Clinical Observation Process

The Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System (TEPES) was developed by Dr. James Stronge. His TEPES Evaluation Model has been used by many states and districts nationwide, including Passaic County Technical Institute, where I’ve been a teacher for the past seven years. As a teacher I’ve been observed and evaluated using this system and have had no complaints. I find the observation report and process ideal because it is very efficient

, straight-forward and objective. As a perspective supervisor, I would like to use the Stronge when it comes to observing teachers in the classroom. I find that the pre-conference and observation form and process is well developed. However, Strong does lack to include a post-conference form or meeting that I agree with; therefore I’ve developed my own to use for the following observation.

For this observation, I had the opportunity to observe an AP Physics class at PCTI, with Dr. WG. Dr. WG is a seasoned teacher and has been teaching this course for several years. Two days before the observation, Dr. WG and I had a pre-observation conference and he also completed a pre-observation form. This form provided me with information about the class being observed, what to expect and gave the observed a chance to include any information that they feel is necessary for the observer to know. I feel this form gives a little insight of what to expect during the observation and helps the observed prepare for the observation as well.

On the day of the observation, I walked in to the classroom a minute or two before the bell rang. The Do Now was already on the board and the students already seated had already begun working. As remaining students were still walking in to class, Dr. WG was finishing writing the objective for the day on the board. Once the bell rand Dr. WG greeted them, read the Do Now to them and objective for the day. He walked to his computer at his desk to take attendance electronically and gave the students time to work on the Do Now. A few worked independently and couple of them worked cooperatively. It was apparent that students were very comfortable in class and the overall atmosphere in class was very casual, like that of a college course.

Dr. WG lesson didn’t go as planned. Students had difficulty with the Do Now problems and Dr. WG realized that the student had confusion and/or not fully mastered the concepts from the lesson before. Dr. WG then spent the remainder of the class reviewing the problems in detail and also presented a power-point presentation on that lesson. By the end of class, students were correctly developing and using the formulas needed and better understood the concepts. Dr. WG would assess students by asking questions and asking students for explanations and connections.

After the observation I filled out the observation form and it was very straightforward and was easy to apply. My only critique is that some of the standards do not apply for an observation. For example:

6.3 Incorporates learning from professional growth opportunities into instructional practice and reflects upon the effectiveness of implemented strategies.

6.5 Engages in activities outside the classroom intended for school and student enhancement.

6.6 Works in a collegial and collaborative manner with administrators, other school personnel, and the community to promote students' well-being and success.

6.7 Builds positive and professional relationships with parents through frequent and appropriate communication concerning students' progress.

6.8 Serves as a contributing member of the school's professional learning community through collaboration with teaching colleagues.

After the lesson, Dr. WG and I had a post conference. I really enjoyed this part of the observation process, because it allowed for conversation about best teacher practices and reflections from their point of view. By the end of the observation process I could tell that Dr. WG was a great teacher. He had the ability to pick up on the needs of his students, cater to their needs and help move them forward to learn the next lesson.

Overall, I learned so much from his experience and I’m pleased with the Stronge evaluation system for observations.

Pre Observation Conference Record

Teacher: Dr. WG Physics Teacher

Evaluator: Derya Yildirim

Grade/ Subject: 11th and 12th grade / AP Physics

Date: 11/16/15

1. Describe the lesson that will be observed. What have/will you done instructionally with students in the days prior to the observation?

Students will be able to examine electric potential and electric field. This is the first lesson on this topic therefore the class will be more of a lecture style, because concepts must be taught through explanation.

In the days prior to the lesson being observed the students will have completed topics on Force and Energy.

2. Describe the population of the class.

This class is a high level, Advanced Placement course. There are 13 students in total: 10 males and 3 females; 12 general education students and 1 special needs student.

3. What will be observed?

Topic: Electric Potential

Objective: Students will be able to examine electric potential and electric field

4. What instructional methods will be used?

Direct instruction, power-point presentation via overhead projector, group discussion

5. What would you like to be highlighted in this lesson?

6. What do you believe to be any areas of concern?

I feel an area of concern could be students having a difficulty understanding the concepts being taught.

Formal Observation

Teacher: Dr. WG Grade: 11th and 12th grade Subject: AP Physics

Evaluator: Derya Yildirim Date: 11-16-15 Time: Period 2

Post Observation Conference Record

Teacher: Dr. WG Physics Teacher

Evaluator: Derya Yildirim

Grade/ Subject: 11th and 12th grade / AP Physics

Date: 11/16/15

1. As you reflect upon your lesson, did your lesson go as planned? Why or why not.

My lesson did not go as planned. When reviewing the Do Now I understood that the students did not grasp or master the concepts of work, force and energy. I felt that I need to spend more time in this area since these concepts are needed for the next lesson on Electrical Potential and Electrical Fields. Therefore, I did not attempt to demonstrate my lesson as planed and review concepts needed.

2. As you reflect upon your lesson, what do you think were areas of strength? What do you think were areas of weakness?

Strength: I feel that by the end of the lesson, the majority of students had a better and deeper understand of the relations and formulas for work, force and energy.

Weakness: Students were confused by the initial solution of the Do Now.

3. If I had the opportunity to teach this lesson again to this same group of students, what would I do differently? Why?

I should have reviewed or given a quick 10 minutes review of the previous lesson and check for understanding before I gave them a problem to do on their own. Students struggled with the concepts required to successfully complete the Do Now.

Stronge TEPES Observation Standards

References

Stronge, J., Tonneson, V. (2015). Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation

System. Stronge and Associate Educational Consulting, LLC.