At the core of Assessment is for Learning is the need to redress the imbalance between summative assessment (which takes place after learning) and formative assessment (which takes place during learning and thus shapes it).
There are two actions at the heart of formative assessment. The first is the perception by the learner of a gap between a desired goal and her or his present state of knowledge, understanding or skill. The second is the action the learner then takes to close that gap.
Teachers first share the learning objective with pupils and then offer and use feedback to close the gap. As pupils become more experienced in the process of working towards shared learning outcomes, they should be encouraged to take more responsibility for their own learning and opportunities for self and peer assessment could be introduced.
Research such as Inside the Black Box provides ample evidence that standards improve if formative assessment is used effectively and consistently. It also shows that there is significant room for improvement in its use. Many of the Assessment is for Learning strategies described in this policy document work towards this improvement.
Successful formative assessment depends on different factors. From the outset, pupils need to believe that improvements in their learning are more likely to occur through their efforts than through their ability. The belief that improvement is possible for everyone regardless of ability should underpin every activity designed to harness classroom assessment to raise standards. Teachers have an important role to play in shifting pupils’ attention from how clever they are to the effort they are willing to put in.
The active involvement of pupils in their own learning is another essential. Formative assessment can be undervalued and perhaps even misunderstood when it’s presented as just good teaching. The real purpose for teachers in improving its use is to give their pupils the capacity to assess themselves more effectively. So, while formative assessment provides a teacher with a bridge between assessment and teaching, formative assessment is essentially a way of creating independent, reflective learners, who can plan and assess their own progress.
Main characteristics of formative assessment:
Provides effective feedback to pupils about their own learning.
Involves pupils in their own learning.
Adjusts teaching to take account of assessment.
Recognises the profound impact assessment has on motivation and self-esteem of pupils through a focus on effort rather than ability.
Encourages pupils to be able to assess themselves and understand how to improve.
Questioning is one of the more common and recognised approaches to formative assessment: asking questionings is something that all teachers do (Sullivan, 2003).
One problem is that it can be challenging to encourage all learners to participate in whole class discussions, even when other approaches are implemented (Capel et al., 2016).
The Question Drop Box allows learners to write a question about the lesson and ‘drop it’. The question can then be used to inform the next lesson or learners can work together to generate answers.
Wiliam (2009) found that learners offered more thoughtful answers if they were given sufficient time to consider a response.
Rowe (1986) found that failure to give learners enough time to consider their answer can compromise learning.
It is thought that teachers should say: “one, two, three, four, I have to wait some more” in their head, before asking learners to respond.
Alternately, timers can be an effective way to provide adequate ‘wait-time
The teacher creates a spinner marked into 4 quadrants and labelled:
Predict
Explain
Summarise
Evaluate
(Or something else)
This can be helpful when revising subject specific ’Command Words’
William (2006) undertook a piece of research to explore how to include all learners in effective questioning. He used ‘Lollipop Sticks’ with each learner’s name written on one. He then selected a ‘Lollipop Stick’ at random and asked that learner to share their answer to a question he had asked.
He found that all learners were more engaged and listened more actively throughout the lesson.
His suggestion is that they did so because they knew they may be asked to contribute at any moment. Furthermore, he found that a larger proportion of the class participated in the discussion.
Group and individual feedback can be provided at the next lesson on how to develop a more accurate answer. Importantly, all learners are encouraged to be involved in feedback. This contrasts with more traditional questioning techniques where learners raise their hands.
Those learners who might feel embarrassment when sharing an answer have that pressure removed (Anderson, 2017), (Marzano, 2012).
This approach also allows the teacher to become a more reflective practitioner (York-Barr et al., 2005).
This approach allows each learner to self-assess their own progress throughout the lesson and then feedback this self-assessment to the teacher (Black et al., 2004):
Red to say that they did not understand the lesson content and found it challenging
Amber to say that some but not all of the lesson content was understood
Green to show that they felt confident and understood the content)
The issue of learner confidence is crucial as confidence in their own ability can have an influence on their levels of engagement and subsequently their attainment (Schunk, 1991).
Capel et al., (2016) acknowledge the challenge of engaging the whole class in questioning. ‘Bouncing’ answers around the room, to build on understanding and to encourage more accurate answers, is thought to be an effective strategy of engaging a wider cohort.
“Sam, what do you think of Chloe’s answer?”
“Emma, how could you develop Ben’s answer to include more detail?”
“Thomas, how might you combine all we’ve heard into a single answer?”
The teacher may facilitate the ‘bouncing’ or learners may throw a soft ball to a peer who they wish to develop their answer.
‘Think, Pair, Share’ is a form of assessment which allows learners to discuss their response to a prompt from the teacher, before sharing it with the entire class.
This technique engages every learner in the formative activity (Fisher and Frey, 2007). It is believed that, because of the increased amount of time a learner has to consider his or her response and that they can discuss their response with another learner, the quality of answers increases (Rowe, 1986).
A timer may be used to provide a structured amount of time. Furthermore, the leaners may use ‘Show me Boards’ to communicate their answers with the teacher/class.
Nortcliffe (2012) believes that peer assessment provides help in two ways:
First, each learner develops their own skill as an assessor
Second, they learn from the feedback provided by their peer.
Wiliam (2006) highlights that the individual providing the feedback also benefits by engaging with the learning intentions and intended outcomes, in the context of another learner’s work.
Peer Assessment - Reflections from Peer Assessment in Action
Granbom (2016) believes that formative assessment can have a positive impact on the attainment of learners, when they are involved in the assessment process.
The study reported higher levels of engagement and development of higher order thinking skills, along with increased attainment.
Learners may find it helpful to complete an assessment sheet, similar to the one provided, as a way of formalising their feedback.
Documented feedback with constructive action points can allow learners to understand the steps they should take to enhance their own learning (Black and Wiliam, 1998).
The teacher may find it helpful to use a sheet like the attached, or to simply document feedback directly onto the learner’s work.
Feedback in the form of grades or commentary?
Literature makes it clear that formative approaches work best when they are combined with engaging teaching (Greenstein, 2010).
For example, using software that encourages learners to engage in an interactive quiz can provide formative information for the teacher and increase learner engagement.
Similar to traffic lighting for checking understanding. Pupils are asked to show all five fingers if they fully understand, or a clenched fist if they haven’t a clue. Anything in between indicates partial understanding of different degrees.
Thumbs is a simple way of checking understanding, assessing a group’s opinion, looking for consensus or checking how people are feeling. The usual convention is: thumbs up – complete agreement; thumbs down – definitely not; thumbs wavering or horizontal – not certain.
Thumbs can also be used to group pupils to go over work that has caused some difficulty. For example, pairing down thumbs with up thumbs pupils to iron out misunderstandings through discussion. Everyone benefits from this, since thumbs up pupils reinforce their own learning by having to explain it.
The aim is to give pupils timely feedback about the quality of their work and how to make it better. To aid motivation, it is usually important to emphasise the positive when assessing a pupil’s work. This is just as important when the pupils are assessing themselves. Two stars and a wish is a very effective way of accentuating the positive.
Feedback makes reference to two strengths in the work (two stars) and one area for future development (a wish). This enables learners to build on prior learning and breaks the process of improvement into manageable steps. Easily remembered, the jingle emphasises what is good about a piece of work while also asking pupils to think about ways to make what they have done better.
This can be used in Peer and Self-Assessment by the pupils referring to the learning intentions and success criteria related to the piece of work. They indicate with 2 stars part of the work they wish to compliment and circle an area for improvement. A way of “Closing the Gap.”
Learning Logs are a means of recording how the children are learning, their progress and problem areas. They allow pupils to keep notes of their thoughts and feelings about their work. Time must be set aside in class to complete these and to help pupils use them conscientiously. A log need be no more than a ring binder and sheets of paper.
Learning Logs give teachers a clear picture of progress of a child’s thoughts and feelings. The teacher should be able to gather information for progress reports, etc.
Teachers could prepare a list of sentence beginnings to help pupils in their evidence but beware that the pupils only rely on these instead of thinking about their learning. Examples could be –
The most important thing I have learned this week was…
What I found most interesting today was…
What surprised me most was…
What I enjoyed most about today was…
One thing that still puzzles me is…
What I need help with is…
What pleased me most was…
Today might have been more helpful to me if…
The GTCS (2012) ask that teachers use a variety of approaches to assess learner progress, in a variety of contexts.
OECD (2008) suggest that this gives learners the opportunity to demonstrate their skills and knowledge more effectively as varied assessments encourage learners to apply their learning in new and unfamiliar situations – a crucial skill for learning to learn.
Therefore, it is not uncommon to see some of the approaches described being used in combination - such as, an ‘exit pass’ combined with a self-categorising ‘traffic light system’ embedded in a lesson where the teacher has used ‘Think, Pair, Share’ (Dyer, 2013).
•Anderson, C. and Palm, T. (2017) Characteristics of improved formative assessment practice, Education Inquiry, 8:2, 104-122.
•Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998) Inside the Black Box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Kings College London.
•Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004) Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom. Phi Delta Kappan. 86(1), p.8- 21
•Capel, S., Leask, M. and Younie, S. (2016) Learning to teach in the secondary school: A companion to school experience. United Kingdom: Routledge.
•Clarke, S. (2001) Unlocking formative assessment: Practical strategies for enhancing pupils’ learning in the primary classroom. London: Hodder & Stoughton Educational.
•Dyer. K (2013) Formative Assessment Strategies: Asking Powerful Questions for Greater Student Engagement
•Fisher, R. and Frey G. (2007) ‘Thinking to Learn’, Learning and Teaching Reflection Framework. Available at: http://www.sqa.org.uk/files_ccc/cfe_Thinking_to_Learn.pdf (Accessed: 22 March 2018).
•Granbom, M. (2016) Formative Assessment and Increased Student Involvement Increase Grades in an Upper Secondary School Biology Course, Journal of Biological Education, 50:2, 185-195.
•Greenstein, L. (2010) What teachers really need to know about formative assessment. United States: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
•Marzano, R. (2012). Art and Science of Teaching / The Many Uses of Exit Slips. Students Who Challenge Us, 70(2), pp. 80-81.
•Nortcliffe, A. (2012). “Can Students Assess Themselves and their Peers? – A Five Year Study.” Student Engagement and Experience Journal 1 (2): 1–17. doi:10.7190/seej.v1i2.29.
•OECD (2008) Assessment for Learning Formative Assessment. Learning in the 21st Century: Research, Innovation and Policy, 1(2).
•Rowe, M.B. (1986) ‘Wait time: Slowing down may be A way of speeding up!’, Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), pp. 43–50. doi: 10.1177/002248718603700110.
•Sadler, D.R. (1998) Formative Assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principals, Policy & Practice. 5(1), p.77-84
•Schunk, D.H. (1991) ‘Self-efficacy and academic motivation’, Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), pp. 207–231. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133.
•Sullivan, C. (2003) Questions worth asking. The Brighton & Hove Assessment for Learning project, 2 (1).
•The General Teaching Council (2012) The Standards for Provisional Registration. Available at: http://www.gtcs.org.uk/web/files/the-standards/standards-for- registration-1212.pdf (Accessed: 22 March 2018).
•Wiliam, D (2009) Solution tree: Dylan Wiliam, content then process. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=029fSeOaGio (Accessed: 24 April 2018).
•Wiliam, D. (2006) ‘Assessment for Learning: why, what and how’, Institute of Education, University of London.
•York-Barr, J. Sommers, W. Ghere, G and Montie J (2005) Reflective Practice to Improve Schools: an action guide for educators. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin.