna, caused by an abundance of knowledge

about the delineation of haplogroups, we often refer to our male lines by the last known

positive mutational test available. But, basically, we who started out being known as

E1 are known today as E1a1. And this is the nomenclature that speaks to me. Such a

designation avoids the more lengthy letter and numbers that are often difficult to

remember. And it also clings to a place in the alphabet that suggests age and rarity.

Still, though, we cannot avoid using the newer designations with the more lengthy

letter and numbers. This is necessary because we are dependent upon the scientific

community for their indispensable input. Such language communicates. So, looking

to YFull,1 a company that provides interpretation of y-dna data from the extensive

testing done by other companies, I am relying on their y-tree for the information upon

which I am expounding.

Until we have more information than we have now, which could occur at any time, we

will go with the idea that there are two main divisions of our E1a1 haplogroup, which is

what we see in YFull’s tree, which, by the way, is the focus of this paper.^ Somewhere

along the way, a split occurred. One group became what we will call the Middle

Easterners. They are designated by the mutation, Z17699. The rest became more

Africa-centered. Their mutation is labeled Z17467.

It appears that the split occurred either in northeast Africa or in the Levant. The reason

for this likelihood is because the Dogon, who are the strongest African carriers of E1a

today and seemingly the parent of E1a1, seemed to live in northeast Africa before

moving to northwest Africa and then to the sub-Saharan region. This assumption is

based on data provided by the 2009 Tishkoff study, which showed the descending

order of the Dogon’s closeness to other African groups.2 But make no mistake—the

story is complicated, and conjecture, at times, must be a willing participant.

In order to avoid confusion about the spread of E1a1, I should mention that while the

Dogon appear to be the parent of our subclade, it is highly probable that it was the

Fulani who spread E1a1. I say this because it is the nomadic Fulani of the sub-Sahara

that carries 10% of E1a1, the highest percentage known.3 Interestingly, the Fulani also

carry E1b1b1 at the rate of 18.8%, which is associated with North Africa.

To date, the Z17699 group of E1a1 shows the following migrants from the northeast

African area or the Levant: a European family with an English surname, two Lebanese

families, and several families who eventually settled in eastern Europe in such

countries as Romania, Ukraine, and others. The Z17467 group is comprised of

Sardinians, sub-Saharan Africans, English families with English surnames, and a family

with Sicilian ties. With additional testing of other known E1a1 men who, to this date,

have not tested for one of the two groups, it could easily be determined which group is

theirs.

The Z17699 group appears to have been born out of what happened in northeast

Africa some 3400 years ago when Moses led the children of Israel out of Egypt. As this

group was being formed, some of the E1a1 in the area apparently became followers of

Moses and adopted Judaism as their religion. With the passage of time some of the

Jewish population headed north into Europe establishing communities in what is

France today. In fact, such communities were in place as early as 6 A. D. in Gallia

Celtica (France, Switzerland, Luxembourg, and part of Germany).4 While this is not the

whole story, it is certainly part of the story that explains E1a1 transition northward into

mainland Europe.

Interestingly, although the Z17699 group has many adherents who are practicing Jews,

there are others who are not Jewish. Maybe they were at one time and, perhaps, lost

that ancient connection. Or, maybe they adopted a different religion, such as

Christianity, Islam, or the Abrahamic religion of the Druze. Of these, there are those

who have remained close to their original homeland and others who have become

scattered.

Like other haplogroups, E1a1 is most always on the move. So, as the E1a1 population

of North Africa moved about, some went north through the Levant, these being the

Z17699 group, and others, the Z17467 group, stayed in the Mediterranean region,

primarily North Africa. And with the establishment of the city of Carthage, planted by

the Phoenicians from Tyre in 814 B. C., E1a1 (the Z17467 division) came under the rule

and culture of the Carthaginians, which was pervasive throughout North Africa.

Carthage quickly became the Phoenicians’ home away from home. Continuing the seagoing

ways of their fathers, the transplanted sailors explored and sought conquest

amongst the Mediterranean islands of Malta, Sardinia, Corsica, and Sicily, as well as

others, in the 6th century B. C.5 Along the way they established colonies of their

people and spread their influence in sundry locations, not only along the North African

coast and in the Mediterranean islands, but along the southern and southeastern coast

of Spain as well.

In time the Carthaginians eventually traveled outside the Mediterranean. In the 5th

century under the leadership of Himilco they explored the southwest coast of Iberia,

eventually traveling as far north as Gaul (France today) and the British Isles. Their

objective seemed to be to obtain tin from Gaul and Britain. In the same period another

Carthaginian, known as Hanno, took 65 ships with 30,000 men and women and

traveled around the coast of northwest Africa, going southward all the way down to

Mount Cameroun. Neither of these expeditions was reported directly by the

Carthaginians themselves, although, early on, they may have written about them.

Instead, we know about Himilco’s expedition because it was related by a Roman

named Avienus, and Hanno’s, because it was reported by an anonymous author of a

Greek work called the Periplus (Voyage).

One of the Mediterranean islands Carthage subjugated, Sardinia, became very

important to the Carthaginians. The island, which was close to Carthage, and which,

according to Pausanias’ mythical history, had earlier been visited by sailors from Libya

under their leader, Sardus, became Carthage’s breadbasket.6 So, from about 450 B.C.

until the Romans arrived in 237 B. C., Sardinia was an extension of Carthaginian power.

In the last few decades of the 400s B. C. Carthage settled much of the overflow of its

population there, especially those who were malcontents with little prospects for the

future. By doing so, Carthage was increasing the agricultural potential of the island,

the products of which could be exported to Carthage.

As Carthage used Sardinia for its purposes, the population became more African. This

occurred because the Carthaginians intermarried with the local North African

population and carried a part of that population to Sardinia. An example of these

intermarriages was the betrothal of the daughter of the Carthaginian, Hasdrubal, a

nobleman and son of Gisco, to Masinissa, son of a powerful Numidian king in the early

200s B.C. The son had been educated in Carthage and was acceptable to Hasdrubal,

even though he was a Numidian.7 Indeed, according to Desanges in The Proto-

Berbers, it has not been unusual to find Negroid remains in Carthaginian burial

grounds. The numbers from the 2013 Francalacci et al. study of Sardinia tell the story

of this Africa admixture. The results show that 139 individuals out of 1204 tested have

a distinctly African legacy. Surprisingly, A1b1b2b and E1a1 share about 1% of the ydna

on the island, with each one having about .5%.

According to Francalacci’s study of the snps revealing A1b1b2b and E1a1, the two

haplogroups do not appear to have as lengthy a history in Sardinia as some of the

other haplogroups on the island. Judging from the variability of 7-10 snps, the authors

believe the two haplogroups could have arrived in more recent ancient times, such as

during the Roman period and that of the Vandals.

The settlement of Sardinia by Carthaginians, Phoenicians, Libyans, and Liby-

Phoenicians, which started in earnest about 450-425 B. C., almost 400 years after the

founding of Carthage, made Sardinia an extension of Carthage, and by association,

North Africa. By the first century B. C., the Roman politician and orator, Cicero,

summed up his assessment of the island succinctly by stating that Sardinians were

“sons of Africa,” thereby leaving the impression, fully substantiated by others later on,

that North African immigration had had a significant impact on Sardinian society.

For those of us who are part of the Z17467 division of E1a1, the two main locations for

our male line in ancient times were Sardinia and North Africa; although if we consider

Y-Full’s E-M44 (E1a1) Tree for our upstream y-dna connections, we cannot ignore

Sicily, the western part of which was controlled by Carthage before the Romans took

over. Yet, because Sardinia was an earlier conquest than Sicily, Sardinia takes

precedence. We must remember, though, that the lines we see today in Sardinia and

Sicily were likely in North Africa 2000 years ago.@

As we analyze the Z17467 YFull E tree division, we see the following groupings+:

1. A Sicilian family, Sardinians from Cagliari, and an Englishman;

2. Two sub-Saharan families;

3. More Sardinians and three English families; and

4. Several related families with an English background.

Seeing these groupings, how do we trace the European-oriented families from

Sardinia/North Africa to England? At this point it is somewhat an uneven process

because while there may be a good deal of certainty about some Z17467 origins, there

yet remains uncertainty about others. Let’s take one group at a time.

The first grouping includes the Sicilian family. This family claims a heritage in Sicily

with their ancestor dying in Italy in 1956. Because of this background, the sensible

conclusion would be that the male line has been in Sicily for a very long time, and

before Sicily, either in North Africa, Sardinia, or Spain. Spain is mentioned because it

was the origin of many who migrated to Sicily. The Sardinians in this group live in

Cagliari today, an area of Sardinia which received many North African migrants, from

ancient times forward. Their lines most likely migrated directly to Sardinia from North

Africa. As for the English line in group 1…….Since the line shares the terminal snp of

the group, Z17467,* and became a part of England, the assumption could be that the

line was one of the earliest E1a1 lines to leave Sardinia or North Africa for Europe.

In the second grouping, one family now living in Canada has been on the North

American continent for 200-300 years. This line first appeared in colonial America, and

only in Canada afterwards. Because of Big Y testing, we know the line is a part of

what is now regarded as sub-Saharan E1a1. However, if the question is: Has this line

been in the sub-Sahara for 2,000 years? The answer is: Probably not!

The third grouping of families seems to have a significant link to Sardinia, a supposition

based on the number of Sardinians in its deep ancestry. Upon leaving Sardinia/North

Africa, the two English lines, which might have been just one line 2,000 years ago,

migrated to England where one line still lives. The other line, which resides in the U. S.,

has a terminal snp that is adjudged by YFull to be only 50 years downstream from that

of the English family. The Sardinians in this group live in Cagliari today.

The fourth group is comprised of two different English surname families, several of

whom have tested. They, too, have a deep link to the Sardinians, though it is not as

close as that of the third group. This particular line seems to have migrated to England

from Sardinia/North Africa like the others who took residence in England.

The Z17467 division of E1a1 greatly benefited from the Carthaginians’ language and

culture and participated in its military and economic pursuits. As citizens and

constituents of Carthage, this division engaged in war against African tribes,

participated in Mediterranean island disputes, and even assisted in the Punic Wars.

And, with the passage of time, the involvement they had with Carthage was transferred

to the Romans and Vandals who became the powerful successors to Carthage.

In all the y-dna studies done over the last 20 years, very little E1a1 has been found in

North Africa. Yet, we know it was present there at one time because it is found in

Sardinia today. But, as always, war takes its toll and this happened to North Africa and

E1a1.# The Punic wars, three in all, surely devastated minor clades and sub-clades of

all stripes. Remember, Cato, the Roman patriarch, lobbied for the complete

destruction of Carthage, and got his wish.

Additionally, once Carthage was no more, the Romans took over North Africa and

drafted a significant number of North Africa’s population for service in Britain, a part of

which was an auxiliary unit of horsemen from Mauritania (modern-day northern

Morocco and northwest Algeria) known as Numerus Maurorum Aurelianorum,8 which

may have contained some E1a1. Lastly, but not inconsequential, the Vandals invaded

North Africa and sent groups of the same population, Mauritanians by name, to

Sardinia.

The Mauritanians of North Africa, like their neighbors, the Numidians, “had significant

sedentary populations living in villages, and their peoples both tilled the land and

tended herds.”9 Tilling the land and tending herds was important to them, but also to

their overlords, the Carthaginians and the Romans. However, the Mauritanians were

also prepared to do battle and were considered outstanding fighters.

Although the Mauritanians in Britain, and even in Sardinia, get our attention, perhaps

because they were known as “Moors” from Africa and may have carried E1a1, it is not

certain that they were the group which contributed to Sardinia’s .5% E1a1 or carried

E1a1 to Britain. E1a1 has been around for more than 18,000 years, which means there

has been ample time for this sub-clade of E1a to be spread far and wide in the area of

its environment, meaning that both great and small could have been carriers. All we

can say for sure is that it was there during the period of the Carthaginians, the Romans,

and the Vandals, all of whom may have facilitated its migration.

According to Michael Brett and Elizabeth Fentress who wrote about North Africa’s

population in 1996, authoring the book, The Berbers: The People of Africa, all the

groups in North Africa, whether Mauritanian or otherwise, are properly referenced as

the Berber population.12 Perhaps this is because the Berber language, which is used

to a considerable extent in North Africa today, actually covered North Africa at one

time. Furthermore, the Berbers are not a single small population of Africa as some

think. Rather, they are a very heterogeneous people. They not only moved about in

North Africa during antiquity, but during the middle ages, they even occupied Spain

and Sicily.

During the Carthaginian period, the Berbers had a real stake in the Carthaginian

empire. As early as the fourth century B. C., according to B. H. Warmington in his

book, Carthage, the Berbers comprised the largest single element in the Carthaginian

army. So, assuming that some E1a1 was entrenched in Carthage and its armies, we

must also assume that where the Carthaginians went E1a1 followed.

For those of us with an English background, our history really comes alive at the point

in time when the Romans took control of North Africa and continued to expand its

empire throughout Europe. The empire took its legions and auxiliaries northward,

many all the way to Britain. Interspersed in the groups were North Africans, some

soldiers and some civilians. Their presence was, perhaps, best personified by the

auxiliary unit already mentioned, Numerus Maurorum Aurelianorum.

Numerus Maurorum Aurelianorum were horsemen stationed at the Aballava fort at the

western end of Hadrian’s Wall in Britain. It has been suggested that the unit consisted

of at least 500 men and that Septimus Severus, a North African emperor, was the one

who brought the unit with him when he arrived in Britain in 208 A. D.13 However,

presently, the time-line of their entry remains unsettled. What is known, though, is that

other North Africans were likely transported to Britain to build the Antonine Wall, which

was north of Hadrian’s Wall. This is supported by North African epigraphic evidence

found there and discussed by Vivien Swan in “The Twentieth Legion and the Antonine

Wall Reconsidered.”

According to Swan, Emperor Pius had to deal with an uprising among the Mauritanians

of North Africa in the war of 146-149 A. D. So he took troops from Britain to support

the war. Then, after the war, as was the practice of Pius and other emperors, troops

had to be returned to those provinces from which they had been taken. Some believe

that Mauritanian allies of Rome and, possibly, slaves, were carried back to the northern

area where the Antonine Wall was constructed. Recruitment would not only have

included Moorish tribesmen, but possibly also men from Legion III Augusta and other

North African units.

Epigraphic evidence for the presence of North Africans in Britain has also been found

at Chester and Holt, places where Legion XX served.16 Such evidence suggests that

North Africans were not just a unit here and there, but scattered throughout many

legions. Some of those legions and units having a mixture of North Africans were I

Afrorum, ala Augusta, II Augusta, III Augusta, First Vangiones, XIII Gemina, and a host

of others. We know this because of the North Africans whose names have come down

to us (See Birley’s book, The People of Roman Britain), but also from the record of one

Petronius Fortunatus, a North African centurion from Cillium (modern Kasserine in

Tunisia) who labored for 50 years in the Roman army. During his tenure he served in

the following units: I Italica, VI Ferrata, I Minervia, X Gemina, II Adiutrix, III Augusta, III

Gallica, XXX Ulpica Victrix, VI Victrix, III Cyrenaica, XV Apollinaris, and II Parthica.

Britain’s contingent of North Africans was established early with Legion VI Victrix,

which was formed under Pompey, the Great.18 This legion came under the control of

Octavian by 42 B. C. Afterwards, it served in Spain from 29 B. C. during the

Cantabrian Wars on the northern coast of Spain and continued to operate in Nearer

Spain (meaning as far south as modern-day Valencia) until 70 A. D. While in Spain, the

legion surely recruited there, likely taking in some of the Mauritanians who had crossed

over.

We know about the makeup of Nearer Spain and Legion VI Victrix because in 218 B. C.

Hannibal, in his preparation for war with Rome, exchanged troops between Spain and

Africa, sending Africans to Spain and bringing Spaniards to Africa.19 But that was just

the beginning. Under Augustus about 37 B. C., western Mauritania, called Mauritania

Tingitana, was added to the Province of Spain.20 And while it is true that provincial

boundaries changed from time to time, any unit from Spain probably had Africans in its

mixture unless there is evidence to the contrary. Incidentally, the 9th Hispana Legion,

which had also recruited in Spain, served in Eboracum around 108 A. D. right before it

disappeared in the war against the Caledonians in Scotland.

In assessing the North Africanization of Spain, it is quite revealing that Roman legions,

which were comprised of thousands of men, were often stationed in Spain, leaving

open the possibility that North Africans who had crossed over were likely taken into the

legions’ ranks. Of the 12 legions that were stationed there according to Stephen

Dando-Collins, author of Legions of Rome, some did, indeed, spend enough time in

Nearer Spain and Further Spain (an area adjacent to Gibraltar) to enlist North African

recruits.

In 122 A. D. Legion VI Victrix, which had served in Spain, was transferred to Eboracum

(York) where the legion would serve for the next 300 years.23 They would create a

military community, which is what Eboracum was at first, and even work along

Hadrian’s Wall. Their presence, that of Numerus Maurorum Aurelianorum, and II

Augusta, which had originally recruited in northern Italy but also spent time in Nearer

Spain, could very well help to account for the number of African skeletons excavated

from ancient cemeteries in York and other places around Britain in later centuries.

Incidentally, II Augusta, which included some North Africans whom Birley named in his

book, was one of the first legions in Britain. Once it joined three other legions in Britain

for the invasion in 43 A. D., it did not leave for the next 250 years. It served in places in

Britain that are known today as Exeter, Gloucester, Caerleon, Carpow, and

Richborough.

One unit mentioned earlier in passing, but one that is equally important in accounting

for traffic between North Africa and Britain is the Equitata unit of I (Flaviae) Afrorum

Civium Romanorum. This was a unit involving both infantry and cavalry, amounting to

perhaps 500 men or more. Formed in Africa before 70 A. D., it remained there,

perhaps serving in Egypt at one time, until it was moved to Britain in the 100s.25 The

speculation is that it may have been called on as a vexillation took place, which is to

say they may have been needed in Britain and transferred to restore fighting numbers.

Using Birley’s book and other more recent works as sources about North Africans in

Britain, we find that there were at least two North African-born Roman emperors, one

being Severus, who was born in Libya, and who headquartered in Eboracum.26

Another, a Mauritanian named Oppillius Macrinus, served from 217-218, but apparently

did not enter Britain.27 Additionally, Lollius Urbicus, a Numidian, served as the

governor of Britain during the building of the Antonine Wall in Scotland.

The evidence for North African footprints in Britain has been present for 2,000 years.

Kajanto, a specialist in epigraphy, noted in the 1960s that of the 714 epigraphic

examples he found in England at that time, 650 were African.29 And the evidence

continues to grow. Today, in addition to books detailing new information about Rome’s

legions, there is also considerable published details about the auxiliary units Rome

instituted, such as that provided by Michael DuBois who authored Auxillae. For certain,

the Mauritanians (Moors), Numidians, and others from North Africa had a presence in

Britain, but from data that we are now seeing, they also were sent to far-off places like

Hungary and Romania.

Following the movements of Rome, we must also consider activity on the island of

Sardinia, which from excavated archaeological data shows Sardinians involved in the

Roman auxiliaries that were established. Two examples (and I found several more) are

II Sardorum Equitata and I Corsorum Civium Romanorum, which were both raised in

Sardinia, though a century apart, and stationed in Mauritania Caesarensis.31 While

there is no evidence so far (at least none I have found) that shows Sardinians moving to

Britain for military service, other than, perhaps, a transplanted governor whom I shall

mention, some of them may have become part of Britain-bound units, either by choice

or by vexillation.

In The People of Roman Britain, Birley mentions two Sardinians, bringing to life two

residents of Britain from 1700-1800 years ago. The first was Lucius Papius Pacatianus,

a man said to be of humble birth, who was the head of Britain’s provinces starting in

319 A. D. Previously, a decade earlier, in 308 and 309 he had served in Sardinia as its

governor, likely as a transplanted official from Rome.32 But there is even an unofficial

and earlier footprint as well. It is in the person of Julia Fortunata, a Sardinian woman

whom we know about because of two stone coffins that her husband had made and

had inscribed for the two of them in old Eboracum during her lifetime.

According to the Bradford Antiquary published in 1900, Julia’s husband’s coffin was

the first one found. It was discovered just outside the city walls in York in 1579/1580.

Sometime in the next century it was taken to Hull where it was used as a horse trough

at an inn called Coach and Horses. There, in 1699, someone informed a Dr. Gale of the

coffin, who then made a drawing of it and read the name on it. It had belonged to

Marcus Verecundus Diogenes, a shipper and citizen of Gaul who had made, or

ordered, two coffins, one for himself and another for his wife. Afterwards, his coffin

was removed to another location, broken into many pieces, and lost.

The coffin belonging to Julia Fortunata, the wife of Diogenes, was not discovered until

1877 when a new rail station was being excavated in York. (See the picture of the

coffin at the end of this paper). The skeleton inside was that of a tall person, one writer

reported. It was then that it was learned that Julia was from Sardinia. The inscription

on the coffin read: “To the memory of Julia Fortunata from Sardinia; (she was) a loyal

wife to her husband, Verecundus Diogenes.”

According to Birley, Julia Fortunata and her husband were part of the merchant class

that serviced the Romans. Eager to profit, those with something to sell made their way

to all parts of the empire, going wherever the army went. In addition to merchants,

there were prostitutes, family members, and even peddlers of slaves. Today, Julia’s

coffin can be seen in the York Museum. The museum has dated it as sometime

between the years 43-410 A. D. Birley narrowed it down to the 200s.

With the sarcophagus of Julia Fortunata, we are made aware that somehow two people

from different areas of the Roman Empire were able to get together and marry, even

though there were wars and dangers all around. We realize that people were not as

constrained and limited in antiquity as we might have thought, but rather had

considerable freedom of movement. And if Julia Fortunata was selling goods in Britain,

surely there were others from Sardinia in Britain marketing their wares and participating

in its culture.

To summarize this paper, it is important to note the following:

1. We have two main divisions of E1a1 and this paper reflects an in-depth look at

Z17467, particularly for those of us who might have an English background;

2. North Africa was home to division Z17467 2,000-3,000 years ago;

3. Just as Sardinia was a part of North Africa, so was Spain and Sicily, which means

that, for research purposes, they should not be separated; and

4. Britain was populated by enough North Africans to transplant some of its y-dna

clades and sub-clades there, some of which came directly from North Africa, some

from Spain, some from Sardinia, some from Sicily, and maybe other islands around

the Mediterranean as well.

If the criterion for tracing an ancestral y-dna line is based on looking for the group from

which your ancestor likely came, then those of us with an English background do not

have to look very far. Two thousand years ago, soldiers and their families (men of high

and low rank), workers and even slaves, left North Africa, Sardinia and Spain and

journeyed to the Province of Britain. There they left their imprint and y-dna legacy.

Despite two millennia of changes, there is still considerable trace of their lives.

Consequently, there is no giant leap to take, but a mere step of acknowledgement that

some of us who are English E1a1 were likely Englishmen when the word was born.

!10

^According to YFull’s Tree there is an E-M44*, but with only one individual listed, it is

not a main division. Maybe it will be one day!

@The original location of E1a1, which could have been in the Middle East, is not

addressed.

*Some of our Z17467 division members are not listed because they have not tested

sufficiently to identify with a particular sub-clade. When they do test, they may be able

to find their places.

#The same thing that happened to E1a1 in North Africa likely happened to E1a1 in

England. The population changed through disruptions. The Jobling/King surname

study estimated that in England during the years 1300-1510 the population declined

from 5.15 million to 2.3 million because of the country’s disease epidemic.

Map of the Roman Empire

!11

Sarcophagus Belonging to Sardinian, Julia Fortunata

!12

Map of Carthaginian Area of Influence

!13

Created by Norman Einstein, September 20, 2005

!14

Ptolemy of Mauritania, King

Born 13-9 B. C.; Died 40 A. D.

!15

Oppillius Macrinus, Mauritanian Emperor of Rome 217-218

!16

YFull’s Present Divisions of our E1a1 Men

!17

Sources

Books:

A Compendium of Ancient and Modern Geography, for…, London, 1831, p. 691, by Aron

Arrowsmith, (the younger)

A History of all Nations, Volume 4, Lea Brothers and Company, 1902, p. 133, Gustav F. Hertzberg

Auxillae: Cohortes, Peditatae, and Equitata, Kindle Edition, 2014, various locations, Michael

DuBois

Bradford Antiquary: The Journal of the Bradford Historical and Antiquarian Society, Volume 1,

1900, “Roman Yorkshire,” by J. Norton Dickons.

Cannae: The Experience of Battle in the Second Punic War by Gregory Daly

Carthage by Brian H. Warmington

Carthage Must Be Destroyed by Richard Miles

From Hadrian’s Wall: Everyday Life on a Roman Frontier, by Patricia Southern

In Colonial Grounds: A Comparative Study of Colonialism….by P. Van dommelen

Legions of Rome: The Definitive History of Every Imperial Roman Legion by S. Dando-Collins

Nero’s Killing Machine by Stephen Dandy-Collins

The Archaeology of Black Britain by Richard P. Benjamin and Alan M. Greaves

The Berbers: The People of Africa by Michael Brett and Elizabeth Fentress

The History and Antiquities of the Fortifications to the City of York by Henry F. Lockwood, A. Cates

The People of Roman Britain by Anthony Birley

The Proto-Berbers by J. Desanges

The Roman History of Appian of Alexandria, Volume 1, by Appianus

The Senatorial Aristocracy in the Later Roman Empire, Clarendon Press, 1972, by Michael T. W.

Arnheim

Paper:

“The Twentieth Legion and the History of the Antonine Wall Reconsidered” by Vivien G. Swan

Internet:

Blogs on the Carthaginians

https://exploringe1a1.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/e1a1-a-very-small-haplogroup-revised.pdf

Pausanias’ History

Polybius’ History

Speeches by Cicero

Various articles relating to the Romans in Britain

Wikipedia articles on Carthage, Berbers, and the Mediterranean islands

Periodicals:

The Bradford Antiquary: The Journal of the Bradford Historical and Antiquarian Society, 1900

Y-Dna Studies:

!18

“Genetic Structure of Pastoral and Farmer Populations in the African Sahel,” by Viktor Cerny et al.,

2011

“Low-Pass DNA Sequencing of 1200 Sardinians Reconstructs European Y-Chromosome

Phylogeny,” by P. Francalacci et al., 2013

“The Genetic Structure and History of Africans and African-Americans,” by Sarah Tishkoff et al.,

2009

Endnotes

YFull’s E-M44 Tree is shown on page 16, the focus of which 1 is after the number 2. EZ17467

has Sardinian representatives whose ancestors likely migrated from North Africa.

2 In an analysis of the Dogon’s movements in the paper, “E1a1, Its Jewish, Genetic, and

Paternal Ties,” page 4, found at http://exploringe1a1.wordpress.com/, 7 of the 13 tribal

groups to which the Dogon are connected are located in northeast Africa.

3 See page 2 of the paper, “E1a1 Haplotypes of Fulani Pastoralists, Revised,” at http://

exploringe1a1.wordpress.com/

4 On page 2 of “E1a1, A Very Small Haplogroup, Revised,” at http://

exploringe1a1.wordpress.com/, note the reference to Gallia Celtica found in the Early

Period of European history in the Jewish Encyclopedia.

5 Z17467* is noted by YFull as a terminal snp for individuals in Sardinia and Sicily.

This can be seen on page 16.

6 Pausanias wrote of Sardinia’s mythical history in 10.17.2.

7 See Wikipedia’s article on Masinissa, a reference for which is found in The Cambridge

History of Africa as well as other places.

8 Anthony Birley mentions the unit, Numerus Maurorum, on page 28 of his book, The

People of Roman Britain. He says they were a unit of Moors “stationed at Burgh-by-

Sands at the western end of Hadrian’s Wall.”

9 A Wikipedia article on the Berbers quotes the historian, Sallust, as he spoke about the

Mauritanians and Numidians.

10 The Romans not only employed Mauritanians in ancient Britain, but also as fighters in

mainland European locales. There is even a sculpted picture of them on Trajan’s Column

in Rome. See page 3 of “E1al, A Very Small Haplogroup, Revised,” found at http://

exploringe1a1.wordpress.com/.

11 According to the Wikipedia article on Vandal Sardinia, which referenced the 1994 work

of La Storia di Sardegna by Francesco Cesare Casula, the Vandals sent Mauri to Sardinia

where they lived in the mountains and raided the cities.

!19

See an example of this assertion on page 25 of The 12 Berbers: The Peoples of North

Africa by Michael Brett and Elizabeth Fentress who speak about the surrender of

Mauritania to the Romans.

13 An article by David Derbyshire from June 11, 2004 in The Telegraph at telegraph.co.uk

suggests that the Roman unit, Numerus Maurorum Aurelianorum, may have been brought

to Britain by the North African emperor, Septimus Severus.

14 Vivien G. Swan’s paper was included in volume 129 of the Proceedings of the Society

of Antiquaries of Scotland, published in 1999. Her findings are mentioned in the abstract

found on page 399.

15 Swan, 1999, p. 424.

16 Swan, 1999, p. 399.

17 Birley, 1980, p. 79.

18 Stephen Dando-Collins, author of Legions of Rome, mentions the origin of Legion VI

Victrix in association with the 6th Ferrata on p. 141. Both were founded by Pompey.

19 On page 133 of A History of all Nations, Volume 4, the author speaks of Hannibal’s

preparations for war with Rome in which he posted 15,000 Spanish troops in Africa and

an equal number of African troops in Spain.

20 On page 691 of Arrowsmith’s A Compendium of Ancient and Modern Geography…,

the story unfolds of how Mauritania Tingitana became part of Rome and the Province of

Spain. It occurred because of the power struggle between Antony and Augustus, with

Augustus winning and placing Bocchus as the King of Mauritania. Then, in order to

facilitate communication and military discipline across the continent, Mauritania

Tingitana (western Mauritania) was made a part of the Province of Spain.

21 Dando-Collins, 2010, p. 150-1.

22 The 5th Alaudae Legion recruited from Further Spain, while the 2nd Augusta Legion

and 7th Gemina Legion posted and recruited, respectively, in Nearer Spain. See Dando-

Collins, 2010, pp. 109, 133, and 146.

23 Dando-Collins, 2010, p. 142.

24 Dando-Collins, 2010, p. 110.

25 I (Flaviae) Afrorum Civium Romanorum is an African Equitata unit whose history

provides a direction connection between North Africa and Britain. See p. 15 in Auxillae

by Michael DuBois.

!20

26 Birley, 1980, p. 29.

27 Donald L. Watson from Lincoln College in Normal, Illinois provides a synopsis of

Macrinus who was born into a poor family in Caesarea in Mauritania. An ambitious

Praetorian Guard commander under Caracalla, he killed the emperor in 217 A. D. and

assumed power.

28 Birley, 1980, p. 40.

29 Birley, 1980, p. 18.

30 Auxillae, 2015, pp. 268 and 388.

31 Both these auxillae were found in Auxillae: Cohortes Peditatae and Equitata, Kindle

Edition. II Sardorum Equitata is located at 2111. I Corsorum Civium Romanorum is

located at 14072.

32 Birley, 1980, p. 53; p. 66 of Michael T. W. Arnheim’s book, The Senatorial Aristocracy

in the Later Roman Empire.

33 J. Norton Dickons, 1898, p. 377, “Roman Yorkshire,” Bradford Antiquary: The Journal

of the Bradford Historical and Antiquarian Society…, 1900.

By Robert E. Hall, July 12, 2018