The first iteration of the project was manufactured using FDM printers that were on-campus. The material of choice was Glow PLA for its radiodense properties and Natural ABS for its radiolucent properties when imaged via Computed Tomography (CT) or O-arm. NinjaFlex was also used as a more elastic material to allow for necessary motion of the spine. This material is readily available, inexpensive, and reproducible, making it an ideal candidate for prototyping.
Radiodensity of Bone: 1000-3000 HU
Radiodensity: 418.83 HU
*Material used for the vertebrae. The material has very rigid properties, which will help in durability testing.
Radiodensity of Bone: 1000-3000 HU
Radiodensity: -62.40 HU
*Material used for the jig to hold the vertebrae in place for calibration.
Radiodensity of IVD: 40 HU
Radiodensity: 175 HU
*Material used for the spinal cord and intervertebral discs (IVDs). The elasticity of the material was very promising in comparison to a human spine and allows for necessary motion.
The second iteration of the project was manufactured using Polyjet printers that were on-site at Medtronic. The material of choice was VeroWhite for its radiodense and rigid properties and Tango Filament for its elastic properties. This material is readily available and reproducible during prototyping, and even after the senior project is finished because Medtronic can continue making these parts with the same material and equipment. This makes it an ideal candidate for prototyping.
Radiodensity of Bone: 1000-3000 HU
Radiodensity: 150 HU
*Material used for vertebrae and entire jig holding the vertebrae. Zinc paint is needed to provide a higher radiodensity to the surface of the vertebrae in order to make them more distinguishable on O-arm imaging.
Radiodensity of Bone: 1000-3000 HU
Radiodensity: 100 HU
*Material used for the intervertebral discs (IVDs), spinal cord, and support base. The elasticity of the material was very promising in comparison to a human spine and allows for necessary motion.
Durability testing was performed as a way to ensure each vertebrae can handle any stress that could be put onto it. One stress that will be performed on the vertebrae is drilling the vertebrae at the location shown below, to simulate where a pedicle screw would be placed during an operation to attach a spine cage.
Stress tests were also performed on the dual rod pins by applying continuous cycles. Compressive load cycles were performed at the top of the dual rod pins, and shear load cycles were performed to the side of the dual rod pins. After deciding on the elliptical dual rod alignment pins, they were manufactured to be tested. Some issues of failure were discovered for both top and bottom pins, which prompted a design change for the dual rod alignment pins.
Due to continuous loading cycles to the top pins that interact with the vertebrae interface, it caused the top of the pins to break off into the alignment holes within the vertebrae.
Due to continuous shear loading cycles, by moving the dual rod pins into and out of the calibration location, it caused the side pins to fail at the interface of the dual rod pin face.