Use conversational rather than formal style
We should use conversational instead of formal writing so learners interact with the computer in a way that resembles human-to-human conversations. Of course, learners know that the character is not really in a conversation with them, but they may be more likely to act as if the character is a conversation partner. (Clark and Mayer, 2011)
In five of experimental studies, Moreno and Mayer (2000, 2004) compared two versions of an educational game, one with a conversational style and one with a formal style. The result is students learned better when they can talk directly to the computer in a conversation style. (Clark and Mayer, 2011).
Although we are all aware that a computer cannot talk to us by referring to the user as "you" or "I", there is strong evidence that in conjunction with personalization training and segmentation learners gained more than those who participated in the formal type of conversational training. (Figure 1)
People should learn better with a human voice than a machine voice. The additional research had provided by Nass and Brave (2005) shows that characteristics of the speaker’s voice can have a strong effect on the learners. (Clark and Mayer, 2011).
Studies that Support the Personalization Principle
There have been many studies support the personalization principle. Research reviewed by Clark & Mayer (2011) demonstrated the effectiveness of the personalizasional principle. Whether it is learning with computers, but the learners engage in deeper cognitive processing during learning. Material using a conversational writing style and addition of on-screen characters can be more effective for some types of learner. Another benefit of applying the personalization principle is that it helps provide the teacher with a sense of presence in the online classroom. Clark & Mayer (2011) point out that instructional text that uses a formal, impersonal, third-person style tends to make the author seem invisible. Conversely, a conversational style and the use of first-person narrative makes each student feel as through the teacher is communicating directly with them.
Critique of the Personalization Principle
References
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning (3rd Edition) San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Clark, R.C & Mayer, R.E (2008). Learning by viewing versus learning by doing. Evidence-based guidelines for principled learning environments. Performance Improvement.
Beck, J. (2007). Does learner control affect learning? Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Los Angeles, CA.
Mass, C.,& Brave, S. (2005). Wired of Speech: How voice activates and advances the human-computer relationship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Monero, R.& Mayer, R.E (2004).Personalized messages that promote science learning in vertical environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 165-173
Clark, R.C (2002). The E-learning Development’s Journal: Strategies and Techniques for Designers, Developers, and Manager of Learning. September 10, 2002
Monero, R.& Mayer, R.E (2000b). Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia message. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 724-733.
Page created by Trang Nguyen, Graduate Student
Master of Science in E-Learning Technology and Administration
Northern State University, Aberdeen, SD.
Created at Northern State University as part of the E-Learning Masters program