II: Problems and Fixes: the De Ago/Fanhome R2

This page is part of a highly detailed review of “Build your own R2-D2,” a “partworks” kit designed and sold by De Agostini/Modelspace/Fanhome.

De Ago's R2

Like the De Agostini Millennium Falcon "partworks" kit, their R2-D2 is good and bad when it comes to screen accuracy. In terms of general proportions it's pretty close, and it's fairly mechanically sturdy. But specific details are almost all wrong, it's a random blend of ANH features and ESB features, and several key components look toylike and cheap. Given the high cost of the product, and given the fact that De Ago advertise the kit as being a “MOVIE-ACCURATE REPLICA”, this is disappointing.

It's sort of weird and depressing. It’s like they examined photos and blueprints really carefully, thought about the design at length, and then went away for a couple weeks. When they came back they drew up their plans based on memory, without relying on the stuff they'd just researched.

So much detail is kind of close, yet doesn’t match any prop from any movie. It feels kind of disdainful to the buyers of the product, to be frank. Each error is pretty minor, but the cumulative effect of virtually every detail being wrong just makes the whole thing a mess.

Left: a thoroughly unconvincing De Agostini holoprojector part. Right: my 3D printed replacement, which is pretty close to screen-accurate. I'm sure you'll agree that even if you don't know what the movie parts looked like, the left-hand part looks like a toy whereas the right-hand part looks like it should actually do something!

Here's a list of some of the visual problems with the kit, broken down into rough difficulty levels to fix.

The goal here is to try and make this kit look as screen-accurate to the radio-controlled (three legged) R2 unit from Star Wars/ANH (1977) as is reasonably possible. Obviously, there were variations in the movie prop droids, so this isn't some absolute goal or anything. But generally any change that makes the kit look less like a toy is a win in my book!

Note that, although there are differences between the various R2 props built for the first film, there was only one three-legged remote-controlled R2 built for the original Star Wars film. The rest were either two-legged R2 units for Kenny Baker to operate, two-legged shell units to drop and strap onto Landspeeders, and so on, and two-legged R5 units sort of bodged together to resemble a three-legged R2. The three-legged R2 did change throughout the course of filming, but aside from the addition of rivets on the body and the colours of the holoprojector rings and some panels, the changes aren't massive.

What’s the point?

Why make any of these mods anyway? Why aren't you happy with the DeAgo/Fanhome product as it ships?

Well, personally I'd rather watch a 70mm movie on a big screen in a theatre than watch it on a phone. And I'd rather have a model that resembles a movie prop than a children's toy.

That said, I don't cast any aspersions on anyone who bought this kit who doesn't want to mess around fixing this stuff! Many people are going to be super happy assembling the out-of-the-bag components, and building up a nice droid model, just as it ships from the factory. Maybe add a little weathering. And that's all fine. The point of making models is to have fun, not to tell other people what they should do with theirs!

So I'm probably going to try and implement most of the fixes in sections 1 and 2. Most of 3 and 4 is probably going to be too much of a pain to tackle, so I'm just going to leave that stuff. In particular I'm focusing on visual appearance issues, and less on mechanical/electronic performance issues.

1. Easy alterations

A test print – sanded and primed – of the octagon port interior.

Left: the De Ago part's profile. Right: a closer profile.

One of my 3D-printed replacement battery harnesses. Sanded to remove print lines, and first coat of paint.

2. Medium difficult alterations

Top: the weirdly shaped De Agostini rear logic lights. In addition to having strangely rounded corners and edges, the flat glass LCD panel representing the logic lights can be seen. There are also light leaks all the way around that need fixing.

Bottom: a test print I've made to more closely replicate the movie prop look. The frame has been designed to fit the odd De Ago cutout, and the black central panel (which needs a little sanding to conceal the print lines) is properly curved and has been equipped with small holes for fibre optic lighting.

Note also that the silver lines on this panel are just silver paint. They were grooves on the original. That’s very difficult to fix since DeAgo used a metal plate.

It also doesn't help that De Ago got these drawings totally wrong. They seem to have thought that the big round thing on the left was a flat disc and not a socket for interchangeable tools, that the small round thing on the right was a raised detail and not a recessed power socket, and that the the ovoid with a cross was a grid-like thing, not the zapper tool from ROTJ seen end-on. Oh well.

Left: my reasonably screen-accurate replacement radar eye surround. Right: the De Ago surround, minus the detail on the right.

3. Difficult to fix without complex alterations

Left: the De Agostini front logic lights have these weird surrounds with rounded corners. The lights themselves are represented by a shiny flat LCD panel.

Right: An upgrade in progress. This is a slightly better silver surround since it's flat, though this version still has somewhat rounded corners. The lights are going to be a bunch of fibre optics run through a flat black panel. This test version has been designed to match the size and location of the rather homemade-looking ANH logic light fibres as closely as possible.

Man, those shoulder sensors are butt-ugly.

4. Very difficult to fix without seriously heavy alterations

The following are all too much work for the return, so I probably won't do any of them.

Mod or not to mod?

Oddly enough, there doesn't seem to be a lot of interest in making modifications to this kit. Compare this situation to the absolutely huge market of third-party add-ons created for the De Agostini Millennium Falcon, for example. Or Eaglemoss' Back to the Future DeLorean or Ghostbusters ECTO-1. For some reason there's hardly anything that I've found for R2. Maybe because nobody bought the kit? Maybe because people are satisfied enough with the level of accuracy? Maybe because the mods for this kit aren't always cheap? I have no idea.

I'll happily post links to anyone who's done mods to their De Ago R2. So far I've only found a couple other than myself. Most of the ones on the De Agostini discussion boards appear to be people who have done various types of custom paint jobs, and don't appear to have altered the physical hardware itself.

Other people's modifications


III   –  About Partworks Kits


This review is © 2018-19 Millennium Falcon Notes