Before we can delve more deeply into the intersections of open education, universal design and culturally responsive teaching, we must understand flexible copyright and some basics about OER.
At the heart of open education are flexible copyright licenses that facilitate sharing and adapting of course materials. This section covers the basics of open licensing. It is adapted from training provided by Open Oregon Educational Resources and may be a review for some of you.
Keep in mind that all materials are automatically copyrighted, even if they are free to view on the web. An open license sits on top of the copyright for a document and specifies what can and cannot be done with a work. It grants permissions and states restrictions.
Broadly speaking, an open license is one that grants permission to access, re-use and redistribute a work with few or no restrictions (definition from Openedefinition.org).
Why should we care about open licenses? Want to edit existing OER texts to add more diverse perspectives or make the materials more accessible? This is made possible by open licenses. Want to involve your students as creators of course materials and/or build upon work from previous classes? Open licenses help facilitate this.
Please watch the short video for an explanation of open licenses:
Traditional copyright:
Open license added:
There are many open licenses developed for different areas of knowledge. However, when it comes to open educational resources the most typical and common open licenses used are Creative Commons Licenses.
In 2001, inspired by the open source software license movement, a group of experts comprised of educators, technologists, legal scholars, investors, entrepreneurs and philanthropists gathered together to come up with a set of copyright licenses that would allow creators to easily share materials that were not software code, such as blogs, photos, films, books, etc.
They founded a nonprofit organization called Creative Commons and developed the first set of open licenses in 2002. These Creative Commons licenses brought clarity and ease to sharing materials online.
CC-BY: Users can do the 5 R’s with the work as long as they provide attribution.
CC BY Share-Alike: Users provide attribution AND license their derivative work exactly the same way as the original.
CC BY Non-Commercial: Users provide attribution AND are not allowed to use the work for any commercial purpose.
CC BY No Derivatives: The work can’t be changed, so users can’t do the 5 R’s. Doesn’t meet the definition of open educational resources!
Basic information about open educational resources (OERs) is another baseline of understanding we should establish as a cohort. The information in this section is adapted from training provided by Open Oregon Educational Resources and may be a review for some of you. Some of the content in the video focuses on course materials that are in the format of a textbook but have flexible copyright, and are therefore, OER textbooks.
Keep in mind that this is only one sort of "open" approach. Some instructors (maybe you?) do away with textbooks all together; we'll talk more about other approaches throughout the cohort
Open educational resources (OER) are educational materials that reside in the public domain or have been released under an open license that permits their free use and re-purposing by others (definition by Hewlett Foundation).
The term “open content” describes any copyrightable work (traditionally excluding software, which is described by other terms like “open source”) that is licensed in a manner that provides users with free and perpetual permission to engage in the 5R activities:
To see how others define OER, please visit What is OER. by Creative Commons.
You probably noticed that this page is all about copyright status. Copyright status has nothing to do with the quality of the work. Just as you wouldn't look for a traditional copyright symbol to tell you whether a textbook is going to work for your course, an open license provides no guarantee. You're the subject matter expert - you need to evaluate open content just as you would any materials you use for your course.
Because you are here, I am guessing that you've done some thinking about your course materials and are concerned with the culture that we create through education.
This week, listen to (or read) this NPR interview with James Loewen, author of Lies my teacher told me: everything your American history textbook got wrong. Loewen discusses some obvious manifestations of racism in history texts, but some of the issues with our course materials may be less overt.
As you listen, consider the course materials in your own courses. Whose voices are represented? Whose are excluded? Which topics may have been omitted and why?