Alexander, L. (2008). “Scalar Properties, Binary Judgments.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 25: 85–104.

Anderson, E. (1996). “Reasons, Attitudes, and Values: Replies to Sturgeon and Piper.” Ethics 106: 538–554.

———. (1993). Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Arneson, R. (2002). “The End of Welfare as We Know It? Scanlon versus Welfarist Consequentialism.” Social Theory and Practice 28: 315–336.

Bennett, J. (1980). “Accountability.” In Z. V. Straaten (ed.), Philosophical Subjects: Essays Presented to P. F. Strawson, pp. 14–47. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Bradley, B. (2006). “Against Satisficing Consequentialism.” Utilitas 18: 97–108.

Bratman, M. E. (2009). “Intention, Belief, Practical, Theoretical.” In S. Robertson (ed.), Spheres of Reason, pp. 29–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. (2007). Structures of Agency. New York: Oxford University Press.

———. (1994). “Kagan on ‘The Appeal to Cost’.” Ethics 104: 325–332.

———. (1987). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Brink, D. O. (1997). “Kantian Rationalism: Inescapability, Authority, and Supremacy.” In G. Cullity and B. Gaut (eds.), Ethics and Practical Reason, pp. 255–291. New York: Oxford University Press.

Brook, R. (1991). “Agency and Morality.” Journal of Philosophy 88: 190–212.

Broome, J. (1991). Weighing Goods. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Brown, C. (2004). “Consequentialise This.” Unpublished manuscript dated September 10, 2004.

Bykvist, K. (2009). “Objective versus Subjective Moral Oughts.” Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved May 9, 2009, from <URL></URL>.

———. (2003). “Normative Supervenience and Consequentialism.” Utilitas 15: 27–49.

Byron, M. (2005, April). “Alternative Consequentialisms, Part 2: Position-Relative Consequentialism.” Unpublished paper presented at Lingnan University, Hong Kong.

———. (2004). “Introduction.” In M. Byron (ed.) Satisficing and Maximizing, pp. 1–13. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carlson, E. (1999). “Consequentialism, Alternatives, and Actualism.” Philosophical Studies 96: 253–268.

———. (1995). Consequentialism Reconsidered. Dordrecht: Kluwer Publishers.

Chang, R. (2004a). “Putting Together Morality and Well-Being.” In P. Baumann and M. Betzler (eds.), Practical Conflicts: New Philosophical Essays, pp. 118–158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. (2004b). “Can Desires Provide Reasons for Action?” In R. J. Wallace, P. Pettit, S. Scheffler, and M. Smith (eds.), Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz, pp. 56–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. (2004c). “All Things Considered.” Philosophical Perspectives 18: 1–22.

Chappell, R. Y. (2009). “‘Why is it that’. . . .” (7:32 PM, November 30, 2009). Comment to a blogpost: Richard Yetter Chappell’s “Actualism and Complex Actions,” Philosophy, et cetera. Retrieved December 28, 2009, from <URL></URL>.

Cochrane, A. (2009). “Explaining the Basic Belief.” Unpublished manuscript dated March 26, 2009.

Copp, D. (2003). “‘Ought’ Implies ‘Can’, Blameworthiness, and the Principle of Alternate Possibilities.” In D. Widerker and M. McKenna (eds.), Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities: Essays on the Importance of Alternative Possibilities, pp. 265–299. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

———. (1997). “The Ring of Gyges: Overridingness and the Unity of Reason.” Social Philosophy and Policy 14: 86–106.

Curran, A. (1995). “Utilitarianism and Future Mistakes: Another Look.” Philosophical Studies 78: 71–85.

Dancy, J. (2004). “Enticing Reasons.” In R. J. Wallace, P. Pettit, S. Scheffler, and M. Smith (eds.), Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz, pp. 91–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

D’Arms, J., and D. Jacobson. (2000). “Sentiment and Value.” Ethics 110: 722–748.

Darwall, S. (2006a). The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

———. (2006b). “Morality and Practical Reason: A Kantian Approach.” In D. Copp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, pp. 282–320. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dorsey, D. (Forthcoming). “Weak Anti-Rationalism and the Demands of Morality.” Noûs.

Dreier, J. (Forthcoming). “In Defense of Consequentializing.” Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics.

———. (2004). “Why Ethical Satisficing Makes Sense and Rational Satisficing Doesn’t.” In M. Byron (ed.), Satisficing and Maximizing, pp. 131–154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. (1993). “Structures of Normative Theories.” The Monist 76: 22–40.

Ellis, A. (1992). “Deontology, Incommensurability, and the Arbitrary.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 855–875.

Eyal, N. (2008). “Non-Consequentialist Utilitarianism.” Kadish Center for Morality, Law & Public Affairs. ISUS-X, Tenth Conference of the International Society for Utilitarian Studies. Retrieved August 21, 2008, from <URL></URL>.

Feldman, F. (1986). Doing the Best We Can: An Essay in Informal Deontic Logic. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Ferry, M. (2009). “Does Morality Demand Our Very Best? On Moral Prescriptions and the Line of Duty.” Retrieved August 9, 2009, from <URL></URL>.

Fischer, J. M., and M. Ravizza. (1998). Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Foot, P. (2001). Natural Goodness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

———. (1985). “Utilitarianism and the Virtues.” Mind 94: 196–209.

Gert, J. (2008). “Michael Smith and the Rationality of Immoral Action.” Journal of Ethics 12: 1–23.

———. (2007). “Normative Strength and the Balance of Reasons.” Philosophical Review 116: 533–562.

———. (2004). Brute Rationality: Normativity and Human Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. (2003). “Requiring and Justifying: Two Dimensions of Normative Strength.” Erkenntnis 59: 5–36.

Gibbard, A. (1990). Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Goldman, H. S. [now H. M. Smith]. (1978). “Doing the Best One Can.” In A. I. Goldman and J. Kim (eds.), Values and Morals, pp. 185–214. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

———. (1976). “Dated Rightness and Moral Imperfection.” Philosophical Review 85: 449–487.

Graham, P. (2010). “In Defense of Objectivism about Moral Obligation.” Ethics 121: 88–115.

Griffin, J. (1986). Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hare, C. (2011). “Obligation and Regret When There is No Fact of the Matter About What Would Have Happened if You Had not Done What You Did.” Noûs 45: 190–206.

Harman, E. (2009). “‘I’ll Be Glad I Did It’ Reasoning and the Significance of Future Desires.” Philosophical Perspectives 23: 177–199.

Harman, G. (1976). “Practical Reasoning.” Review of Metaphysics 29: 431–463.

Harwood, S. (2003). “Eleven Objections to Utilitarianism.” In L. Pojman (ed.), Moral Philosophy: A Reader, 3rd ed., pp. 179–192. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

Heathwood, C. (2008). “Fitting Attitudes and Welfare.” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 3: 47–73.

Heuer, U. (2004). “Raz on Value and Reasons.” In R. J. Wallace, P. Pettit, S. Scheffler, and M. Smith (eds.), Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz, pp. 128–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hieronymi, P. (2006). “Controlling Attitudes.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87: 45–74.

Hill, Jr., T. E. (2002). Human Welfare and Moral Worth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Holton, R. (2009). Willing, Wanting, Waiting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hooker, B. (2000). Ideal Code, Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Horgan, T., and M. Timmons. (2010). “Untying a Knot from the Inside Out: Reflections on the ‘Paradox’ of Supererogation.” Social Philosophy & Policy 27: 29–63.

Howard-Snyder, F. (1997). “The Rejection of Objective Consequentialism.” Utilitas 9: 241–248.

Hurka, T. (2006). “Value and Friendship: A More Subtle View.” Utilitas 18: 232–242.

Hurley, P. E. (2009). Beyond Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. (2006). “Does Consequentialism Make Too Many Demands, or None at All?” Ethics 116: 680–706.

Hursthouse, R. (1999). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jackson, F., and R. Pargetter. (1986). “Oughts, Options, and Actualism.” Philosophical Review 95: 233–255.

Johansson, J. (2009). “Fitting Attitudes, Welfare, and Time.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12: 247–256.

Joyce, R. (2008a). “What Neuroscience Can (and Cannot) Contribute to Metaethics.” In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology. Vol. 3, The Neuroscience of Morality, pp. 371–394. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

———. (2008b). “Response to Nichols and Katz.” In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology. Vol. 3, The Neuroscience of Morality, pp. 419–426. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Kagan, S. (1994). “Defending Options.” Ethics 104: 333–351.

———. (1991). “Replies to My Critics.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51: 919–928.

———. (1989). The Limits of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kamm, F. M. (2007). Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. (1996). Morality, Mortality. Vol. 2, Rights, Duties, and Status. New York: Oxford University Press.

———. (1992). “Nonconsequentialism, the Person as an End-In-Itself and the Significance of Status.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 21: 354–389.

Kavka, G. (1983). “The Toxin Puzzle.” Analysis 43: 33–36.

Kawall, J. (2003). “Self-Regarding Supererogatory Actions.” Journal of Social Philosophy 34: 487–498.

Kennett J. (2006). “Do Psychopaths Really Threaten Moral Rationalism?” Philosophical Explorations 9: 69–82.

Lawlor, R. (2009a). Shades of Goodness: Gradability, Demandingness and the Structure of Moral Theories. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

———. (2009b). “The Rejection of Scalar Consequentialism.” Utilitas 21: 100–116.

Levy, N. (2005). “The Good, the Bad and the Blameworthy.” Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy, <URL></URL>, vol. 1, no. 2.

Lopez, T., J. Zamzow, M. Gill, and S. Nichols. (2009). “Side Constraints and the Structure of Commonsense Ethics.” Philosophical Perspectives 23: 305–319.

Lord, E. (2010). “Having Reasons and the Factoring Account.” Philosophical Studies 149: 283–296.

Louise, J. (2009). “I Won’t Do It! Self-Prediction, Moral Obligation and Moral Deliberation.” Philosophical Studies 146: 327–348.

———. (2004). “Relativity of Value and the Consequentialist Umbrella.” Philosophical Quarterly 54: 518–536.

McLeod, O. (2001). “Just Plain ‘Ought.’” Journal of Ethics 5: 269–291.

McNamara, P. (Forthcoming). “Action Beyond Morality’s Call versus Supererogatory Action: Toward a More Adequate Conceptual Scheme for Common Sense Morality.” Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics.

———. (1996a). “Making Room for Going Beyond the Call.” Mind 105: 415–450.

———. (1996b). “Must I Do What I Ought (or Will the Least I Can Do Do)?” In M. A. Brown and J. Carmo (eds.), Deontic Logic, Agency and Normative Systems, pp. 154–173. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Mellema, G. (1991). “Supererogation and the Fulfillment of Duty.” Journal of Value Inquiry 25: 167–175.

Mill, J. S. (1991). [1861]. Utilitarianism. In J. M. Robson (ed.), Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Vol. 10, pp. 203–59. London: Routledge.

Moller, D. (2009). “Review of Michael Zimmerman’s Living with Uncertainty: The Moral Significance of Ignorance.” Ethics 119: 606–611.

Nichols, S. (2008). “Moral Rationalism and Empirical Immunity.” In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology. Vol. 3, The Neuroscience of Morality, pp. 395–408. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

———. (2002). “How Psychopaths Threaten Moral Rationalism, Or Is It Irrational to be Amoral?” The Monist 85: 285–304.

Noggle, R. (2009). “Give Till It Hurts? Beneficence, Imperfect Duties, and a Moderate Response to the Aid Question.” Journal of Social Philosophy 40: 1–16.

Norcross, A. (2006a). “The Scalar Approach to Utilitarianism.” In H. West (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Mill’s Utilitarianism, pp. 217–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. (2006b). “Reasons without Demands: Rethinking Rightness.” In J. Dreier (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory, pp. 5–20. Oxford: Blackwell.

Oddie, G., and P. Milne. (1991). “Act and Value: Expectation and the Representability of Moral Theories.” Theoria 57: 42–76.

Olson, J. (2009). “Fitting Attitude Analyses of Value and the Partiality Challenge.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12: 365–378.

Parfit, D. (2011). On What Matters. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. (2001). “Rationality and Reasons.” In D. Egonsson, J. Josefsson, B. Petersson, and T. Rønnow-Rasmussen (eds.), Exploring Practical Philosophy, pp. 17–39. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Pettit, P., and M. Smith. (1996). “Freedom in Belief and Desire.” Journal of Philosophy 93: 429–449.

Piller, C. (2006). “Content-Related and Attitude-Related Reasons for Preferences.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 81: 155–182.

Portmore, D. W. (Forthcominga). “Consequentialism and Moral Rationalism.” Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics.

———. (Forthcomingb). “Imperfect Reasons and Rational Options.” Noûs.

———. (Forthcomingc). “The Teleological Conception of Practical Reasons.” Mind.

———. (2011). “Doing Our Best.” Unpublished manuscript.

———. (2009). “Consequentializing.” Philosophy Compass 4: 329–347.

———. (2008a). “Are Moral Reasons Morally Overriding?” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11: 369–388.

———. (2008b). “Dual-Ranking Act-Consequentialism.” Philosophical Studies 138: 409–427.

———. (2007). “Consequentializing Moral Theories.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88: 39–73.

———. (2005). “Combining Teleological Ethics with Evaluator Relativism: A Promising Result.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86: 95–113.

———. (2003). “Position-Relative Consequentialism, Agent-Centered Options, and Supererogation.” Ethics 113: 303–332.

———. (2000). “Commonsense Morality and Not Being Required to Maximize the Overall Good.” Philosophical Studies 100: 193–213.

———. (1998). “Can Consequentialism Be Reconciled with Our Common-Sense Moral Intuitions?” Philosophical Studies 91: 1–19.

Postow, B. C. (2005). “Supererogation Again.” Journal of Value Inquiry 39: 245–253.

Quinn, W. S. (1993). “Putting Rationality in its Place.” In W. S. Quinn, Morality and Action, pp. 228–255. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. (1990). “The Puzzle of the Self-Torturer.” Philosophical Studies 59: 70–90.

Rabinowicz, W., and T. Rønnow-Rasmussen (2004). “The Strike of the Demon: On Fitting Pro-Attitudes and Value.” Ethics 114: 391–423.

Raz, J. (1999). Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. (1975). “Permissions and Supererogation.” American Philosophical Quarterly 12: 161–168.

Rønnow-Rasmussen, T. (2009). “On For Someone’s Sake Attitudes.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12: 397–411.

———. (2007). “Analysing Personal Value.” Journal of Ethics 11: 405–435.

Ross, J. (Forthcoming). “Actualism, Possibilism, and Beyond.” Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics.

———. (2009). “How To Be a Cognitivist about Practical Reason.” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4: 243–282.

———. (2006a). Acceptance and Practical Reason. PhD diss., Rutgers University–New Jersey. Retrieved March 12, 2010, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text. (Publication No. AAT 3249337).

———. (2006b). “Rejecting Ethical Deflationism.” Ethics 116: 742–768.

Ross, W. D. (1930). The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sachs, B. (2010). “Consequentialism’s Double-Edged Sword.” Utilitas 22: 258–271.

Scanlon, T. M. (2007). “Structural Irrationality.” In G. Brennan, R. Goodin, F. Jackson, and M. Smith (eds.), Common Minds: Themes from the Philosophy of Philip Pettit, pp. 84–103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. (2001). “Sen and Consequentialism.” Economics and Philosophy 17: 39–50.

———. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.

Scheffler, S. (1994). [1982]. The Rejection of Consequentialism. Rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. (1992). Human Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.

Schroeder, M. (2010). “Value and the Right Kind of Reason.” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 5: 25–55.

———. (2009). “Means-End Coherence, Stringency, and Subjective Reasons.” Philosophical Studies 143: 223–248.

———. (2008a). “Having Reasons.” Philosophical Studies 139: 57–71.

———. (2008b). “Value Theory.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2008), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), retrieved from <URL></URL>.

———. (2007a). “Teleology, Agent-Relative Value, and ‘Good.’” Ethics 117: 265–295.

———. (2007b). Slaves of the Passions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sepielli, A. (2010). ‘Along an Imperfectly-Lighted Path’: Practical Rationality and Normative Uncertainty. PhD diss., Rutgers University–New Jersey. Retrieved June 14, 2010, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text. (Publication No. AAT 3397515).

———. (2009). “What To Do When You Don’t Know What To Do.” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4: 5–28.

Shafer-Landau, R. (2003). Moral Realism: A Defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sider, T. (1993). “Asymmetry and Self-Sacrifice.” Philosophical Studies 70: 117–132.

Sidgwick, H. (1966). [1874]. The Methods of Ethics. New York: Dover.

Singer, P. (1999). “A Response.” In D. Jamieson (ed.), Singer and His Critics, pp. 269–335. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2005). “You Ought to be Ashamed of Yourself (When You Violate an Imperfect Moral Obligation).” Philosophical Issues 15: 193–208.

———. (2003). “Consequentialism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2003), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), retrieved from <URL></URL>.

Skorupski, J. (2010). The Domain of Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. (1999). Ethical Explorations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Slote, M. (2001). Morals from Motives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. (1991). “Shelly Kagan’s The Limits of Morality.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51: 915–917.

———. (1984). “Morality and Self-Other Asymmetry.” Journal of Philosophy 81: 179–192.

Smith, A. M. (2010). “Attitudes and Control.” Unpublished manuscript dated April 12, 2010.

———. (2008). “Control, Responsibility, and Moral Assessment.” Philosophical Studies 138: 367–392.

———. (2005). “Responsibility for Attitudes: Activity and Passivity in Mental Life.” Ethics 115: 236–271.

Smith, H. M. (Forthcoming). “The Moral Clout of Reasonable Beliefs.” Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics.

Smith, M. (2009). “Two Kinds of Consequentialism.” Philosophical Issues 19: 257–272.

———. (2006). “Moore on the Right, the Good and Uncertainty.” In T. Horgan and M. Timmons (eds.), Metaethics after Moore, pp. 133–148. New York: Oxford University Press.

———. (2005). “Meta-Ethics.” In F. Jackson and M. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy, pp. 3–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sobel, D. (2007a). “Subjectivism and Blame.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (Supplement): 149–170.

———. (2007b). “The Impotence of the Demandingness Objection.” Philosophers’ Imprint 7: 1–17.

Sobel, J. H. (1994). Taking Chances: Essays on Rational Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. (1976). “Utilitarianism and Past and Future Mistakes.” Noûs 10: 195–219.

Sosa, D. (1993). “Consequences of Consequentialism.” Mind 102: 101–122.

Splawn, C. (2001). “The Self-Other Asymmetry and Act Utilitarianism.” Utilitas 13: 323–333.

Steup, M. (2008). “Doxastic Freedom.” Synthese 161: 375–392.

Stratton-Lake, P. (2005). “How to Deal with Evil Demons: Comment on Rabinowicz and Rønnow-Rasmussen.” Ethics 115: 788–798.

Strawson, P. (1962). “Freedom and Resentment.” Proceedings of the British Academy 48: 187–211.

Stroud, S. (1998). “Moral Overridingness and Moral Theory.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79: 170–189.

Sturgeon, N. L. (1996). “Anderson on Reason and Value.” Ethics 106: 509–524.

Suikkanen, J. (2009a). “Consequentialist Options.” Retrieved August 9, 2009, from <URL></URL>.

———. (2009b). “Consequentialism, Constraints and the Good-Relative-to: A Reply to Mark Schroeder.” Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy (March), <URL></URL>.

Tännsjö, T. (1999). “A Concrete View of Intrinsic Value.” Journal of Value Inquiry 33: 531–536.

Taurek, J. (1977). “Should the Numbers Count?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6: 293–316.

Thomson, J. J. (1990). The Realm of Rights. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Van Roojen, M. (2004). “The Plausibility of Satisficing and the Role of Good in Ordinary Thought.” In M. Byron (ed.), Satisficing and Maximizing, pp. 155–175. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vallentyne, P. (1989). “Two Types of Moral Dilemmas.” Erkenntnis 30: 301–318.

———. (1988). “Gimmicky Representation of Moral Theories.” Metaphilosophy 19: 253–263.

Velleman, J. D. (1989). Practical Reflection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Vessel, J.-P. (2010). “Supererogation for Utilitarianism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 47: 299–319.

Wallace, R. J. (2010). “Reasons, Values, and Agent-Relativity.” Dialectica 64: 503–528.

———. (2006). Normativity and the Will: Selected Papers on Moral Psychology and Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. (2001). “Normativity, Commitment, and Instrumental Reason.” Philosophers’ Imprint 1: 1–26.

———. (1994). Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Williams, B. (1973). “A Critique of Utilitarianism.” In J. J. C. Smart and B. Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism: For and Against, pp. 75–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wolf, S. (1990). Freedom within Reason. New York. Oxford University Press.

———. (1986). “Above and Below the Line of Duty.” Philosophical Topics 14: 131–148.

Woodard, C. (2009). “What’s Wrong with Possibilism?” Analysis 69: 219–226.

Zimmerman, M. J. (Forthcoming). “Partiality and Intrinsic Value.” Mind.

———. (2008). Living with Uncertainty: The Moral Significance of Ignorance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. (1996). The Concept of Moral Obligation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. (1993). “Supererogation and Doing the Best One Can.” American Philosophical Quarterly 30: 373–380.