____________________________________________
“Is Classical Electrodynamics an Inconsistent Theory?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (2007) 263-282.
(published version) [preprint]
Abstract. Classical Electrodynamics is a classical theory treating systems comprising an electromagnetic field and electrically charged matter. In a recent book, Inconsistency, Asymmetry, and Nonlocality, Mathias Frisch argues that this theory is inconsistent within in its intended domain of application and that a number of interesting methodological morals follow from this conclusion. My purpose here is to discuss Frisch’s argument for the inconsistency of electromagnetism and the conclusions he draws from it. I contend that although the argument is valid it relies on a contentious understanding of the Lorentz force law. I also contend that even if the claim about inconsistency is granted, the connection with the claimed methodological consequences is not nearly so tight as Frisch takes it to be.
Note. Frisch's “Conceptual Problems in Classical Electrodynamics” is in part a response to this paper.
_____________________________________________