The librarian is responsible for selecting library materials. The librarian will collaborate closely with faculty to ensure that the curriculum is fully supported, and will regularly seek feedback from students on how the collection could better meet their needs. Community input is always welcome.
Materials selected for purchase or accepted as gifts by the library should:
Support the school’s curriculum
Be consistent with the vision and mission of the library and the school as a whole
Support the academic and recreational needs of the community
Reflect the diversity of the student body and expose students to a wide variety of cultures and experiences
Be suitable for the range of learning styles, levels of ability, and stages of social and emotional development represented within the student body
Not reflect the personal values and biases of the librarian or other members of the school community
Encourage critical thinking and good citizenship by representing opposing viewpoints on controversial issues in a manner that informs rather than indoctrinates.
Meet quality standards for content, presentation, and durability
Be accurate and up-to-date
Represent a good value for the collection in light of cost, available budget, and competing needs
The librarian will consult a variety of sources to inform selection decisions, including but not limited to:
Surveys and request forms representing the reading interests of the community
Book review publications including Booklist, Horn Book Guide, Kirkus, School Library Journal, and Voices of Youth Advocates
Youth Media Awards such as the YALSA, Michael L. Printz, Robert F. Sibert, Schneider Family, Coretta Scott King, Stonewall, and Pura Belpré Awards
Collection guides such as the Children’s Core Collection from H. W. Wilson
Resources for building diverse collections such as Social Justice Books, Reading Diversity: A Tool for Selecting Diverse Texts, We Need Diverse Books, and Globalizing K-12 Reading Lists of Children’s and Young Adult Literature
The librarian will follow the CREW guidelines for Continuous Review, Evaluation, and Weeding. This formula considers the age and last circulation date of an item, as well as the MUSTIE factors:
M = Misleading (or factually inaccurate)
U = Ugly (worn and beyond mending)
S = Superseded (by a new edition or a better book on the subject)
T = Trivial (of no discernible literary or scientific merit; usually of ephemeral interest at some time in the past)
I = Irrelevant to the needs and interests of your learners
E = The material or information may be obtained expeditiously Elsewhere via electronic format or interlibrary loan.
For details, refer to Mona Kerby's CREW Weeding Guidelines chart:
Community members who have concerns about the inclusion of a title in the library’s collection are invited to discuss the matter informally with the librarian. If a satisfactory resolution cannot be reached in this way, the community member may submit a formal Request for Reconsideration of Materials.
Within ten days after the form has been submitted, the library advisory committee will meet to consider the request. This committee will include an administrator, a classroom teacher from the relevant subject area, the school librarian, an objective member of the community, and a student. Each member of the committee will read the complaint and the challenged material in full before the meeting. Once the committee has reached a decision, the complainant will be notified by the school’s administration.
Challenged materials will continue to circulate until the challenge process is complete.
The library adheres to the professional principles stated in the ALA Library Bill of Rights, The Freedom to Read Statement, and Challenged Materials: An Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights.