I:  Designing R2-D2

A brief history of R2-D2

R2-D2 is one of the most memorable and lovable mechanical characters in film history. The compelling visual look, strong characterization, and ingenious sound design all conspired to create an endearing little robot that captivated audiences back in 1977, and still holds cultural currency today.

Writer/director George Lucas basic concept was that astro-droids” such as R2-D2 were robotic mechanics or repairpeople, tirelessly fixing failed equipment across his fantasy galaxy. That's why they couldn't speak verbally except in electronic chirps and whistles – the droids, as Lucas dubbed his robots, mostly had to deal with other hardware.

INT. REBEL BLOCKADE RUNNER - MAIN PASSAGEWAY

An explosion rocks the ship as two robots, Artoo-Detoo (R2- D2) and See-Threepio (C-3PO) struggle to make their way through the shaking, bouncing passageway. Both robots are old and battered. Artoo is a short, claw-armed tripod. His face is a mass of computer lights surrounding a radar eye. Threepio, on the other hand, is a tall, slender robot of human proportions. He has a gleaming bronze-like metallic surface of an Art Deco design.

– Star Wars script, revised fourth draft. January 15, 1976

Unlike the shiny anthropomorphic protocol droids, such as C-3PO, astro-droids were squat and functional. They were mechanized yet sentient Swiss army knives, packed with tools and manipulator arms: perfect plot devices for getting our heroes out of various scrapes! They’re often called astromechs” by fans, perhaps due to the term appearing in the Star Wars novelization, but they’re never called that in the original movies.

Screenshot from The Empire Strikes Back (1980)

Surprisingly, the two droids as characters have a very non SF origin. Lucas has often credited Akira Kurosawa's film The Hidden Fortress with inspiring R2-D2 and C-3PO. This Japanese classic from 1958 depicts the massive tides of clan warfare from the point of view of two ordinary bickering peasants, rather than focusing on generals or shōguns.

Feisty princess Yuki (Misa Uehara) with squabbling serfs Tahei (Minoru Chiaki) and Matashichi (Kamatari Fujiwara) in a scene from Kurosawa's the Hidden Fortress.

Star Wars likewise features a huge all-encompassing war, but we're introduced to the story by the lowliest members of society – a pair of argumentative mechanical servants. Structurally there’s a pretty linear narrative line to the first film. We first meet the robots, who take us to Luke, who takes us to Kenobi, who takes us to Han, who takes us to the princess and to the parallel story line of the bad guys. The two story lines then collide for the grand finale.

I think the robots are the centrepiece of the story in a way, because we're seeing the film – at least the first half of the film – through their eyes.

– Gary Kurtz, 2015

...I wanted to start and end the film with the robots, I wanted the film to really be about the robots and have them be the framework for the rest of the movie.

– George Lucas

In terms of the actual robot design, Douglas Trumbull’s 1972 science fiction film Silent Running was quite influential. It features a trio of squat, nearly silent robots engaged in repairing a crumbling spacecraft. Though none of them look particularly like R2-D2, they are also repair robots with extendable arms. (if anything, there's more of a connection to the “Gonk power droids)

Trumbull took a remarkable approach to the design of his robots. To make them look completely unlike a person in a suit, Trumbull hired legless amputees who could walk on their hands. Using human performers allowed him to imbue his plastic boxes with a tremendous amount of emotion and pathos.

Screenshot from Silent Running. Freeman Lowell (Bruce Dern) communes with Dewey (Mark Persons) and Huey (probably Cheryl Sparks in this scene), two of the film's robots.

A droid on foot

The next major step saw Lucas hire American conceptual artist, and key Star Wars designer, Ralph McQuarrie in 1975. McQuarrie's initial role was to produce a handful of paintings to impress studio executives and thus sell the project, but he soon began designing everything imaginable – costumes, spacecraft, cities, and so on. He was joined by illustrator and designer Joe Johnston, who focused on vehicles and some environments. It's no exaggeration to say that the Star Wars universe we know today could never have existed without this incredible and imaginative art.

Ralph McQuarrie and George Lucas.

McQuarrie's earliest sketches of R2-D2 are fascinating in retrospect. The character below left looks somewhat similar to the final robot, but the minimalist character below right is particularly intriguing since it was designed to roll around on a single large ball bearing. This was basically impossible to execute technically in the 1970s, but of course has some interesting parallels to BB-8's design from 2015.

The first (one) had a spherical bottom, like a ball bearing that would roll around. He could go any direction - he had gyroscopes in him, so that he didn’t fall over. He just leaned into whatever direction he wanted to go in, and spun his single wheel, which is really a sphere. Which sounded pretty interesting, but very difficult to do in reality.

I put little panels on him and places for arms to come out. I knew he had to have a lot of little gadgets - that he was kind of like a Swiss army knife. And he had to have lights, and [...] lenses to see through. He had to have colour to distinguish him from another robot, so I found places to put blue.

— Ralph McQuarrie

Sketches by Ralph McQuarrie, from 1975-1976.

The later drawings and paintings, however, actually show the droid walking. This explains R2's somewhat inefficient industrial design, in fact. Because his legs pivot high up on the body, like a person's shoulders, his centre of gravity is also awkwardly high. This odd design makes sense if you think of him walking along like a person swinging along on crutches, which was the original idea. The anthropomorphized head and shoulders also make the R2 robots friendlier and more personable for the audience. Unfortunately the design resulted in some mechanical headaches when it came to building the real props, since R2 is a bit top-heavy and the motorized foot design isn't incredibly efficient.

For R2 I was looking for something different than the little robots [in] Silent Running, that Doug Trumbull had done. [...] I knew that our robots would be compared to their robots, because George had talked about them... He said, "those little robots in Silent Running… we want a little worker like that for R2-D2". And I thought well, instead of a box I’ll make him a can. A cylinder, with a dome on top. That was my first thought. Just strictly in the sense that I didn’t want him to look like Silent Running robots. [Those] had two legs, so I thought we could give R2 three legs.

— Ralph McQuarrie

This mysterious and haunting painting by McQuarrie, apparently the first completed for the production, shows a proto C-3PO, and a walking R2 making their way across the Tatooine dunes. There's a clear line of footprints behind R2 – those aren't wheeled tracks in the sand.

Production painting by Ralph McQuarrie.

Note the strange and disconcertingly human eyes and mouth on the golden droid. This was an early 3PO concept, and McQuarrie credited John Barry with coming up with the more neutral eye and mouth design used in the final robot. McQuarrie later reworked this painting with a different face, so if this version seems strange to you, that's probably why. Incidentally, Californians may recognize that the towering cliff face is modelled after Morro Rock, near San Luis Obispo.

We had superb production illustrations by Ralph McQuarrie, and as you know the film adhered closely to them. A lot of the credit is due McQuarrie, as the look of the picture was due to him.

John Stears, Cinefantastique, 1978

This detail of a shootout in the cantina shows a familiar pair of droids lurking in the corner. This R2 certainly seems to have a busy head, encrusted with lights. Note the faint shadow above the dome. This suggests that originally he was painted as a taller robot, and then altered later to be much more squat. 

A variant of this droid appears in a draft poster design that McQuarrie painted in 1975. Luke was actually a young woman at this point in story development, and Han Solo can be seen wielding a "laser sword". The overall design is quite interesting, as it owes a lot to a Flash Gordon conceptualization of the story, rather than the gritty lived-in world that Star Wars eventually depicted.

Finally, here's a very interesting look at the droids. Lucas hired artist Alex Tavoularis to produce some of the early storyboards for developing the film. Tavoularis' style involved a lot of dynamic angles and an extremely stylized, almost comic-book-like, look. Threepio had a particularly dramatic and fluid sense of human-like motion in these drawings, and R2's design reflected aspects of McQuarrie's early sketches.

The name

First of all, R2-D2 never stood for anything, though some post-production marketing materials have created some ideas. There appear to be two origin stories for the actual name. In one version, mentioned in Star Wars: the Annotated Screenplays, Lucas simply made the name up because it sounded good. The other version is this:

...when I was mixing the soundtrack for American Graffiti with the sound editor, Walter Murch, we were working with a number of dialogue tracks and about twelve reels of film. Walter asked me to go to the rack and get R2-D2 – reel two, dialogue track two. When I heard that I thought what a great name that would be, and wrote it down in my little book. When I was developing the character of the little robot in Star Wars I developed it around that name.

– George Lucas in Bantha Tracks, the Lucasfilm fan newsletter. Issue 8 – spring 1980

Legendary editor and sound guru Walter Murch, holding the fateful reel.

Incidentally, I generally write the name in alphanumeric form because it saves me three keystrokes, but for much of the Original Trilogy the name tended to be written phonetically: as Artoo-Detoo. In at least one early draft of the script it was actually Artwo-Detwo. Artoo is also how the name appears in both the final script and the novelization ghostwritten by Alan Dean Foster and credited to Lucas.

Generally the specific robot is named Artoo, whereas generic droids of the type are "R2 units". C-3PO is written as See-Threepio. Less commonly, R5-D4 is even listed in the US trademark application as "Arfive-Defour", which was a name apparently used on some toy packaging.

 Did George Lucas coin the word “droid”?

“Droid” is obviously a shortened form of the word “android,” which generally refers today to a mechanical device designed to resemble and simulate a human being. However the word “android” itself stems from the ancient Greek word “androeidēs,” meaning “manlike.” It was used as far back as the 1700s to refer to the alchemists' strange dream of miniature biological replicas of humans, more commonly known as “homunculi.”

In Lucas' world a “droid” is simply any kind of robot, whether or not it resembles a human, and he first used the word in the second draft of Star Wars, completed on 28 January 1975. However, it does have a precedent - a writer named Mari Wolf used the word in her story “Robots of the World! Arise!” in 1952. It's not known if Lucas knew of this reference when he wrote Star Wars, or if he came up with the term independently.

The word is also a trademark owned by Lucasfilm since 2008, and licensed to Motorola for selling Android phones.

Funnily enough, the original release of Star Wars had different character names for different languages and markets. R2-D2, for example, was flipped around and became D2-R2 in La guerre des étoiles in France. C-3PO was Z-6PO, Darth Vader was Dark Vador, Han Solo was Yan Solo, Chewbacca was Chiktabba, the Millennium Falcon was le Millénium Condor, and so on. French wasn't the only language that inflicted name changes. Darth Vader, for example, was Lord Fener in Italy. The Millennium Falcon was der Rasender Falke in German. The original English names were restored to many markets by the 1990s.

Defining a Robot

The next stage was to transform McQuarrie's drawings of R2-D2 – and other mechanical effects such as the landspeeder and the light sabres – into physical reality. The trick was to turn the sketches and paintings into detailed plans that could be built by a small team of technicians. Lucas was adamant that the robots and other props had to look convincing. The audience had to believe that they were genuine working devices from a galaxy far, far, away.

It's easy to forget how revolutionary the Star Wars production design was at the time. This embarrassingly shonky robot is from Logan's Run: released just a year before Star Wars. A man inside a mirrored box, equipped with a crude face mask, was apparently supposed to look futuristic.

By summer 1975, British special effects expert John Stears was on the job as special mechanical effects supervisor. Stears is not well known today, despite being one of the Oscar winners for Star Wars, but in the mid 70s was an industry veteran. He had an early career as a matte painter and model builder, and was famous for his gadget and prop work on the James Bond films – winning his first Oscar in 1965 for effects work on Thunderball. Conveniently for Lucas he was also a “powder man” with a pyrotechnician's licence – perfect for making walls blow up when hit by a blaster.

John Stears lies on the Tunisian sand as he controls the RC R2, which is rolling along on plywood sheets.

Incidentally this image, and many others in these articles, is a still frame from material shot by documentary filmmaker Peter Shillingford. He was hired to produce the behind the scenes Tunisia and England footage, what he calls the "film about the film," that appears in The Making of Star Wars and many other documentaries. It was shot 16mm colour, but sadly mostly without sound since the production team couldn't afford the requisite location sound recordist who would have had to accompany the camera. Shillingford was assisted in Tunisia by Mike Shackleton, who also worked with the first and second units at Elstree.

Special effects or visual effects?

Historically filmmakers have made a distinction between the two. Special effects are real life mechanical tricks that take place in front of the camera; often known as practical effects. Concealed wires, mirrors, simulated smoke or snow, and so on. From this point of view R2-D2 in the original films was in part a special effect. Optical tricks performed live in-camera also fall into this category.

Visual effects, on the other hand, are those done after filming of live action is complete. A wide vista could be painted onto glass sheet, and then live action footage filmed earlier could be combined with it. Computer graphic imaging (CGI) effects are likewise typically added after filming is complete.

So, for example, the ANH shot of R2 being attacked by the Jawas is a combination of the two types of effect. The mechanical prop rolling along in Tunisia was a special effect, as was the muzzle flash and the big burst of smoke from the Jawa's stun gun. However, the glowing zap lines were a visual effect. They were hand-drawn by animator Adam K. Beckett, and superimposed towards the end of the production process.

The hand-animated rotoscoped zap effects didn't always quite work the way they were supposed to! Note how these glowing panel lines are actually misaligned, though it all flashes on-screen so quickly that you'd never really notice.

In Star Wars the special effects work was mostly done at EMI Elstree studios, but the visual effects work was mostly done by George Lucas' California company later known as ILM. Of course, modern computer technology is blurring these distinctions. For example, the Mandalorian TV show uses extensive computer graphics projected realtime onto giant screens behind the actors.

Another key hire was the legendary John Barry – not the English film composer of James Bond fame, but the English production designer. He started in autumn 1975, and was instrumental in the creation of the rich, lived-in set and prop designs that Star Wars is known for today.

The team responsible for Star Wars' real-life look. Set dresser Roger Christian in 1970s rock star mode, art director Leslie Dilley, production designer John Barry, construction manager Bill Welch, and art director Norman Reynolds.

But a little-known fact is that Barry technically wasn't the film's first production designer, since 20th Century Fox’s British managing director Peter Beale had hired art director Elliot Scott to consult briefly on the film and produce a preliminary budget for the complex and costly production. During his two week stint Scott brought in John Stears, who thus was the first full-time British hire on the movie, starting work on the first of August, 1975. This was even before George Lucas had flown out to the UK. Not long thereafter producer Gary Kurtz hired Barry and art director Norman Reynolds, and things kicked into gear. (Barry visited the US for meetings on 20 August and Lucas went to the UK in September)

John Stears (left) and his team ponder a recalcitrant radio-controlled R2 on the Tunisian dunes in 1976. From footage shot by Peter Shillingford.

The earliest work, in late 1975, was done at two temporary locations. Lucas and Kurtz were based initially out of the 20th Century Fox offices in Soho Square, London. And a small production team moved into Lee International Studios on Kensal Road W10 in North Kensington, London, and started prototyping key designs. The site was a “four walls” facility, meaning you could just rent the space without having to use studio staff. (the building, just east of Ladbroke Grove and Kensal Green Cemetery, is now sadly gone)

An early production sketch by conceptual artist Ralph McQuarrie shows some basic, and familiar, R2 elements, along with some features that never made it to the screen. The droid is 18" in diameter and 3 1/2 feet tall, which is pretty well what it ended up as being in the finished film. Note how the dome is hemispherical at this point.

A lot of people contributed elements to the final R2 design, starting with Ralph McQuarrie's paintings and sketches. John Stears, Norman Reynolds, Roger Christian, Les Dilley, John Barry, and others all pitched in with ideas, with George Lucas as the final arbiter. Like everything to do with movies, the finished droids were a mixture of boundless creative design and physical, budget-restricted, reality. The decision to abandon the crutch-walking idea and make him a wheeled robot was likely made around this time.

The McQuarrie sketch below shows how a small performer could fit within the droid body in two-legged mode; the approach ultimately taken with Kenny Baker. It also shows how the droid would move on wheels when in two-legged mode.

Note that some of the leg and shoulder details differ considerably from the finished droid, which also lost the dome antenna detail shown in the middle. The retractable "fairings" were replaced with flexible hoses, but the 18" body barrel diameter remained almost the same. The hemispherical head later became ovoid, of course.

Production sketch by Ralph McQuarrie.

The wooden prototype

The next stage was to create a rough full-sized mockup as a proof of concept. It was clear by this point that R2 had to be a human being inside a costume, so the physical dimensions of the droid were essential to establish. They needed to know the height and width of the barrel, and how the robot's feet would fit those of a human performer.

And so it came to pass that set decorator Roger Christian and carpenter Bill Harman went down in history as makers of the first incarnation of R2-D2 in a physical form. The momentous event occurred at the aforementioned Lee International Studios; a grandly named but scruffy and rat-infested building on the southern banks of the Grand Union Canal.

I hired a carpenter – Bill Harman – who'd made all the props for Monty Python. He was brilliant – you could give him anything and he'd make it work. We had no money, not even enough to buy timber, but Bill had marine plywood at home, which he bent around the frame we'd built. In an electrical store, I found an old lamp from the 1940s and fitted that on top. I carved the little moving prongs on the front, and we stuck some aeroplane bits on and got him approved.

— Roger Christian, Cinema Alchemist, 2016

George Lucas and the first completed R2 prototype.

Note the angled boxes between the skirt and the battery boxes - these were the fairings, replaced later with hoses, for concealing Kenny Baker's legs.

The version above is actually the second one that Harman built - the first one was deemed too wide, was never completed, and is now lost to history. In fact, in a phone interview Harman said it ended up in the canal. This second mockup was the smallest that could be built and still accommodate a certain performer named Kenny Baker.

There are a lot of fascinating things about this prototype. First, it’s remarkably close to the finished R2 design in many ways. Tons of tiny fiddly details, like the shape of the ankles, the arrangement of ribs on the “skirt,” the presence of half moons on the feet – it’s all there already!

I made a 3D model of the wood prototype R2 to learn more details about how it was built. Obviously the back of the body barrel has to be blank as we have no photos of that.

Second, R2 already has his characteristic dome. And the reason it gained this unique shape was fortuitous happenstance. It wasn't possible for Harman to make a dome quickly and cheaply out of wood, so other options had to be considered. The small studio that the Star Wars team initially rented was owned by John and Benny Lee’s Lee Electric, the largest movie lighting company in Britain at the time. And the dome was actually the reflector from a decommissioned Lee Electric 1000 watt lamp that Christian found in a scrap storage room (the “electrical store mentioned in the quote above referred to storage, not a retail shop). According to Christian, Bill Harman paid Lee's studio manager a princely 10 shillings (half a pound; though it's odd he should specify shillings since the UK went decimal in 1971) for the lamp. You can see earlike bits of metal in the photo above – those are the original lamp's handles or brackets.

Amazingly, despite all the changes and new droids over the years, the semi-ovoid and non-hemispherical proportions of this ancient and forgotten piece of lighting equipment still live on today in the shape of R2-D2's head! The only real change in shape was the addition of the two neck rings.

Third, the pale green holoprojector on the front left side of the dome, was an aircraft reading lamp found by Roger Christian. It came from a Vickers Viscount plane, but wasn't the same model of lamp that was built into the final droids.

The screen-used droids had grey-painted lamps, used on a different era of Viscount, which differed in geometry and construction from this green one. (for everyone who thought Christian was misremembering when he described finding a box full of green airplane reading lights, this photo suggests he was right!) Incidentally, parts of the final grey lights also show up, upside-down, on the Millennium Falcon and X-wing fighter dashboards.

Finally, note how the horseshoes on the shoulders are located on the inside of each leg in this design. This was also the case in the initial blueprints. However, the team made a last-minute change during development and switched the horseshoes to the outside, which is where they are today.

The move to EMI

Fox's board finally and reluctantly greenlit the show in mid December 1975. By that time production had already moved to EMI Elstree Studios in Borehamwood, north of London. Elstree was where most of the film's live action photography would take place, and where almost all the props and costumes were created. The quintessentially English studio may have seemed an unusual choice for an American film to be made. But at the time it was able to offer eight large sound stages, and like Lee International it permitted the Star Wars operation to assemble its own technical crew while also providing access to excellent facilities. The crew was thus a mix of people hired by Star Wars, and employees of EMI Elstree. Also, Britain was much cheaper than Hollywood, and had relatively easy access to Tunisia (three hours by plane) for filming most of the desert sequences.

It was at Elstree that a third known prototype was built - a rather strange-looking fibreglass version. This version was crude, but helped finalize the dimensions that would fit Kenny Baker's body.

John Barry (left) and team examine Kenny Baker inside the fibreglass R2. This is the only photo I know of that shows the barrel of this prototype.

Note how the horseshoes are still on the inside of the legs with this version.

Finalizing the designs

Next, the team had to nail down the basic designs on paper. Like any major film production, Star Wars relied on a series of detailed blueprints to guide the set and prop builders. They were hand-drawn by highly skilled movie studio draftspeople (or draughtsmen as they were known in the UK at the time) at EMI Elstree, under the close supervision of the Star Wars art department.

Production drawing 67/1. Back when the movie was still known as “The Star Wars”.

Here's a well-known blueprint of the near-final R2-D2, drawn by Peter Childs, one of five EMI draftspeople who worked on the film. (he was also a model maker on 2001: a Space Odyssey)

It's pretty well the R2 we all know and love, and only truly obsessed fans will notice the minor differences between the remarkably elegant and precise blueprint and the finished droid. (I think there are around six) The mechanical precision of these blueprints, hand-drawn in a pre-CAD (computer-aided design) era, is quite impressive.

What are blueprints?

A blueprint, to a layperson, refers to a precisely-drawn technical, mechanical, or architectural drawing, used as a plan to build something.

Blueprints and printing technology

However, the term “blueprint” is actually an anachronism, since it has its origins with an inexpensive iron-based photochemical process invented in 1842 by John Herschel. This “cyanotype” technology yielded solid cyan or blue prints with white or pale blue lines, and was used for around a century.

The image below is from an architectural blueprint of a building. You’ll notice that it is, in fact, a print that is blue! And, since it’s a negative, it’s a bit hard to read.

The Star Wars technical drawings were mostly done in pencil, and drawn up by skilled EMI Elstree staff, following British conventions. Indeed, the majority of the set and prop drawings printed in JW Rinzler’s book Star Wars: the Blueprints are photos of those beautiful drawings. In this era of computerization it's amazing to think how such complex and precise plans were once created with high-tech tools like pencils, rulers, and T-squares!

However, since pencil masters were very delicate, and since multiple copies needed to be distributed to the crew, full-sized duplicates were required. The drawings were thus reproduced as disposable “dyeline” prints, for use in workshops and on film sets. (while xerographic photocopiers had been around since the 1950s, large format copiers weren't until the 80s or so)

Dyelines

Dyelines were also commonly known as bluelines, whiteprints, or diazo prints. They used a postwar type of “reprographic” image-copying technology that didn’t employ cyanotype chemistry. Dyelines used the rather stinky ammonia diazo chemical process instead, producing dark blue lines on translucent synthetic sheets or paper. Colour-wise, a dyeline is therefore the inverse of an actual “blueprint”, and thus more readable. Also, paper is a less desirable material because it can shrink, stretch, or expand - synthetic vellum is more dimensionally stable. That's essential for stuff that's carried around workshops and measured from.

Architects and designers of a certain age will have strong memories of having to stand around the whiteprint/diazo machine, waiting impatiently for a print to emerge, amidst the foul wafts of ammonia gas. And, over in Canada, CBC Vancouver’s diazo machine led to the creation of a musical act in the early 1980s – the not very famous Diazo Brothers Band! But my digression has digressed here.

The image below is a production-made dyeline copy of one of R2’s shoulders. You can see that, unlike a blueprint, it’s a positive image. But it’s also rather noisy, in large part because dyelines tend to fade with exposure to UV – the bane of collectors everywhere! Another thing of note is that a dyeline is printed by sandwiching the original drawing to the dyeline material, and exposing the whole thing to UV. This means that a dyeline is automatically the exact size of the original.

So these aren’t blueprints?

Since the Star Wars plans are dyeline copies of pencil drawings, it’s completely correct to say that the production prints are not blueprints in the Victorian/pre WW II sense. However “blueprint” has long been generalized to mean a technical drawing, and not solely a document that was printed using cyanotype processes.

After all, today we don’t even use diazo dyelines anymore – they were replaced first by photocopying (xerography) and later by large-format plotters and computer printers. Which is just as well – dyelines fade quickly, are not as crisp as digital plans fresh off a printer, and require unpleasant chemicals to make.

This is why I’m using the word blueprint in the contemporary, if less accurate, way. The technology of printing has changed; the underlying needs and purposes for the prints haven’t. It’s like talking about “dialling” a number on a touchscreen phone. Which then “rings” despite having no bells. Or talking about a “technical drawing” that was made on a computer and printed out, and thus never actually truly drawn.

Of course, if you're an architect or engineer or someone who works in the reprographic industry, then using the specific technology name still makes a lot of sense, but not all of us are!

Note that “blueprint” is also a marketing term for a fantasy drawing produced for later ancillary material. These are often drawings that purport to show what the fictional droid or spaceship might have inside it. Such drawings are not blueprints in a real sense, of course, because they were never used as plans for building stuff.

R2-D2 on paper

R2-D2 was a particularly complicated design, and so was represented by many different drawings with some revisions and alterations. Some of the blueprints have been published in books licensed by Lucasfilm, some have surfaced via auction or private sales, others remain locked away in Lucasfilm's archives and have never been seen by the public, and some are probably lost in the mists of time.

Regarding terminology, in drafting parlance, an “elevation” is a flat drawing, exactly face-on, of a building or object seen from one particular side. So a front elevation is the front view of R2, and so on. A body section is a cross-section, as if the droid had been sliced in half horizontally, and you were looking down at the lower section. If a blueprint is “dimensioned” it means it has specific size measurements marked on it. Because they were drawn in the UK in the 1970s, the dimensions on these blueprints are all in Imperial measurement units. 

The ANH R2 blueprints

The following is a list of ANH-era blueprints known to have existed. This research is largely courtesy Robert Jackson, who purchased dyeline copies of some of them. Some of these we know of solely by number and title, because they're referred to in other blueprints.

Note that the number refers to blueprints drawn for the whole production – plans for sets, props, and so on. It’s not like there were 51 drawings of R2-D2 before the first one or anything.

Finally, were different blueprints drawn up for the RC R2 versus the Kenny and stunt droids? The answer is no. All the droids were made from the same set of basic plans. Some additional drawings were made for specific additional features, such as the RC R2’s foot motors and servo-controlled leg drop mechanism.

First set of EMI blueprints, drawn by Peter Childs, early January 1976

52.   Front elevation

53.   Body sections D-D (middle barrel, through lower front vent)

54.   Body section C-C (lower barrel, through second row of panels)

55.   Body section A-A (top of barrel, through centre of shoulder hub, dropping down to top vent)

56.   Body section B-B (bottom of barrel, through middle of lowest panels)

These plans were withdrawn, even though Peteric had already started working to them, and replaced by:

Second set of EMI blueprints, drawn by Peter Childs, late January 1976. Titled “Set: Robot R2”

67/1.   Front elevation (replaces 52), sheet 1 of 4, body barrel dimensioned. Reprinted in Star Wars: the Blueprints (2013).

67/2.   Rear elevation (ie droid from the back). Known from auctions; not published.

67/3.   Port side elevation, no dimensions, sheet 3 of 4. “Robot R2 Port Elevation (for 3' 8" man)”. This drawing has never been published, but a copy was auctioned by Propstore and is featured in an Adam Savage Tested video.

67/4.   Starboard side elevation, or “Starboard Elevation Robot ‘R2’ (for 3' 8" man)”, no dimensions, sheet 4 of 4. Reprinted in Star Wars Blueprints (1977), the Making of Star Wars (2007), and Star Wars: the Blueprints (2013).

68.   Body sections A-A and B-B

69.   Body sections C-C and D-D

Related blueprints

33.   Profile of Head (dome). Dimensioned dome profile only.

37.   Mech arm arrangement (front manipulator arms)

60.   Dome (Head assy, or “Head of Artoo”). Five separate dome views on one sheet.

61.   Leg assy (not dimensioned)

63.   Louvred intake (front vents)

84.   Horseshoe modification to leg (this one covers the change in leg design from the early prototypes, where the shoulder was on the inside of the leg, to the final design, where the shoulder sticks out on the outside of the leg)

120. R5-D4 was seen as simply an R2-D2 with a different head. This drawing, by Norman Reynolds and Peter Shields, describes the replacement tapered dome that was crafted in fibreglass. The eyes differ from the final droid, and are marked “purchased lenses” on the drawing.

Other ANH drawings/blueprints

There are a handful of other production drawings known to exist, mainly because copies have been auctioned off to the public over the years. These aren't numbered using the scheme above since they weren't drawn up by the EMI Elstree drawing team.

Ralph McQuarrie drew an early drawing showing how a small performer could fit inside a droid body. This drawing has a very early design for R2 which differs from the finished droid. It’s part of the Lucas Archives and has been exhibited publicly.

John Stears drew up a neat sketch (“Specification List of Alloy R2 Robots. John Stears Special Effects Director 29-1-76”) of various aspects to the droid planning process - one is shown below. These indicate the number of R2 units planned, and what functions they could perform.

That drawing was followed up by another Stears sketch, “Additional R2 units for studio requirements, from special effects department.” This one is undated.

Precise technical diagrams documenting the leg drop, the outer foot motors, and the middle foot steering mechanism (004-SW) were drawn by Enid Malik of Film Art Services. She's listed as “EJM” on those drawings. These drawings have made it possible for Robert Jackson of OpenR2 to produce machined components that replicate the original ANH RC R2 mechanical design.

Post ANH-drawings

The droid builders of ESB were issued the ANH blueprints to build their droids – no new R2 body blueprints were drawn up. But one problem occurred which resulted in subtle differences between the ANH and ESB lower bodies. This stemmed from the change in blueprints from the 50 series to the 60 series described above.

However, a few blueprints were drawn up during the production of ESB and ROTJ as well. For example, draftsperson Peter Hole produced drawings of R2's drink-serving mechanism from ROTJ (drawing 252), the tools and internal accessories from the ROTJ era (drawing 69), and a couple others.

How accurate were they?

A topic of some debate in the droid-building community is how close the original 1976 blueprints were to the finished droids. The answer is, “very, in the case of the aluminium droids, but details differed.”

The plans were drawn by consummate professionals, and represented the intent of the designers closely. There were a couple of errors in dimensions and rendering, since they weren't drawn with the benefit of semi-automated CAD software like drawings are today. But they’re really very good. And the 1976 droids were built by engineers and experienced metal workers.

There are a few points that have lead to some confusion, and why some hobbyists have dismissed these blueprints.

But careful analysis of photos of the finished props shows that the EMI blueprints were followed very closely indeed.

The fan blueprints

Over the years legions of Star Wars enthusiasts have wanted to build R2-D2 robots of their very own. A loose international club was formed, and various plans and blueprints have been drawn up by teams of hobbyists. These are available at Astromech.net, and are used by most hobbyists to build their own personal R2 robots.

However, these plans were mostly based on reverse engineering and measuring some existing screen-used droids. They try to synthesize the differences between the original and prequel droids, creating a composite look that isn't consistent with any one specific screen-used robot. There are also features and dimensions on the fan plans that never existed on the original movie droids. However, Disney-era films and TV shows sometimes feature robots that were hobbyist-built, and so some of the fan designs have eventually made it to the screen.

Since these pages are concerned with the original movie robots, the hobbyist plans are not a primary focus here.

Peteric - the unsung heroes of the Full Metal R2

Finally, when it came to building the R2 externals, John Stears hired a small English engineering firm named Peteric Engineering to do the work, because he wanted the droids to be built from metal. Much of the complex technical construction was thus done by external engineering contractors, not by filmmaking staff at the studio itself.

John Stearsdrawing below shows what he wanted. It indicates that two “hero” units for Kenny Baker to operate were planned, and a single radio-controlled/RC droid (the “mobile tri-leg one) was intended. A fourth unit was designed for Baker to operate arms and so on for closeups, two were empty shells free of either motors or performers for certain stunt uses (strapped to the landspeeder and sucked into the sandcrawler), and one was a partial unit for the fighter cockpits. There is no photographic evidence that I’ve seen showing the last half-droid, however. It’s possible that a seventh droid was built as far down as the bottom of the body barrel, rather than halfway down the body, but we do know of many different droid domes that were made.

A sketch by John Stears detailing the specific features needed by each R2 unit to be built by Peteric (here misspelt “Petric”) Engineering.

Peteric were based at Shepperton Studios on the outskirts of southwest London - diagonally across the city from Elstree. (Shepperton is where the rebel hangar and awards ceremony sequences were shot, incidentally) The majority of the original Star Wars R2 droids had domes, frames, and exteriors entirely built from sheet aluminium – they didnt use “aluminum without the letter “I” since they werent built in the USA! The metalwork bill ran to £18,000 – roughly £115,000 or $145,000 US in 2024 money; a not inconsiderable sum for the cash-strapped film.

To make the body barrels the crew took flat sheets of 1mm aluminium alloy (we don't know the specific alloy type), marked out panel locations from the blueprints, and punched out holes using a then high-tech Strippit punch machine. Peteric's managing director David Watling said in a 2013 interview with Brandon Alinger, “we had some machines that would punch holes very accurately within a few thousandth of an inch, in the flat material, and then you would roll it and join it. He also added, we had a tooling facility, which allowed us to make those punches and dies, so if we wanted a strange shape, we could make it.”

Another key person in the story was Jack Swinbank, a highly skilled metalworker employed by the firm. According to Watling, “Jack was one of the finest sheet metal workers I have ever come across, and he would be able to tell you exactly in the flat (ie: on the flat metal surface), where to make a hole, so that when you bent it, it came in at exactly the right place.”

The bodies were welded together to form a strong seamless barrel - not an easy trick to accomplish, given how thin the metal was. In fact, the accuracy of this complex work clearly reflects the skill and experience of the people who worked on the project.

Kenny Baker confers with a 1970s boffin (nerdy mad scientist in American parlance) with awesome spectacles. This picture is believed to have been taken at EMI midway during the build process, and not taken at Peteric. The man is not known to us, and is not Jack Swinbank.

The legs, dome, and feet were also crafted in metal, but were based on measurements taken from cast plaster references sent to Peteric from EMI. In other words, because the legs and feet weren’t dimensioned on the blueprints, Peteric took calipers to the casts and used that data, now lost, to construct the metal versions.

Sadly Peteric did not retain any of the blueprints, models, and records of R2's construction for posterity. It’s a shame, since it means that their important contribution to science fiction history (they also worked on Alien, designing and building a never-used mechanical jaw and head) is nearly lost and mostly forgotten today. Especially since other individuals and firms have regrettably taken credit for building R2-D2 over the years.

Almost all the droid parts were designed and custom-made. The hologram projectors, shoulder buttons, and eye lenses were probably the sole “found parts on the robot’s exterior. Here are some more shots of shiny all-aluminium R2 units under construction at Peteric.

R2-D2 in progress. Note how the third one has dark patches on the dome. These are marked out with blue dye.

The battery boxes attached to the feet all had holes cut out of the inside edge in these shots. In the case of the Kenny model it's so that Baker could put his feet into the R2 unit's feet. (actually – into a pair of rubber boots) However, the radio-controlled (RC) droid had the same holes to accommodate the projecting motor mechanism. The RC droid just had curved panels made from thin sheet metal to cover the holes.

The photo below shows an early camera test of one of the Kenny R2s. Kenny Baker is visible inside - you can see his back with his criss-crossed suspender/trouser brace straps, and his right foot in a white boot. Also apparent is how the droid is made of metal, except for the white fibreglass feet and battery boxes.

The domes

All ANH R2-D2 units had metal domes made by Peteric from spun aluminium alloy. This means a flat sheet of aluminium was pressed into a dome shape by turning it against a wooden "former". As noted above, the shape and curvature of the dome were modelled after the old stage lamp found by Roger Christian. R2 doesn't have a hemispherical dome like the early sketches and paintings, but one slightly stretched vertically into a part ovoid.

John Stears (right) examines the three-legged droid being assembled in the workshops at EMI Elstree.

Peteric's David Watling has said that each head consisted of two domes - an outer visible dome, and an internal support dome. This dual-dome design is basically the system used by hobbyist R2 makers today. Curved metal panels were then hand cut to fit each panel opening.

Note that there is some variation in the various panel holes on the original ANH domes. The RC R2's dome had panel holes which basically matched the blueprints. However, some of the other droid domes had subtly different panel hole locations. They were sometimes slightly further apart, or in the case of the holoprojector hole, aligned slightly differently. This is because each dome was made by hand, and it's entirely possible that different people were responsible for measuring and marking out each dome.

Watling also said that they were supplied with a cast plaster dome as a model for the dome; believed to be the one shown in the auction photograph below. The plaster is covered with handwritten measurements to be transferred over to the bare metal dome for marking. Note how the holoprojector is closer to the PSI panel than to the opposite blue panel, indicating that this off-centre look was the designers' original intent, matching the blueprints. The two logic lights are also not centre-aligned vertically within the panel – the gap at the bottom is larger than at the top.

Intriguingly, the pencilled text on the left reads "2? HEADS ALL PANELS REMOVABLE EXCEPT THOSE MARKED 'X'". However, it's not clear if that reads "3" scratched out and replaced with "2", or "20". I suspect the former. No droid in ANH was seen with an opening panel, though interior photos clearly show that one or two of the domes were built that way. The symbol "CL" is presumed to mean "centre line."

Dome neck mechanics

Incidentally, the mechanical arrangement of the ANH droid domes has been the source of confusion for a long time. Essentially how it worked was the metal dome had two visible rings at the base – one bare metal, and one blue.

The bare metal ring was attached to the body barrel assembly, but could rotate independently of the body barrel's position. In the second shot below you can see three trapezoidal brackets. These brackets, which had nylon slides on them, prevented the bare metal ring from being lifted off, but allowed it to spin freely. Finally, the bare metal ring had three positioning pins, which fitted into mating holes in the base of blue ring. This simple gravity system allowed the filmmakers to remove the dome instantly as required. The damaged droid in the post-battle hangar scene has a dome that's been dislodged and offset from its body - you can see one of the pins sticking out in the actual movie!

The blue ring was permanently part of the bottom of the dome, and had holes to match the pins. The dome would simply sit atop the metal ring, and was held in place by nothing more than gravity and alignment of the pins. The body's bare metal ring, the dome's blue ring, and the dome itself all turned as one group atop the body.

A view of the RC R2 without its dome in place. Two of the three dome ring pins are circled in red – the third is obscured by the radio-control equipment. And the three trapezoidal rotation brackets are circled in blue.

The stunt droids capable of toppling had threaded bolts, instead of pins, so that the domes wouldn't fall off. These had to be accessed via the back door of the body barrel.

C&L

A small company called C&L Developments, located just south of Shepperton in Weybridge, Surrey, were subcontracted by Peteric to perform the machining and the mechanical work. This included the final integration of the motors and other moving mechanisms in the RC R2. C&L's Neil Anderson worked on the RC R2's complex leg-drop mechanism. Peteric's Watling has said that C&L worked on many of these parts since Peteric did not have all the necessary machining equipment.

The leg drop mechanism

The RC R2’s middle leg was released by a servomotor, and dropped down on a dampened spring mechanism. In other words, the motive force for the descent came from a bank of springs at the top of the body, and the descent was slowed as it neared bottom through the use of a hydraulic dampening device. This was a “dashpot manufactured by British engineering firm Kinetrol – a product still sold today! A separate bank of springs powered the outer leg tilt motion.

Incidentally you sometimes hear that the original droids used "pneumatic" mechanisms. None of the OT R2s were built with pressurized gas or air systems for leg control. However, years later at least the ANH RC R2 was retrofitted with a pneumatic leg, almost certainly during the prep work for Episode I at Leavesden Studios. Also, the original ANH R2 wasn’t what fan builders call 2-3-2 capable: the RC R2 could lower its middle leg but couldn’t raise it. The leg locked in place as it descended and the operators had to lift up the dome, reach in, and reset it. All while moving the legs back to their 2-leg position.

They could have simulated the leg-raise effect by doing a leg lower and then making the film run backwards, but it seems they never did. Whenever R2 transitions from 3 legs to 2 in the first film he does so basically off-screen, or he tilts forward and you can't see his feet.

Unfortunately, according to Neil Anderson of C&L in a 2020 conversation, the RC R2 droid was damaged in shipment from the UK to Tunisia. The cargo plane had a rough landing, and the middle leg mechanism bore the brunt of the damage, resulting in a leg that failed to catch on the first day of shooting.

A polished droid

Once the mechanicals were integrated, the EMI studio art department was responsible for painting, according to Peteric's Watling. Sadly, we basically have no photos of this part of the build, which occurred during the final frantic days before the droids had to be air-shipped to Tunisia for the first day of filming. We thus have no studio photos of gleaming white and blue metal droids, prior to weathering. The closest we have are a couple of shots taken in Tunisia, such as this one.

Location photo in Tunisia by an unknown photographer; possibly on-set stills photographer John Jay. John Stears is crouching.

We also have this shot, which was actually taken as part of a promo shoot for the 1-year anniversary of the movie's release. The full image shows C-3PO, standing next to him, holding a cake with a single candle. Aside from the general weirdness of the "radar eye" being backlit in red, and the logic lights being lit with yellow rather than blue light, it's quite an interesting photo.

This picture may look cheerful enough, but it was actually taken during a rather grim period in R2's existence. It's not commonly known that he went through a Sith phase in his youth, as evidenced by his red eye. He dabbled in the darkness.

The robot looks extremely clean, unblemished, and almost new. The panel lines are all crisp and sharp. Especially compared to the ones touring the world, which look pretty beat-up. The droid has open battery boxes and skirt, suggesting it was a Kenny droid. But it has no rollerskates on the underside of the feet, and certainly no hint of a wheel. And the right leg is button-back, which is odd.

I've no idea why this one looks so good, given that the picture was taken so long after filming completed. Regardless, these shots are probably the closest we can get to how the R2s looked, freshly built.

Background ANH droid domes

The background droids, which had different colour schemes from R2-D2, had unique heads. These appear to have been cast in fibreglass using a mould derived from the plaster dome above. In fact, there are obvious dents on the plaster form, presumably reflecting the studio lamp used as its model. And these dome dents were faithfully duplicated in glass-reinforced plastic!

This is the cast head of the droid seen roaming down a Tatooine street in the photo below. Notice how the big dent at the top of the plaster dome is replicated. Also, the cast domes have noticeably deep magic panel recesses, and often have a variety of random approximations for the separate detail components.

Generally if an ANH droid has a fully-painted and non-metallic dome you know it's a fibreglass one. The non-R2-D2 droids shown behind the X-wing and Y-wing pilots during the final battle sequence were all simply domes made this way. Finally, it seems two R5-style heads were also made of fibreglass.

The RC R2, wearing a red-painted fibreglass dome. This is on the Mos Eisley street set in Ajim, Tunisia, and the droid is probably being carried back to position one for a retake.

The robotic R2

John Stears was keenly interested in building an actual working robot; one capable of performing. He is said to have visited academics and researchers to try and enlist their assistance. In other words, he didn't want to just cobble together the bare minimum that looked acceptable on-screen. A man with ambitious plans indeed.

Conjecture: this approach, while admirable in principle, was definitely incompatible with the general lack of time and budget suffered by the first film, and may have been the underlying reason why the 1976 robots had such technical problems. In a sense Stears was ahead of his time, since modern films and TV productions use a lot of computer-controlled mechanical effects in addition to computer imaging. Unfortunately, the delays inflicted by Fox's refusal to commit to the project officially until December 1975 also cost the production dearly.

A set of handbooks produced by Stears to assist the operators of the droids he built for the first film. Each book contains a typed set of instructions and descriptions of each prop. According to the auction site which sold them, the pictures on each cover were drawn by Stears using white typewriter correcting fluid (Tipp-Ex or similar).

In the end, fully robotic R2s were not possible, both in terms of budget and available time. Stears had to be satisfied with all-metal robots largely worn as costumes or occasionally puppeted externally. Only one robot was built with mechanization, and that radio-controlled R2 simply had driving motors in its outer feet, a steering mechanism in its middle foot, and a spring-loaded middle leg mechanism. It couldn't turn its head or operate its arms.

It was Stears and his effects team who worked on the mechanisms of the RC R2, and the lights built into most of the droids. According to Stears in a 1978 Cinefantastique interview, his crew included “Dick Hewitt, electronics expert; Brian Warner, Bert Hamilton-Smith, Bob Nugent, all engineers; (and) Bennie Smith, electrician.”

Stears was quite upset that none of the people who worked on his end of the show were listed in the film's credits, grumpily remarking that "the American crew credits included everybody including the teaboy, but my effects crew never got a mention." Accordingly he placed a full-page ad in Screen International, a British industry magazine, thanking the people and companies who worked on the project. Note that this ad doesn't just focus on the people who made R2-D2, but also people who worked on the landspeeder, the dewback mannequin, the light sabres, the non-R2 droids, and so on.

Plastic droid

In addition to the all-metal radio-controlled droid, and the two Kenny metal droids with fibreglass feet described above, there were also droids built entirely from synthetic materials. In an interview broadcast in 1978, producer Gary Kurtz says that "two or three were made out of fibreglass." This view of a workshop shows EMI studio technicians working on moulded droid components.

Fibreglass parts being made, probably at EMI. The mould at front right was used to create a leg and a shoulder as a single part. The man at the back is working on one of the two halves of the fibreglass body barrel for R2. Most likely from footage shot by Peter Shillingford.

At least one of the all-fibreglass droids saved the day in Tunisia, since the empty shell could be pulled around when the complicated motorized three-legged droid failed. This low-tech method is how much of the R5-D4 scene was filmed for the droid auction.

John (Barry) called Les (Dilley) and me into his office and shut the door. He told me he’d been to John Stears’ workshop and looked at his remote-controlled R2-D2s, and that he thought they weren’t going to be ready in time for the first day’s shoot in Tunisia.

So John Barry had Les and I prepare a secret R2-D2 that no one but us would know about to take to Tunisia. We prepared a lightweight fibreglass version, fully dressed and functional. We would rely on pulling it around using the tried and tested way of nylon fishing line.

— Roger Christian, 2016

What is fibreglass, anyway?

Fibreglass, or fiberglass in the USA, is not what it sounds like. It's mostly plastic, and not glass.

It’s often referred to as fibre-reinforced plastic (FRP) or glass-reinforced plastic (GRP), which are more accurate names. The stuff is commonly used to make small boats, swimming pools, bathtubs, water tanks, and occasionally droids!

In the world of fibreglass manufacturing, a “buck”, “plug”, or “pattern” is the object that’s shaped like the thing you want to reproduce. A skilled sculptor creates this buck using a variety of different materials, such as clay or wax. Once it's complete, a mould is made of the buck, and then that mould is to cast the final product. You can see the hard moulds used to cast R2’s body barrel and legs in the photo above.

A semi-liquid plastic resin, a kind of gloopy gelatinous material, is carefully painted onto the inside of the mould. Then a mat, or sometimes a woven mesh, of fibrous material is laid down in one or more layers, and more resin painted in over top. It’s this glass fibre mat which gives fibreglass its name. The liquid resin hardens permanently via an irreversible chemical process.

Fibreglass is therefore a composite material, since it consists of multiple substances. The bulk of an object is hard-setting plastic, usually polyester or epoxy resin, with the thin mats of glass fibres used to strengthen the plastic. Often the first coat of plastic to be applied to the mould is known as a “gel coat”. This gives the finished object a smooth and glossy appearance, with the resin beneath giving it structural strength.

How many droids were there in Star Wars?

It may seem a straightforward question, but it’s actually quite complicated. Basically as far as I can tell, nobody knows for certain anymore exactly how many R2-D2 props were constructed for Star Wars (1977). In fact, how is that even defined? The number of domes? Of bodies? Of full units?

Complicating matters further is that the various components making up R2 have been mixed and matched from year to year, from film to film. A droid on public display today might consist of an ANH body with an ESB dome. Some of the prequel droids were built from scratch for the film, but some were actually reworked Original Trilogy droids. Here's what I've found so far.

The John Stears diagram refers to 6 full droids and 1 half droid, though since the sketch was from early in the build process it's uncertain if that was the final number produced for the film, and it seems unlikely that a half droid was actually built. The number 7 was corroborated by Peteric's David Watling in an interview with Brandon Alinger in 2013. Watling said that “about 10” domes were built, but added he doesn't remember exactly how many.

Gary Kurtz, in a 1978 interview, said that "8 or 9 droids" were built, and adds that 2-3 were made from fibreglass. An auction of a pre-production plaster head via the Bonhams auction house claims that 7 droids were built.

This production memo talks about 10 R2s. It's not, however, clear how that is defined. Do they mean complete droids? Do they mean body shells and domes? Does it include the fibreglass droids? Does it count R5-styled droids? Are they also counting other prop droids like the Treadwell and the big standing droid?

A production memo that was auctioned to the public.

This location photo in Tunisia shows at least four astro-droid bodies were present on set. Since all the droids are still beautifully clean, pristine, and undented it's clear the photo was taken before filming began. It looks like the left-hand one is the motorized R2-D2 (three wheels plus head electronics), the next one is a Kenny R2-D2 (the holes in the battery boxes and only two legs), the third one is an R5-D4 head atop an R2-D2 two-leg body (blue utility arms, plus the door above the coin slots has no recess), and the unpainted one on the right edge is clearly a plastic or fibreglass moulded shell, not a metal body. In addition, we know from other photos that both Kenny droids were present in Tunisia.

Here's an empty fibreglass shell being hastily converted on-site to play R5-D4; probably for the roll-out and bad motivator scene. At this point many of the metal details are missing. The under-shoulder details are on the table, waiting to be installed. Notice an important detail – the small horizontal door above the coin slots that has the R5 recess to it. Notice also the wooden frame, used during construction to hold the body back in the correct 18° position for the tripod mode. The R5 from the previous photo stands in the background. 

Is that blue marker dye they're using?

In addition to the background droids used in Mos Eisley, aboard Princess Leia's ship, and on the Death Star, there were also the droid heads made for the X-wing fighter scenes. Most of these droid copilots were little more than moulded fibreglass heads, painted a variety of colours and in a number of schemes. The thrifty production even used a black-painted fibreglass R2 droid head as a basis for the floating torture robot that Darth Vader uses on his daughter.

The torture droid was actually super-creepy. Its upper half was a cast fibreglass R2 dome, but in addition to being painted black it was equipped with a variety of actual medical instruments of various types. Brrrrr.


In a 2003 interview Don Bies, droid wrangler for the prequel films, said that there were 15 Artoos in those movies. This includes both modified OT droids, and the units built specifically for the prequels.

So here's a summary of my best guess. In 1976 there were 1 metal three-leg R2, 5 metal two-leg R2s, 1 metal partial R2 (maybe), 1 three-legged fibreglass R5, and 2 two-legged fibreglass R5 built, for a total of 10. This is conjecture based on the research above, and assumes that the number of metal droids wasn't reduced when the decision to make all-fibreglass droids was made.

The patent

In September 1977 Twentieth Century Fox filed a US design patent (USD251628S) for an "ornamental design for a robot". It was assigned in 1979. This has now expired, but the fact they did so is interesting, reflecting as it does the massive commercial value of the property. The inventors are listed as Ralph McQuarrie and John Stears. Sometimes this drawing is incorrectly referred to as a "blueprint", when it's obviously not. It is worth mentioning, however, that this patent is for the overall look of the robot, not for any particular mechanism or mechanical implementation.

The names "Artoo-Detoo" and "R2-D2" are also trademarked in the USA for the "action figures and accessories" class.

Old Rivet; the ANH RC R2

And here's a famous publicity shot of the original tripodal radio-controlled R2-D2 from Star Wars. Pretty beat up from months of filming, and hastily bolted and riveted together in places! This droid is sometimes referred to as "Old Rivet" by fans. I usually call it the ANH RC R2.

The photo was taken in Hollywood by famed American rock photographer Bob Seidemann in 1977 after the film was released, as part of a series of promo shoots of the original cast. Much of the cast, anyway. R2-D2 was represented by this radio-controlled droid, not by Kenny Baker in a costume. Darth Vader was portrayed by Kermit Eller and not David Prowse. And Alec Guinness and other cast members were not present.

The key point is that the droid in the photo below is not as it appeared during filming, but during the post-production period when it was called upon to make media appearances. Its condition in these pictures represents the rigours of filmmaking, plus the repairs and modifications it underwent at ILM in California.

There are a number of interesting points regarding this particular robot.

This is just a brief list of some of the unusual points about this robot. Check out the list of first and second gen droids for more details!


On to part II: the Astro-droids of 1977.


Copyright

This text was written entirely by and for 3Dsf.info. Feel free to make copies for your own use, but I ask that you not repost it for download elsewhere. The reason is I'm updating these pages all the time for accuracy and development purposes. So the most up to date page should always be available at 3Dsf.info!

The majority of the photos are copyright their respective owners. They're either the property of Lucasfilm or of various people who have posted images online; specific provenance is mostly not known. They're reproduced here for the purpose of criticism and research.

Contact

If you have any corrections or comments, feel free to drop a line:

contact@3dsf.info